LOL, quoted for posterity. Old BitcoinExpress with his never knowing what is going on and the telling of porkies.... ah

Took mtrlt about 4 hours for the first build which got about 250KH on a 6990. A few more days and it was near a MH. So months no.... he just didn't want to release it after it was announced because of the teenagers and trolls like yourself that said he was lying and insulted him in other ways.

This culture of continually belittling others and denigrating people just because you don't agree with something is quite a horrible character trait you have, you likely aren't very popular at all in the real world if you act like this after someone does something for FREE. He offers the community something that he spent time doing and the best you can muster up is "Shut the fuck up". I know you must be only a teenager and lack life experience but you have a horrible personality.


I'm claiming it because it seems obvious to me. If I had proof I doubt you would believe me, just like with this miner. Either way , believe what you want, you obviously are a bitter and illogical person. If only you had any talent, maybe someone could later criticize something you do for others for free.

Touch a nerve did I? So you believe artforz, a guy who has attacked other chains in the past and kept his bitcoin gpu miner to himself for some time is all of a sudden "reliable" ? Yeah, you seem intelligent.

A guy that withheld a gpu miner in the past then goes to design a new coin (tenebrix which is what Litecoin is based on), then told people it wasn't GPU mineable when in fact it was..... yeah... believable.. that is, if you're a teenager living in your moms basement getting upset at "arrogant" people on the internetz.


Yes the evil SolidCoin crew, releasing things to the public for free. Oh the travesty of it all! If only we could be like you.. doing nothing, hiding GPU Miners from the public whilst you scam them out of Bitcoins.

Download and see for yourself, or ask someone with one of those cards to verify. Why do you want screenshots when you can get actual results at pools right now?

I believe the demo will only work on 5800 and 6900 series cards. Maybe others will work. mtrlt needs to release the opencl source instead of binaries to get most cards working good.

I think someone has now managed to get 250KH/s on a 5830 overclocked.

Goes to show where the best developers are... working at SolidCoin.

http://solidcoin.info/reaper.html

"GPU resistant" . Nice work artforz and coblee, fooled your few fans for some months. Reaper gets 200KH/s on a 5830 . artfoz and coblee went around telling people gpu mining was impossible because they only got 9KH/s on a 6870.... believable with hindsight?

Could you sound any more bitter King Coblee? Just because I let realsolid use my account before or I have posted things for him doesn't mean I am him. Furthermore this "RealSolid" person posting here isn't connected to the SolidCoin project at all, whereas I help with SolidCoin. If this is willingly allowed on this forum then perhaps what you suggest may start happening in other places around the internet targeting Bitcoin developers.

I spoke to realsolid on IRC and he confirmed this "RealSolid" account here isn't his. So perhaps the mods should ban the troll.

It was known since the start there is a 5% per block CPF fund. How you want to imagine those funds getting into the CPF is up to your creative troll mind. Just think it's realsolid whipping slaves and grinding fairies into dust as a cocaine substitute as to why there is a 5% per block CPF fund if it helps you sleep at night. I'll sleep better at night knowing the currency I'm supporting has funds to fight legal battles, hire developers and take out advertising in major publications, th--anks.


I have done some ground work for SolidCoin acceptance for major businesses, including ones which have heard of Bitcoin and rejected it because of numerous issues. This is what the developers are working towards in v3 . Unlike the teenagers here who would rather fight and belittle others the people working around SolidCoin have been in business for decades and have many connections in the business world.

I think it's obvious as to who is losing a battle when you start talking for everyone. "almost every conscious being in the world" . Haha, wow, a few teenagers on a competitors forum who don't understand SolidCoin but dislike some concepts is "almost everyone" . Ah you teenies with your biebers and inexperience in life. Funny to the "mature" people that see it.

Yes there was an "attack" used which rerouted about as much coins as you suggested away from the CPF into the attackers hands over a couple of days. That was fixed in v2.03 . Now it cryptographic signs the block header so it can't be modified by anyone else other than the block creator. A few extra rules were added to tighten up the CPF generate also, such that it could only contain one "out" instead of many, as the attacker(s) used more outs to get by the existing checks.

5% of the last block is the base for the generate (ie created). Then another 5% comes as a "fee" from the trust node signing. You can check block.cpp in the source for this.


If the "trust accounts" all remain viable then over the course of about 50 years (estimated) they will each give 200K before they drop below one million. So 10 * 200K = 2 million . It is possible these accounts will be "Nulled" at some point in the future as the trust node system is overhauled.

The CPF is spendable but it's likely no transfers from it will occur until the NPO is setup, you can check that and its current balance at http://solidtools.net . Just today it appears we have a single "user" with more SC than the CPF, which is interesting. One of the exchanges has had more than the CPF in its wallet for some time, but since it's not "theirs" it's not really valid I don't think.

You can look at it that way if you want, the CPF gets 5% per block. Whether you want to look at the generate being created out of thin air or the trust accounts losing half the 5% to provide it as a fee is kinda irrelevant. There is 5% economic centralization, a tax if you want to call it that, for the coin protection fund (CPF). Combined with that to ensure trust accounts die they have to lose money for every signing.

People get confused between "trust accounts", which are the initial 10 seeds for trust nodes, and trust nodes themselves. 2 different things there, everyone can become a trust node, but only some people hold the trust account keys so that they can protect the network in the mean time.

If remaining ignorant is not seeing the reward system is shaped like a pyramid then yes I'm glad I'm "ignorant"

And 4 of them are created by BCX. Go figure.

Essentially no where, but you can look at it like a "fee" that goes to the generate (ie CPF).

I suggest you draw the following.

1) Draw the amount of bitcoins given at 50BTC as a line
2) Draw the amount of bitcoins given at 25BTC as a line above (1), center it
3) Draw the amount of bitcoins given at 12.5BTC as a line above (2), center it
4) Draw the amount of bitcoins given at 6.25BTC as a line above (3), center it


Ends up looking something like this.



I wonder what that looks like.. hmm.

Because they are unspendable, within the context of what "Spending" is. Signing a trust block and losing 5% value isn't "Spending" , it's a special transaction for trust nodes to ensure they eventually die.

The links contain more information on what I was talking about. Link spamming is posting irrelevant links. Get the lingo right.

Actually we are against that in principle, but it's hard to stop a bank at the moment if they truly wanted to buy many SolidCoins. I'm sure if they offered $10/coin a lot of people would "cash out". That cost is still significantly higher than a Bitcoin attack. That said being a trusted node doesn't really give that many "Special powers" it just protects the network by limiting the number of blocks non trust nodes can create in a row, making it more fair and less "Suspicious" of miners holding back blocks. If a bank/government became a trust node RIGHT NOW they could cause some annoyances and slow the network a little, but they couldn't stop it.

There will be work done on trust nodes going forward to improve them. SolidCoin aims to protect its users from government, bank and large corporation attacks, so that is where work will be done to ensure that's the case as much as it can be. It's going to be hard. You can read some more about that on our myths page :-

http://solidcoin.info/myths.html#SolidCoin_will_be_shut_down_by_the_government

SolidCoin being centralized is just a myth spread by some trolls.

http://solidcoin.info/myths.html#SolidCoin_isn.27t_decentralized_because_of_trust_nodes

In regards to the CPF that is there to protect every SolidCoin holder from future legal issues that will likely come up. A way to fight a legal war and also help promote the coin in advertising, etc.