https://buyproxies.org/panel/cart.php?gid=2I would like to suggest another function, which is quite easy to implement. I am SEO since 2000, I use all kinds of programs to make spam and get links to my sites using different TIERS of links. I see that here in this program there is a small problem, it is that WTM, CC etc. put limits to the daily requests for IP of the data. For which I am forced to establish that I look at the coins every 9 minutes, I think the truth is quite high. In order to eliminate that limitation, if you look up in the link, you will see that I can acquire 5 Proxys elite (not transparent) for 10 $ month. You should only add a small form to add them, and each time you go to consult WTM, CC or Coinwarz you are using a different Proxy, in sequential order. This would allow me to obtain data every 2 minutes, for example, instead of every 9 minutes, and thus be closer to the real price of the moment. I add proxy: port 1 Proxy: port 2 ... And AM every time I ask for data, it is sequencing the proxy to use. regards I will not be able to include support for these concepts in Awesome Miner as that would harm the relationship with these coin statistics providers. They are the owner of the coin statistics data and we need to play by their rules. Another solution to this would be if I could work out a deal with these providers where they allow me to request their stats every 30s via the Awesome Miner cloud. Then all users of Awesome Miner would frequently request the data from the Awesome Miner cloud instead - not putting load on the servers for the coin statistics providers. However, as I'm not owner of this data I'm not sure a setup like this would be accepted. It is a good solution that you propose, I do not think they can refuse, because in the end you are removing traffic to their own apis. As long as you make reference to the data provided by those 3 websites, and I hope that soon Shit to mine. Really the providers of data, the data that we use most and we need is the price. Seeing the new coins every 9 minutes is enough, but having the price every minute is a great luxury. For example AW CU, the same program makes the requests to the exchanges to your apis, in a moment, you can request the data of currencies to the sources of always WTM ... but the prices of exchanges request them separately from different Exchanges, And so we can choose the exchange for each currency, I keep insisting that this function is very important for me and I think for many other miners. IF I do not want to work with exrates and it turns out that it gives me the price there, but I want the price of crex24 that can vary by 5% + -, for me it is interesting to have the real price of the exchange where I am going to sell that currency . No doubt there would be an increase in profits for us miners. In new currencies, the price difference between exchanges can be enormous and therefore distort the result of the auto profit |
|
|
|
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vgoaqp54bqbxxkn/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202018-10-24%20a%20las%2017.42.20.png?dl=0Hi @patrike, I'll give you another example of why we should choose exchange for each currency. In the capture that I leave you, you will see BCI and the price of Hitbit (the highest of all of the exchanges), price 19000 satochis. The problem is that neither hitbit, nor tradesatochi nor other exchanges work the BCI wallets, only in exrates, and there the price is less than 14000 Right now BCI at 19000 is among the 3 most profitable assumptions in AM, but it is unreal, hitbit does not allow to receive that currency, and therefore also shows an unreal price, on which AM is based. And like this other many coins. That's why the need to be able to choose for each currency the exchange you want from the ones that CC provides me. If I mine BCI at that price, I would be losing a lot of money, and that is that so much information without control, usually gives these problems. This is one of the examples of the benefits of being able to choose the Exchange by currency Thanks for the detailed information. I do understand the scenario you describe. if you find out that BCI isn't working well on any exchange, I would actually recommend you to change the profit factor of this coin to 0 (or close to 0). Changing the profit is what I do, but it is not an optimal solution, it serves temporarily until there are better options in the program. I do not see that it is complicated when defining a pool for a currency, to be able to specify the Exchange (if it is for Coins calculator) and if it is left blank, I would use the higher one as it does right now. This problem does not only occur in BCI, it occurs in many more currencies, it is something that the program really needs to be more tuned in auto profit. |
|
|
|
https://buyproxies.org/panel/cart.php?gid=2I would like to suggest another function, which is quite easy to implement. I am SEO since 2000, I use all kinds of programs to make spam and get links to my sites using different TIERS of links. I see that here in this program there is a small problem, it is that WTM, CC etc. put limits to the daily requests for IP of the data. For which I am forced to establish that I look at the coins every 9 minutes, I think the truth is quite high. In order to eliminate that limitation, if you look up in the link, you will see that I can acquire 5 Proxys elite (not transparent) for 10 $ month. You should only add a small form to add them, and each time you go to consult WTM, CC or Coinwarz you are using a different Proxy, in sequential order. This would allow me to obtain data every 2 minutes, for example, instead of every 9 minutes, and thus be closer to the real price of the moment. I add proxy: port 1 Proxy: port 2 ... And AM every time I ask for data, it is sequencing the proxy to use. regards
|
|
|
|
|
Master nodes take hours without giving rewards. Are they going to say something by discord or by here, or have they abandoned the project?
By the way, the second exchange does not work either, volume 0, some sales orders, nobody buying. Please get a serious Exchange type crex, CryptoBridge, or similar. These two exchanges are junk exchanges that only serve as an excuse, but they really are a desert.
|
|
|
|
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vgoaqp54bqbxxkn/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202018-10-24%20a%20las%2017.42.20.png?dl=0Hi @patrike, I'll give you another example of why we should choose exchange for each currency. In the capture that I leave you, you will see BCI and the price of Hitbit (the highest of all of the exchanges), price 19000 satochis. The problem is that neither hitbit, nor tradesatochi nor other exchanges work the BCI wallets, only in exrates, and there the price is less than 14000 Right now BCI at 19000 is among the 3 most profitable assumptions in AM, but it is unreal, hitbit does not allow to receive that currency, and therefore also shows an unreal price, on which AM is based. And like this other many coins. That's why the need to be able to choose for each currency the exchange you want from the ones that CC provides me. If I mine BCI at that price, I would be losing a lot of money, and that is that so much information without control, usually gives these problems. This is one of the examples of the benefits of being able to choose the Exchange by currency
|
|
|
|
|
Why are there so many comments on new accounts? , when the price of the project has plummeted and is about to die. It seems that they want to manipulate with comments of new accounts. Is it that nobody sees it ?, Another safe and anonymous currency, like other 1000 more that there is in the market.
I sell my master and make room in the VPS for another Master. He is already dead
|
|
|
|
|
Very good specifications. But what is the project behind this coin ?, If there is no project, there is no future, with which, there will be hardly any miners, I will not mine. I'm tired of mining projects that do not work then, imagine a coin without a project. I wish you good luck.
It's not an excuse that it only takes a week. When you consider a coin, it is because behind there is a project to carry out. ZEON does not have anything that looks like a project and now presenting one does not work either.
|
|
|
|
|
For more than I read and look for information, I do not see the project behind this currency, I do not see the roadmap, I do not know what it is for, I do not know when it is planned to go out on an exchange.
Someone can clarify these doubts. It is that a coin without project or use behind, it does not make sense to mine it or create VPS
|
|
|
|
People already create coins as if it were a hobby and call it a "project" project of  What does a coin do without a project behind it? Of course, it is better that you spend your time doing puzzles and crossword puzzles. In my life I have seen a less reliable project than this, hahahaha, I feel a bit of embarrassment |
|
|
|
Very good update, please do not forget the OC of the RTX
"cryptopia,graviex,crex24,cryptobridge,hitbtc,coinexhange"
Many and good features for CC, I have left an exchante filter line above, is that correct? or I should add the .com or similar.
I liked being able to delimit the Exchanges, I love the 3 hours, I work always in current because 24 is very excessive, it seems very adequate 3 hours.
Could you tell me if I placed the filter correctly?
Although all these developments are great, it is only for CC. I still think that getting the prices of the exchanges prices and choosing in each currency the exchange and high or low price, would be just perfect, but these advances help a lot, thanks for being a developer that listens to both the community.
Do not forget Shittomine, that would be bestial.
Thank you very much for everything @Patrike, I really appreciate your delivery to the project.
Thanks for your nice feedback. Right now the filtering of exchanges requires you to know the name of the exchange as listed in the CoinCalculators.io API. See: https://www.coincalculators.io/api/allcoins.aspx?hashrate=100000000It's not case sensitive, but otherwise you need to list the same like in the API response above. The only incorrect entry in your example was "coinexhange". That one is not matching anything in the API. Otherwise your example with multiple exchange names looked fine. To answer your question about the order - the order you list the entries are not relevant. You can use any order because Awesome Miner is simply filtering based on the exchanges you list. If you list "cryptopia" and "graviex", Awesome Miner will look at which one of these two have the highest price and give you that highest price. If another exchange has an even higher price, it will be ignored if not part of your filter. If a coin isn't listed on any of these exchanges, Awesome Miner will give you the price of zero, because none of the exchanges you put in your filter is supporting this coin. The idea with the filtering is that you should only enter the few exchanges you have an interest in using. Your other requests have not been forgotten - I always take notes of good and important suggestions and constantly work on improving the software based on this. Thanks! PAtrike would be ideal if you could specify the Exchange in each currency. Because if it is in several and I will give the highest, there is still a mini problem. If at least there was an order of importance as I said before, that if in the line I put before Crex24 that Graviex, heed the order, I could help and not have to do anything in each currency. But if you can not, your thing is that each currency has a field to specify the exchange of CC Can you explain this scenario about Exchanges per coin a bit more? The concept right now is that you enter a few exchanges like Cred24 and Graviex, and then you will only be presented with the rates for those two exchanges. The use case for this is that you probably only have accounts on a few exchanges and then it doesn't make sense to get exchange rates from the others. This scenario is fully supported. With a way of defining Exchanges per coin, would that be if you only want to sell your XMR on Cred24 and only ETH on Graviex for example? Or what would the main benefit be of that detailed level of configuration of exchanges? Just as you say in your last paragraph "With a way of defining Exchanges per coin, would that be if you only want to sell your XMR on Cred24 and only ETH on Graviex for example? Or what would the main benefit be of that detailed level of configuration of exchanges?" I have accounts in all the exchanges, but imagine that I only want to use a not very high number of them, in particular I use about 7. So for the mining to be even more perfect, if I define the pool of a currency, I also tell the Exchange, AM will take the value of that exchange and everything will be super accurate. Although it has almost all exchanges, it does not mean that a certain currency has to be mined in an exchange that I never use, and I may prefer to use another exchange with a slightly different price, but one that I use often. With this AM will always be in tune with me, because I will take the prices of the exchange where I will finally make the sale later. It is not a whim, it is a reality. I for a single currency that the best price is in an exotic Exchange, but then also for example in CryptoBridge, I prefer to tell you to take the price of CryptoBridge. Thus the profit is optimized better. I understand that this would only be valid for CC coins, but it is my first provider, and the truth, it would be a good improvement. If it is not by defining the pool, in the currency tab, you can specify the exchange that I want. This eliminates problems of price differences and the autoswtich would be much more accurate |
|
|
|
Very good update, please do not forget the OC of the RTX
"cryptopia,graviex,crex24,cryptobridge,hitbtc,coinexhange"
Many and good features for CC, I have left an exchante filter line above, is that correct? or I should add the .com or similar.
I liked being able to delimit the Exchanges, I love the 3 hours, I work always in current because 24 is very excessive, it seems very adequate 3 hours.
Could you tell me if I placed the filter correctly?
Although all these developments are great, it is only for CC. I still think that getting the prices of the exchanges prices and choosing in each currency the exchange and high or low price, would be just perfect, but these advances help a lot, thanks for being a developer that listens to both the community.
Do not forget Shittomine, that would be bestial.
Thank you very much for everything @Patrike, I really appreciate your delivery to the project.
Thanks for your nice feedback. Right now the filtering of exchanges requires you to know the name of the exchange as listed in the CoinCalculators.io API. See: https://www.coincalculators.io/api/allcoins.aspx?hashrate=100000000It's not case sensitive, but otherwise you need to list the same like in the API response above. The only incorrect entry in your example was "coinexhange". That one is not matching anything in the API. Otherwise your example with multiple exchange names looked fine. To answer your question about the order - the order you list the entries are not relevant. You can use any order because Awesome Miner is simply filtering based on the exchanges you list. If you list "cryptopia" and "graviex", Awesome Miner will look at which one of these two have the highest price and give you that highest price. If another exchange has an even higher price, it will be ignored if not part of your filter. If a coin isn't listed on any of these exchanges, Awesome Miner will give you the price of zero, because none of the exchanges you put in your filter is supporting this coin. The idea with the filtering is that you should only enter the few exchanges you have an interest in using. Your other requests have not been forgotten - I always take notes of good and important suggestions and constantly work on improving the software based on this. Thanks! I leave here the list of exchanges supported by CC and its exact name, this contribution will help to choose the Exchanges better, you know what they are and how they are written. It does not matter the uppercase and lowercase. Stocks.Exchange SouthXchange TradeSatoshi Cryptopia CryptoBridge Crex24 Bittrex HitBTC TradeOgre Binance Bittrex Graviex Livecoin Exrates.me Bit-Z Btc-Alpha Poloniex PAtrike would be ideal if you could specify the Exchange in each currency. Because if it is in several and I will give the highest, there is still a mini problem. If at least there was an order of importance as I said before, that if in the line I put before Crex24 that Graviex, heed the order, I could help and not have to do anything in each currency. But if you can not, your thing is that each currency has a field to specify the exchange of CC |
|
|
|
|
The order of exchanges for CC, influences something.
If in the line of exchanges, I put before Crex24 that Graviex, I chose the value of Crex24?
|
|
|
|
|
Adjust reported revenue
For Yiimp based pools, Awesome Miner can compare their estimated payout with their actual payout for each algorithm. Awesome Miner uses the data for the last 3 days to calculate the "Actual Performance", indicating how far the estimates are from the actual payouts on average. A value of 100% indicates that the estimates matches the actual payouts an a value of 75% indicates that the payouts are 75% of the estimate on average.
The feature to adjust the reported revenue, Adjust reported revenue for actual payout performance can be enabled in the Options dialog, Statistics section. The actual payout performance will be displayed in the Online Services tab in the main window and the Revenue and Profit values will be adjusted based on this factor.
------------------------
I have two suggestions. The above is your documentation.
I have already realized that this works perfectly, Awesome calculates perfectly the profit of the last 3 days, if they are YIIMP. This works perfect in online services. But sometimes exceptions occur that give a problem.
I explain, I do not feel like putting a screenshot. But it turns out that days ago Zpool had some problems in Neoscrypt that marked that he earned much more than what was actually obtained. As a result Zpool NEoscrypt's auto profit, which calculates only AW, has remained at 2.67%. And that's a problem, its value is so low, that although now at Zpool Neoscrypt works well, it will never jump in the auto profit because if profit is so low, it will never come out, and you can never again calculate the profit in online services Here the question is, how do I reset that particular figure of Zpool Neoscrypt. Because now it never comes out, it can never be recalculated, and that self-calculated value can not be changed by me. There should be an option to reset all or some of the items in a pool auto exchange of online services. I hope to have explained.
The second theme. I really like the average of 3 hours of CC, but still it seems a high value. The most suitable for me would be something like 30 minutes, but it can not be calculated. You could do a value of 3 hours + current, just as there is 24 hours + current. I think it would be a perfectly valid measure, take the value of 3 hours and take the average with the current measure for example
3 hours: 0.001
Current: 0.0007
(0.001 + 0.0007) / 2 = 0.00085 seems to me a very adequate value. 3 Hours can also be an excessive time.
Those are my suggestions, I hope I have helped.
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 5.7.1
ASIC mining
- Added Antminer DR3 (Decred) support
GPU mining
- Added predefined algorithms CryptoNightV8 and X22i
- Improved API parameter setup for Sgminer, to make it less likely to configure incorrectly
Features and integration
- CoinCalculators.io integration includes exchange rate support for Highest Bid and Lowest Ask (configurable in the Options dialog, Statistics Providers)
- CoinCalculators.io integration includes exchange filter setting, to specify that only specific exchanges should be used when presenting the coin price
- CoinCalculators.io integration improved by allowing configuration of coin difficulty (current, 3h, 6h or 24h)
- Removed support for Zergpool because they have discontinued their services
User interface
- Added more coin images
- Release notes for the recent releases can be accessed from the menu at any time
- Release notes presented in a more readable way when informing about a new release
API
- Added HTTP API for returning the unprocessed API data from a miner (/api/miners/(ID)/apireport)
Mining software
- WildRig Multi Miner 0.12.1.1 beta, including offline benchmarking support
- CastXMR 1.5, including CryptoNightV8
Corrections
- Correction to wallet balance for KMD, by introducing another block explorer
Very good update, please do not forget the OC of the RTX "cryptopia,graviex,crex24,cryptobridge,hitbtc,coinexhange" Many and good features for CC, I have left an exchante filter line above, is that correct? or I should add the .com or similar. I liked being able to delimit the Exchanges, I love the 3 hours, I work always in current because 24 is very excessive, it seems very adequate 3 hours. Could you tell me if I placed the filter correctly? Although all these developments are great, it is only for CC. I still think that getting the prices of the exchanges prices and choosing in each currency the exchange and high or low price, would be just perfect, but these advances help a lot, thanks for being a developer that listens to both the community. Do not forget Shittomine, that would be bestial. Thank you very much for everything @Patrike, I really appreciate your delivery to the project. |
|
|
|
Yes, this is what you need, thanks, now the balance has started to appear correctly There should probably be some kind of feature to detect unrealistic profit values - but this will have to be configurable in some way. it's like at the moment WTM vs CC: WTM = 27,298.01 mzc / day CC = 12,535.97 mzc / day is it the same as variant to paint in red or the name of the coins or all statistics on this coin, at that moment when there are problems in the network? http://images2.imagebam.com/5a/8b/33/eae497999825814.PNGso that the coin does not hang for days as the most profitable The problem that you mention, is the same one that I try and suggest to patrike above. WTM or CC give different values because some look at some exchanges and the other looks at others. One gives the sale price, and another the purchase price. That is why it is necessary for AW to receive the prices directly from the Exchange, just as AW CU does, and then we can choose in each currency, the Exchange where the price will be looked at. And the price that should always be given, is the sale price, the maximum price that are willing to pay at that time. If you homogenize this takes price data, everything will improve greatly. Currency data, such as something, name, etc ... If you must acquire them as WTM, CC, Coinwarz and soon Shittomine do now. But the prices of the coins, should scan them from the api directly and we can choose the Exchange that we use, or the one that has the most similar price. Then the Auto Profit will be much more accurate. |
|
|
|
Great theory, but in reality the only coin that matters is Bitcoin. You can pick a few of the 3823 alt coins and 99.99% of them will go to zero. You have very bad odds of getting that 10X or 100X. And even if you are that lucky, guess what? If bitcoin fails, EVERY alt will fail. So I would prefer Awesominer to profit switch algos and pools to instantly convert to bitcoin, which it does. But my only complaint is what Awesominer is telling me I am making per day is no where near reality. Awesomeminer needs to get a better algo or smarter at choosing what coin and pool is best after benchmarking your rig, and be ACCURATE. I don't need something that switches between 50 algos and 4 pools if it doesn't outperform Nicehash app. Don't tell me I am making $2-$4/day/rig when I am really making $1/day (USD from BTC).
Awesome is not magic. You should investigate each pool autoexchange and see what close to reality they are, and calculate the profit. Put nicehash, zpool, Ashaspool etc ... Each one on an equal machine, 24 hours, record the profit averages that each pool promises. When you finish the 24 hours, you will observe the differences of the estimate obtained, with that you can make a rule of 3 and obtain the real Profit of each auto exchange. It's something we should all do, Awesome can not do that for you. Even I usually get that value for each pool / currency to get closer to reality. |
|
|
|
|
Contrary to what other users say to reduce the price, I do not see it well, the program is worth what it costs. Instead of a price reduction, I prefer an improvement in the quality of the data, since it is the fundamental part on which the program is based.
If you do not make a profit today, it is that you do not dedicate enough effort to look for new coins, new masters to mine etc. If you only mine what others mine, then if you do not earn money use or do not use Awesome miner With which a drop in prices does not make sense, I prefer a better program with better data quality to a cheaper program with the wrong data.
It is a software of a payment, there is no recurring payment unless you use the separate online module, which will only be used the day you provide me with detailed statistics.
So I support the price that goes on like this, it is a good job that PAtrike has done, and focus on improving the data and functions, to lower the price. It is not so expensive at all, its price seems quite adequate. I just want a better program, and have more control over the data and prices.
|
|
|
|
Hello @patrike, I would like to explain to you one of the problems and the solutions we can have.
Awesome miner is a great program, but it depends on obtaining data from the coins. What happens that according to the source, because WTM, Coinwarz or CC, and maybe some day Shit to mine, each one gives the price of a different site and that many, but that often gives us not real values of price, because we They give the price they want and it does not match our exchanges. In this way efficiency is lost in the auto profit.
I think you should do a job here, because this is the basis of your program. My idea or suggestion, is that even if the data is collected from these webs, the price is deducted directly from the exchanges. The same thing that AW CU does, in which we put the data by hand, but read the prices of the exchanges prices. And best of all, I could say XVG I want the price of Graviex, I mean, to be able to choose for each currency the exchange where I want the price, and if it is not, then the exchange that has a price similar to that of the exchange that I use. I would choose it, and if I do not choose it, I would show the highest one.
It is very frustrating to mine a currency at a higher price than what I am really selling it, because maybe it takes the price of a rare exchange.
Like AW CU, it reads the prices of a dozen exchanges, but always shows the highest and that is unreal, because normally the highest corresponds to a rare exchange of low volume. To be able to increase the amount of coins with shittomine, and to be able to specify in each currency the exchange that I want the price, would make a huge change. Also if left by default it would show the higher price.
But the simple idea of many more currencies, and more realistic prices to the exchanges we work, can make a big difference, but now that the market is so low.
I also consider that what I ask or suggest, is the most important part of this program, the quantity and quality of the data. You can not take whattomine prices that can be different from CC or coinwarz, but being able to choose the exchange where you look at the price per coin, would be a step forward that many would appreciate and raise a step more the quality of Awesome miner in front of their competition.
It is very normal, very recurrent that many times we are undermining with exaggerated prices, for that reason, you should collect the prices of the exchanges, apart from the data of the pages of currency. In two different processes. It gives you more control and many more coins if you add Shittomine
Those that seem good idea, please comment, because if many people support these ideas, patrike will think more.
Since earlier this week, I have been in contact with the admin of ShitToMine about adding API support for Awesome Miner. No decisions are made yet, but I'm open for adding it in Awesome Miner. CoinCalculators.io do have a concept of Highest Bid / Lowest Ask, but they are not yet exposed over their API. I think the Highest Bid is a value that might be of interest for you so I've reached out to them to see if this can be a value to provide to Awesome Miner. UPDATE: This has been sorted out now and I've just finished the implementation in Awesome Miner where you can select if you want CoinCalculator statistics with Highest Bid or Lowest Ask - and as a bonus I also made it configurable to get the coin difficulty based on Current, 3h, 6h or 24h. In addition to the above, I do see your point about being able to get the coin exchange rates directly from the exchanges for the scenarios where the coin statistics providers doesn't deliver an exchange rate that is realistic enough. I will have to explore this a bit more and this could possibly be an improvement that would make sense to add. ask moobidoo (is it written like this?), in AW CU he reads the prices of different exchanges, so it is something that can be done, and then if you also define a pool of a currency, you can choose the Exchange from where you take the price, then the program would be perfect. I remember again that many times it happens that new coins that are in several exchanges, shows the highest value and is usually the smallest exchange without volume, so AW CU also fails in that sense. Being able to choose from the exchange list that you read the prices, the one I use, would certainly be a big step forward The program can have 1000 functions, but the base of the program is the mining and the QUALITY of the data. That quality right now does not exist, sometimes it gives the sale price, sometimes the purchase according to the web where you read it, WTM, CC etc ... at the moment I can say in the pool when defining it, I want the price of CryptoBridge for this currency, the result would be PERFECT. It is the base of Awesome miner, to more data and more quality of the same, better control of the mining and of course of profits. It has already happened too many times to mine at prices that did not correspond to reality. |
|
|
|
|
For when the first exchange ?. There danger of there being a lot of accumulation of coins in the master, and the more accumulation the more the price will fall when going out in exchange because they will sell more. Law of supply and demand.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello @patrike, I would like to explain to you one of the problems and the solutions we can have.
Awesome miner is a great program, but it depends on obtaining data from the coins. What happens that according to the source, because WTM, Coinwarz or CC, and maybe some day Shit to mine, each one gives the price of a different site and that many, but that often gives us not real values of price, because we They give the price they want and it does not match our exchanges. In this way efficiency is lost in the auto profit.
I think you should do a job here, because this is the basis of your program. My idea or suggestion, is that even if the data is collected from these webs, the price is deducted directly from the exchanges. The same thing that AW CU does, in which we put the data by hand, but read the prices of the exchanges prices. And best of all, I could say XVG I want the price of Graviex, I mean, to be able to choose for each currency the exchange where I want the price, and if it is not, then the exchange that has a price similar to that of the exchange that I use. I would choose it, and if I do not choose it, I would show the highest one.
It is very frustrating to mine a currency at a higher price than what I am really selling it, because maybe it takes the price of a rare exchange.
Like AW CU, it reads the prices of a dozen exchanges, but always shows the highest and that is unreal, because normally the highest corresponds to a rare exchange of low volume. To be able to increase the amount of coins with shittomine, and to be able to specify in each currency the exchange that I want the price, would make a huge change. Also if left by default it would show the higher price.
But the simple idea of many more currencies, and more realistic prices to the exchanges we work, can make a big difference, but now that the market is so low.
I also consider that what I ask or suggest, is the most important part of this program, the quantity and quality of the data. You can not take whattomine prices that can be different from CC or coinwarz, but being able to choose the exchange where you look at the price per coin, would be a step forward that many would appreciate and raise a step more the quality of Awesome miner in front of their competition.
It is very normal, very recurrent that many times we are undermining with exaggerated prices, for that reason, you should collect the prices of the exchanges, apart from the data of the pages of currency. In two different processes. It gives you more control and many more coins if you add Shittomine
Those that seem good idea, please comment, because if many people support these ideas, patrike will think more.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
