LOL guys, there is a suprnova mined block  |
|
|
|
|
There is a minor glitch (or bug IDK) in the user interface of the account trading site.
If you click on the price to be sorted by it, than the highest that is shown is 7.5 and the 15000 (of the low digit ones) is coming after the 2 PASL price.
|
|
|
|
How about submitting PASL to be listed on coinmarketcap.com? BTW what a proce jump now, seems the dumpers have gone |
|
|
|
|
Seems to be a nice project!
Still no more details (besides spring launch) about the ICO?
|
|
|
|
Price looks quite promising now!  What we need is bigger hashpower as well as at least one more pool, and in time more exchange will come for sure. |
|
|
|
I prefer cryptopia, plus alot more btc will be needed to get it on there. if im not mistaken to list on cryptopia you need to buy dot right? the price for 1million dot has increased to 23 sats so im thinking youl need 0.23btc now, so we need to get in on there quickly before price keeps going up Didn't realize the price increased. I've made adjustments to the balances. For CCEX it would be 0.75-1.00 BTC to get listed and it says "Please, make sure coin is compatible with our existing interfaces." No idea if our coin meets that. They approved the voting listing however. It's also possible to submit coin vote on livecoin.net as well. Pool hashrate 200GH. Need more pools...  Definietly! fairpool is getting too much of the blocks just like nanopool in PASC. That is not good considering how people view this inequal hashrate distribution.. |
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone!
I'm making a cryptocurrency portfolio to myself. I plan to invest some money into it every month. But I'm relatively new to the crypto world (less than a year experience). And I would like to get some advise from more experienced members. So here are the ones I plan to invest into:
BTC, ETH, DASH, XMR, DCR, GBYTE, FCT, NEM
I think these have potential for the future. But as I'm not too expereinced, I'm asking your opinion about these, and other coins that I might have overlooked.
|
|
|
|
|
By 2 digit I meant those that consist only of 2 numbers before the "-". In the account explorer there are quite a few that has no operations yet so they are still owned by the original miner.
|
|
|
|
BTW, Does anyone have a 2 digit PASL account? I would like to get one PM me if you have |
|
|
|
Well that 100 is getting fillend in the first minutes of every huour, so you have to hurry and be punctual to make it |
|
|
|
Well I know nothing about their cloudmining, but they transaction accelerator really helped me yestrerday. An exchange made my withdrawal transaction too big in bytes and with the regular fee it was too low in terms of satoshi/byte... In the end this accelerator helped me. I'm really happy that I found it |
|
|
|
No Suprnova is done even with the original PascalCoin. Apparently due to unfair practices.
But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?
I can't see them, but you can send a message to those nodes in the wallet, can't you? |
|
|
|
It's good to have a pool! Now it's not a problem to have just one, as the hashrate is still relatively small and solo mining is still possible. But there should be 1 or 2 more pools added in the future to prevent what happened with PASC-nanopool sutff. Than if the situation is consistent, an exchange could be considered imo. Believe me I tried. I tried contacting Suprnova, Poolmn, and Coinotron and none of them were interested. Most likely until we finally get listed on an exchange this will be the only pool. I tought suprnova could have been an option as ocminer alredy posted in this thread.. |
|
|
|
It's good to have a pool! Now it's not a problem to have just one, as the hashrate is still relatively small and solo mining is still possible. But there should be 1 or 2 more pools added in the future to prevent what happened with PASC-nanopool sutff. Than if the situation is consistent, an exchange could be considered imo. |
|
|
|
The miner writes this text all the time: [19:48:18] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:49:50] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:51:56] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:53:29] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:55:01] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:56:33] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:58:05] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted
[19:59:37] Stratum connection to 127.0.0.1 interrupted What can be the problem? The wallet is running and is stating that it has one JSON-RPC connection. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah it seems to be the same at me too. ~90% cpu load and only 1600mh/s insted of the 2200mh/s
|
|
|
|
What's the syntax ? doesn't work for me at the moment  Can`t run for solo. And bat, and with modded configuration file. P.S. " Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size." I'm getting the same and it's not mining... [09:32:08] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size.
[09:32:08] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:19] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[09:32:52] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size.
(5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.000/m Yeah I just tried it and got the same thing. I also got the same issue with PascalCoin 1.5.0 Maybe we need to set a special node name and such. Maybe you guys can ask Wolf0 for some info on how to run it. I've asked him. He told me: "Prefix must be 16 chars." But I don't know what to do with that... |
|
|
|
What's the syntax ? doesn't work for me at the moment Can`t run for solo. And bat, and with modded configuration file. P.S. " Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size." I'm getting the same and it's not mining... [09:32:08] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size.
[09:32:08] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[09:32:19] Waiting for work to be available from pools.
[09:32:52] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size.
(5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.000/m |
|
|
|
|
Will there be a short beta test before the lauch?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
