Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 06:46:07 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 »
4481  Economy / Scam Accusations / brave-official.info is a scam. on: November 26, 2019, 06:35:10 PM
I just received an email that offers 1500 BAT tokens for installing brave browser.

Quote
We inform you about the completion of the Bounty project to update our Brave browser.

On this occasion, we are distributing 1,500 BAT tokens to each participant who fulfills several simple conditions.

The first condition is to install or upgrade our Brave browser to the latest version on your Windows or MacOS.


There is google form for claiming reward that contains address of a fake website.
According to whois.domaintools.com, the domain has been registered just 10 day ago.
The official website of Basic Attention token is https://basicattentiontoken.org/ and any other link is fake.

Be aware of these scams.
4482  Other / Meta / Re: @Admin there is a glitch in the merit system if you refresh the page on: November 26, 2019, 02:41:55 PM
I remember when the issue was brought up before, but I must say I've never had it affect me.  I guess I've never been tempted to refresh the merit page for whatever reason.  When the issue came up last time I thought that maybe theymos could add a script to close the tab right after hitting the send the button.  I don't know how difficult that would be to implement, just a suggestion.
I don't think the implemention of your suggestion is difficult. Because now there is a same thing in "report to moderator" page. After you click on "report" button, you navigate to the board containing the reported post.
4483  Other / Meta / Re: Bumps ..... are limited to once per 24 hours on: November 26, 2019, 12:46:38 PM
I do but his time I wanted to have some conversation and wanted to get the attention of the mods (again). He is breaking rules which is not top secret and also harming the community but yet I never seen any ban to apply against him.

I doubt the administration wants to throw the ban hammer for a multiple post.   But if they do it repeatedly, and you keep reporting the posts, eventually they will be banned. 

We need more clear rules.
All of us know that plagiarism will lead to permanent ban. But the rules regarding spamming, multiple posts in a row, insulting, etc. are not clear. Unclear rules can lead to different behavior from different admins and moderators toward different users.

The rules should be clear.
X times multiple posts in a row = Y-day ban
If X % of your Y last posts are deleted you will be banned for Z days.
4484  Other / Meta / Re: What will the badges look like? Any Idea? on: November 25, 2019, 08:29:44 PM
I can't quote the locked topic, but theynos posted the badge already. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193860.msg52793373#msg52793373 :



I posted a new topic regarding how to quote posts in topics that are locked. Hope that is helpful.
For this purpose, you should quote a random post in a topic that is not locked and follow two simple steps.
4485  Other / Meta / A guide to quoting posts in locked topics on: November 25, 2019, 08:26:46 PM
First method:

Use the code below:
Code:
[quote author=X link=topic=Y date=Z] 

X: the username of poster
Y: Click on the post you want to quote and copy what exists after "topic="
Z: Use epochconverter. Enter the exact time the post has been created and copy "Epoch timestamp"

The problem of this method is that you have to make the original post again and it's too time-consuming especially when there is a photo or a complicated code.


Second method:

Quote a post in a topic which is not locked.
Then you should change the url.
Change the number exists after "quote=" to the number you see at the end of the url of the post you want to quote. (Don't change the number exists after "topic=" or you will get error.)


Using the new URL, you can quote the post in the locked topic. But the problem is that clicking on the quoted post will navigate you to a wrong page.
For solving this problem, change the number exists after "topic=".


Using this method there is no need to change the username of the poster and Epoch timestamp


Using the second method I could quote the post made by Theymos in a locked topic.


Being primarily a text-based forum, it's not surprising that there hasn't been much original bitcointalk.org art, but I've always thought that this has been a bit of a shame. Therefore, for bitcointalk.org's 10th anniversary, let's have an art contest!

Prizes:
 - I will distribute at total of at least 1 BTC to the art submissions which I personally like the best, completely subjectively. I might give out more if there are a lot of good submissions.
 - I will give out a ton of merit, probably at least 500 in total, based mainly on effort.
 - Between 1 and 20 (depending on number of submissions) people will receive art contest recognition badges: , based mainly on community consensus of who had the best art. In judging consensus, I will be substantially but not entirely influenced by the total amount of merit your art received.

Post original bitcointalk.org art in this thread along with a Bitcoin address. Any art you post must be created by you. It should be related to bitcointalk.org, but need not be related specifically to its 10th anniversary.

The contest ends Nov 22 18:04:28 UTC; submissions after that are not guaranteed consideration. BTC will be sent all at once, probably a few hours after the end time.

Keep this thread clean: only post art and discuss the art posted, staying very on-topic. No "reserved" posts, please -- it only clutters the thread. See this thread for more commentary, questions/answers, and comments.
4486  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How does provably fair environment ensure the survival of gambling houses. on: November 25, 2019, 04:08:57 PM
As it is already said, the house edge guarantees that the gambling website is profitable. The house guarantees that the house beats gamblers in the long term. Besides, Gambling websites consider a maximum amount for the profit a gambler can earn in a single bet. As every single bet is independent form other bets, a gambler might bet a huge amount which is more than the amount the house can afford to pay.
4487  Economy / Reputation / Re: ANN threads that are probably using bumping services on: November 24, 2019, 07:42:36 PM
You are right. I changed the subject to "ANN threads that are probably using bumping services"

Please check the post history of these users too.
These users have made all of their posts in Tachyon Protocol, Karvuon, Pawtocol, Amazonians Green Coin, Cocos-BCX, RIDENODE and KABN threads.


rafiqul3: (Archive)
Total posts: 34 , Tachyon Protocol: 7 , Karvuon: 3 , Pawtocol: 9 , Amazonians Green Coin: 8 , Cocos-BCX: 3 , RIDENODE: 1 , KABN: 3

EdmundLucien: (Archive)
Total posts: 16 , Tachyon Protocol: 2 , Karvuon: 4 , Pawtocol: 3 , Amazonians Green Coin: 3 , Cocos-BCX: 1 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 1

quitoneca: (Archive)
Total posts: 13 , Tachyon Protocol: 2 , Karvuon: 2 , Pawtocol: 1 , Amazonians Green Coin: 1 , Cocos-BCX: 2 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 3

nonfrotanme: (Archive)
Total posts: 36 , Tachyon Protocol: 11 , Karvuon: 3 , Pawtocol: 8 , Amazonians Green Coin: 6 , Cocos-BCX: 2 , RIDENODE: 1 , KABN: 5

websetorno: (Archive)
Total posts: 33 , Tachyon Protocol: 5 , Karvuon: 1 , Pawtocol: 5 , Amazonians Green Coin: 12 , Cocos-BCX: 4 , RIDENODE: 1 , KABN: 5

mixcoin9000: (Archive)
Total posts: 28 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Karvuon: 1 , Pawtocol: 5 , Amazonians Green Coin: 3 , Cocos-BCX: 4 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 5

CryptoAngel25: (Archive)
Total posts: 12 , Tachyon Protocol: 1 , Karvuon: 2 , Pawtocol: 1 , Amazonians Green Coin: 1 , Cocos-BCX: 3 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 2

coutabtugil: (Archive)
Total posts: 15 , Tachyon Protocol: 1 , Karvuon: 3 , Pawtocol: 3 , Amazonians Green Coin: 2 , Cocos-BCX: 1 , RIDENODE: 3 , KABN: 2

calpeuserwong: (Archive)
Total posts: 16 , Tachyon Protocol: 1 , Karvuon: 4 , Pawtocol: 4 , Amazonians Green Coin: 2 , Cocos-BCX: 1 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 2

yanbeginning: (Archive)
Total posts: 33 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Karvuon: 1 , Pawtocol: 4 , Amazonians Green Coin: 6 , Cocos-BCX: 5 , RIDENODE: 2 , KABN: 9

l3ol3l3y: (Archive)
Total posts: 16 , Tachyon Protocol: 7 , Karvuon: 0 , Pawtocol: 3 , Amazonians Green Coin: 3 , Cocos-BCX: 0 , RIDENODE: 0 , KABN: 3

centjetssonli: (Archive)
Total posts: 19 , Tachyon Protocol: 3 , Karvuon: 1 , Pawtocol: 4 , Amazonians Green Coin: 3 , Cocos-BCX: 0 , RIDENODE: 0 , KABN: 8

4488  Economy / Reputation / ANN threads that are probably using bumping services on: November 24, 2019, 05:51:16 PM
However the new bumping system has caused spammers to no longer be able to bump the threads, there are still many newbies spam ANN threads. Project owners are trying to have an active thread and there is no doubt almost all of them are scammer.
Please post link of these threads and also members that are helping them.

Here are some ANN threads I found.

1. Tachyon Protocol
2. Bankcoin Reserve
3. SwapZilla
4. ModiHost


Following users only post on the four threads mentioned and do not post on any other threads.


1. Unlucky5555: (Archive)
Total posts: 21 , Tachyon Protocol: 8 , Bankcoin Reserve: 6 , SwapZilla: 4 , ModiHost: 3

2. JN_NL: (Archive)
Total posts: 24 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Bankcoin Reserve: 8 , SwapZilla: 7 , ModiHost: 3

3. tropakolcoi: (Archive)
Total posts: 20 , Tachyon Protocol: 3 , Bankcoin Reserve: 10 , SwapZilla: 5 , ModiHost: 2

4. randomnewby: (Archive)
Total posts: 9 , Tachyon Protocol: 0 , Bankcoin Reserve: 9 , SwapZilla: 0 , ModiHost: 0

5. fotirofors: (Archive)
Total posts: 21 , Tachyon Protocol: 9 , Bankcoin Reserve: 6 , SwapZilla: 4 , ModiHost: 2

6. AlexLad: (Archive)
Total posts: 23 , Tachyon Protocol: 8 , Bankcoin Reserve: 6 , SwapZilla: 6 , ModiHost: 2

7. katena40f: (Archive)
Total posts: 22 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Bankcoin Reserve: 5, SwapZilla: 8 , ModiHost: 3

8. Balticnat: (Archive)
Total posts: 21 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Bankcoin Reserve: 3 , SwapZilla: 8 , ModiHost: 4

9. blismepebar: (Archive)
Total posts: 22, Tachyon Protocol: 5 , Bankcoin Reserve: 6, SwapZilla: 6, ModiHost: 5

10. rty435h4wr: (Archive)
Total posts: 21 , Tachyon Protocol: 3, Bankcoin Reserve: 9, SwapZilla: 7, ModiHost: 2

11. tapcitundvi: (Archive)
Total posts: 21 , Tachyon Protocol: 6 , Bankcoin Reserve: 5, SwapZilla: 6 , ModiHost: 4

12. viacheslav_sazhenkov: (Archive)
Total posts: 14 , Tachyon Protocol: 5 , Bankcoin Reserve: 2 , SwapZilla: 4 , ModiHost: 3
4489  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🚀ROCKETPOT.io 🚀| Multiply Your Bitcoins✅ | Win the Jackpots 💰 on: November 24, 2019, 02:08:22 PM
Rocket games are very risky because it is very rare that you will be able to stop the rocket at 1.01 or 1.02. Sometimes we are just a second late and the rocket crashes leaving us empty handed.
It's very difficult to cash out at a certain multiplier manually and as you said cashing out at 1.01 or 1.02 is almost impossible.
If you want to cash out  at 1.01, 1.02 or any other specific multiplier, you should use auto cashout. This is what many of users are doing at Rocketpot and cashing out at 1.01.
4490  Economy / Gambling / Re: FreeBitco.in - Win a Lamborghini Huracan LP 580-2!! on: November 24, 2019, 01:29:05 PM
How long to wait for a letter with a free 1000 satoshi? I have not visited the site for about a week, but no letters have yet been received. Are there any new betting events like soccer or hockey?
Is this the new kind of abusing freebitco?
If you don't visit the website in order to becoming eligible for claiming that bonus, you are an abuser. In this way, you would abusing freebitco's generosity.
Freebitco gives that bonus to attract those who have forgotten freebitco, not people like you.
4491  Other / Meta / Re: Enabling quotes in locked topics on: November 23, 2019, 10:19:51 PM
Right now, it’s not possible to quote a post from a locked topic because we can’t reply. Quoting from locked topics could be useful sometimes to refer to a normal quote like it’s possible for every unlocked topic. I know, it’s also a solution to just quote the text and add a link manually but that wouldn’t include the date of the quoted post and need more time to type the author, especially for multiple quotes.
I am in favor of enabling quotes in locked topics. But you can use epochconverter for adding the time of quoted post.
Enter the exact time the post was created and click on "Human date to Timestamp" button. Then Epoch timestamp will be shown.

Here is the code for quoting the post you referred to.

Code:
[quote author=theymos link=topic=5193860.msg53152306#msg53152306 date=1574458668]

4492  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion to reduce signature campaign spam posts on: November 16, 2019, 01:55:27 PM
Talking about the signature campaigns, I think it really up to the dev and the manager who is managing it. They are spending money to get exposure for their business or product whatever it is and they should have the full right to chose what they want keeping the forum interest in mind.

We really can not force them to do certain things that may lose their interest to advertise in here too. It always has to have a balance and I think we are not doing bad in it so far.
Why can't they be forced to do that? There are countless forum rules. Another rule could be that signature campaigns may not require a minimum number of posts.
I only remember the Yobit campaign some time ago where they intervened, because the conditions of the campaign led to massive spamming.
I don't agree with you. I think minimum number of posts requirement is needed.
Assume that there is no minimum posts requirement. What if there are many users who make only 1-2 posts per week while the campaign needs more active participants?
Be sure managers will likely remove such participants as they have the right remove anyone. So it's better to more clear rule.
I think the better solution is to have a limitation on maximum number posts. (the maximum number of posts that are payed cannot be more than X.)
4493  Other / Meta / Re: An experiment to encourage new member posting on: November 16, 2019, 10:39:49 AM
Well this project doesn't seem to have worked. I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't worth targeting newbies in specific topic threads.

I considered staring an "Ask a legendary" thread, but I'm not sure that my knowledge id sufficient to support it.

OK - here we go with another thread, it's about the velocity of Bitcoin - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201929.0
Consider moving this thread or the previous one to "Bitcoin discussion" or any other related board. The thread might get more attention if you do so.
But, it might be needed to make a new self-moderated thread to delete the posts that are made by junior members and above ranks. Because there are many spammers in "Bitcoin discussion" that will probably make posts without any attention to being a newbie requirement.
4494  Other / Meta / Re: Source merit increase. on: November 15, 2019, 07:45:26 PM
I’ve started to search a bit deeper around the forum lately to look for people who don’t get that many Merit’s. I’ll always Merit reputable members when they make a good post but I think it’s important to help lower ranked posters rank up otherwise we just have an exclusive old boys club of Legendary Members & nobody else gets Merited.

Try to send at least 1/3 of your daily sendable merit’s to deserving low ranked accounts.

My monthly allowance is a lot less than some of you guys, Loyce & suchmoon etc but I’ll do my best for the forum to spread the love around a little bit.

Merits should be given to posts without any attention to username of the poster, the rank and number of merits the user has already earned.
If a legendary member makes a post and receive certain number of merits, equal number of merits should be given to a newbie if that post had been posted by him.
4495  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🚀 Sportsbet.io - Main Club Partner of Watford FC ⚽ Fun. 🏀 Fast. 🎾 Fair. 🏆 on: November 15, 2019, 12:23:32 PM
I had made a topic in Gambling discussion board regarding Different odds for a same bet in sportsbet.io
I asked about the odds that have same outcomes but have different odds.
For example, Romania and Sweden will face each other tonight.
The odds for draw are 3.20 while for "Any to team to win? No" are 3.05
The odds for 0-0 are 7.40 while for under 0.5 are 8.91

I posted that here so that thread might get more attention.
4496  Other / Meta / Re: Force Moderators To Give A Reason For Deleted Posts on: November 15, 2019, 10:01:23 AM
I agree, sometimes I just wonder what's going through their minds each time they press the "Delete" button.

Just recently, a post of mine got removed and it's not even off-topic.

Quote
You want them to pay you for 3 posts/WEEK!?


I wouldn't see why not, maybe if the rates reduce to double digits satoshi as a tradeoff Cheesy


Posts are deleted usually because they are off-topic or considered as spam. But there are some other reasons too. I checked the thread you posted in. The post you have replied to has been deleted by moderators. So your post should be deleted too.

When a post is deleted, you receive this message. "Please avoid posting things that need to be deleted."

I suggest avoiding reply to the posts that need to be deleted too.
4497  Other / Meta / Re: New bump algorithm applied in Service Announcement (Bitcoin) on: November 15, 2019, 07:39:57 AM
Yes, that's normal.
"Service Announcements" is one the four boards that have been affected by new bumping system. So, in this board, the topics are sorted by their bump score as default. You can If you want to see the topics sorted by the time of their last post, just click on "last post" column header.
4498  Economy / Gambling / Re: FreeBitco.in - Win a Lamborghini Huracan LP 580-2!! on: November 15, 2019, 07:06:43 AM
I think this is the hidden gem of this site that are overlooked by the majority of the people that are criticizing faucets. They look at the 100 some odd Satoshi that the site is giving and missing the referral income potential that the site is offering as a passive income.

Most of my referrals are inactive now, because most "new" users only do the faucet thing for a while and when they realize that 100 Satoshi is not a lot of money, then they simply give up. If they just took the time to dig a little deeper, they would have found the real gems on this site. < I now get a lot of free Satoshi per day without solving any Capthas or having to use the faucet feature, because my balance on the site is getting 4.08% interest.>  Grin
The hourly faucet is not 100 satoshi. That's very lower for new users. They can get only 23 satoshi per hour.
With wagering, the amount of free satoshis you can get per hour increases. That's why you are now getting 100 sotoshi per hour. If you wager, the amount of base hourly faucet can increase up to 19 times.
4499  Other / Meta / Re: Respond to thread without bumping, and report to followers on: November 14, 2019, 07:46:01 AM
For instance, I'm hesitant to respond to an old thread because I'm afraid that bringing it to the front for the entire forum could revive some low-quality discussion...
It wouldn't be reviving them at all: since what you'll be adding by bumping it is a quality addition, then why should you should care about old spam posts on the thread. When you've bumped the thread with your new reply, the discussion can then take off from there again.

It would even help to get those low quality posts deleted, when the thread is bumped to the first page, the replies that were off-topic would be visible to most users, since it probably went unnoticed when it was posted.
So this can serve three good purposes, gets old spam posts deleted, generates new discussions on an old topic, and also replies/posts that were so good and were not merited, stand another chance of being so.

Generally an overall approach shouldn't be applied to all the threads. This should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Most of the times, it's better to open a new topic. Sometimes you should reply to the previous topic (Only if you think that cannot be discussed in a better place and you have something worthy to post)
The decision on whether to post in the old thread or open a new topic should be made base on the discussion.
As steamtyme said, sometimes it can be a good idea to pm a user when the thread have been inactive for a while and you want to reply to a certain user for asking a question or answering to a question and you think there aren't any other user interested in your post.

I don't think it's a good idea to make a post in a thread and make it visible for getting old spams deleted. It's not worth moderators time.

Also, I think that the forum want users to avoid inactive thread as much as possible. When you try to reply to a topic that has been inactive for more than 120 days, you get the following message.

"Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
4500  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🚀ROCKETPOT.io 🚀| Multiply Your Bitcoins✅ | Win the Jackpots 💰 | Launch Thread on: November 14, 2019, 06:58:39 AM
I don't know the odds but there has been a lot of talks about how bad beats could happen back to back and good ones can happen back to back as well, this must have been just one of those instances.
The house edge in Rocketpot is 2.5%. So, if you cashout at x, your chance to win the bet is 0.975/x. For example, if you cashout at 2.00 your chance to win the bet is 0.4875 or 48.75%.
Most of the gamblers in Rocketpot bet on 1.01x. Their chance to win the bet is 0.965 or 96.5%. This means that the probability of rocket crashing at 1.00 is 3.5%.
So, in every 29 games, 1 rocket is expected to crash at 1.00
Where did you get that 2.5% house edge?
"Rocketpot's house edge is 1.5% or less " as per their FAQ section : https://rocketpot.io/faq/
The house edge is 1.5% or less if the jackpot is taken into account. If the jackpot is not considered the house edge is higher. As I was calculating the probability of hitting 1.00, so I didn't consider the portion of house edge that goes to jackpot.
As far as I know 1-1.5% of the house edge goes to jackpot.
Pages: « 1 ... 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!