|
As far as I have tried Epochtalk I think there is no away to quote a message ,only a simple Reply option is available at the moment while replying from your Inbox unlike SMF. Maybe it will a part of future developments.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't understand why would you want to advertise on a website which is the main source of introductory knowledge for beginners . I'm sure Satoshi would never any such intentions of making money from bitcoin.org.Moreover not sure what kind of advertisements what will be accepted.Suppose if you're advertising a ponzi which initially is reputed and quite well structured ,there are chances it will scam in the future and run away with the investments.
Point is,don't want bitcoin.org as the source for the scam.You can take any advertisements for example ,you would not know they're scam until the turn out to be one.
|
|
|
|
im from new bombay. and i heard their banglore office is just a name not real one. also im sick and can't fight with them. i never involved in any legal actions or police case so i am bit nervous about that.
That's just adds a plus point for them being a scam.You have to visit Bangalore Office though . |
|
|
|
i also contacted to many cyber cell department in india. but got no reply. and currently i don't have money to file legal case against them.
Dude you don't need to have money to file a legal case.Where in India are you from ? I'll help you.Have you tried visiting their office in Bangalore ? I suggest you do that first. |
|
|
|
|
1.Approach Bangalore's Cyber Team.
2.Just hit the ChamarjPet Police Station and I'm 100% sure any cop will come with you to their office . (Below is the office address)
3.Show them all the proofs.File an FIR.
igot India
2nd floor, 3rd Cross, 4th Main,
Chamrajpet, Bangalore, India
CIN: U72900KA2012PTC061947
|
|
|
|
|
For me,Escrow = People you trust .In the worst case scenario if they scam ,the best you could do is blame yourself instead of blaming forum or the people trusted by the people that you don't have known or traded before with.
P.S. : I use Shorena and Mexeer-2 .
|
|
|
|
|
1.Considering the Trust system,all signature campaigns should completely remove "Trust" as one of their rules for users to participate in them.
2.Initially it was meant to spot out scammers who literally have ripped people off for dollars who don't deserve to be here but since then a lot has changed.
3.I see people with highest quality of posts with negative feebacks for silly reasons.I think investing in a Ponzi is a subject limited to one's personal choices ,you can't force him to not to.That being said, if you don't comply with his intentions,you're free to leave him a feedback and this should be understood by the campaign managers that it necessarily doesn't portray one is a spammer and he deserves to be kicked out of campaign if he still has the highest quality of posts .
4.Just my two cents.You don't exactly have to agree with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Who is your secret escrow ?? Mind revealing the details without beating around the bush.
|
|
|
|
|
I have got a really sexy address ,its literally sexy : 1SexyNPXArL5p5k4vcBK8owfM6zUJENq7
|
|
|
|
On a side note, I'm not going to tag this guy as the trolls keep telling me "You should only tag someone after PMing him about the accusation and not receiving any reply in a substantial amount of time" bullshit , lets see what happens if I follow.
I already did and since I'm not on DT it barely matters.At least its a sign to people in my network not to trust him right ? I mean do you see him -negged by me ? Sorry if I sound stupid but still coping up with your trust lessons. |
|
|
|
|
Posting in series might get you banned.Know the bump rules.You have to Delete previous bumps before posting a new one.You have posted serially one after other ,please delete all those bumps and just keep one after Krunox's comment.
|
|
|
|
You are so useless.... this is obvious a REAL scam and you don't even bother to neg rep... yet you hand them out on other members where there is no proof... you are the most useless person on this whole forum.
Removing people like you from the default DT is the only right solution..... you are a big joke mister
Damn mexxer-2 you are being a scape goat lately.People first accuse of giving negative reps and now for not giving them. |
|
|
|
Might as well tag him ,No? |
|
|
|
Changing the thread titles doesn't change the content inside it.As per the forum rules,one thread about a service.Since you already have one opened here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1367469.0 creating this one was unnecessary . I'd ask you lock it. |
|
|
|
Sounds like Im doing your homework here. Oh well. We are using symmetric keys so each pair of people that wants to communicate need 1 key. If n is 3 and the names are Alice, Bob and Claire we get the following pairs.
A-B
A-C
B-C
All other possible pairs (like B-A) are doubles. I will leave it for you to find the general formular for any n. If you have trouble finding a solution start from 3 and ask yourself how many additional(!) keys you need to add for the 4th person. Repeat adding more people until you see a pattern and test for a higher number.
Problem solved .Thanks for tip sho.Yes it was a homework, exactly 5 marks you have helped me gain.  |
|
|
|
Not sure if this belongs here but could not find the other closest section to my query. The question is :Suppose that everyone in a group of N people wants to communicate secretly with the N–1 others using symmetric key cryptographic system. The communication between any two persons should not be decodable by the others in the group. The number of keys required in the system as a whole to satisfy the confidentiality requirement is The options are :
A) 2N
B) N(N – 1)
C) N(N – 1)/2
D) (N – 1)2Need this for a project I'm working on.Logical explainations appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
Very sad for your loss.Low life sewer scums will never change .
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
" and " 
" is annoying and not one of the things escrows use to base their opinions.
