|
gnaget
|
 |
July 30, 2011, 01:30:58 AM |
|
Are those errors from trunk?
EDIT: Oh I see you were using gnagets branch. Yeah he doublecalled the getworks. So most of those rejects are actually not rejects. But its still wrong. I left some comments on github.
The problem wasn't the double call, though I fixed that. The problem was the fact that the work variable in jsonrpc_getwork could be either bool or dictionary. I was treating it as a dictionary all the time  It is running beautifully now, I am watching it for a few more minutes before I create a pull request. You can all send me 1% of your returns, since you'll get a 2-3% increased efficiency now |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 01:33:48 AM |
|
[20:37:27] RPC request [d175a000] submitted to BTC Guild
[20:37:27] RPC request [82d0a000] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:27] Added work to store
[20:37:27] RPC request [9c730000] submitted to BTC Guild
[20:37:28] RPC request [getwork] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:28] RPC request [getwork] submitted to rfcpool.com
[20:37:28] RPC request [f00f6000] submitted to BTC Guild
That's promising
|
|
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 01:35:26 AM |
|
Bleeding tip has it disabled because i want to see what happens on my test server. If my rates are low after a couple of hours I'll reenable it.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 01:50:07 AM |
|
ok, it is working well on my end, still seeing more stales than I'd like, but none from switching
|
|
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:19:22 AM |
|
triplemining.com 8030755... 8 million+ wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clipse
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:28:34 AM |
|
triplemining.com 8030755... 8 million+ wow
BTCguild just broke all records, just over 13million share block  |
...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> ClipseWe pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:32:45 AM |
|
13 million... jesus
well i dont feel as bad for triple then.. i keep watching thinking they wll hit zero any second now.
I'm betting if you asked them.. they'd like the hoppers to use them as back up until they kill that beast
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:47:29 AM |
|
triplemining.com 8030755... 8 million+ wow
BTCguild just broke all records, just over 13million share block Wow, glad I left them to hop... |
|
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:49:19 AM |
|
Who all is testing the getwork store? I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking. I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales. If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it
Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keninishna
|
|
July 30, 2011, 02:57:39 AM |
|
Who all is testing the getwork store? I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking. I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales. If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it
Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales
link? |
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:04:19 AM |
|
Who all is testing the getwork store? I'm getting stales, but only when I am not looking. I reset my db, and added some logging to try to debug it, and I'm at 1100 shares / 0 stales. If I stop watching, suddenly I'll get a run of stales and I'll miss it
Edit: 1800 shares / 0 stales
link? here's one https://github.com/gnaget/bitHopper/commit/742a5082862870b63ac3e95432c97d1223ece030@gnaget don't miss the stales pls |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:07:05 AM |
|
2700 shares / 0 stales. I would say I'll actually MISS them... Edit: 3300 shares / 0 stales. I'm digging this |
|
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:12:33 AM |
|
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:13:55 AM |
|
testing as I'm speaking ... edit: ups I'll wait on this one, it's the "bad" merge |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:15:10 AM |
|
Did you get it working? I made some changes to flow, but I know you made your own fixes, so I don't know how similar our code bases are |
|
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:18:05 AM |
|
c00w: I just saw you have user data in the data site. What are the number representative of, and over what period?
4500 / 0
|
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:26:23 AM
Last edit: July 30, 2011, 03:38:55 AM by paraipanakos |
|
funny to see how some ppl take their measures against hoppers...  edit: forgot to tell, it's c00w's hopper but I like gray more than "that" blue hehe |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:27:40 AM |
|
Um bad merge meant I left in one conflict...
The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.
Other than that the code is the same.
User shares are over the life of the database.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:30:27 AM |
|
The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.
?? My pruning function was working when I committed it Edit: I see what you did, I put the LoopingCall in bitHopper.main() to keep it consistent Edit Edit: Yup, you have 2 LoopingCalls |
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:32:43 AM |
|
Um bad merge meant I left in one conflict...
The difference is I actually prune the store so there isn't a giant memory leak. And I cleaned up work a little bit.
Other than that the code is the same.
User shares are over the life of the database.
okay uuuhh a shiver passed on my spine, this will be a little hopping beast guys. When it will reach critical mass I'm gonna see a handful of proud coders  |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
