Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:16:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
421  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 12:41:08 PM
So Mr. "Professional Developer" has a hobby of stalking perceived "enemies" on the internet and boasting about it... *facepalm*

You facepalm a lot eh? Spending 30 seconds writing an internet post doesn't waste that much of my life, especially when it exposes hackers like yourself and btx. I'm not doing any investigating into anyone, SC users and others do and they discuss it because they don't like people like yourself and btx. The fact you're into furries was just the beginning, wonder what else they will expose about you. Cheesy
422  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 10:32:10 AM
Should one interpret that as tacit endorsement of the pathetic 'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture and, thus, a tacit confirmation that you have, indeed, employed such a bizarrely contrived and inefficient scheme instead of using the concept of licensed mining ?

Again, you are too ignorant to understand how I have solved the problem of 51% attacks, trying to educate you would be like trying to get a monkey to play a Metallica guitar solo. Leave it to your "big brother" artforz to fill you in, if he's capable, when the details are finally released.
423  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 10:21:23 AM
This is getting progressively more and more puerile.

Also, I sort of think that SC2.0 would rather use some kind of "licensed mining + PKI framework" approach rather than lame "police nodes + civilian nodes" approach.


'Peer<---> Trusted "Policeman" Hash Node<---> Peer' architecture is just too unbelievably lame to be true.

Haha, maybe learn how to program first before trying to understand these things eh? No one cares what an uneducated, non programmer thinks about programming a cryptocurrency. Oh, unless they're a troll too . Smiley
424  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 09:51:04 AM
Got some inside info on mr bitcoinexpress.

Mr Dan Maddox got himself a mail order bride it appears? Does "lanie grace" approve of your childish activities Dan?



http://filipina-sweethearts.com/mail-order-brides/men/dan459/dan459.html



425  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 06:27:51 AM
I am almost certain they are three separate people, especially Artforz.

Yes it's easy to make out the man dressed in animal costumes.
426  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2011, 06:22:10 AM
lol, how many lies can you make up here? Cheesy

Anyhow, make sure when the public beta goes live you do attack the network like you promised. Ok? Warm those geforce2mx's up.

Beta is also supposed to be out within hours, so you may be unable to make it to Steve Job's funeral?
427  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Possible 51% Attack on fairbrix (fbx) on: October 03, 2011, 11:35:21 AM
hmmm...
http://school.anhb.uwa.edu.au/personalpages/kwessen/shared/Marsaglia03.html

Hope you didn't forget to credit Mr. Marsaglia for the CMWC4096 RNG

Aww how cute artforz. Actually try wikipedia for a simple CWC, it's amazing how bad your google searching skills are, shouldn't be a surprise given you poor programming/copying skills though?
428  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Fairbrix fiasco on: October 03, 2011, 10:23:05 AM
Is it possible that the solution to "GPU Hostile" crypto-currencies lies within the IE9 Hardware Acceleration and an older lesser known work around for previous anti-parallel computing by the cryptocommunity?

Maybe a modded hardware accelerator could turn GPU's into APU hybrids and could crunch at tens of thousands times faster than every CPU on the network combined. A mere 1 GH /s machine would be a beast...I would shutter to think what a 68 GH /s farm would do.

I would love to claim this as my own idea but it in fact is the (theoretical) brain child of a couple of iOS engineers I know. They (theoretically) adapted it from from previous failed attempts at cryptographers to prevent parallel computing in cracking MD5 hashes.  "GPU Hostility" was solved a while back.

I would also speculate that someone needed a testnet and really didn't want to disrupt Tenebrix as there is already an exchange and pool. I would venture to say this theoretical attacker may in fact have nothing against Fairbrix and is developing a Solidcoin killer.

All just theory on my part.  Grin Grin Grin

~BCX~


PS I would also guess the test is complete and I wouldn't worry about it.

Caitlin Upton, is that you? Dressed up to look like an internet troll? Well let's see, I carefully analysed your text bitcoinexpress and summed it up like this.

Quote
I personally believe that U.S. Americans are unable to do so because, uh, some . . . people out there in our nation don't have maps and, uh, I believe that our, uh, education like such as in South Africa and, uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our education over HERE in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, or, uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future, for our children
429  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Possible 51% Attack on fairbrix (fbx) on: October 03, 2011, 10:11:10 AM
Yes, and I have an idea for a chain that will be completely fair, immune to all known attacks, any possible unknown attack and even impossible unknown attacks! Mining it will also produce more power than it consumes. So not only will it revolutionize the global financial economy, it'll also fix the energy crisis, cure cancer and shit rainbows! And it'll be done Real Soon Now(tm).

You? Have an idea?  Grin Please, you take copying to a whole new level. You ruined the comedy act when you started it with "I have an idea". And for what it's worth, when you and your playground chums don't manage to inflict any damage on SC2.0 what then? Going to crawl back into your little house built with failbrix? It's going to be hilarious.
430  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: CPU Mining - Who will emerge Dominant? on: October 03, 2011, 08:51:13 AM
Indeed, talk about 7.7 million premined coins taking the rest of us 3 years to get to the same level LOL what a joke. Waiting to dump all my TBX for Solidcoins 2 when it comes out. Too bad Tenecrap is the only CPU miner working now and Failbrix got attacked by lolcusts/artforz so that tenecrap stays on top.

Yep, lolcust tried to hide the fact yet again that there were 8 million premined coins. Trying to pull that sort of deception twice is rather ludicrous and is why the price is crashing on the exchange even though artforz is blowing 200BTC trying to keep it steady. These amateurs don't understand what it takes to release something successful.
431  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 03, 2011, 08:22:25 AM
Nah I'm not like artforz, copying other code to solve problems which are simple. Take a look at my block init for example.

Code:
void BlockHash_Init()
{
    static unsigned char SomeArrogantText1[]="Back when I was born the world was different. As a kid I could run around the streets, build things in the forest, go to the beach and generally live a care free life. Sure I had video games and played them a fair amount but they didn't get in the way of living an adventurous life. The games back then were different too. They didn't require 40 hours of your life to finish. Oh the good old days, will you ever come back?";
    static unsigned char SomeArrogantText2[]="Why do most humans not understand their shortcomings? The funny thing with the human brain is it makes everyone arrogant at their core. Sure some may fight it more than others but in every brain there is something telling them, HEY YOU ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSON IN THE WORLD. THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE. But we can't all be that, can we? Well perhaps we can, introducing GODria, take 2 pills of this daily and you can be like RealSolid, lord of the universe.";
    static unsigned char SomeArrogantText3[]="What's up with kids like artforz that think it's good to attack other's work? He spent a year in the bitcoin scene riding on the fact he took some other guys SHA256 opencl code and made a miner out of it. Bravo artforz, meanwhile all the false praise goes to his head and he thinks he actually is a programmer. Real programmers innovate and create new work, they win through being better coders with better ideas. You're not real artforz, and I hear you like furries? What's up with that? You shouldn't go on IRC when you're drunk, people remember the weird stuff.";
    BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8 = new unsigned char[BLOCKHASH_1_PADSIZE+8];  //need the +8 for memory overwrites
    BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD32 = (uint32*)BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8;

    BlockHash_1_Q[0] = 0x6970F271;
    BlockHash_1_Q[1] = 0x6970F271 + PHI;
    BlockHash_1_Q[2] = 0x6970F271 + PHI + PHI;
    for (int i = 3; i < 4096; i++)  BlockHash_1_Q[i] = BlockHash_1_Q[i - 3] ^ BlockHash_1_Q[i - 2] ^ PHI ^ i;
    BlockHash_1_c=362436;
    BlockHash_1_i=4095;

    int count1=0,count2=0,count3=0;
    for(int x=0;x<(BLOCKHASH_1_PADSIZE/4)+2;x++)  BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD32[x] = BlockHash_1_rand();
    for(int x=0;x<BLOCKHASH_1_PADSIZE+8;x++)
    {
        switch(BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8[x]&3)
        {
            case 0: BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8[x] ^= SomeArrogantText1[count1++]; if(count1>=sizeof(SomeArrogantText1)) count1=0; break;
            case 1: BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8[x] ^= SomeArrogantText2[count2++]; if(count2>=sizeof(SomeArrogantText2)) count2=0; break;
            case 2: BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8[x] ^= SomeArrogantText3[count3++]; if(count3>=sizeof(SomeArrogantText3)) count3=0; break;
            case 3: BlockHash_1_MemoryPAD8[x] ^= 0xAA; break;
        }
    }
}
432  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 03, 2011, 07:18:37 AM
You also do not have enough faith in your own code to let me test your "unbreakable SC 2.0" with an audience watching either do you? So until you are ready to step and get bitch slapped again, STFU.

Haha, I said it will be out in a few days. If you want to pull out of your "attack" because you're scared then that's ok. No harm no foul right?

Otherwise hold your mouth and do it publicly when it starts, we'll all be watching! Smiley
433  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 03, 2011, 06:39:15 AM
I guess we'll see in a few days then won't we.

Regardless what I am known for, it was enough for you to be talking crap one minute and pulling down your network the next wasn't it?

Riiight. Like you're the only troll on the block. You think pretty highly of yourself I think when you've actually done _nothing_ to deserve that own self impression.
434  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 03, 2011, 06:28:04 AM
Please, I'm sure you can wait a few more days to show the world how smart and brave you are. Real development takes time, it's not like changing a variable in geistgeld and hacking the chain, which is all you're known for.
435  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 03, 2011, 06:22:30 AM
You won't have long to wait, it will be up within a few days. Just keep an eye on the site or forum like all other SolidCoin users.
436  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency on: October 03, 2011, 06:06:52 AM
That 2M @ 0.0001 buy order ... not me.
So, please dump enough coins... whoops, there's only 774K GG total in existence.
Aka "more completely baseless FUD from mr. egomaniac to keep propping up vaporcoin".
Or how did the "SC2.0 Public Beta Testnet this weekend" work out? Oh, right.
Oh, and as a thanks for this nice personal attack, I'll gladly donate my expertise and if required a few days on my personal 5970s and/or LX150 cluster to break your chain to hell and back.

Haha, the amateur has his feelings hurt. The order on btc-e is yours. And yes, donate everything to the "attack". You might want to get some help with the programming of it though. I don't think there is some source for you to copy for this kind of thing.
437  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: CPU Mining - Who will emerge Dominant? on: October 03, 2011, 05:53:38 AM
We'll see or since you now obviously have a testnet, lets find out who's talking shit.

Yes we will all see. Just like you destroyed the 1.10 testnet that didn't exist. Just like taking solidcoin off google rankings. LMAO, deliver something kid. 2.0 is waiting for you.
438  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: CPU Mining - Who will emerge Dominant? on: October 03, 2011, 05:45:03 AM
No matter what you say SC will always NOT be the first and will simply be an iteration of Tenebrix.

GPU hostility or better known as parallel computing hostility was tried and failed awhile back by cryptographers trying to come up with a hashing solution that couldn't be cracked by the likes of GPU's and FPGA's. Same principle applies here.

Works for me and rather than get greedy, I'll simply drop a single 5770 on it and rack up hella lot of coin. A single 5770 will compute like 30 Core i7-2600's  Grin

Yes they were first to implement it, a shoddy product barely anyone uses. That's the difference between me and everyone else, I've worked on successful products before, I know how to make things easy for users.

Your ignorance about GPUs/CPU design makes me laugh, probably even makes your role model artforz laugh. You're just going to create a new identity once you've thrashed this one aren't you?
439  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency on: October 03, 2011, 05:34:46 AM
Mostly because tenebrix is a bitch and a half to get working in the first place.   Took me an hour of looking at code, windows batch files, etc to see why it's dumping core or failing assertions before I got it running.  EC2 boxes don't have GUIs.

You've fixed the headless problem, so the major hurdle to running the miners remotely has been cleared.  It's easy enough to do, but as you pointed out with a grand total of 230 BTCs available to cash out (and only 30 of that above .0001BTC) it's definitely not worth the price of admission.

The two orders on GG/TBX at btc-e that look like 200 @ 0.0001 are actually artforz orders. So try and pump-n-dump down to that level if you want to start costing Artforz some btc. Smiley
440  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Possible 51% Attack on fairbrix (fbx) on: October 03, 2011, 04:48:36 AM
Setup a testnet, let's find out.

BTW the solution to supposed "GPU Hostile" platforms like Tenebrix, Fairbrix and your copy cat SolidCoin lies within the GPU hardware accelerator used with IE9 beta.  Modified hardware acceleration, so simple I can't believe it was overlooked. Have I tested it successfully, you be the judge.

LOL, I thought you had me on ignore? And yes, feel free to point your Geforce2MX mining army at SC2.0, do your best (which if I had a sticker for participation, you'd get one).
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!