Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 12:15:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
421  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: 100% cpu bug with 12.1 drivers and cgminer on: March 09, 2012, 03:07:40 PM
use -I 9
kill CCC.exe
422  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: BTCServ - [hacked / for now down] on: March 09, 2012, 10:04:49 AM
I miss that page Sad http://btcserv.net/bitcoin/history/
423  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [30 GH/s Prop] Alex's Pool (pool.schaetter.us) on: March 09, 2012, 07:09:35 AM
smells like trolls are invading that topic
424  Local / Майнеры / Re: [35 GH/s] pool.itzod.ru - 0.000038234240 BTC per share on: February 25, 2012, 01:22:19 PM
I'm offering an unique system, so that pool can please it's angry miners, just add trading market where miners can sell their unpaid ballance to other miners(or even investors) that can speculate with pool luck expecting to turn positive and get an extra profit when unpaid ballance is paid by pool luck, something like that:

AngryBob sells 10,42374476 btc for 9,5 btc

add a small fee, say 0,5% paid by seller

p.s. comment in Russian, не хватает слов чтобь написал все :]
425  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: 'How to hop 10' Bitclockers & fake rounds on: February 19, 2012, 11:54:38 AM
Bitclockers.com are:
a) faking round lengths
b) faking round starts and not owning up to blocks

c) underclocking hoppers and miners' earnings from time to time
426  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ANN]Legal complaint against bitcoinica.com on: February 17, 2012, 08:47:27 AM
you are soo greedy that you lost your minds...
427  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BITLC] Change of payment scheme for Bitlc.net (Previously bitcoins.lc) on: February 12, 2012, 12:46:15 PM
Mining at random intervals, or only during day or whatever, is not hopping and "hop proof" payout schemes do not penalize this behavior. Quite on the contrary, even if you mine at random times, you would be gaining substantially more with PPLNS or DGM compared to proportional.

if you are right, that kind of "hopping" rips off regular miners...but wait... hop proof schemes protect regular miners...unless they are screwing them to pay that "substantially more" to someone else...unless you are clueless
428  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BITLC] Change of payment scheme for Bitlc.net (Previously bitcoins.lc) on: February 08, 2012, 01:16:43 PM
my theory is that regular miners are sheep, you can put 10% pool tax(see btcguild hashrate) and they won't figure it out for months even if you put it on front page with size 24 font...
429  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BITLC] Change of payment scheme for Bitlc.net (Previously bitcoins.lc) on: February 08, 2012, 07:28:29 AM
The reason for me wanting to switch payment scheme comes from the anger and frustration of pool-hopping-pools. (Abcproxypool for example)
It's not a single users that hops us, it's entire pools (which results in slowdowns and frustration from my side) - i know that eleuthria agrees on this.

So yes - we're switching cause of pier pressure and to "escalade" and in the long run - be a better pool.
As I've said before - we're here for the long run.

--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc.
https://www.bitlc.net/

is that hard to ban 10Gh+ hopper or review 10+ btc per 24h payments by hand?

I want ESMPPS -tx fees
430  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Why do you mine on deepbit? on: January 26, 2012, 11:01:29 AM
lots of posts and you can't count that (100 - pool tax % - reject rate %) * uptime of deepbit is bigger than pool X
431  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Miners are getting jacked for 15-20% of earnings!!!! on: January 26, 2012, 10:57:39 AM
jkminkov, can you be please more specific? Do you have any evidence that any large pool is keeping his blocks for himself?

why just large pools?
do you have evidence than pool X is 100% honest - if yes, then make a whitelist...

organofcorti, you wasn't convinced that pool was hiding blocks but you wasn't convinced that the pool was NOT hiding blocks either
432  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Miners are getting jacked for 15-20% of earnings!!!! on: January 25, 2012, 04:58:08 PM
miners are jacked more than 15-20% when pool op keeps found blocks for himself

Any evidence for this?

ask Vladimir :p
433  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Miners are getting jacked for 15-20% of earnings!!!! on: January 24, 2012, 10:42:15 PM
miners are jacked more than 15-20% when pool op keeps found blocks for himself
434  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [80 GH][0% Fee] A1BITCOINPOOL.COM 10 BTC BONUS PROPORTIONAL POOL on: January 17, 2012, 07:28:06 AM
cold truth is that casual miner with a few cards, can't maintain 99,9% uptime for whatever reason and all "fair" methods are a double-f**k for him
435  Local / Майнеры / Re: [25 GH/s] pool.itzod.ru - 0.000039975767 BTC per share on: January 12, 2012, 05:13:12 PM
Всем привет! Майню на вашем пуле используя процессор, так как не могу найти прогу для ГПУ чтобы рвботала через HTTP прокси.
Может можете мне подсказать, а еще желательно с конкретными параметрами. А то перелопатил пол и-нета нашел только что можно майнить через Ufasoft майнер, который можно легко сконфигурить на работу через прокси.
Если бы нашел, с удовольствием майнил бы через ГПУ АТИ.

BTCProxy.net
436  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~20GHs] BTCPool24 0%,PP,PPS,LP,JSON,Instant pay on: January 07, 2012, 02:00:44 PM
that happen when you are bad at math, 0% fee PPS cannot exist, sooner or later someone have to pay the bill

if you are mad @ pool op click his adsense hundreds of times until he get banned, that's why site is still running atm
437  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Eligius-miners: Do you agree with what is done with your hashing power? on: January 07, 2012, 01:54:11 PM
as serious as killing a fly
438  Local / Майнеры / Re: [90 GH/s] pool.itzod.ru - 0.000041546807 BTC per share on: January 02, 2012, 12:45:11 PM
Возможно, пулу надо было выбрать проп с дипбитовской защитой от хопперов, которая заключается в задержке объявления о нахождении блока и связанных с ним выплат, скажем, на двое суток.
Тогда смысла в публикации статистики никакого не будет, потому что она будет неактуальной. Да и результат будет тем же самым, вряд ли многие будут неделю искать один блок на пропе. На PPPS искали и даже на длинных блоках скорость была под конец блока 76-80гх, довольно долго. Но многие наши юзеры вышли из майнинга, когда курс упал ниже отметки прибыльности для них... Roll Eyes

Фактически у нас сейчас пропорциональная система выплат.
Верно. Разве что на длинных блоках идут выплаты в дальнейшем, а не "тупо" выплатил сколько нашел и все. Потому оно и называется PPPS, собственно.

почему не принимать ESMPPS, новичком не притягивать в тут же момент?
439  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: bit pit - (LP, ESMPPS, 8-decimal payout, SSL, API, 0% fee, Almost 0% Stales!) on: December 31, 2011, 08:24:29 PM
the problem is that pool op ran away with our btc, not that old shares are paid last, I'm talking about confirmed balance, not unpaid esmpps shares
440  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: *Catalyst 12.1 Preview* Decreased performance, anyone else confirm? on: December 16, 2011, 09:55:46 AM
it is slower with phoenix but it has small boost with cgminer with flag -I 9(to remove cpu bug)

w7 x64 5870@950/300 gives 434,4Mhash/s, with catalyst 11.11/b/c/ was 433,3
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!