If I am trading from the order book, on say Bittrex and I am looking at the volume and the support walls etc... , am I looking at only the trades from that particular exchange or am I looking at the trades/walls etc from all the exchanges put together?
As TryNinja said, Bittrex or any other exchanges only show sell and buy orders submitted on it, not other exchanges. It's impossible to have all of orders in different exchanges in a single wall. If I am only looking at the data from that particular exchange, how can anyone make an informed decision when there are a multitude of other things happening on other exchanges?
Prices on different exchanges are very close to each other. Bots and arbitrage traders don't allow the price on different exchanges to be much different. So, if you are trading in an exchange with a sufficient volume, don't worry about other exchanges. Prices are always same. Surely, the data must be an aggregate of all the exchanges like that displayed by CMC.
Coinmarketcap extract the price from different exchanges and calculates the weighted average price for every coin.
|
|
|
Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?
You can still see the ranking based on earned merit using the link below. https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=earnedmeritRead this post
|
|
|
According to the picture below, I have received 466 merit and sent 224 merit. So, the merit ratio should be 0.48 not 1.07. I had reported this on Vod's topic before. But since the bug still exists, I posted it here again. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBerKQ59.jpg&t=663&c=2YVaFD0sDWiMOw) Source: BPIP
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=995810FortuneJack Username: hosseinimr93 Current Amount of Posts (Including this one): 1394 What other platforms are you active on (Like twitter, reddit etc.): Telegram, Twitter, Facebook. Earned 380 merit in the last 120 days. Will update the signature and avatar once accepted.
|
|
|
There I am astonished in "10 Most Time Online" section. All the 10 accounts are Brand new. All the accounts Registered in Bitcoin Forum From 14 to 17 August, 2018. First account total online time is 7527d 21h 19m. From Aug 14, 2018 to Today=7527 days.
How it is possible? What type of Bitcoin ID it is?
It's a bug. They are probably parsing forum pages and sending so many requests with multiple devices. Here are two threads discussing about this issue. (There are probably more topics.) The forum stats are wrong! @theymos check it out,please."Total time logged in" bug and accounts with long time logged inBitcoin Forum record its history from November 2009 to December 2017. But there was no history after December 2017.
As logfiles said, statistics were no longer updated after DDos attack on December 2017. Below is the post Theymos made that time regarding disabling some features. I might've figured it out. A bunch of things are currently disabled; I'll work on safely enabling them in the coming days.
Alex_Sr has provided some unofficial stats for new users per month. It has been updated until January 2020. (Visit the link below) Statistics of user registrations on Bitcointalk 2017-2020
|
|
|
As said in previous posts, the problem is with your connection. Changing the server, disabling your firewall, disabling your antivirus or using a (secure) VPN should solve the problem. If none of them works, the only thing you can do is to export your private keys and import them into another wallet like Exodus.
|
|
|
1. If I’m not mistaken, a Legendary forum member has already sent a request to Chainsecurity. After that, he received the response confirming the company audit. You can look through the thread to find that post.
Here is the post made by libert19 regarding the email sent to Chainsecurity.
|
|
|
Electrum giveaway on Loyce.clubDownload Electrum, get free Bitcoins! Electrum.exe (Special offer, only today!)
Archive (1) And if you clicked on it, you would see the following page. Archive (2)
|
|
|
Seems that the winner is dothebeatsThe price at April 1, 22.00h CET was a bit higher than 6,200 dollar. dothebeats prediction postCongratulations dothebeats![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBJrsODe.jpg&t=663&c=Gg83LaVjbFGZSA) Source: Tradingview(The time in the picture is in UTC) Edit:Exact price at 22:00:00 (CET) ---> 6216.13 Exact price at 22:00:59 (CET) ---> 6203.37In both cases, the winner is dothebeats
|
|
|
This reply of mine is meant for hussein i mr 39 (username was intentionally changed).
You were infected too. You lost those BCHs. Sorry buddy. My virus is so contagious and so smart. You are infected even if you change the username.
|
|
|
Don't quote anyone today and you wont get infected. Stay safe - don't quote and sniff.
I had not quoted anyone today, but got infected. I was infected even before I made the first post today. It's possible to get infected even without making post.
|
|
|
Whenever you want to store a new coin, the best thing you can do is to visit the official website and check if there is any official or any other recommended wallet. (Be careful of fake websites) I just checked Theta Token official websiteYou can create a wallet through their website. It gives you a the keystore file, the mnemonic phrase and your private keys.
|
|
|
No Addresses starting with 3 are P2SH, but they are not always segwit. Look at the bold part of achow101 post which you suggested to read. So ive always had my bitcoin in my hardware wallet. Now there are 2 options: Legacy and Segwit. Whats the actual difference ?
Legacy means that you will be using addresses of the form 1... Segwit means that you will be using addresses of the form 3... or bc1... (one is for P2SH nested segwit and the other is for native segwit). Note that 3... addresses are for P2SH addresses in general and are not just for segwit. bc1... addresses are for segwit specifically but not all wallets support it yet. And following post made by o_e_l_e_o Addresses which begin with 3 may or may not be SegWit, and may or may not be multi-sig. It all depends on how you set it up. Electrum does not create SegWit addresses beginning with 3 though - it will only let you import them. So if you created your 3 addresses in Electrum, which it very much sounds like you did, then it will be multi-sig legacy rather than SegWit or multi-sig SegWit.
But anyway, I was wondering if I purchase something using my legacy address, how to redirect the UTXO from that address to my bech32 address/wallet. Same with my p2sh-segwit address.
When you send your bitcoins, Electrum automatically send the remaining balance to your change address. As your change address is not a bc1 address, the best thing you can do is to enable "Pay to many" and send the remaining to your bc1 address manually, so there is no remaining bitcoin. Assume that you are going to send 0.01 BTC to an address while your balance is 0.02 BTC Send 0.01 to that address and send 0.01 minus transaction fee to your bc1 address. (A better solution for sending the remaining balance suggested by o_e_l_e_o in the next post)
|
|
|
From my understanding your question is how to import both of legacy segwit address (address starting with 1) and nested segwit address (address starting with 3) in a single wallet and then send the funds to two other addresses. Create a new wallet in Electrum. Select "Import addresses or private keys" Enter private keys of both of your addresses. Just note that you must add p2wpkh-p2sh: before private key of your segwit address. Private key of your legacy address p2wpkh-p2sh:private key of your segwit address Then you will have both of your addresses in a single wallet. In order to be able to send bitcoin to multiple addresses, as OmegaStarScream said, select "tools" at top of the window then click on "Pay to many". Edit: Are you sure the address starting with 3 is a segwit address? If you have created that address using Electrum, that's not segwit. That's a legacy address.
|
|
|
Has gold token team any issue with access to physical gold currently? Is this shortage real or just fake news (who would know it better if not GOLD token team?).
Currently 19,200 gram of gold is stored in Bullionstar vault of Digital Gold and total supply of GOLD tokens is 17,200. So, Physical gold bought and stored is even more than tokens circulating in the market. Therefore, there shouldn't be any problem. 2000 more tokens can be generated without any need to buy more physical gold. Because they have already been bought. When the project started, 7200 gram of gold were bought and stored in the vault. They bought more gold gradually and now 19,200 gram of gold is stored in the vault. They buy physical gold before it is needed and before the demand exceeds supply.
|
|
|
Thank you efialtis for the update. Even if we say updating this thread is not a priority for them and there is no need to update it for now, their website must be updated. 9% of wagering amount is going to Plinko, Wheely and Free Spins games. Two months ago, they said that information about how these games work will be added to the website by end of the week. (See quoted post below) Right now we are adding this information to How to Play and Fairness sections, should be ready by end of week.
It's not clear how these games are working. So, the game is not provably fair. Adding this information must be a priority. People play in the website must know how calculations are made.
|
|
|
Ah, no surprise here. I see that they still refer to Bitcoin as Bitcoin Core.
Right Look at their guide to buy bitcoin. It says visit our buy bitcoin page and then select whether you want Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Core. And when you visit that page, you see Bitcoin Cash first. They are saying we have two kinds of bitcoin. Every newbie visit this website is likely to make such mistake and buy bitcoin cash instead of real bitcoin. I just searched about owner of the domain. Till now, I didn't know the owner of bitcoin.com is Roger Ver. If that's true, what we see in this website is not surprising.
|
|
|
"Reputation" board has been created for talking about reputation of people who trade and that's why it's under "trading discussion" board. But Reputation board is now being used for other purposes as well. I'm not saying it's used incorrectly. It's being used correctly, because there isn't any other board more suitable than "reputation" board for talking about some other issues. Even the main purpose of Trust system was to rate people based on their trades. That's why when a flag against a user is created, the message shown in the profile is about risking of losing money when dealing with the user.
Now trust system, "Reputation" and "Scam accusations" boards are correctly being used for different things. However the "reputation board" is being used, I think it's working well.
But if some others believe that "reputation board" is being used incorrectly, below are my suggestions.
1. Adding a sub-board for the current "reputation" board. 2. Having a new board called "Reputation" with two sub-boards. One for traders reputation and one for other things. 3. Using the current reputation sub-board for traders reputation and add a new sub-board under "Meta" for talking about users.
But as I said, the reputation board is working very fine. It is being used for different things without any problem. No change is needed.
|
|
|
|