Dear OutlawsGrandSon, please prove by your example that you are right. Give this loan to the OP, or buy his slap-up domain for $1300.
evidence to everyone that they are wrong and that all other is actually just trolling.
a good idea isn't it? it won't be a problem for you, right?

the real surprise is City lost against Norwich. no one expected that, only Leea-1334 expect drawn from there, and it was the closest in the whole pool.
Manchester United is no big problem to score a goal, they have perhaps the best-attacking potential of all the teams. this is no surprise if we know how bad Tottenham is this season. I made mistake and expect them to score, and they failed to do so even against any of the worst defences ^{Man. United} in the league.

ok, user colires is already known here as risky and there are already proven scam allegations against them.
but does anyone really understand what is the subject of fraud here and what happened in this case?
I see a few screenshots from some discussion, where we neither know who the participants in the discussion are, nor what the subject of the trade is.

Your next round can't be named "Round #3". because new tasks have already been set here in the meantime. you could call it more like Round # v3.3 


No easy merits for you in this round. 

you have to have players who are capable of leading that way of playing. I don't think Barcelona currently has players who can provide such a game system as it was with Iniesta, Xavi, Messi.
Plus, where there are guarantees that Xavi will be as good a coach as he was as a player. we have already seen some failures.


Pogba is looking for a better team that is competitive to win trophies. Why not accept the fact that he is the one who should make the difference, and that he is the one who will make an immeasurable contribution to team success.
or simply, it is not the capacity to be a leader on the ground. he needs a few great players next to him to be great too, but he is not the one who will help someone to be great.

You must understand him, they want to feel younger. like a newbie not old as legendary.

Round 3 is already started. the new rule, OP wrote those words with him on paper, we are guessing from scratch. 

OP, have you perhaps overlooked this suggestion?
I also think that this could help you, but to better understand what happened to your transaction. It's official Trezor app https://suite.trezor.io/

Exchanges had the most rigorous rules when it comes to restrictions on the residence. it is not their whim, they just harmonize their TOS with the legislation of other countries. In this case, there is probably a ban on crypto in your country of origin.
how exchanges are financial services, they are the first to react to such laws. other services will just follow their example, which will again subsequently affect your ability to make money from there. I think you should need to consider only services where KYC is not mandatory.

maybe some gateway to use and promote certain products related to your articles on the website. Amazon for example.

Ad network can be a solution, but there is significantly less earning potential.


I remember Mellowads from the beginning, they had very high standards for accepting publishers. they have now become an opportunity for scammers. I saw many Bitcoin doubler and Ponzi fraudsters promoted there.

One offtopic question for you.
I have never used/have NFT before nor ever used the Opensea platform. whether setting up items for sale requires some fee payment, regardless of whether it will be sold or not?
or you just add them to your page and attach the price?

thanks.

I suppose this is the right answer to the OP doubts.

btw. all trading changes in the centralized exchange are internal. therefore, they do not require an additional withdrawal fee.
If you try to withdraw Bitcoin from Binance for example, and you add a withdrawal address also from Binance (some other account) it will be accepted as an internal transaction and it will be executed without an extra withdrawal fee.

Wow, I did not know that those contests are by you as a supporter, not as part of a team. Well done for it.
someone mentioned here the idea of some other ways of promotion. are there any suggestions about it?


much more daily trade volume is needed that it would be interesting for Binance to consider listing BGL on their platform. Even think if they were to be paid a high fee for BGL listing, they will not do so without a serious daily volume. I mean, they expect a profit from each order executed. How much money he can expect from the coin with daily volume from $6k up to $20k.

There is no sense to give them a few more matches to prove anything. He had 3 years and didn't prove much. He is still a true United legend and as a manager, he did some good things. But tactically he is a noob and a big club like M. United looking for the best.
Zidane is not in competition. He wouldn't take the team in the middle of the season ^{even if it's still at the beginning of the season}. I read somewhere, he waiting for France national team.
Rooney, I guess it is not an option either. There is not enough time for a new manager to learn his job and bring some good results.
Probably the closest one is Conte, he has already given some indications that he is interested in the job. and he is best for the current situation to raise a team in a short time and make some instant results.
In a long term, Ten Hag is also an option. Probably the best choice currently, but he is taken, and it's not realistic to expect to resign at the current club, where everything is going well, and to accept such a demanding job.

this is probably a good initiative, cheaters should be separated and marked.
but why not make a translator green list as well? shouldn't they also be rewarded in some way for good work? I believe that would help managers and project owners when assigning jobs to someone.
I think there was even one such list, but it probably hasn't been updated for a long time.

shouldn't you be looking for some of the previous work from the translator? also checking post history, it is easy to determine if the user has any connection to the language for which he is offering translation.
honestly, I'm surprised that after so much experience and campaign you've been managing, you still don't have your own list of quality translators.

So, in the end, did you solve your problem here?
It can be complicated when you did that there was no experience with hardware. even if you get all the tools that other users have suggested to you, that doesn't mean you can easily solve the problem.

I just read your 1xbit review. To be honest, it's not worth a cent. If they pay you for that, they can be considered deceived. It's not a review, it is more of a pure enumeration of what is on their site. if I don't know anything about them, what you wrote will certainly not convince me to use their service.
I would rather label you as someone who writes nonsense just for the sake of a monetary reward.

About your negative tag, Jolly wants to mark all paid 1xbit supporters. that is his right here. it wouldn't be a problem for you that he is not a DT member and that makes it difficult for you to participate in other campaigns, where you will write anything to make some money.
So, I guess, JollGood maybe it can just change the explanation in the feedback itself (in your case)

btw. about negative tag to all participants in 1xbit review, I think that's wrong. if there were a case where someone wrote really honestly and listed all their problems (which would turn out to be a negative review), whether such a person should also be marked as red?
if so, why? he wrote the truth
if not, why not? anyone who participates in their campaign should be marked negatively.

is late payment really a good reason for a negative tag? it doesn’t matter if it’s a signature campaign payment or a casino withdrawal.
as far as I could see, he did not give any excuses about casino withdrawal delay, nor any accusations against users or an attempt to avoid payment. I guess users of its casinos should be alerted to the probable possibility of late payment, but not that they will run out of their money. it seems to me that there is an important difference.

Can we negative mark them because of the low payment rate in their signature campaigns? I mean, it is below any minimum, and directly affects the production of spam on the forum.

I got the same email like this, and to the address, I registered at CMC. I am somehow convinced it has something to do with the last Coinmarketcap hack.
I guess both email bases (Ledger and CMC) contain mostly addresses that are actually used and are not fake.

It's very hard to find reputed and legal service that has illegal items for sale. the good thing is that most SM marketers are familiar with crypto, so probably is possible to make deal.
I suggest you search on Facebook groups (there are probably similar ones on Reddit) dedicated to social media marketing. of course, a lot depends on which language/countries you want to be active in, local only or global etc...