Bitcoin Forum
July 12, 2024, 05:36:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 422 »
4961  Other / Off-topic / Re: 5000 posts and only a year later on: July 19, 2012, 07:53:08 PM
You absolutely deserved that scammer tag. Regardless of the circumstances, KeyserSoze performed work for you and then you refused to pay him as promised. You admitted to it.

I thought you'd always be an annoying troll, but I'm now glad that I didn't permaban you (your name appears awfully often in the ban requests thread...). Your recent posts/projects have been very interesting and constructive.
4962  Other / Meta / Re: Imageshack support on Bitcointalk on: July 19, 2012, 05:46:18 PM
Also, now none of the images load for me, and if I visit the link manually I get an error that says you aren't allowed to hotlink proxified images.

Is it working now?
4963  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How does ancap deal with an oil spill? on: July 19, 2012, 05:18:12 AM
No, it is much cheaper to kill the victims or bribe the protection agencies. Even enslave the victims for labor on the next oil rig.

No company could afford to bribe or defeat the hundreds/thousands of opposing protection agencies. Any protection agency that allowed its customers to get killed or accepted bribes would go out of business.
4964  Other / Meta / Re: Imageshack support on Bitcointalk on: July 19, 2012, 05:13:59 AM
It'd be cool if someone would set up a proxy that added a "Stop using Imageshack" watermark to the image.
4965  Other / Meta / Re: Imageshack support on Bitcointalk on: July 19, 2012, 04:41:20 AM
Is it fixed now? Imageshack links are now automatically translated so they take you through a proxy.
4966  Other / Meta / Re: Imageshack support on Bitcointalk on: July 19, 2012, 04:24:54 AM
Will that even work? Bitcointalk uses https:// for everything, and referrers are never passed when in secure mode like that.

True. It wouldn't work.

4967  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How does ancap deal with an oil spill? on: July 18, 2012, 07:16:39 PM
The company pays because if it doesn't the victims' protection agencies will attack the company.
4968  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is it possible to send BTC to an address that doesn't exist? on: July 17, 2012, 06:59:17 PM
The coins in that address cannot be redeemed.

Only the generation transaction to that address can't be redeemed. Other transactions could be redeemed by Satoshi if he still has the private key.
4969  Other / Meta / Re: Historic data on forum visitation? on: July 17, 2012, 06:23:02 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats
4970  Other / Meta / Re: What happened to bitcointalk when the btc prices rampaged? on: July 17, 2012, 06:10:33 AM
I bet man, sent it soaring through the roof.

You think the the pw encryption had anything to do with it as such a large amount hit the server at once? Since it is technically new to the software? Or atleast to us? Or new to your hardware?

I doubt it. Hashing one password takes only one-twentieth of a second, and it only happens when someone logs in.

Quote from: pekv2
Gosh, to bad the user count got wiped or didn't have a chance to be used today. Would have been exciting to see.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats
4971  Other / Meta / Re: What happened to bitcointalk when the btc prices rampaged? on: July 17, 2012, 05:55:00 AM
I don't know. sshing into the server always timed out, so I couldn't investigate. My guess is that it was caused by a lot of traffic.
4972  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Is blk0001.dat the same everywhere? on: July 16, 2012, 09:53:47 PM
Each person who downloads the block chain from scratch should however get an identical (hash-wise) blk0001.dat from now on though, right?

That seems likely. I'm not sure that blocks are guaranteed to be ordered sequentially in blk0001.dat, though, or that extra data isn't added.
4973  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Is blk0001.dat the same everywhere? on: July 16, 2012, 09:44:49 PM
No. Orphan blocks (blocks not in the main chain) are also stored there, and each node is likely to have a different set of orphan blocks.
4974  Other / Off-topic / Re: Personality types on: July 16, 2012, 07:57:51 PM
Is there an easy (Read: free) way to find out? The website linked in the OP charges money to run the test.

http://similarminds.com/jung.html
4975  Other / Meta / Re: Independent scam investigations on: July 16, 2012, 07:28:42 PM
So, by this I'm to understand that you will read private messages with probable cause? While I respect your position (and think highly of how you conduct yourself with your responsibilites), I'm definitely not ok with this.

As Maged mentioned, I usually only confirm that a reported PM is accurate. Sometimes I read all of the PMs between the potential scammer and the victim, with the victim's permission. There have been only a few cases where I've read all of a potential scammer's PMs, and they all turned out to be guilty in the end. I don't do it lightly. I never read random PMs; I haven't even read any of Satoshi's PMs, which would undoubtedly be very interesting.

No actual shit, dummy, why wouldn't an administrator have access to PMs? Even if you designed a system that had no easy GUI to do it, you could still read them with a proper commandline SQL query, it just would be a little more difficult. I can't believe you would think otherwise.

It is necessary to use SQL to read them. SMF doesn't have an interface for it.
4976  Other / Off-topic / Re: Personality types on: July 16, 2012, 04:18:28 AM
INTP
4977  Other / Meta / Re: Are mods notified when posts are edited? on: July 15, 2012, 06:17:04 PM
Did not know. That is worth the switch to SMF default. thanks

Be aware that the other themes aren't supported. They're missing features and some things might be broken.

I just added last edit info to the Bitcoin theme. Hover your cursor over the post time.

Edits aren't recorded when they occur within 5 minutes of the post time. (This has always been the case.)
4978  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] BDT - 3% weekly interest bond, backed by Bitdaytrade on: July 15, 2012, 05:03:07 PM
Have you used Bitdaytrade much, Meni? Is it stable?

Up to 1,000 bond will be put up for pre-IPO sale. They will be sold at a 5% discount for 0.95 BTC each. This is only available to investors buying at least 100 bonds. Send me a PM to reserve your spot.

What is the purpose of a discount like this?
4979  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How does one send 0.00 BTC ? on: July 15, 2012, 07:41:58 AM
Could you provide an example use case?

It's used in hashcoin's payment channels protocol. Miners will need to do it in 100+ years when blocks have no subsidy (if there are no fees). You can use it for tracking an asset without tying up BTC: the asset is represented by the 0-BTC output, and sending this 0-value output to someone (also valid) transfers the asset. You can use it for storing data in the block chain without tying up BTC.
4980  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Underwhat circumstances would you sell off all your BTC? on: July 15, 2012, 06:05:46 AM
Never. Even if I knew the entire system was about to fail, I'd still keep 1 BTC.
Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 422 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!