filbfilb doesn't agree. 

Yet interestingly, all fully supported in the 0.1 version of the Bitcoin protocol.

Golden cross on the weekly, as the 30 week (green) crosses the 100 week (orange) from below.  In 2015, this golden cross occurred during a period of extended consolidation.  In 2019, this cross occurs during a period of extended consolidation...

I was also a little bit distracted. Because some of the users received a merit today and i had to add them and edit again.

Oh, man i was sure i added you to the list, cuz i know i browsed through your profile when edited. I probably forgot to save. Sorry, i browsed through almost 200 profiles.
I updated.  

Ok, now the list is updated. Here are all WO users (68 users) who posted at least 1x in WO this month. I didn't count users who didn't send or receive any merit in WO (September). I also included some users of the WO merit senders that i could find for this month, even if they didn't have any post here.

edit: done  

WO September Statistics (Merits Received/Sent)

micgoossens received 45 sent 45
fillippone received 31 sent 12
SuperTA received 28 sent 27
makrospex received 27  sent 18
JayJuanGee  received 25  sent 39
LFC_Bitcoin received 21  sent 25

vroom received  19 sent 3
Globb0 received 18 sent 40
Icygreen received 18 sent 4
Toxic2040 received 18 sent 0
d_eddie received 17 sent 8
Last of the V8s received 17  sent 6
mindrust received 16  sent 20
xhomerx10  15 sent 4
VB1001 received 15 sent 13
Dabs received  14 sent 96  
Wilhelm received 14 sent 20
jojo69 received 14 sent 4

HairyMaclairy received 9  sent 11
BobLawblaw received 9  sent 0
lightfoot received 6 sent 0

Raja_MBZ received 5  sent 4
Elwar received 5 sent 0
Lambie Slayer received 5  sent 0
arewethereyet? received 5  sent 0

Torque received 4  sent 5
JimboToronto received 4 sent 4
nutildah received 4  sent 3
Totscha received 4  sent 1

Dunkelheit667 received 3  sent 5
JSRAW received 3 sent 4
Findingnemo received 3  sent 0
tranthidung received 3  sent 0

sirazimuth received 2  sent 5
jbreher received 2  sent 5
bitcoinPsycho received 2  sent 4
Ibian received 2 sent 1
Saint-loup received 2  sent 1
Pamoldar received 2  sent 0
akhjob received  2 sent 0
cAPSLOCK received 1  sent 6

bkbirge received 0  sent 2
ivomm received 0 sent 1
Cryptotourist received 0  sent 1
Hueristic received 0 sent 1
Bossian received 0  sent 1
hugeblack received 0  sent 1
btcbeliever received 0 sent 1
rs1x received 0  sent 1

WTF are you on about? How could evidence of personal identity have anything whatsoever to do with evidence of protocol change?


Back at ya.

See any evidence of SegWit in the white paper? No?

Explicitly in front of your face. Willful dereliction of truthiness.

SegWit was indeed an alteration of the Bitcoin protocol. Undeniably. There is really no way to argue otherwise.

...This time, around, I don't really care, and I am fine with just continuing to follow my system that only sells small amounts on the way up and also buys back on the way down in intervals that are reasonable for me, and the tweaking this time around is to spread the intervals even more than they had been the first time around, but otherwise I am largely keeping with my system because I like it..

So, yeah a week or two ago, in our run up to a bit above $11k, I made several sales on the way up, and bought back at various points between about $10k and $9,400, and in this last run up to nearly $11k, I had a few BTC sell orders trigger, so the more that triggered, the higher my buy back points are.  I have sell orders on different exchanges so some of them triggered and some of them did not, but so far in this particular most recent correction, from today, NONE of my BTC buy back orders have triggered yet, and most of them are set for a little bit below $10k.  

In my earlier days, I would have had both my BTC buy orders and my BTC sell orders more tightly structured; however, these days I am more happy with larger intervals and my goal and recent practice has been to increase and increase and increase the integers in which such orders are triggered.

Another way of conceptualizing my strategy towards my BTC holdings has been to attempt to create my BTC buy/sell orders in such a way that I am largely NOT too much attached to price direction.. neither psychologically nor financially.  

Of course, I profit more from upwards BTC price movements, but it is also in my thinking that inevitably in the longer term BTC's price is much more likely to go up than it is to go down, but in the meantime, I am profiting from volatility in such a way that it causes me to become less and less concerned about BTC's price going down.  

Also, I have a plan that is projected into the future of starting to liquidate 1% of the value of my BTC stash per quarter, so long as the BTC price is not below $5k, and I am thinking that I will start to employ that particular plan in a few years, and I think that there are real decent chances that the BTC price is not going to go below $5k in the coming years or to interfere with my tentative liquidation plan, and if BTC's price does go below $5k, then I will just plan to hold off on cashing out my 1% during any such quarters that the BTC price does go below $5k, if such periods of low BTC price performance were to come, once I start my liquidation plan.

If it requires 12 times the materials we currently use then it's not "green", WHATEVER people think that means, it's just wasteful.

And just because I know people keep forgetting, co2 is not a pollutant.

@Biodom
Give me some of that sweet, sweet HOPIUM