breakout incoming.
Biff is smart enough to pull his alleged short given his machismo. "McFly(!), I thought I told you to never come in here."  |
|
|
|
|
I see the Italians are having bank problems; are they coming next?
|
|
|
|
Now is the time to load up on ETH apparently and ride the next wave. We just gonna go up, right?  BTC is going back up in a day or so unless this crassic talk gets in the way. |
|
|
|
Just as we start to raise into mid 380's these classic people make another bombing run and we are back in 370s. Hopefully coinbase and block-chain alliance buddies do not release any supporting statements and classic continues its fade into obscurity. This will mean price increase.
Lol @ bombing runs. Queues up the thought of experimental aircraft being tested at Area 51 but this Classic project ain't even classified. |
|
|
|
|
Let's get serious, are we?
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately classic is not quite dead yet.
When it is and the threat of chaotic, contentious and unnecessary (segwit is superior) hard fork is over, we can all look forward to a massive price increase (like move from 230->450 after xt collapse) and bitcoin moving forward.
These bombing runs from Gavin and coinbase are getting tiring.
I doubt they will be able to centralise bitcoin development under their control.
Why unfortunately? Isn't it always good to have different possibilities? you never know what might happen  I personnally support all the coins! Classic, Core, Litecoin... It's precisely because Bitcoin Classic isn't an alt they all go mental. No its because I want bitcoin development lead by people who: value decetralisation, provide features like confidential transactions etc. as opposed to people who: visit cia, join organisations that want to work with government to police bitcoin, float ideas like blacklists of transactions, and do not care about ordinary node users etc. I don't want bitcoin to be crippled by these people into paypal 2.0 (except slower) are u saying u want gavin and coinbase out ?? ... i am trying to interpret what u mean . u do not like the "blockchain blacklists" because of what reasons again ?? from what i gather from what u said, u don't like "blockchain blacklisters" or "cripplecoiners" .. that sounds like a real problem ... can u look outside your window ?? are the blacked out SUV's parked outside yet  their might be a drone too watching you what you say about gavin and coinbase . You are acting retarded, Mr. Aztec. You are trying to act as if you don't realize that you are asking stupid ass question, and really these are a kind of trolling disingenuous search for responses. Accordingly: >>>>>>are u saying u want gavin and coinbase out ??<<<<< these are pushers for increasing the blocksize and threatening hardforks to achieve these goals >>>>>.. i am trying to interpret what u mean . u do not like the "blockchain blacklists" because of what reasons again ?? from what i gather from what u said, u don't like "blockchain blacklisters" or "cripplecoiners" .. that sounds like a real problem .<<<<< Not too many people really like the idea of blacklists because that would inevitably take away from fungibility, and ultimately remove most value from bitcoin. >>>can u look outside your window ?? are the blacked out SUV's parked outside yet their might be a drone too watching you what you say about gavin and coinbase .<<<<< People do not need to be paranoid or conspiratorial in order to arrive at the conclusions that there may be nefarious forces that are pushing these various kinds of measures to make bitcoin more trackable and to keep bitcoin under wraps in significant ways and even to imply certain threats of monitoring to individuals who are using bitcoin (maybe to attempt to deter them from currently illegal acts?) Thanks for highlighting dumbasses' positions JJG. Let it go before I have to go nuclear on the Aztec-butt smeller. Gosh, it stinks to high heaven. |
|
|
|
|
I doubt this will have any potential for HF customers being made whole.
|
|
|
|
And considering that one of the top dogs in the Saud family owns ~19% of Fox News Corp, you get the constant barrage of anyone but Rand Paul/non-interventionism being spoon fed to the republican boobs nationwide. Would Trump change this foreign relationship?  |
|
|
|
Who has been holding from $502, $475, $465, and $428?
When are you gonna sell? at $350? 300? 200?
Price can't go up because transaction volume can't go up. It's that simple, so unless you know about some secret deal between core, nodes and miners to increase capacity, enjoy watching the value of your holdings slowly deteriorate.
You are a fucking jerk when you spin and threaten with your exaggerations. The price is up and down and up and down.. but mostly up, especially in the past year, and you remind me of some playground bully who is attempting to mislead with spin and trying to take away the marbles. HODL your marbles people.... hahahahaha... Hodl and buy more marbles... dollar cost average, and things should continue to progress with bitcoin... in the meantime, including this year is likely going to be decent for BTC prices, whether you already had coins or if you are buying in the $300s, $400s or $500s. Actually, I'm not sure if there are too many people who are newbies reading this thread... but just in case, HODL... and buy. He totally reminds of the guy that played Biff in Back to the Future. "What are you looking at, butthead?" |
|
|
|
OP's link is posting an article dated today from one that was originally made back in 2013 when the litecoin price was over $8 a piece. So, these miners are likely already out since it feels like 2013 was over a decade ago. |
|
|
|
Right... 4 people holding more than the botom 40% USD is worse than 2 or 3 people holding 99% of bitcoin.
Somebody missed emelemtary calculus...
 hahahahahah |
|
|
|
I wanted to buy bitcoin today, but I lack the capital to purchase 1 bitcoin, unfortunately did not buy bitcoin now, I think the price will rise higher than previously  That's the magic of bitcoin - you don't have to buy exactly 1 BTC but rather a .55 if that's all the fiat ya got at the moment. In other news, I can't believe how many people got trolled hard by lambcrotch up in here.  |
|
|
|
What is  ?  This made my day, thank you. He's holding out for a management position don't ya know! I just wish there was another movie after the fact. |
|
|
|
Everyone should tweet/FB this to their peoples and start driving the buzz.  |
|
|
|
|
Investing in startups usually takes more than ~6 months (on average tho usually much longer for the real promising ones to gain a foothold) for any steady dividend to be incoming as it takes them quite a while to get their plan/service rolling as funding comes in (or doesn't). So, you buy 1 BTCs worth of said startup's shares at current prices and then dividends are going to be paid based upon this pricing despite a BTC being worth 4 or 5 figures next year. At this point, you just chased a $30-40 monthly dividend (paid starting next year if you're lucky) and lost that coin that is worth much more in value. It would be one thing if we just climaxed another bull run and you figured investing a decaying priced BTC at high prices would get you some value atm but we are doing the exact opposite. Don't do anything besides buying and holding in the early stages of a bull market. All that said assuming what you plan on investing in is not a scam, which most are.
|
|
|
|
Dude at ZH is laying out what he sees is playing out in 2016 and this is 3 out of 5 of them. ----- 2016 Theme #3: The Rise Of Independent (Non-State) Crypto-CurrenciesA number of systemic, structural forces are intersecting in 2016. One is the rise of non-state, non-central-bank-issued crypto-currencies. We all know money is created and distributed by governments and central banks. The reason is simple: control the money and you control everything. The invention of the blockchain and crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin have opened the door to non-state, non-central-bank currencies--money that is global and independent of any state or central bank, or indeed, any bank, as crypto-currencies are structurally peer-to-peer, meaning they don't require a bank to function: people can exchange crypto-currencies to pay for goods and services without a bank acting as a clearinghouse for all these transactions. This doesn't just open the possibility of escaping the debt-serfdom of central and private banks--it opens the door to an entire global economy that's free of the inequality and concentration of wealth and power that is the only possible output of central bank created and distributed money. ... More... http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-06/2016-theme-3-rise-independent-non-state-crypto-currencies |
|
|
|
tarmi is dead baby.......tarmi is dead. QFT! Dude got Rekt in a blanket. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
