^^^ You think it's fucking reasonable to believe that we're stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum orbiting a million-mile wide thermonuclear bomb in an endless virtually empty universe created by nothing exploding for no reason?
The only way anybody could possibly believe any of that shit is if they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth.
Occam's Razor, the universe as a quantum fluctuation, that at some point in 10^10^10^10 years, however, there is no time before the universe, so the concept of this is rather meaningless. That the right quantum fluctuation created an explosion so large known as the big bang. The asymmetry between anti-matter and matter, "The LHCb data revealed a significant level of asymmetries in those CP-violation-sensitive quantities for the Λb0and Λb0-bar baryon decays, with differences in some cases as large as 20%." as in regards to the Large Hadron Collider. However the preliminary findings are level of 3.3 standard deviations, so about 99.9%+ usually it warrants a 5 standard deviation. Explains why the result isn't 1-1 or a total of 0, but something other than 0. Hence you get stars, galaxies. Billions of years and trillions of planets to conduct random mixing paves the way for the chance of life. And a documentary shows that mixing a bunch of elements together in a certain fashion and environment can arrive at a pre-state for life. Do this a trillion-trillion times, it becomes much more likely that one time results in the needed outcome for life. From 100 billion possible places on a single planet to 100 billion in a galaxy, to 100 billion galaxies in the universe. So you got 10^11*10^11*10^11, or 10^33 as in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Possible attempts at achieving life. From there, replication, and variation paves the way to life, and evolution to us. A single-thing as pre-cell replicates a billion times, say 99.9999% dies, you are left with 1000, which are just different enough in variation to survive, and they copy themselves. Some are losing the ability to copy, and others maintaining it, over time, you get variation and change. Where some change and variation is better than others. These better variations take over and continue, ones that find consuming another within their cluster as an energy source is an more optimal method, paves for more complex versions, of them running away from each other, and a form of competition, speed, and shape (Survival of the fittest). Which continues and cointunes, perhaps in size, and cooperation is more optimal, which paves the way to the first simple organisms. Size, is more optimal, which keeps going on for 100s of millions of years, as it takes a loooooong time to get anywhere. You get simple sex-tiny things and a form of cooperation, in a way to life. Paves to larger, and larger, then eventually fish like life. Life can tend to want to spread around, so one that escaped and went on to land, at a start had that advantage, that the one in the sea didn't. These again, competition, speed, shape, form, eventually intelligence to plan against another became an advantage. To simple creatures, to mammals, to larger faster. Upright, cooperation, and eventually early humans, humans, civilization, and us today. *I skipped like 99.999999% in between here, but basically the concept. To say that we are existing in a beginning state of the universe a magical super being, that created this dome around a flat planet, is starting from a top-down approach saying that God created everything. And why specifically this super-being created Flat Earth only and nothing else? Why not square earth, Cube Earth, alternate dimension, etc? Why a complicated metallic dome holographic around a flat plane? And nothing else? And why is your concept right, and no others is? When bottom-up, from a single point, skipping the need for the convenience and explanation of how everything works. So out of nowhere, this so-called being popped into existence said "Hey" I want to create flat earth, with a dome around it, and it will be populated by a 5 pointed intelligent organism, 1 head, 2 arms, 2 legs, for the lols. It's the same as if you threw 50 coins on a table at once, and expected all of them to land on the side. It will tend to result in the simplest most common approach. You are the one that is brained washed with all this nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
Nice painting, $200 USD is what I'd offer for it at most, IMHO, unless you are a famous painter/artist, you are unlikely to get 1-10 bitcoins, as 7800-78,000 USD is pretty steep, I can see it going for a couple 100 bucks at least and assuming you use escrow.
|
|
|
|
@pushups44
Thanks for understanding, you are right it's quite tough to make money here.
I can't share this experience with my friends or family or police because it's not legal so i kept it confidential.
Nobody understands my pain, so i decided to post here to seek some help.
i will wait if there is something which can be done here, or i will be living the rest of my life seeing Ethereum going up and up and dying with shame.
Anyone, even the best of us can get scammed, but following strict policies, of never sending 1st, and always utilizing escrow, minimizes the risk, however, a few years back, one of the most trusted escrow agent, even decided to pull a quick one. It happens, but being 99.999% safe is better than 0%. However, in cases like this, should follow common sense here. There is no such thing as a $10,000 for a $100,000 crypto return instantly. That is almost certainly 99.999% a scam. Even if the person appears extremely trustworthy, it's too good to be true. Using that logic, you'd never send in for that 10x hope to gain a deal, no matter the person. Who knows, maybe that person's account got hacked, or it's an account that appears almost exactly as that user, etc. Next time be more careful. |
|
|
|
Hello Lightlord, did you guys resolve the issue? Looks like the banner is different now  But the first banner was really a direct copy-paste of BBcodes, Whichever signature designer designed it is lazy as a fuck and need to be known and exposed I noticed this banner:  @Lightlord send message to theymos and see if he can do something about this. Hm, maybe you and bitdeer both hired the same designer who was lazy to create something new? I tried, if those are considered not the same, then I don't know what is considered the same.  |
|
|
|
A cloud mining company like bitdeer, incompetent and outright theft, to pass someone's else work for their own. Plagiarism. See for yourself If they can't even either hire someone else to make a banner ad, or make the ad themselves. Then this company certainly has issues.     |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Notbatman inside an engineered high-level delusion by a mentally imagined belief source.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Relativity/Gravity has been falsified by Sagnac and Dufour & Prunier, the rug has been pulled out from under your counter-argument of muh grabity; you've got no valid explanation for why objects fall/sink. As a bonus Sagnac confirmed experimentally the existence of a static aether, it's this aether (a superfine gas-like material) that gets displaced in a vacuum and pushes on objects.
A compass works inside a Faraday cage so clearly it doesn't remove all electromagnetic influences.
> "the aether (a superfine gas-like material) that gets displaced in a vacuum and pushes on objects.", What are the odds thou, that the aether pushes on the object in the exact same way, as the displaced atmosphere? To the point, if you have taken a 10,000 frame per second camera, and measured a ball dropping inside the vacuum, vs outside, that it results in the same 0.7003 seconds on both? That this superfine gas-like material just happens to be fine-tuned to exactly the same parameters of the displaced atmosphere? Don't you realize how ridiculous this sounds? Gravity doesn't need 0.0000000001% coincidence or exact fine tuning just happen to be. It works in all situations, and perfectly as expected. |
|
|
|
My understanding of aether is that it's an incompressible superfine gas-like substance, the least dense material possible with the most kinetic energy. Particulate matter would be in this case an area of low density or expanded aether. The aether is still flowing through the matter as kinetic energy however the high pressure area has been displaced by a lower pressure system.
As for my opinion on the experiment you purpose, you're doing the same thing as af_newbie and attempting to strawman my argument with a loaded question. The Earth's electric field does not push on objects directly. It's is possible to counter the force pushing down on an object by levitating it with a high voltage field but that's not how the force pushing you down works; it's displaced atmosphere that's pushing you down.
Regarding: "What do you think of these experiments: Place a non-conductive non-magnetic object inside a 1 meter tall evacuated container and apply a potential of 100V (opposite to the Earth's electric field) to plates at the top and the bottom. Hypothesis: The object will be weightless and float freely because the applied voltage counteracts the Earth's electric field. Increase the applied voltage to 200V. Hypothesis: the object will accelerate upward at 9.8 m/s 2 because the field inside the container is equivalent though opposite to the Earth's field." > What if you applied the same above experiment, but inside a vacuum chamber? So how exactly does the displaced atmosphere push you down? Simple answer, gravity is in force, and your explanations are rubbish. Or putting a Faraday cage inside a vacuum chamber, both removing the electromagnetic influences and atmosphere displacement. And dropping the ball, So why does the object still fall? |
|
|
|
^^^ You're the idiot for claiming unproven theory is fact. Coulomb's inverse square law is something that can be demonstrated in the lab, gravity or more accurately relativity is unproven theory that has been falsified in the lab.
@born yesterday_stupid as fuck, get inside a Faraday cage then have it lowered into a lake.
Like I said. Checkmate. All done using your 'electric field theory', and your arguments.  |
|
|
|
Contest conclusion: jayce is the winner of the 0.05 BTC prize!  Its as if jayce read my mind, on how I'd imagine it to be, good job! payjoe93 wins 2nd place and consolation prize, for your effort put in, i'll award you double of 0.001 btc for 0.002 btc. Just pm your bitcoin address. Remember winners, pm your bitcoin addresses
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
