it is certainly best to start by paying someone for that kind of support. there are many who are mainly engaged in this type of business, running node services, mining pools etc... it’s better than depending on someone’s goodwill.
you also definitely need some kind of promotion on targeted groups dealing with this part, such a Reddit threads, Discord groups. For example, there are plenty of discord channels of masternode coins, which are neglected, but there are still some people who are following and waiting for some updates. Mostly these are people who have run nodes and already have experiences with it, I suppose that they may be your target. (this is just example)
Certainly, after the promotion, early birds will respond to you if your project has a perspective and something unique something that will attract attention.
I used to be interested in such things, but most of the projects are one or two man's show which after a while they get bored and abandon the project, so your project must be very good with clear potential if you want to attract serious supporters and build community.

You have right here. Reviews with visual impression only do not mean that much.
If 1xbit wants to get an honest and real review, they should need to send funds to the tester, in his personal wallet. Not on his account on the platform. So, testers need to create an account, unknown for 1xbit, deposit money (obtained from the owner for testing purposes) and finally, make a withdrawal if they don't lose money there.
I guess no one wants to send money there because of many scam accusations and the problems they have. None other than potential shillers whose opinion is completely irrelevant.

if this were to really happen, I guess all of this mining hardware will be sold/moved to another state with cheap electricity. Mining hardware owners certainly won't bury him in the ground. Everything will come to the same thing again.

Even if China is rich, they certainly cannot ignore the daily profits that miners bring them. 60% of this, right? https://www.blockchain.com/charts/miners-revenue

it is a rule from some ancient time. Participants changed signatures in the middle of the campaign or never wear them at all. there were no dedicated managers like now so it was abused.
I think that in any new campaign, the basic rules list just copy/pasted from the previous campaign so this rule somehow survived, but only in writing.
Probably now, this rule means nothing because managers regularly check all signatures wearing.

If you plan to hold any POS coin/token, of course, it worth staking it. but you have to research well what that coin will be.
I remember a big hype when masternode coins started, many of them promise a big future but now just a few of them still worth holding and staking. As everywhere, the wrong investment is always the wrong one.

don't be your guide only the highest APR. often it is unfounded and inflation eats up all your profits from staking.
You can pay attention to cex.io exchange, https://earn.cex.io/staking they offering to stake some stable coins, but the great thing is that you can sell/withdraw funds whenever you want and don't need to wait for a locking period.

I saw now you are talking about Mellowads as a reputed ad network.
I think they are lost their credibility a long time ago. Check thread Mellow ads accept advertisements from Bitcoin doubler websites. they have considerably lowered the criterion by which they accept advertisers, I find many scammers promoting in his network. This has resulted in their ads not being eligible on websites from many high reputed services. That's means if you use their network for your promotion, your ads will show on poor and low-quality pages.
It's just a suggestion, I would rather not use them and find another advertising service.

He missed many things here. For example, where is the signature code for member and full member participants? it says they are open to them as well.
if we take into account their very bad past, now he offered a higher rate than usual ^{I guess it is just a way to attract people to ignore negative trust and participate}, here is a recommendation using escrow service to secure payments for participants.

Probably because Legendary members have more reputation on the forum than Jr.Member. doesn't it seem logical to you?
Legendary member won't risk their authority here and write a fake honest review for a few bucks.


This is another test for a 1xbit casino. If they respect negative review and paid for them, perhaps this may be their first step towards improving their reputation here.

I confirm that I talked to @TheAndy500 about this case on Telegram (20.May first time). He got an offer to run their bounty campaign but was sceptical from the start that they are fraudsters. he contacted me that I would be some kind of confirmation to him if a case like this happened. (if someone insists, still have chat log)
He ^@TheAndy500 recommend them ^KOMMUNITAS @lucifur as a designer with whom he cooperates and satisfied with his work. I don't see any bad intentions here.

I am going to oppose Flag against @lucifur. I believe he did not explore the background of the project, is it a scam or not. Are they use AI-generated photos or not (I'm also not sure I would recognize that). He is just a designer, not a scam hunter. Of course, he learned a lesson now.

Good catch TheAndy, you recognized scammers without check images or WP.

Your balance 0.190 BTC, is it from a deposit which you made there or it's from giveaway, faucet or any other way of promotion? If you deposited any amount of funds there, do you have any proof, screenshot or something? It can be important.


I hope you will be paid for your honest review.

I don't think so. He wants to pay for a review here on the Bitcointalk forum, why not? If someone makes an honest negative review, you think he should be negative trust punished by DT members?
He said honest review, not shill. I guess they will pay for this job, even if the review does not present them with a positive feeling.

More complicated, fewer people eligible to swap and get new tokens which result in more tokens for them.
If we compare it with other established projects, it's obvious that they are worthless and that they have no prospect of one day being stable and attractive to use. I haven't patient with such poor projects like Livetree.

this is fun.
if the current price was $37k, you set up a pretty wide range, I do not see the essence. also, you could write "between $10k and $64k", it will most likely be there somewhere.
I don't think that is possible to make any long term prediction ^{longer than two days} based only on price changes and chart as instruments.
As Bitcoin_Arena says, with this system you will finish quickly after one noisy tweet.

they were very close in Leicester 2015/16 season, but towards the end, they gave in to the pressure. as far as I remember the crucial game they lost from Chelsea, even if they did not at a high level at the moment.
until the arrival of Pochettino, they were mostly not candidates to do something serious. None of them expected to win anything, not even themselves. A few solid seasons does not mean that club going to be on top in Europe.
I don't like them, they do not have a recognizable identity.

this seems very clever if possible for a machine to recognise irrelevant posts which contain specific words.
What do you think to add something like a Twitter timeline, where some of the most relevant tweets ^{from different accounts} will be shown. So people can read the most important tweets even without going to the Twitter app/platform itself.

Sounds interesting. What is your expected price?
I have a lot of other questions about this website, but only if the price is reasonable.
You also can send me on PM or through Telegram in direct chat.

Sta kazete za trenutno stanje? $0.1 trenutna vrednost ZIL tokena, nesto se razmisljam da uskocim malo, vrlo brzo bi trebalo da se vrati na 0.2+

It can be an interesting tool for Twitter lovers. I had thought of something similar before.
How you choose which Twitter accounts are taken into this analysis? For example, most active ^{I guess you track only Bitcoin/crypto related}, do you have any database there, or you follow them by some hashtag?
I mean, some spammers can be hyperactive but posting only some nonsense.

The payment rate is quite low and you can't expect any quality for that money here. Although it is not about big money, you may also want to consider hiring an escrow service. you will gain more trust, and do not complicate the payment and additional fee.


Why you writing your post with a lot of nonsense "<>" characters inside?
it is very hard to read, and it would be desirable for you to stop doing that if you want someone to read it and not end up on ignore lists.

OP sorry for the offtopic here.

When you say "20k up to 400+k followers" I guess it's a matter of several different profiles. Not just one big.
You need to share links to your social media profiles. You know that fake accounts without a reaction from his followers do not mean anything.