@gnaget depends on observers point of view...
if you go with the flow, I think not
|
|
|
Um bad merge meant I left in one conflict...
The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.
Other than that the code is the same.
User shares are over the life of the database.
okay uuuhh a shiver passed on my spine, this will be a little hopping beast guys. When it will reach critical mass I'm gonna see a handful of proud coders
|
|
|
funny to see how some ppl take their measures against hoppers... edit: forgot to tell, it's c00w's hopper but I like gray more than "that" blue hehe
|
|
|
testing as I'm speaking ... edit: ups I'll wait on this one, it's the "bad" merge
|
|
|
like the feature but needs a little more testing... [30/07/2011 02:13:10] Result: 3bd2e5fc accepted [30/07/2011 02:13:23] Result: f290e5a0 accepted [30/07/2011 02:13:28] Result: 205f2a06 accepted [30/07/2011 02:13:40] Result: 8ce364a3 accepted [30/07/2011 02:14:49] Result: e4b8d9fb accepted [30/07/2011 02:16:43] Result: 226ce5b7 rejected [30/07/2011 02:16:46] Result: f1d1cacf rejected [30/07/2011 02:17:06] Result: 5ca9f9aa rejected [30/07/2011 02:17:14] Result: 1900c3de rejected [30/07/2011 02:17:14] Result: 1f779de2 rejected [30/07/2011 02:17:15] Result: c80e85da accepted [30/07/2011 02:17:24] Result: 6793cbbd accepted [30/07/2011 02:17:32] Result: 5041aa36 rejected [30/07/2011 02:17:41] Result: 68fd9fec rejected [2[30/07/2011 02:18:25] Result: 7c9db2fb rejected [30/07/2011 02:18:25] Result: 3e4de03c rejected [30/07/2011 02:18:25] Result: 6fee92b3 rejected [30/07/2011 02:18:25] Result: 5cfe88df rejected [30/07/2011 02:18:25] Result: ef7c9464 rejected
|
|
|
0% stales with my new code and switch back and forth between servers. I'd call that a success!!!
awesome work edit: it works in theory for the moment, i get lots of rejects and the miner stops reporting accepted or rejected shares output ah, an error too [01:56:00] RPC request [0b6fc000] submitted to bitcoin.cz [01:56:00] RPC request [getwork] submitted to ozco.in [01:56:00] LP Call ozco.in:8332/LP /home/alex/fork/bitHopper/work.py:143: UserWarning: Warning! request.finish called twice. request.finish() [01:56:03] RPC request [getwork] submitted to ozco.in [01:56:04] btcmonkey: 2722474 [01:56:12] RPC request [getwork] submitted to ozco.in [01:56:13] RPC request [9d311000] submitted to bitcoin.cz [01:56:13] RPC request [getwork] submitted to ozco.in [01:56:15] RPC request [getwork] submitted to ozco.in [01:56:26] triple: 7963311 [01:56:27] RPC request [ce3c2000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
|
|
|
It only mines on the backups when there are no other pools which can be hopped. So if it never mines on arsbitcoin its a good thing.
i know that, but the thing is, when it's supposed to jump to a backup, it never hops to arsbitcoin, even though i disable the other 2 backups, it just jumps to a pool over 43% instead of taking the backup. I get that too (last ver), it refuses to jump on ars as backup
|
|
|
so my latest annoyance/confusion: If I go to localhost:8337/stats it works fine - if I go to 192.168.1.xxx:8337/stats it works fine - if I go to <external_address>:8337/stats it does not work fine. I've got my router set to forward 8337 and just to verify I fired up ryouiki's mod and I can still access that stats page with the external IP, just not c00w's version. Is c00w's version set to only allow HTTP connections from localhost or something? If so, how do I change that?
usually soho routers don't allow you to access external interface from the same pc you redirect the port to (80 for example) instead try to acces it through an external web proxy ( http://hidemyass.com/) or from a pc outside your local lan
|
|
|
... Me gusta aunque no entiendo lo de la "reversión involuntaria de pagos" ...
Una vez hecha la transaccion no se puede cancelar sin querer o queriendo (voluntaria)
|
|
|
i am still able to log on to the pool account, though. and i have my BTC... but... i have 0.0988411 BTC confirmed and there's this rule: "Minimum amount for instant payment: 0.10 BTC" btw, how can i be sure it's bitclockers pool i'm banned from? EDIT: also, how do i fix stuff like this from happening all the time? yeah they tend to impose a lot of rules lately, like the 0.10 limit when you get the server to "actively refuse" your connection you know you're banned (filter based), you could try getting another ip and try it again though not recommended because you know you're not wanted there stuff like what ? lagging some servers ? easy, you change to a better ISP
|
|
|
I've given up on them a week ago for the massive stale shares and dashboard errors not reporting them correctly. I still have 2 bitcoins in there (an error I think) hehe
|
|
|
They implement obscure algorithms to make your work useless, hide fast blocks and not sharing them when they have the opportunity, advocate protecting miners from hoppers, who in fact are normal miners after all, and claim they break unknown rules, etc. I have an edge and I'm gonna use it.
I'm not trolling any one, I see the benefit of hopping, and I see the benefit hoppers can bring. My point is to help the pools that DON'T obscure their algorithms, or delay, or in any other way hamper hoppers. I'm saying working together to the benefit of everyone. We get more pools to hop on == win. They get our help when they need it the most == win. Look at backburn, he came in here pissed at us, and even he acknowledges it would be an "excellent gesture". Look at tripplemining, they are planning on moving from a prop scoring method, and maybe if we jump in and help them, and promise to continue to help them, they won't, and we won't lose the pool. I wont help prop pools. That goes against hopper math and common goal: make pools change to a fair system (let them take the risk) Ask c00w to implement it if he wants and go help pools as you wish
|
|
|
getting loads of errors. you got banned
|
|
|
This thread is being trolled big time (my opinion)
@gnaget I'm not gonna hate you or something like that, you are free to do whatever you want in the bitcoin ecosystem like all of us. I'm definitely in to this for making some money. Helping the pools you say ? They implement obscure algorithms to make your work useless, hide fast blocks and not sharing them when they have the opportunity, advocate protecting miners from hoppers, who in fact are normal miners after all, and claim they break unknown rules, etc. I have an edge and I'm gonna use it.
|
|
|
Ive only noticed the high stales (false submits?) for bitclockers, so I highly doubt its the hopper at fault since the whole lot of other sites would have had similar instances.
I've suspected this is the issues causing the higher than normal stale rate across the board. I'm getting 2-4% stales on every site, and I've noticed that the vast majority come when the proxy switches pools. I think it is more pronounced for bitclockers because of his anti-hopping tactics, which I assume are to blame for the connection issues I was complaining about earlier. So, when I would lag out, move away then move back, the shares being submitted were probably for the last pool +1 seeing same thing here
|
|
|
yo tenia esto para ponerlo en el blog, a ver que os parece:
*Mayor privacidad, al disminuir – cuando no eliminar – la interferencia de terceros en las transacciones. *Aumento decreciente y predecible de la masa monetaria, lo cual puede ayudar a preservar, y probablemente a mejorar, el poder adquisitivo de los usuarios. *Menores – e incluso nulos – costos de transacción en la web, cuyos niveles actuales entorpecen el libre intercambio. *Simplifica y acelera el pago de persona a persona, prescindiendo de intermediarios no deseados. *Hace viables los micropagos a gran escala. *Impide la congelación de fondos. *Impide la reversión involuntaria de pagos. *Impide la restricción arbitraria de bienes y servicios que pueden adquirirse. *Permite la acumulación de fortunas enormes en un espacio ínfimo. *Permite hacer transferencias a cualquier parte, ignorando barreras geográficas y políticas. *Puede ocultarse fácil y gratuitamente – sin tener que apelar a terceros para su resguardo. *Facilita la protección contra el robo en todas sus formas – impuestos inclusive. *Es menos vulnerable a cualquier tipo de ataque, dada su naturaleza descentralizada. *Es, a los fines prácticos, infinitamente divisible.
|
|
|
Yo te sugeriría que ampliases la mercadería de tu tienda y sería la polla excelente.
jaja tambien, te agradeceria que me des alguna pista o si te apetece hacer algun diseño chuli para ponerlo en las camisetas, incentivado claro esta
|
|
|
Una moneda digital, sin embargo decentralizada y con varias ventajas: -Global -Libre en su mayoria de comisiones -Anonimo, si lo sabes usar.(Facil a menos que te den pabor las computradoras) -Sin cargos reversos(chargebacks) -No cuesta aceptarlos -Deflacionarios, aumentan en valor a su tiempo.(Aun puede haber periodos en el que el valor cae) -Minados por todos para todos
gracias le voy hacer una entrada al blog
|
|
|
|