atheism is not A RELIGION.
"The true atheist doesn't exist, because he knows that God might exist somewhere that he hasn't examined, yet."
- I agree on this, maybe atheist are still waiting for a moment where God really shows up .

And that's the problem, you don't know what created the universe, it could be your god from the bible or it could be something totally different therefore your proof is meaningless.

Since you said God is anything that created the universe, it makes no sense to say that God is the God from the bible because the god from the bible is clearly not Zeus or The big bang which is just a process, not a God.
And from that we are back to the beginning where you can't prove what the first cause really is.

First of all, you don't know whether the bible is right or wrong. If the bible were right then none of the other possible causes for the existence of the universe would be possible because only the God from the bible had to be the creator, therefore your scientific proof is gone and now relies on the bible being right or not.

So you have no answer to my question and you keep ignoring it? You claimed that if cause and effect were put in place by Zeus, then zeus is god. If that was the case then you can't say the bible is true, it's simple logic that you obviously are ignoring because I made you look bad again rofl

Like what machines? And why is the universe a big ''machine''? You also don't know everything that is in the universe and whether it had a cause or not so you can't say everything has a cause because we haven't found something without one, which btw physicists did find, radioactive decay.

Cause and effect is meaningless.

If everything must have a cause, then what caused God? The counter-arguement to that is that God is an exceptional being that doesn't need a cause.

But if there can be something without a cause, why does the exceptional being have to be labeled God?

We can use the same argument to say that the Earth is an exceptional thing that, just like your conception of "God", also doesn't need a creator.

There is no reason for us to believe that this universe had a beginning, and therefore was created by anything.

There is evidence of things being created, sure, we have humans and some animals using tools to make artifacts. From this you jump to 'everything is created'? How, exactly?

Everything I see and experience hasn't been created, it has been altered, grown, rearranged, spun, settled, and transformed.

How do you know or prove that anything was ever created, as opposed to things simply changing shapes and forms eternally?

For example, can you prove that the earth was ever truly created as opposed to it simply being a large space rock that was pulled into the sun's orbit, and then sculpted by solar wind and meteorites into the shape it currently has?

'
''2. If cause and effect were put into place by Zeus, then Zeus is God;'' ''If the bible is a fact then God can't be Zeus or any of the other things you said so your logic is a bit confusing here. You claim that God is anything that created the universe but at the same time God is the God from the bible??''

Talking out of your ass again eh? Most mutations are neutral in the sense that they will not be significant. Nachman and Crowell estimate around 3 deleterious mutations out of 175 per generation in humans (2000). Of those that have significant effect, most are harmful, but the fraction which are beneficial is higher than usually though. An experiment with E. coli found that about 1 in 150 newly arising mutations and 1 in 10 functional mutations are beneficial (Perfeito et al. 2007).

The harmful mutations do not survive long, and the beneficial mutations survive much longer, so when you consider only surviving mutations, most are beneficial.

Beneficial mutations are commonly observed. They are common enough to be problems in the cases of antibiotic resistance in disease-causing organisms and pesticide resistance in agricultural pests (e.g., Newcomb et al. 1997; these are not merely selection of pre-existing variation.) They can be repeatedly observed in laboratory populations (Wichman et al. 1999). Other examples include the following:
Mutations have given bacteria the ability to degrade nylon (Prijambada et al. 1995).
Plant breeders have used mutation breeding to induce mutations and select the beneficial ones (FAO/IAEA 1977).
Certain mutations in humans confer resistance to AIDS (Dean et al. 1996; Sullivan et al. 2001) or to heart disease (Long 1994; Weisgraber et al. 1983).
A mutation in humans makes bones strong (Boyden et al. 2002).
Transposons are common, especially in plants, and help to provide beneficial diversity (Moffat 2000).
In vitro mutation and selection can be used to evolve substantially improved function of RNA molecules, such as a ribozyme (Wright and Joyce 1997).

Whether a mutation is beneficial or not depends on environment. A mutation that helps the organism in one circumstance could harm it in another. When the environment changes, variations that once were counteradaptive suddenly become favored. Since environments are constantly changing, variation helps populations survive, even if some of those variations do not do as well as others. When beneficial mutations occur in a changed environment, they generally sweep through the population rapidly (Elena et al. 1996).

High mutation rates are advantageous in some environments. Hypermutable strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are found more commonly in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients, where antibiotics and other stresses increase selection pressure and variability, than in patients without cystic fibrosis (Oliver et al. 2000).

Note that the existence of any beneficial mutations is a falsification of the young-earth creationism model (Morris 1985, 13).

You haven't explained this tho ''If the bible is a fact then God can't be Zeus or any of the other things you said so your logic is a bit confusing here. You claim that God is anything that created the universe but at the same time God is the God from the bible??''

Humans had only lived not longer than a billion years on earth. But evolution is true. Its just that it takes a billion before that will happen and there are factors affecting it.

If you lived on the sea for billion of years, you and your kin will soon adopt the aquatic life and will soon have gills lol  
The monkey/apes that turned into homo-sapiens lived in a place where they need to stand because of predators which they soon stand on two feet.

If your crappy links were in fact proof of your god, pretty sure that everyone would know this as it would have been made public a long time ago.

As your links are not quoted by a single other person aside from yourself....

Your links = FAIL

I just can not understand. What other proofs of God do you need to have in the scientific plan? This is not provable at all and I do not understand how it can be proved. Is there a god and how much religion is there in society. It already depends purely on everyone from what he believes.