Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 04:56:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 [212] 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 ... 573 »
4221  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Potential Large mining facility - need some help. on: May 14, 2015, 12:01:13 AM
Please stop opening posts over and over again for the same issue in different ways. Either edit or add to your original post. Locking this thread.
4222  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.1 on: May 13, 2015, 11:14:19 PM
I cloned and built cgminer from https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer yesterday and it wouldn't work with my ASICMiner Tubes connected via USB.

I decided to try the version here: https://github.com/blockerupter/cgminer and it worked, but it's six months old.

Is this a known issue? Or should I start digging to see what broke it?

If the version you last compiled is working, what features would you need from the new version?
Why not stick to that one?

Regressions are usually worth looking into.
You're comparing it to a different codebase. As far as I'm aware, the blockerupter code that was contributed by them to mainline cgminer NEVER worked. None of the main devs ever got any hardware from them to get it working and they never contributed fixes to make sure it was working. I don't go chasing code from other people's branches to get mainline cgminer working with hardware from manufacturers that never really engaged the software community they depend on but I'm very happy to receive fixes from outside sources if they're willing to maintain it. The avalon nano and the blockerupter drivers both fall into the "submitted but broken code" category I'm afraid.
4223  Bitcoin / Hardware / MOVED: 0 electricity and ISP costs, large facility paid for. Is mining still lucrative? on: May 13, 2015, 11:02:25 PM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1059891.0
Duplicate thread and in wrong place. Post one only please.
4224  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 46 blocks solved! on: May 13, 2015, 01:50:46 PM
Mr Con
May I ask you
If one miner make 200 billion best share 200,000,000,000 and didn't discover a block , That mean block diff not in 0 to 200 billion ?

Or someone new join and made a 50 billion bestshare can solve ? Or he must do over 200 billion to solve it.



another question

Why bestshare can stuck for 20 days in pool 'stats without update ? ( using your ck pool  last update )

Is that bug or normal

solo.nicehach said they using ck pool and they don't know why my bestshare stuck.

Actually it's Dr Con not Mr, but Con will suffice.

I have no record of any share being over 200 billion and if there was such a share the pool would have tried to submit it and I'd have a record of it being rejected or orphaned. If on the other hand you got that on some other pool, then that's nothing to do with me as they run their own custom code (or custom code on top of my ckpool) and either they have broken something or have a similar record to what I just described. You'll have to take it up with them. Best share only goes up when... you get a better share as others have tried to tell you and resets to zero when a block is found by anyone on the pool.
4225  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 45 blocks solved! on: May 13, 2015, 11:45:12 AM
Another lucky winner awaiting a confirm
https://blockchain.info/block/0000000000000000126eaa074c22a5f01b1eed56c2d309713fbeffc629207c40

17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp with ~20-50THs

It is really the luck of the draw. The group had over 500 THs and did not hit a block.
Yes but this miner has maintained 25TH for over a week (not sure how long).
4226  Bitcoin / Pools / [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 46 blocks solved! on: May 13, 2015, 11:36:47 AM
Another lucky winner awaiting a confirm
https://blockchain.info/block/0000000000000000126eaa074c22a5f01b1eed56c2d309713fbeffc629207c40

17UhZWXLyiHmPmAb4VdFweGWRYY52qjxwp with ~20-50THs

Congratulations!

Code:
[2015-05-13 11:30:55] Possible block solve diff 59650500941.187515 !
[2015-05-13 11:30:55] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2015-05-13 11:30:55] Solved and confirmed block 356223

Code:
{"hashrate1m": "21.5T", "hashrate5m": "22.7T", "hashrate1hr": "25.8T", "hashrate1d": "45.6T", "hashrate7d": "25.5T"}
4227  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 45 blocks solved! on: May 13, 2015, 12:09:50 AM
Sorry guys, I can provide the service but I can't magic the luck for you.  Undecided
4228  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] B's A More Ethical & Trustworthy Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide on: May 12, 2015, 09:53:21 PM
CK makes a point of slamming SFARDS for a single thread but does little or nothing for Avalon / Bitmain being non-hardware threads for the most part.
Their thread became a competition thread. Support threads are still about hardware as I already explained.
4229  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Eligius - NMC Merged Mining Addr Field on: May 12, 2015, 09:46:35 PM
Eligius support thread was 2 below yours, please use it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441465.0

/locked
4230  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 45 blocks solved! on: May 12, 2015, 07:59:27 AM
is there any chance of setting up merged mining on here so that even if we dont hit a block we can share the profits on another coin?

maybe use the password field as the merged coin address?

what do you think?
Zero chance
4231  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: SFARDS: “Speaking IMHO”- The Best Miner is…contest, 1 BTC for winner! on: May 12, 2015, 07:43:45 AM
Thread being moved to competitions.

Meanwhile the meta discussion regarding refashioning the mining section has been moved here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1058414.0
4232  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 45 blocks solved! on: May 12, 2015, 05:04:57 AM
45

Code:
[2015-05-12 02:38:37] Possible block solve diff 77791050210.824402 !                                                                              
[2015-05-12 02:38:37] BLOCK ACCEPTED! 
[2015-05-12 02:38:37] Solved and confirmed block 356026
4233  Other / Meta / Refashioning mining sections on: May 12, 2015, 01:58:18 AM
While were are taking about the repurposing of threads in HARDWARE...

CK can you move all the Antminer / Avalon SUPPORT threads to the MINING SUPPORT section?

Since we are talking about whole threads being not really about HARDWARE anymore.
No. Without a dedicated hardware support section, it's flexible enough for hardware announcements and discussions to turn into support threads, even though there is obviously then crossover with the mining support section. Competitions have previously been problematic though and I'd rather avoid that mistake again. The mining subsections are historical in development and no longer ideal but despite discussing this many times over we've been unable to come to something where the demarcation is clear enough to warrant a respin. I'm happy to discuss it again in meta/ if you wish to.
4234  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CKPool Quesiton on: May 12, 2015, 12:58:45 AM
Hello everyone.  I have read through this forum, and only have one question that I cannot seem to find the answer.  Does the ckpool code auto-pay the block finder from the address in the ckpool.conf, or is it a manual pay until "I" modify code to auto pay from that hard-coded address to the block finders address ?
There is no payout management at all in the code. ckdb includes calculations for PPLNS payouts but does not perform the payouts or manage the wallet itself.
4235  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 44 blocks solved! on: May 12, 2015, 12:25:20 AM
If it was a while ago, I may have deleted it without answering as I avoid giving personal support questions since my time is limited and I'd rather give as many answers in public as possible where others can benefit from them and avoid needing to repeat myself. Apologies.

No problem CK.

   I just started running your script on iEGservers, and was wonder which file I can view to see if any blocks were found ?  I see users/pool.status/workers, but nothing in the way of blocks found.

Thanks!

If you're saying you're running ckpool on your servers and asking a question about that, that is not really on topic for this thread which is the solo ckpool thread but a ckpool software question which should be in the appropriate thread here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=790323.0

But to avoid you asking the question yet again, in short there is no block summary anywhere in the pool code. Only the database if set up will have a record of it.
4236  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 44 blocks solved! on: May 11, 2015, 11:44:38 PM
Hey CK, I know you prolly missed it, but please check your PM...

Thanks!

If it was a while ago, I may have deleted it without answering as I avoid giving personal support questions since my time is limited and I'd rather give as many answers in public as possible where others can benefit from them and avoid needing to repeat myself. Apologies.
4237  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 44 blocks solved! on: May 11, 2015, 11:36:58 PM
ck did you made some automatic updates on the best share part?

No I haven't. The pool is behaving very nicely as is. Did you notice something?
4238  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 44 blocks solved! on: May 11, 2015, 02:37:05 AM
I have a problem see screen shot


cant find the miner on ck's pool

been there for 6 days  what has happened?







full size link
http://imageshack.com/a/img633/619/jqDzT2.png
You mangled the address in your URL. The Aagh component of your address is what you should be saying right about now.
4239  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 44 blocks solved! on: May 09, 2015, 01:39:40 PM
Should I mess with my miner diff? Will it help somehow? Can someone explain the whole diff thing and if it makes sense to adjust? I have 30 sp20's if that matters. Thanks.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274023.0

However since I wrote that guide, and wrote the diff management code ckpool and therefore this pool uses, that means you need to do nothing here (and it makes no difference with solo mining anyway).
4240  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: cgminer config on: May 09, 2015, 04:10:57 AM
I have got cgminer running with a hashfast board, but it constantly scrolls with errors of not finding a avalon and icarus device, how do i get it to stop looking for the miners i dont have and stop cluttering up my window, i want the device not found errors to go away since i dont care about devices i do not have?
Those messages only show up if you have it in verbose or debug mode... so don't do that.
Pages: « 1 ... 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 [212] 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 ... 573 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!