The wallet is not synchronized, is stuck on the block 2271722! I just updated the blockchain zip on our website. http://www.navajocoin.org/files/Navajo-Blockchain.zipPlease download from there and unzip to your Appdata folder. Alterntive reinstall with the installer exe and download the blockchain automatically. btw. Wallet is running since 4 days without errors..
|
|
|
*IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS*
QT WALLET If you are using the QT wallet , just use click the included BAT file ONLY once , BEFORE running your QT Client/Wallet , this will AUTOMATICALLY create a folder named NavCoin and copy , I repeat only COPY all the files on %APPDATA%NavajoCoin including your wallet.dat to %APPDATA/NavCoin.
Where is the bat file? I have uploaded the from zip file! I will correct that this evening, as soon as I am home!
|
|
|
There nav will be added to Coinwallet.co online wallets Finally! Great!
|
|
|
I might be wrong but i dont know if thge old coins are going to work in with the new ones now since that means there will be more of the new coins than there should be since the already swapped old coins were sold again.
The V3 has to die in my opinion . Only one coin can survive. Like soopy wrote it would be a possibility to rollback the chain, but in every case people will loose the invested money after whatever will happen.
|
|
|
I am monitoring this thread. Also holding some "old" DRZ in cold storage.
Just a Question: Do you really trust a DRZ V3 Wallet from a dev that scammed DRZ? Who knows there is no backdoor or whatever? Did anybody went through his new code.
|
|
|
FYI
Due to testing, I had to disable automatic blockexplorer update. I will inform you all, when I reanabled it!
|
|
|
I've kept my wallet offline for whole December. I've updated wallet lately to 3.2.0.0 and kept wallet on twice for +15 hours in row, but I can't get any stakes with 16000 NAV. Wallet is staking and it's expected to stake in 3 hours. Usually it's approximately double of that, but it's not staking in even 5 times of that. There must be some kind of issue as I can't be this unlucky. And I haven't received any orphans either.
What is your network weight with 16.000 NAV? It really depends on more factors than the amount.
|
|
|
navajocoin.org down... did i just try at a bad time? updating maybe?
hm maybe a network hickup? All ok here
|
|
|
Let's hope everybody will get his coins from cryptsy... btw. anybody knows, which address is cryptsy on the richlist? I know #2 is Bittrex.
|
|
|
To the [1]... I think we are already in discussion to do that. But if it would be worth?
|
|
|
Nice list but Nav claims to be the only True Anon, maybe we should try and disprove some of the other anons ?
That would make Nav look better and then have the bounty for other people to disprove Navs anon.
Personally, I do not think this is a wise thing. An action of this kind, would be taken by the other groups as a premeditated attack, aiming to put them in a bad light, the beginning of a war of FUD. Starting a war is never wise, even if you could win. I think that is true, even for the little things, even for the forum. In general, I think NavajoCoin, needs new allies, new friends and new collaborations with other currencies. I do not believe that NAV needs new enemies who feel slandered, at which point they would be justified to respond with the utmost vehemence to a hostile attack unjustified. Why awaken the sleeping dogs of war? Thank you for your wise words, Remy!
|
|
|
Can you translate that? I do not really understand your post.
Thank you
|
|
|
@sum2dev or any dev. there may be a spelling mistake in the whitepaper ;P
in the solution section: 1. Self Registering Nodes - When an anonymous server comes online it will register itself on the network as avaialbe to accept transactions.
Bump. also, any news on the richlist getting fixed? I am just updating the richlist. I think it will be updated this afternoon. EDIT: Richlist is up to date! I will monitor, if it will update automatically now! EDIT2: should update every 30 Minutes now. Excellent work. Long time needed fix. seems its not updating I just checked and it looks updated. I can't see a problem right now. But I have activated logging to test. Edit: I found the cause... wrong crontab settings ...
|
|
|
@sum2dev or any dev. there may be a spelling mistake in the whitepaper ;P
in the solution section: 1. Self Registering Nodes - When an anonymous server comes online it will register itself on the network as avaialbe to accept transactions.
Bump. also, any news on the richlist getting fixed? I am just updating the richlist. I think it will be updated this afternoon. EDIT: Richlist is up to date! I will monitor, if it will update automatically now! EDIT2: should update every 30 Minutes now.
|
|
|
I will use a USB to msata device to put all Blockchai ndata on it. This should realise a performance of around 30 to 40 Mb/s instead of 5Mb/s ... We will see.
Does the class difference on SD card not make a difference? IE Class 10 is quicker than class 4 (standard). If the I/O on the SD is locked at 5 Mbs then that will be the IOP (input output processor) and the buss will be locked at that speed usb or not? That's correct! It also depends on the blocksize writing speed. Most sd cards are for camera and smartphone usage. Not usefull for operation systems... At all sd cards are slow... I get a max 8mb write speed on raspbian
|
|
|
I cant wait for Nav staking unit. I will can stake 24/7 with it. I cant make it myself I no have enought skills.
I have sugestion that Nav Staking Unit must be very easy to working and completed to plug and play. This allow new person in cryptocoins easy join and have some Nav's.
Anyway what with masternodes system ? will be added or is not needed ? And Nav staking Unit maybe can be Masternode too ?? It can have version as normal staking wallet or be a Masternode ? if its possible ofc.
Main problem this Pi is suffering at the moment is the performance! Right now it is not really doing its work. It's a pity there is no msata ssd on the board. I try to bring the main system on a sd card and the blockchain data to a usb stick to spread the load on the device. Edit: I just found a msata module. I will order it and keep you updated! Id advise you to use a Pi2 there is hardly any difference in cost but it preforms a lot better. Yes I agree I would have loved a Sata port or it to be bootable from Usb would have been nice as well Ive read some posts from people that only bootup from the SD card and then run from USB that's a lot quicker but will take some modding. Btw seems wallet is taking less then I thought it only takes up 750 mb ish so it will run on PI2 Mine is filled with other POS coins staking atm but ill try to run some test. Thnx! I already use a version 2 model. But it seems the sd card is to slow to handle the blockchain data. If u really want a Sata you could look at the Banana Pi it has one on board. But with sata the whole thing could get really expensive imo if u have to attach a sata disk as well it would be nicer to stick to Usb imo decent ones can do 20Mbs and up. **I forgot you need a SD card in my previous posts .. lol so add another 10-20 euro's to the cost. I will use a USB to msata device to put all Blockchai ndata on it. This should realise a performance of around 30 to 40 Mb/s instead of 5Mb/s ... We will see.
|
|
|
I cant wait for Nav staking unit. I will can stake 24/7 with it. I cant make it myself I no have enought skills.
I have sugestion that Nav Staking Unit must be very easy to working and completed to plug and play. This allow new person in cryptocoins easy join and have some Nav's.
Anyway what with masternodes system ? will be added or is not needed ? And Nav staking Unit maybe can be Masternode too ?? It can have version as normal staking wallet or be a Masternode ? if its possible ofc.
Main problem this Pi is suffering at the moment is the performance! Right now it is not really doing its work. It's a pity there is no msata ssd on the board. I try to bring the main system on a sd card and the blockchain data to a usb stick to spread the load on the device. Edit: I just found a msata module. I will order it and keep you updated! Id advise you to use a Pi2 there is hardly any difference in cost but it preforms a lot better. Yes I agree I would have loved a Sata port or it to be bootable from Usb would have been nice as well Ive read some posts from people that only bootup from the SD card and then run from USB that's a lot quicker but will take some modding. Btw seems wallet is taking less then I thought it only takes up 750 mb ish so it will run on PI2 Mine is filled with other POS coins staking atm but ill try to run some test. Thnx! I already use a version 2 model. But it seems the sd card is to slow to handle the blockchain data.
|
|
|
I cant wait for Nav staking unit. I will can stake 24/7 with it. I cant make it myself I no have enought skills.
I have sugestion that Nav Staking Unit must be very easy to working and completed to plug and play. This allow new person in cryptocoins easy join and have some Nav's.
Anyway what with masternodes system ? will be added or is not needed ? And Nav staking Unit maybe can be Masternode too ?? It can have version as normal staking wallet or be a Masternode ? if its possible ofc.
Main problem this Pi is suffering at the moment is the performance! Right now it is not really doing its work. It's a pity there is no msata ssd on the board. I try to bring the main system on a sd card and the blockchain data to a usb stick to spread the load on the device. Edit: I just found a msata module. I will order it and keep you updated!
|
|
|
|