Weekly or bi-weekly webinars are a great things to connect with the crowd and it also help in fetching more investors.
Webinars would probably take too much time, you also need to prepare for that. But some kind of FaQ with the community would be nice. Or maybe just a live stream in which you present the most recent updates and answer community questions for about half an hour. A simple presence by any team representative on this thread would suffice assuming the team are very busy right now. Unfortunately they think that the presence of someone designated will cost them a lot and would bring you problems in the forum, I think it would be the opposite, the constant inclusion of Youtube videos and exclusive acting in Telegran and Email does not seem to solve Tbh, a presence of the team member even though not too often will be satisfy the needs of most investors. At least they give a sign that the project is still alive. Sure, we need here some reaction, not very much of it but still... I somehow see very rarely the projects where the devs find the golden middle in terms of contacting the community. |
|
|
|
Hi everyone! First of all, your support means a lot for EHF! Thank you! We saw many questions and we will try to answer most of them in a 5 days (step by step). Watch a new video about eHealth First. Senior Expert in Software Development, Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Fabian Schütz: What will be done by eHealth First? https://youtu.be/_v-8BZ1KkYsAll the details are on the website http://www.ehfirst.io/ and in the White Paper http://www.ehfirst.io/#wp. The WHITE LIST is launched! Please use the link to fill in the form: https://ehfirst.io/whitelistIt takes 5 minutes only. NB! After submission the form all investors participate in the lottery, in which 20 randomly selected winners will receive an additional 2 000 EHF tokens. In May 2018, EHF Pre-ICO will be launched. Up to 1 500 000 EHF tokens for sale. Price at launch 0.006 Ethers. Daily price increment +0.25%. Bonuses of up to 40% is available. Take a look on https://ehfirst.ioHi, thanks for the update a little bit late than expected but 1>0 of course, we missed you. Dont go away for that long and keep us informed please. I would like see more video interviews from team members, this will allow how do they see the project? are they set for success? Ambitious project with roadmap until 2025 must do the right thing. Community in here are waiting for your answers to our questions impatiently, as mentioned above we missed Ehealth teams communication with us. I would like to think that the dev team would find time to interact with the community considering they are very busy right now. I think a daily update to the community would suffice.Imho. Daily is a bit too much, I think. Just regular updates on the project development would be enough for me, I'm really interested in how that MVP development is going. daily updates seems to me a little exaggerated, say weekly would be the right option, i have look over again the video on youtube, is very explanatory, just hope they can finish the project in less than 3 years... Yeah, the daily news are excessive. There are usually projects with too many or too few regular info about their development. Weekly would be just fine |
|
|
|
thanks for sharing this with us. quiet interesting video and also motivating. lets hope for the best in the upcoming months  great to see that the project is steadily developing and improving, I am eager to have some more good news from them. |
|
|
|
Every day i'm seeing a new ico about health.
I believe the competition between projects will bring the next generation of health services.
Competition is always good for the end users as it will keep the companies motivated to give their 100%. There is enough room on the blockchain so that we no longer have to worry about competition as much as before. I'm finding that collaboration is the much better road to healthy industry. I would say that tough competition is good for the end users when the companies are already fully established and operated. But at the company's launch, very stiff rivalry can negatively affect the future progress of the project, it can even totally refrain it from entering the market. |
|
|
|
Hmm. This is a valid point about the Geo-Blocking being a cause for tv show piracy. If a show is not available in a certain region and Crypto Flix fights piracy... How does Cryptoflix help to bring the show the viewer in the restricted region?
Well, either by some additional/alternative subscription or by some one-time promo codes/passwords. Lots of ways to do that I guess. |
|
|
|
The private sale is almost here, last time we got some updates they had collected something like 800k $, i wonder if they managed to raise some more in the meantime.
There are pretty good chances that they will fetch more amount in the private sale. The project is giant, and they raise money slowly but steadily. They really need huge amount to accomplish everything that is planned, and they will in all probability manage to do it. |
|
|
|
|
Cryptoflix is getting really popular. 200 pages here - pretty impressive interest to it! I really hope for this project, we had a very few successful projects here, so we need them more..
|
|
|
|
i wonder if also some of this educational content could be actually funded, i mean i remember watching math demonstration on youtube it was quite useful, no reason for people producing this kind of material to get funded
In most cases it will not be necessary to fund the educational movies, but sometimes it makes perfect sense. For example, a film about biology or nature might be filmed, which requires traveling to other countries, renting a flight or diving. I don't really think it will work with educational content or documentaries. Such movies are usually created to spread awareness about some problem or to attract attention. There are special funds and agencies for this, sometimes even governmental. I think that would be a good add to their video library, The more diversity the better. But I do not see it as determinant. iI also think so the educational movies would be a nice extra to enrich the offer but are not essential, i think the various countries subsidize the creation of these documentaries to show the beauty of nature in their land or to highlight some problems... It seems to me a good idea to fund educational films as well. I believe they are essential to human knowledge, and used better for schools. Indeed, they are less sought after, but they are still looking for those with good content. And some documentaries help people see the world, even if they do not have the posibility to travel, or some for their new holiday travel plans. Well, in the glory days of avaxhome, some educational content had its solid audience. I think here, the devs can do the same. |
|
|
|
I just recently read an article about Aubrey de Grey. It seems like he solved a 60-year old mathematical problem (Hadwiger-Nelson problem for all of you who are interested), that no mathematician had a solution for so far. And all that as a Biologist! He is truely a genius and eHealth can be happy to have it on board.
He not really solved the problem, but he increased the lower bound of a coloring problem to the number of 5 and this is remarkable. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02385.pdf  Wow, i really can't respect him enough. He is really one of the geniuses of our time. A talanted person is talanted in everything, hah? I am not that one wearing such pink glasses, but that's definitely a good sign for the project! |
|
|
|
eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.
I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey? It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken. Yes you are right, I asked specifically Turkey because I m writing from Turkey nowadays and didn't see any cooperation news except that employee news(sorry I forgot the name) The cooperation is always good, especially such a perspective and promising one. I hope everything will go as it has to be going. |
|
|
|
Why you think so? It can be an important feature, there's a lack of well done free educational content, back in my school days I would have killed for such educational content
There are very seldom good educational content for free in the net till today. If cryptoflix is willing to offer such good educational content, I am sure more and more people will come to the platform. Education is a means to an end. If they can offer university courses in which you can take a test afterwards that would be a good thing. If it's more documentaries I think the target group would rather watch the latest hit shows. Of course the majority of the audience are not interested in educational content. However, at least small section of it should definitely be present. |
|
|
|
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.
100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them. For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much. Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number. The burning of the leftover coins will also raise the coinvalue again. Which will be pretty good for pre-ico investors. Anyways, all the stakeholders would feel better when all the caps are reached and no additional measures are needed. |
|
|
|
Cryptoflix is listed on a lot of ico reviews platforms, like the last coindelite and have a nice score of 4,5. I don’t know if this score mean something but I think there is some investors that checking these sites, so it improve the visbiiity for sure.
there are people who use these sites to get informed about projects, but it's better to do your own research if you plan to invest. I agree, but such sites are useful for beginners, who are just starting to invest, this will allow them to protect themselves from a frank scam.. Such sites save us time, because one person to see hundreds of projects is unrealistic, and projects with normal ratings can be looked at in more detail. This kind of news are always great because show that the project is interesting and having so many good reviews increase the trust of the project. Well, if we talk about independent rating platforms, then they can be trusted. Although of course you always need to do your own research. Both methods are of great importance if it comes to the risk of losing money. Some people are just not capable to conduct a correct market research, they make false conclusions and therefore lose their investments |
|
|
|
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.
100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them. I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet. This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe Yes, projects related to medicine should be considered at the state level, especially in countries where there are problems with this. True, but they (the governments) would rather spend money on something that will bring them more money than on people's health. The bitter true... |
|
|
|
Giving an image of seriousness and showing good project planning is essential to attract investors.
That is a must. Without seriousness none project will gain attention from investors. The market condition is just another aspect and it less important compared to the seriousness from the team itself. yes thats why i'm concerned they are shifting the ico. that just looks like a cashgrab and maybe scares of investors I wouldn't go as far as calling it that. Many projects only have one source of income - the ICO. You have to make the most of this opportunity otherwise you will run out of funding later on. 100% agree, for some projects ICO is the only opportunity to force investors to talk about them We need to increase the credibility of the project, and for this we need to attract famous people to the team. Famous people don't have anything to do with credibility. Credibility is all about the team and them reaching milestones on times and working on the project the best they can. Famous people are just for marketing, for awareness. Involving famous people would probably result indirectly to higher level of credibility, but they are really better for marketing and advertising purposes. |
|
|
|
I was thinking about the KYC on this project and the targeted demographic. I keep seeing the term "unbanked" being used a lot. My concern is, KYC requires not only identification but also proof of residency. The proof of residency requires a utility bill in the party's name with a matching address.... See where I'm going with this? Most utility companies require some form of debit or credit or pay a large deposit. I think a lot of your target audience will not be able to pass KYC because they probably don't have utilities turned on on their name. Might want to think of offering a solution ahead of time, before this becomes an issue. Otherwise, you might find yourself making a lot of refunds.
In case of our KYC, the sufficient proof of residency is an ID or Passport with your address. The uploading of another document is only optional - you do not have to do it. Also - very important is to state the fact, that we have two target groups - unbanked people and crypto community. Most of the unbanked people do not have any crypto and also don't want to have anything with it or just don't have any/enough information about it. So we are don't really expecting them to participate in the TGE. They are an important segment of the final product - ALAX app store. And they do not need to have any crypto to be able to use it (that is part of the reason why we have two tokens). I just have 2 types of passport in my country. national and international. And only in national I have my adress. But its non english. its ok? You still need probably any document with your physical address. I am not sure if non-english pass will go. If the devs have some people for that so it may fit. |
|
|
|
Cryptoflix will be successful in countries where people buy content and are ready to spend their money for digital entertainment
In countries where audience use torrents and isn't punished for that - no
Just mu opinion
I guess time will come that anti piracy laws will be enforced strictly on most countries so that people will be encourage to use this platform instead.Imho. I think that the platform would work good in developed countries, because people can afford to pay for such services and sometimes because in such countries it's prohibited to use torrents. If the price/quality ration will be good and content will include new movies, I don't see a problem. Yes, but their main goal is to get people in undeveloped countries Mostly bankless people. So it would be hard to convince them to spend their little money for cryptoflix. Yeah, only some of them will pay even low prices even if there will be no other alternative. However, this tendency may be changed later. |
|
|
|
Hello!
I'd be grateful if you can answer me these two questions:
1) ICO is performing quite bad so far. If unsuccessful, would you return invested funds to investors?
2) On your alax.io page, FAQ says:
"Is there a mandatory KYC form?
KYC might be required in some cases - we will contact participants right after their contribution in case it's needed."
So, it doesnt say its mandatory for everyone. Otherwise its very misleading.
If someone is not comfortable with KYC would you issue a refund or those funds are lost in that case?
Thank you
Hello. 1) We didn't have a soft cap, so we cannot speak about unsuccessful TGE. I am not sure if there are already all private investors since not all deals have been made yet. Even if there won't be much more participants and claimed tokens in the TGE, all tokens will be redistributed among the participants based on their stake (so no refund in this case). 2) In the time we have prepared the FAQ, we weren't completely sure if there will be a mandatory KYC procedure but later our legal advisors advised us to have it mandatory. If someone did not pass the KYC or he/she will reject to do it, we will, of course, make a refund. Having no soft cap doesn't make an ico success. I was also thinking it was unsuccessful but it seems investors jumped in after my last check. 21 531 109 ALX already booked! -- It was around 5 million last time i checked. So it means around 2 million euros. It is successful in my opinion now. Investment numbers are raising everyday, now the altparty has started, i think good and boom times are ahead. Alax will gain more momentum with this market. it's incredible how fast the market is changing. Just a week ago the future didn't look good and now all the alts are raising like in the past year. It's changing fast, but not fast enough. But on the other side, steady growth is healthier than unexpected ups and downs. Alax has a really short TGE, I hope they will be able to reach their goal. I think the same. However, working here within the cryptomarket, we have to be ready for.everything, for any drastic or exciting changes. The only question is are you ready for that? |
|
|
|
I am always surprised to realize that we are in the future. eHealth is the future if they achieve their goals ; the future, why ? Just the concept is very interesting because they create an ecosystem around the health. What's matters is our heatlh but also the way doctors have access to our datas, the organisation in this sector...... It's gonna be hard to create this ecosystem because there are many differents aspects to control. eHealth will have to work very hard but i heard that nothing was impossible so... Gosh, the future's already comin'! I really believe in Ehealth as the proj to be able to make the wildest health-related dreams to come true |
|
|
|
i do not think the team has changed anyway just expect some official announcement, well the project has been added on an other ico rating site (icoinspect) in my opinion is excellent visibility and publicity, if the team really did the kyc they did it to show that they are real people...
Yeah, that's right, a great sign for the project's successful future. However, I do still hate those KYC systems. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
