|
I've seen that too in phoenix miner,and LP doesn't work like it should be, waiting for 1.55 to fix some issues for everybody
btw, it's the fastest miner for my hardware so I will not be giving up on him
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Are there any other pools I should avoid which have a role "mine" in the default config? I assumed those would be safe or "beneficial" to mine if they were in the config since he has been taking out the "bad" ones before. the pool are changing on a daily basis, so you you could search the previous pages for info when you have some time or read future posts in this thread to better make your decisions  |
|
|
|
slush it's known to have implemented a scoring system a while ago to make hopping not feasible, don't worry about that and let your hopper make his job Wait, I should not worry about not earning any BTC for the shares I submitted?  He meant dont use slush if you are concerned, its not a very practical place to hop at. thanks clipse @bitcoindaddy, you could search a little more info on that or read this http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg53701#msg53701 |
|
|
|
Odd things are going on at slush's pool right now. He said he had database problems and claimed that they're fixed, but the estimated reward continues to plummet if you stop mining in the middle of the round and you end up not getting paid for your work. I don't know if that's still the database problem or some anti-hopper mechanism.
slush it's known to have implemented a scoring system a while ago to make hopping not feasible, don't worry about that and let your hopper make his job |
|
|
|
i use phoenix too with phatk kernel and had same issues until realized it was not the proxy but job pre-fetching
I'm using queue 2 (-q 2) not 5 (default), requests work lots faster and submits in time
switching cost you shares too so expect some eff. loss although LP is active
If I understand you correctly, I'd change the following flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 to look like this: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 -q 2 Is that correct? you sir are right on the spot |
|
|
|
|
i use phoenix too with phatk kernel and had same issues until realized it was not the proxy but job pre-fetching
I'm using queue 2 (-q 2) not 5 (default), requests work lots faster and submits in time
switching cost you shares too so expect some eff. loss although LP is active
|
|
|
|
I'm concerned by the number of stales I am getting on bitHopper. It is running LP, right? I'm getting around 2-3% stales on most sites, including btcguild (backup), which without bitHopper my stales were < 1%
give us a little more detail, what miner do you use and stuff |
|
|
|
So I am guessing we are the reason that the polmine website and thus the polmine stats keep crashing? Anyone want to tell them to publish stats through json api?
hehe good one, you go first |
|
|
|
on my android? I have used the windows search
 hehe, he probably used the search on the removable drive that shows up when you plug in the phone |
|
|
|
|
hey don't uninstall the app, if you're using andreas schildbach Bitcoin wallet just go to About in menu and scroll down to Reset the Blockchain menu. If it gives you lots of FC's you should consider giving a report to author with you phone model and other info
|
|
|
|
wow, just had a jawbreak with last release, nice work ppl. wish I had 10 bitcoins for every one of you making this real  |
|
|
|
What about this: If there is no pool with shares < 0.43*difficulty then mine namecoin if shares < 0.43*namecoin-difficulty, else switch to a backup pool? Namecoins might raise in value  The problem isn't really on the mining/supply side of the fence, there's just not that much demand. also, is anyone else having problems with polmine again? I updated to the regex above and still get 10^10 shares. for me this works fine api_address:http://polmine.pl/?action=statistics role:mine api_method:re api_key:; </b> <br/>([ 0-9]+)<br/> api_strip:' ' |
|
|
|
Its back up but the polish and american polmine are giving different numbers...
Polish claims it just found a block though.
I noted some lag on the english version sometimes |
|
|
|
........
I also hope his server is immersed in mineral oil, or liquid nitrogen, or something.
ROFLs man hahaha |
|
|
|
shouldn't we use the valid share count opposed to the total share count? [unitedminers]
name: unitedminers.com
mine_address: pool.unitedminers.com:8332
api_address: http://www.unitedminers.com/?action=statistics
api_method:re
api_key:Valid shares for current round:</th><td>([,\d]+)
api_strip:','
role:mine
#CHANGE THIS
#unitedminers.com
user: workername
pass: workerpassword I guess so, but in the end there is a small difference between the two |
|
|
|
let's test the load balancing and redundancy  |
|
|
|
parece ser que no se ha enterado mucha gente del bitcoin aqui en españa, muchos me preguntan que es y porque vendo unas camisetas que no me comprara ni dios |
|
|
|
I'm not happy I am going to say this, but I am sold on hopping Ethical issues aside... it is a lot more fun. Getting .7 BTC for 5 minutes of mining kinda kicks ass too hehe that's called pure luck |
|
|
|
we should open another thread to continue with this, didn't make myself clear enough ? English is not my native language you should try it and leave politics aside for the moment, we don't have enough data to say it's good or bad for the system. |
|
|
|
... give away their edge for free, making it useless in the process.
that's called helping the community I think, sharing, being social... etc Sure, pool hopping has certainly helped the community a lot... i think it did: -no more stress if pool goes down from attacks -maximizing incentives for "small" miners -hashing power spreading more evenly (various pools) -pool operators finding bottlenecks in their infrastructure -finding better payout schemes (transferring risk to pools, PPS - greater responsibility of pool ops. ) the list could go on |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
