Ok, so I can conclude , purchasing account will be tag -ve.
I would say, from my side, in >99% of the cases, but not in 100% of them. I don't believe things to be absolutely white and black; there must be some gray in between. |
|
|
|
I want to this campaign manager job. I have not extra experience . iF you choose me I will try to my best. Best of
E-mail:sadirmrida284@gmail.com
Do not manage campaigns if you have no experience. Incompetent managers are almost equally responsible for the downfall of this forum as are account sales. It better than you, who alway using your DT for abusing trust and receive many red nagative? ok.
I am not abusing anything, but it seems that your alt account got tagged given that you claim to *know a lot about my actions*.  I apply for him, not for you. No one is perfect, dont aim another when you are not God.
Nobody should hire you, probably not for anything given your unprofessional stance and lack of any valuable skillset. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Gold is a scam and is in no way related to Bitcoin other than copying the existing UTXO at a fixed point of time. It's a premined shitcoin run by incompetent developers and literally has about 0% support from the existing userbase. Hi, how can i see my BTG address in coinomi wallet?
Bitcoin address = BTG address. |
|
|
|
For a Masternode 25k BSD is yet required. Will that persist in the future ?
Yes. That requirement will never change as it is a consensus rule. |
|
|
|
I really want try to manager for campaign, but maybe i'm not enough trusted or experience, so noone pick me. If you choose me, i will do the best of mine with highest atitude. Email: getoutofmylife90@gmail.comYou got to be kidding me. You're a shitposter who even lacks adequate language skills, let alone campaign management skills. |
|
|
|
Stop linking to that outdated and misleading thread. Do you not see the last time that it was updated or do you only care about your post count? The correct ranking to refer to can be found in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=276897.0. Just in case if you find no one I am willing to act as an escrow but you should reveal what is the trade going on for as I would not like to get into some paypal stuffs .hi
Careful. Offering escrow services without an adequate history of trades, as well as your low rank, could easily land you a negative rating (or two). |
|
|
|
I'm interested on this.
It would be my first job like a manager, but I'll be glad if you give me a chance to prove my value.
Pm sent
PM Sent, I am Interested.
You can hire me  I am very interested with this JOB. Although I am a newbie when it comes to this work. My patience and dedication to this work is my advantage. Please consider me.
Please sent me PM thanks.
Interested in running the signature campaign
What is up with all these random shitposters applying for a position that they are clearly not qualified for? Do not hire any of these unless you want to stab yourself in the foot. The other applicants are okay. |
|
|
|
So I think you will got negative trust as soon as you purchase account except she grant the permission for you to purchase that account
I'm not a gatekeeper. Even if I don't tag you for something like that, that provides zero guarantee that someone else won't do it. Now in the forum account sales only allow farming spamming and scamming according to Lauda.
Correct. No good can come of them. If you need a second account for whatever reason, just create one. Next you are saying that you will publicly claim that you are the new owner of the account. Darkstar also has an alt account which he/she uses for less secure connections and they also publicly claim that. Hence I dont see any problem if you do the same. The idea of the account abusing signature campaigns also goes away with this.
I guess it is acceptable given that we tag it with at least neutral to a archived post admitting to the ownership of the account (and obviously given that it does not abuse any campaigns or similar). |
|
|
|
your nativity
Ah yes, it's almost Christmas again. Big-out-of-breath LOLThere's a reason for which he is on the SMAS list; we have good bullshit detectors.  I go with whacking his head. Who will? There should be someone who have a great voice here to take the initiative doing so. Stepping down would be hard to do (if you know what I mean).
Not necessarily. Others have stepped down in the past, even though the roles weren't exactly identical (see sirius). I think like you, there are so many new accounts appearing every day and the spam appears in common, it makes the forums washy.
A nice example would be those absolutely brain damaged users who constantly post bounty applications in the wrong thread, but yeah let's all pretend these are "new users" and give them the benefit of the doubt. Give me a break. |
|
|
|
Paying Lauda a fee to remove a negative? Do you have any sort of evidence that Lauda has ever taken a bribe like that? I know you think that extortion attempt was a reputation breaker, but I've never read anywhere
that you could make such a deal with him. Or her.
No, he has not. The reason for which he is insinuating that, is because he likely tried to do this with an alt account which promptly got a negative for attempting to do it. I remember explicitly tagging at least one person because of this.
Update, here's an example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=973899. Don't drink the scammer kool-aid from QS. |
|
|
|
I am not saying I am leaving (I am not in need of having to conduct very much business around here and the business I do conduct is with people who know to ignore lauda). I am saying that I recommend others to simply leave and take their business elsewhere when they are treated by dishonest people such as lauda and friends.
Scammers doing business with other shady individuals and scammers. Before you point fingers as "lauda and friends", you need to take a better look. Crybaby. |
|
|
|
You posted the same link twice. Fix your post. |
|
|
|
|
rausvi11 needs to provide some proof that he/she is the original owner of that account. Mere words from a random member are not enough.
|
|
|
|
Ah now I know why your posts takes about an hour to be done, you are carefully taking person's words from the contexts to write your rubbish opinion under it. Just you to know, I don't care about SMAS and your nativity, I have only meant that you set high standards to other users.
All your points were absolutely stupid and destroyed by other users, but yeah keep accusing others of posting "rubbish" while actually spamming with pretend-genuine-posts. Coinbase users != bitcointalk users. bitcoin now is mainstream
Bitcoin is far from mainstream. Truth be told. It would be far more productive and nicer to dedicate the time in making the forum better today onwards. Past is there but future is coming which will be defined in the present time.
And how do you suggest we do that, with a main admin that doesn't care? It's very easy to say 'we should focus on making the forum better', but with the person in charge being essentially useless that is near impossible. I don't know. I am not the one in power so I don't really know what capabilities and the extent of their position but I can say that it should start from above, the admins (the one who has the greatest authority here). Basically, do their job. What could have been done, what to do, what will do. Either someone whacks theymos on the head[1], and he realizes that his policies are absurdly stupid, or he steps down. Until one of these two happens, not much is going to change here.
[1] Before some crybaby screams 'violence', this was obviously not meant literally. |
|
|
|
Advantage.. Seems like it did.
It did not. Since August this year 2017, BCH, BTG(wonder when it will be in my hot wallet tho) has been created from fork. Many of crypto investors were expecting that BTC price will declined due to chain split, but look at now,
I wouldn't call those two anything other than standard coins; definitely not a chain split given their minuscule support. The case with the latter, BTG, is much worse as that is an outright scam. Unfortunately, regulators are slow to catch up to all of these and prosecute people who are doing it. BTC is breaking ATH repeatedly and other forks are following! (B2X, Bitcoin Silver, etc)
The ATH thing has nothing to do with the forks, and BTC would be much higher without them. B2X is an attack, and Bitcoin Silver has literally nothing to do with Bitcoin, same as BTG. |
|
|
|
|
I'll need some more time to review this case, but it looks like it's a positive report which would result in the manager and everyone related to the project being tagged.
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to avoid these people from such fork even if a group of people supports it, or once the wants to have it activated no one can stop them anymore?
Bitcoin is decentralized. The source code is open and available to anyone. You can create your fork within a few hours if you know what you're doing. Ergo, nobody can stop you. Just take a look at the "Bitcoin Gold" scam for example. |
|
|
|
The following users have been added to the SMAS list today: faceoff97
lvincent
owengtam09
_noname_
majdoso
black014
HabBear
bebejhen
Givebirth
Loyseu
Shnikes101
silent17
johnleo
Prettymie
enterprevic
kapipindot
|
|
|
|
I may be mistaken, I remember it was half of one-tenth of a percent. So maybe add another zero. Still, I'd be fine with that.
You need to stop drinking so much when Bitcoin hits new highs.  You need to understand that most of us are quite busy, we have other jobs.
You being probably one of the busiest escrows given your response time. Sorry that you feel that way. No one was and is stopping you from using an escrow that charged fees that you were happy with. No one is forcing you to use someone's services.
Definitely. There are various cases of annoying users though which sometimes makes me feel like escrow is a type of 'classic support' job. However, there is some right to what you are asking for. Since the increase in the bitcoin price, I will see to reduce my minimum fee.
Charging things in USD is counter intuitive to the idea behind Bitcoin, which is why I'm hesitant to changing it to quickly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
