|
Reserved for more content.
|
|
|
|
nothing new with this coin, many coins pegging to gold, all are just marketing words. not worth investing.
This is a kickass investment. Just look, some sofa-fighting shithead approved moonbux as an escrow which automatically gives him a magical power to manage $2.25 contributions. Acknowledgement of the fact that he was given the chance to deal with money will lift his self-esteem to 300 points this friday. Oh shit this is the worst show I have been on for the past 90 years. I wanna manually locate my head and turn it 180 degrees to not see how these imbeciles handle the business.  "I'll bite your ear off if say that again about monbux." |
|
|
|
|
<redacted> in the thread title because the naming may be open for discussion, albeit I have an available (procurable) five-letter .com in mind that's an excellent fit for what's envisioned if the following is feasible.
Envisioned is an altcoin 100% pegged to the US dollar, viz. one <redacted> coin to $1.00 USD. <redacted> would be primarily available via exchanges at the locked-in one US dollar per for reasons explained next.
<this is the "next" part> The primary utility (but could easily be used for [lesser] others) would be for the über-safe movement of any nation-state's fiat currency across borders by those concerned with the price fluctuations of cryptocurrencies, namely Bitcoin, when seeking such a service to transfer moneys that'll required (for whatever motives) placed on-hold for an extended period of time.
Mining would be POW exactly like Bitcoin's protocol with Segregated Witness (SegWit) implemented at the onset, such acting as a proving grounds of sorts. Same true for other Bitcoin-based implementations designed to address a plethora of known and future vulnerabilities, somehow readily effectuate quasi-regardless consensus by <redacted>'s miners. In essence, perhaps, the miners may have little say in protocol changes, their main concern being maintaining the network while making bank (again, open for discussion on the feasibility of such).
Speaking of "making bank", miners would not only enjoy the block rewards, but earn a fixed $1.00 USD fee per transaction regardless the amount transacted, a neat added incentive to assure onboarding enough miners to protect the network. Granted, a $1.00 tx fee may come across as excessive, especially for wee transaction amounts, but, again, consider the primary utility of <redacted> - conveniently moving large amounts of money around the world sans worrying about price fluctuations, very easily converting to bitcoins so to immediately convert to fiat of choice with extremely very little loss (or gain) of value. Converting <redacted> directly to fiat would be accomplished via the trusted legacy cryptocurrency exchanges if desiring to bypass the to-bitcoins option, not to mention in-person transactions et al. Readdressing the $1.00 USD transaction fee, a scaleable at-first $0.25 incrementally to $1.00 USD fee, perhaps reevaluated accordingly to the decreased block reward, may be prudent, again, open for discussion.
Standard bounties apply for naming suggestions, logos, explorer(s), wallets, apps, etc., payable via <redacted> coins slightly above the prevailing rate.
No premining, airdrops, IPO, etc., albeit a TBD/TBA premium will be allocated per block reward toward <redacted>'s coffer for bounties, development, legal, [fancy new cars, trips to China, hookers, blow,] etc. (seriously, this is a genuine proposed endeavor)
Furthermore, optimistically, institutional mining would be keep at bay so that more independant miners would be able to reap the block rewards et al.
Tentatively, so to guarantee plenty of <redacted> coins in circulation given its intended usage, the starting block reward of 200 coins at an on-average every two minutes (every five minutes on average at most) most likely is warranted, again, open for discussion.
Thoughts?
Bruno
|
|
|
|
Dang, if only I were in Vegas this time of year... Then I could wear a tutu!
Why would you be in Vegas any other time of the year when there's no CES, and it's over a hundred degrees in the shade when pretty women from around the world are walking around half-naked? Nevermind. I think I answered my own question - no CES. How close am I? |
|
|
|
Okay, I vetted monbux and approve him as the escrow dude for ORO.
Thanks. Also, please note that the OP has requested that the invested funds will be released to them right after they distribute the Orocoins accordinglu to each individual (these will be done per investment; seperately) I'm not a escrow dude, hence don't have a clue as to what an accordinglu is, but I'll assume it's a good thing.  Seriously, sounds cool, bud. |
|
|
|
And also its white collar crime that only hurts a ton of people its not like a kid stealing his 3rd apple because hes hungry so we put him on 3 squares a day for life. Inmate 1: What are you in for? Inmate 2: I got life for stealing a pizza. It was my third offense in California. Inmate 1: What are you in for? Inmate 3: I got life for running a website where others sold shit and I took a cut. Inmate 1: What are you in for? Inmate 4: I ripped off tens of millions of dollars from retards and ... sorry, gotta go now. My homie just paid the hundred dollar bond to get my ass outta this godforsaken hell hole populated with you losers. Hope the fucker didn't scratch my quarter-of-a-million-dollar ride while coming here to pick me up. |
|
|
|
The problem is that it's not Google who pays for these views, it's the advertiser - the brand. And Google, as well as the reseller agencies, just makes money on this kind of stuff.
My bad for not making it clear that it's the advertiser who may have to pay for my views, not Google (OP has been editing reflecting such). TBC, the intent of this thread is to express how quickly Google's proprietary algorithm is as it relates to its advertising program, coupled with it's not spot-on as I, and am sure others have witnessed in the past during their cruising- the-wew experiences. |
|
|
|
I for one reject you notion of a 6-sided cubeworld. It would simply be impossible to have a full cube, one side is most likely to be a gravity sink. The gravity sink would be what keeps the portals from breaking down as AFAIK the Lizard Clan built these portals on the concept of gravitational teleportation of molecules. What these portals do is create a "personal" micro black hole, through which your body will be transported to your place of destination.
Now because we have not yet communicated with our brothers on one of the other sides, we still do not have the tech available to ensure that our molecular structure will not be torn apart in the teleportation process. To acquire this tech we must find a way to reach out to the lizard clan. I suggest we sacrifice 500.000 female virgins to the moon, and 10.000.000 chickens to the sun. I've heard the Lizard Clan thrives on zero-gravity vacuum grilled chicken.
Our next dilemma would be to share or not to share our newly acquired tech with the peoples of the other 4 sides of the Cube. For this I advise to send out an exploratory and diplomatic mission to asess the capability of these people to use our tech for the good of all living on the Cube.
Even though I do not carry an embedded sig campaign, I hope this discussion will be able to make use of my hypothesis.
Actually, I've thought of that (in bold), hence firmly believing that our Cube Earth resides in a giant mayonnaise jar filled with æther. |
|
|
|
|
I believe that the Earth is a cube having six [relatively] flat sides where the population of all six sides don't communicate with one another, at least the side we live on hasn't yet communicated with any of the other five sides. The center of Cube Earth is hollow made up of portals that may or may not currently be in use as the only way to transport between the other sides. All six sides have their own sun (or suns), moon (or moons), stars, etc. Except for the Lizard clan populating one side, the inhabitants of the other four sides look basically like us.
Post your thoughts below and, as always, users with embedded sig campaigns are welcome to participate.
|
|
|
|
|
I just visited thesaurus.com to check the spelling of a word. To view the results, I placed my cursor in the white space below the banner ad where I normally place it, then click so to enable scrolling. A faction of a second prior to clicking, the banner ad expanded to ~3/4 times its size, resulting in me to inadvertently click the ad, whereupon the corresponding website opened in a new [Chrome] tab revealing some obscure product/service I've never encountered before and had no interest in learning about, thus immediately closed the tab, returning to Thesaurus.
Not even thirty seconds later, I was on YouTube checking out a video when loo and behold, in the right-hand corner of the page where ads are normally placed I see an ad for the same site I was just on for no more than two seconds, an ad for a product line that is in no way related to the YouTube video I was about to enjoy.
I'm curious as to how much my two seconds of time visiting the site and now will be presented to me via Google adsense network countless times in the coming days is gonna cost them that particular advertiser due to me simply viewing the ad as I visit myriad websites, again, during the next several days.
Edited (strikethrough) due to the first reply's comment which I quoted to reply.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I vetted monbux and approve him as the escrow dude for ORO.
|
|
|
|
 "I just shat a stinky Marshall Long, but thanks to Poo Pourri nobody's the wiser." Translated: Thank Jehovah that Marshall Long's not attending if the OP et al. is of any indication. |
|
|
|
As I was the one removing that post and locking the thread, I guess I should state why (even though it was fully covered by Lauda, SaltySpitoon and achow101).
CHRISBIN702, I removed your post as, even though it might have been funny, it didn't relate to the OP, which explicitly asked if it's a good idea to run a Bitcoin Node as a newbie. I know that this is harsh, but posts should relate to the topic the OP has set.
Furthermore, the reason I locked the thread is because a good answer has been provided and I wanted to keep out bad or not fully correct posts as this usually happens with these kind of threads. However, as Lbromy has explicitly requested the thread to be re-opened, I have done so.
In the spirit of A good laugh won't hurt you ... |
|
|
|
As you have noticed this is a self-moderated thread and you will be moderated, if you don't like it, bad luck Finally, somebody gets it!: Start a self-moderated thread proposing a theory seeking an intelligent exchange of ideas from the community, but have the ability to delete posts counter to the theory presented. |
|
|
|
So you changed from Friends4Cash site to Friends4Crypto. But we all saw it coming. Even when you tried to pitch your scamming city to the GH forum a year back. I saw your plugin for the CC points for all this 6mo back and was waiting for you to do something with it. Since your converting your own CC points from paypal payments then to Crypto. Did you ever procure a money licence for this? Especially in NY...  "Then I started working under the radar using my real name, possibly like Satoshi Nakamoto, teaching and trading securities even though it's against the law for me to do such thanks to me convincing a couple dudes back in the day to mortgage their homes so to invest in an entity in a desert that I controlled but didn't really exist, and also distributing and converting point thingies for myriad currencies sans a license in ... wait for it ... New York." |
|
|
|
https://blockchain.info/tx/c7b46a79fd8887038bd3a8e884b04820038415a60e0b9d2c2f5bcff68a2687bf Okay, call me an idiot for not knowing what the Estimated BTC Transacted of $84.96 depicted above (red box/arrow) is. Please enlighten me, for I'm hard-pressed in finding another example on the blockchain where the Estimated BTC Transacted DOESN'T exactly correspond with the actual dollar OR bitcoin amount transacted (sans fee), in this case $10,012,517.46 (green arrow). Very epic catch gleb / here we found another bluff   Pretend for a second that I'm a fuckin' idiot. Exactly what did I uncover if anything? EDIT: Okay, upon further review, I found nothing. I just found several examples of txs where when several bitcoin wallet addresses are funded, the address receiving the least amount is depicted as the Estimated BTC Transacted.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
): 
