^^^ The chosen ones.

Universities and collages offer courses for every profession under the sun except one, you can't become an astronaut. Space is fake.

^^^

middle ages, dark ages, space ages, disinformation ages,
source on that?

they said it wasn't flat, it moves to and fro,
your sources don't confer!

gigantic spans of time, a history that doesn't rhyme,
the source is your ass you fucking goof!

lying wonders to fool the clever mind, the bells and whistles are so precise,
your source is the devil and your narrative a farce!



I'll leave you to contemplate your folly with this rendition of Chemtrail Cowboy -- https://youtu.be/vca7c04r95I

The globe hijacks the 1 minute angular resolution limit of the eye resulting in a ball with a radius of 3443 nautical miles, it fraudulently claims the compression caused by an object going past the limit is curvature. When a zoom lens with a lower limit is used the globe model completely falls apart.

Ships don't go over a curve because the horizon isn't the side of a fucking ball.

I'm not twisting anything, the horizon is actually flat.

A globe earth dictates that the horizon is the physical edge of a ball. However it can be shown via practical experiment that's well documented, beyond any doubt, that the horizon is an optical phenomenon caused by the angular resolution limit and perspective of the eye/camera.

The result is that, what is observed from a fixed perspective (a flat horizon with a dynamic range) is not consistent with a globe earth.

Most of modern science is a disgrace to the scientific method. There's got to be a point in many scientific professions where the scientist realizes something is horrifically wrong (the nuclear scientists describing the barrels full of dead bodes at the DOE is a personal favourite) but he needs his career and goes along to get along.

Take for example the guy who demolishes buildings for a living, image his reaction to watching building 7, a steel and concrete structure reinforced to withstand natural disasters implode in on itself at free fall speeds due to what the TV claims is fire. He can't understand how he watched the building implode live after the BBC reporter had already stated it had fallen.

1+1=3.

^^^ Have you considered hanging yourself or curling up inside a gas oven instead of trying to gaslight me?

I can prove the earth is both flat and motionless. I don't care if you're the liar or the fool, you can go fuck off and die either way!

You fucking cock smokers want to force 1+1=3 on me, fuck you!

@odolvlobo,

   The air plane is above the earth plain, it's a 1:1 ratio with the earth below. There are 1 nautical miles per 1 measured minute of arc thus the Sun @ 0.53° is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.

I'll take gaslighting for $1200 Alex.

When a 1 foot object goes beyond 1/2 nautical miles it's too small (below 1 minute) to resolve with the human eye. This is the limit of your vision, this is where your horizon line originates and rises to your eye level from.

The angular resolution limit of the eye (1 minute) is key to understanding that the earth is flat.

A 1 foot object can't be resolved beyond 1/2 nautical miles because it's too far away thus too small. At 1/2 nautical miles the 1 foot object is 1 minute in angular size, this is the limit of a 20/20 human eye. This is where the horizon line forms, it's not the curved edge of a ball ships sail off of.

The horizon line is flat because the earth is flat and, it's an optical effect that varies based on the angular resolution limit of the eye/camera and perspective i.e. eye height/angle of attack above the plain.

Once you understand the distance to the horizon is a dynamic variable that's it, the globe must have a curved edge with a fixed distance.

🎵 FLAT EARTH MUSIC TELEVISION 🎵 24/7 LIVE! -- https://youtu.be/UWHHDAP-RMw

Well I'm impressed.

---

What do you believe the horizon is?

A. Objects beyond your angular resolution limit that are compressed into a line where the sky meets the earth,

or,

B. a convex dome of water below you that rises up and blocks your view of the ship you're on as it sails over the side of the curved edge.

^^^ 200 proofs is good, one of the first flat earth videos to go viral years ago.

Next time you're on an airplane don't look but listen, "it looks flat" they whisper.

^^^ I actually meant to say maximum distance in the statement above. The angular resolution limit can be used as standard to gauge an objects actual size with. Sailors use the ratio of 1 minute for every 1 nautical mile, this rule of thumb is standard practice.

The horizon line is everything squished together, the distance to this line if it's not obscured by a narrow band superior mirage changes depending on the angular resolution limit. Atmospheric refraction not withstanding no objects are visible past this line.

@Cryptotourist,

Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey.



If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.



@odolvlobo,


The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum maximum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution.

^^^ If you want to make a claim about what is being observed it helps to understand how vision works. The angular resolution limit of the eye, camera, etc.. making the observation can be and is a factor for some observations.

Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible. When observing the Sun its angular size appears to be ~0.53°. Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun. If perspective and atmospheric refraction are accounted for then ~0.53° equates to a solar diameter of 32 nautical miles (36.8 statute miles or 59.3 kilometres) at a ratio of 1 nautical mile per minute.



Ref:
Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.

@hornetsnest, 0.53°.



edit:
Alex, I'll take triangles for $500 please!



edit2:
No wait Alex, you don't even need to ask, I've already got it! What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?

@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.

^^^




BTW champ I claim now and have argued with you multiple times that, the Sun is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.

^^^ Modern humans didn't evolve from apes on our flat earth, this is a globe exclusive theory.

The idea of a rotating pressurized system open to a vacuum is a fucking joke; the earth is a flat, motionless enclosed system. Party headquarters clearly has dirt on you or you wouldn't be going along with the globalists and their big lie, amirite?


Meanwhile in California, what's left of it...