Developers are very good at promoting their project. I have already seen M.S advertising in a variety of places, in a mobile wallet, on sites, on coinmarketcap ... I think this will significantly affect the success of the ICO.
Google ads are the best way right now to promote your project to a normal investor. Bounty campaigns does most of the job but these ads Target new investors too and Markspace is doing their best to do this. I fully agree with you.. Even they should think about advertising in Google Play. I am sure that the vast majority of people enjoy this app! |
|
|
|
|
Hi, DEV.
Please change the address of my wallets in Twitter and Facebook company.
There's an old address that's been hacked.
In the Facebook table I am at number 153, and on Twitter at number 174
Here's my new address. 0x99eaeb9dd44670fcea40a700a2bee1b9efff130
|
|
|
|
8.4 out of 10 is a good result and I think ehealth will get better rating day by day. Looking forward for the next 2 weeks for more good news! I do not trust all these sites that evaluate projects by their criteria. For me, it is important to study the project personally, but this time I agree with the assessment! |
|
|
|
|
Oh I think I missed airdrop( Who can share the link. please send me the link by private message.
|
|
|
|
ICO ends on 26th February or this is ends of 1st round only?
1st round only, its written on their site. And Period of Sale: 12 February 2018 UTC 21:00 to 9 April 2018 UTC 21:00 it's gonna take a long time for this sale to end. I'm really curious about how the price of this token will do after the ICO. There will be four rounds for the token sale. The first one will end in around two days while the token sale will end at April, 9th. Each round has different bonuses as I know. Rounds usually have different bonuses being the first rounds those that have the highest bonus to attract investors. now they have around 45% bonus. and they already achieved their soft target so that's great. these are excellent news soft cap already reached and a good bonus to invest now (45%)in these two day that are remaining, i see that the good advertising continues https://icotop.io/en/project/sphere-social/... This is really good news, now you can not worry about the success of the project. I am sure that sales will only increase now! |
|
|
|
I look at icobench just to know which ICOs are around, I just completely ignore ratings because in my opinion are useless as hell
I am not sure about it. Yes it is not %100 accurate but sometimes they are useless. I just check them to get to know about new projects which may be feasible to invest or have a future. Those may not be 100% accurate but moderate. It's probably personal choice, but as for me, the ratings there help me to understand and find out more about a new project. In the majority of cases, I agree with ratings of ICOs there. yes you're right it's about personal choices in my opinion do not rely on a single channel but look at more sources like rating sites, forum btk, read the whitepaper, the road map, follow the social and then get an personal idea of the project, however icobench offers excellent advertising and visibility... ICC ratings are sometimes accurate, or not at all, some ICOs has been rated high and ended up being scams, so it is better to use rating to look for the ICO, but to investigate on your own anyway, depending too much in ICO rating could cost a lot, sometimes they are paid to incentivize to be high ranked, Another one property of such rating platforms - they are able to create hype, if everywhere in all rating platforms high score can happen in high probability that all tokens will be sold at pre-sale. This effect is called the crowd effect. When people do not understand the project look at its rating and start buying, thereby triggering a reaction of avalanche sales. |
|
|
|
good news according to me icobench is the best site of ico review the high mark means that the experts believe in the project, and is a good additional advertising... There is only one rating by a human person who gave Cryptoflix a perfect 5/5/5 score. The other rating is from Benchy the ICO analyzer bot, which only checks for things like the existence of a whitepaper and the amount of social media channels. Yes, as long as there aren't some more experts' ratings the score doesn't mean anything. And even with a rating of 20 experts it's always recommended to check the project for yourself. Most ratings are set automatically, analyzing the presence of certain points and documents. Nobody reads these documents! roughly speaking, there can be just a file with the title and everything) So only an independent analysis can give an accurate assessment of the project! |
|
|
|
I agree but there is a fine line between censorship and snuffing out the lowlifes that live to ruin other peoples day. Moderation is a better term than censorship in these circumstances.
Such problem exists in all social networks, at places where going discourses about politics, religion, or history there always will be individuals who will try to hook up and provoke another by imposing their version of the truth. yep happens everywhere. it's up to the moderation team to discuss and implement a cohesive policy. Sure, there should be a kind of censorship in this network. However, the devs have to be cautious in terms of not being out of line in this stuff. Sphere is certainly the kind of project that requires continuous work, in all stages of Ico and after it, Team seems to me aware of realizing a platform that covers the failures of today's networks, surely it is necessary to include ways to inhibit harmful behavior to other Of course, censorship will have to be dealt with even in such a decentralized social network as the Sphere. Perhaps they could impose it on users. For example, a kind of dislike from the information, when a certain limit is reached, this information marked with dislike should be checked for compliance with the rules. Although this scheme also has drawbacks. I also think that moderation is better than cersorship. I think censorship should only be in the most extreme cases. Of course, but as for me, moderation is just a particular case of censorship in this case. Moreover, the latter can be done automatically, and for moderation we need people who will perform it. You are right. I think we will need a system, where a content will be blocked, if 51 % of the users voted to block it. So you can avoid censorship from only a few privileged members. Very interesting idea! A kind of controlling body that will monitor the information flow will be the users themselves! It's just brilliant. But this can also lead to censorship of things the majority doesn't like. I think they should not concentrate that much on it. I do not think it's a good idea that 51% of the users can vote to block content. Everyone has his ideas, his principles, different characters. Maybe some like something, others do not like it. There is also the fact that someone has an altercation with someone else, and may want to block all their content. in a sense, you are right, but do not forget that even the most decentralized network needs to be moderated, otherwise it is chaos!! And who can be a moderator not to lose the status of decentralization??? Only user! and only most! |
|
|
|
I prefer to buy when it hit the exchange most of the ICO went below ico because of the dump made by the one who bought at a higher percentage.
It's crazy how fast these tokens get dumped after hitting exchanges. Sad that most of the people just invest for the money. I think this will cause problems in the future. The get rich quick image that crypto has will fade. Its a phase we have to go trough to get the interest of a wider audience. Alas, this is life.. And every endeavor to get a piece of, even these methods are sometimes depressing, but nothing can be done.. |
|
|
|
Yes, thats right and i think eHealth First has more potential than other healths projects here on bitcointalk.
This is why I fully support this project. I think that this could be very profitable investment As fas as I know there are not too many health projects in crypto and anything like this with such an experienced team and so well organized. I guess all crypto holders either big or small must pay attention to this project because wealth will be useless if we are not healthy enough to enjoy it.  Thats true it doesn't matter how much money you have if you have irreparable health problems. You are absolutely right, there is no washed away making money if you can not use them.A very good example was shown in the movie "Breaking Bad". A lot of money to no avail. |
|
|
|
It is nice when I read that cryptoflix will offer free educational contents. I wish the content will have a good quality and not just the ordinary one.
Many wrote that the content of the educational plan will be distributed free of charge. I wonder what it will be for the content? Who knows?? Please tell me. |
|
|
|
The plain truth is that moderation is a form of censorship. ie. you are still censoring what you deem inappropriate. There are certain things that should be censored (eg. Sexually explicit things, excessive gore), but what should never be censored is ideas. Unfortunately, the latter has been censored by the ideologically left by labelling it has hatespeech.
What about when someone is insulting other users or even is threatening them? Ignore/block button ofcourse, iam really sure they will provide it, no reason to not. I do not rule out the fact that inadequate people feeling freedom in their actions will not only threaten but also much more, but do not miss the moment that such persons are everywhere! |
|
|
|
According to the contract address, they started 20 days ago and they only raised '40.49 Eth' , What do they must do? !!!!  Their cap was only 100 eth for current phase also they are having a tough time because of the current market. I think they should make more marketing. But they may be keeping for later rounds. 100 ETH? It will sound strange, but why so little? Usually private rounds have bigger caps, because they wanna attract big institutional investors during this stage, to get bigger funds in the beginning of a project. who knows? maybe they wanted to test the water and see if they need more promotion. That's a rather odd way to test the waters. Anyway, I hope that they will promote the project more during the next stage, so more people will find out about REPU, hence more investors. Maybe they just wanted to make some money for marketing in the other rounds? Or maybe they also wanted to limit the bonus payments a bit, which will lower dumps maybe. I think this is done specifically to attract potential investors. a small minimum threshold is easier to collect, and investors tend to have time to participate seeing this. |
|
|
|
Nah, this is pure science fiction that you are talking about. How could you tell that person I'd sick by scanning his eye
Actually there are some diseases which you already can check for in your eyes and I assume with AI learning etc this will get even bigger. This shit is getting more real by the minute. There already devices that can see by the color of your skin if there's something wrong. Sure al these things need to be finetuned, but it already works on quite a remarkable level Yep, I think this will be an important part of futures health care system. Devices with which you can check for specific problems without going to a doctor, maybe even without doing something actively like it was said somewhere before with some wearables which you have on your body anyways and which will check your body regularly. I worked in healthcare innovation and that's exactly what they are looking to do more and more. Why travel for hours, wait for minutes/hours and drive back home again for a two minute conversation that just as easily could be done from the comfort of your own home. And especially if someone is too ill to travel. Yes that is something really important. Also maybe in some years, this devices will tell you directly that you should go to a doctor, or if you lose consciousness or have a heart stroke it calls the ambulance directly. I think wearable gadgets are actually getting there to do something similar or solve problems automatically for us when needed I really like that idea. Like a medical approved FitBit Think of all the possibilities when combining a medical accurate HR tracker with a smart watch I think that the data collected by the bracelet will be a nice addition to the overall picture which will tell the patient when to see a doctor! |
|
|
|
|
It is a pity that your project still do not want to notice investors. But I am sure that together we will be able to change it!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
