Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 04:54:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
501  Local / Барахолка / Re: [Предзаказ] Bitfury ASIC 65nm on: July 08, 2013, 04:36:33 PM
krab, он видимо увидел "FREE MONEY" в названии англоязычной ветки и понял это по-своему  Grin
502  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 08, 2013, 03:38:53 PM
Yifu's name and face are known. He doesn't seem to have gotten any bad attention from the Chinese government.

They are dealing with potential security issues in china. e.g. ngzhang  doesn't drive his own car anymore, doesn't use his old cellphone, doesn't live where he used to...

They have physically secured the transportation route between them and the shipper in hopes of preventing damaged avalons (said 6-7 Avalons had  broken corners or damage).

Avalon bribe a DHL manager because they want to push their devices out of the country ? evidence please?
Friedcat was showing his self in the conference in Shanghai.

could any one tell me, how to give a non-exist tracking number to our customers?


first, we send the packages to HK-DHL agent.

agent transport them to HK, a few days time.

packages picked up at HK.

after about 1 week, they will give us the tracking number if we ask for.

to most country, 1 week time is enough for a delivery.

if anything goes wrong, like custom issues happened or wrong tel number or something , our agent will call us, give us the tracking number, let us contect with our customer. i think multiple people get my email when they having custom issues or DHL can not find you.

why we use such a screwed work flow?

1, save shipment cost.
2, if we go to DHL directly, they didn't accept this device, there is PSU and FANs in it, which is contraband. only these agent can send them out by doing some bribery work. if we tell them we are not satisfied, they simply ask us to deal with DHL ourself instead.

fuck

I beg you guys to use your google next time.
503  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1100GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: July 08, 2013, 02:15:00 PM
Considering BFL have been too lazy to make P2Pool a consideration, they really should throw some of that BTC1000 donation fund they setup towards forrestv, cg and bfgminer teams for doing this work for them.

They just don't care. Josh doesn't even know what is p2pool. This perfectly fits his "money printing" conception. They should start shipping standalone miners with pre-set standard config: main pool Guild, backup pool 50BTC, option to set your MtGox and bank account, so after quick configuration you just power it up and receive USD straight to your account, and forget about bitcoins Grin
504  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1000GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: July 08, 2013, 12:16:10 PM
node: lenny.dnsd.me:9332
I setup BE Blade to use +1 pseudoshare (+1 to username). However, I am still getting these errors, but not so often as before.
Log below:
There's also someone mining on my node right now on BE Blade (12.6GH/s hashrate, 7.6GH/s of it - DOA). Looks like he setup +1 to username as well.

I cannot prevent other users to connect to my node and start mining with BE Blades. If they will not setup +1 to username, my p2pool log will be spammed with thousands of error messages. How to fix it in p2pool code?

50% DOA is just what is expected and it will probably drop to about 18% after share period switch.

Blades send diff1 shares regardles of what the node tells, so if the difficulty is set higher, a part of pseudoshares will be reported 'hash > target'. Those rare cases reported when you set diff to 1 are just hardware errors which are not filtered by the blade's software (my AM USB's chip produces about 1% or less HW errors depending on temperature).

Any code tweaks most likely won't decrease your node load. If you want to get rid of these messages in your log, just comment out lines 413 to 415 in p2pool/work.py.
505  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 07, 2013, 10:51:55 PM
If China is such a heaven, why do Avalon need to bribe a DHL manager to push their devices out of the country? And why doesn't friedcat reveal his name? I live in a post-communist country and here the less attention you receive from government organizations the better.
506  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 07, 2013, 09:36:59 PM


Do you understand how laws work? It DOES mean we (and more pointedly, friedcat) need to pay tax. Do you think a company that digs gold out of the ground and then sends gold to their shareholders would be tax-exempt?

Tax codes are FAR, FAR more complex than you seem prepared to accept. This sort of circumstance is covered for anything that has a fair market exchange rate (and bitcoin does, as we are well aware).

Obviously, you are made it more false, Law recognized Gold as a commodity , not BTC~~~ how could you use the totally different concept to make this false comparison ? Huh 

OK, forget BTC. When you move something like mining devices across the border, especially in quantities, you must declare it. When declaring, you must state the price. Either friedcat undervalues the devices or declares full price, it will eventually attract customs' attention.
507  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 07, 2013, 08:53:18 PM
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
Of course , In China is absolutely no tax duty on receiving Gift...I can buy a diamond rings no matter how much it worth and gives to my girlfriend as my girlfriend appreciate to me gives me back no matter what the size of BTC...
Volume of the transaction isn't change the basic principle of BTC that isn't recognized as money by the government! Which countries you lived that request people to pay duty when they exchange their gift??? I am highly doubt this government can be existed without riot within those angry people.

If Chinese Government stated that they recognized BTC as a money , I think this great....super good news for us...we will see BTC soon hit 10000USD.



Don't you see the difference between giving a diamond ring personally and sending thousands of devices all over the world? First, it's too noticeable for tax office and customs. And second, you can't just say that you have such many friends and send them gifts all the time.
508  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 07, 2013, 07:49:01 PM
Western thoughts isn't the same in China. For Friedcat he selling his devices by receiving BTC.. First of all ,Chinese government isn't recognized BTC as a money..Thus logically, they are trading stuffs with stuffs, no law in China indicated people trading stuff with stuff need to registered with the government.
Just like you and me , we are friend, you gives me a computer ,as I appreciate what you did ,I give you back a BTC...Do we need to registered our gift transaction to the government Huh Are you insane Huh

It's all about volume. In most countries you cannot legally "receive a gift" of "trade stuffs with stuffs" worth millions USD without paying tax or at least registering your deal properly.
509  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1000GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: July 07, 2013, 07:10:23 PM
1
lenny.dnsd.me:9332 updated Smiley

It's interesting how AM blades wil perform after the switch. According to my calculations, they must still have about 18% DOA  Sad

That's sad. Wonder to know, if I will manage to get 100% efficiency Sad

BTW I have newest p2pool from git master branch. How to fix these errors (BE Blade mining)?
Code:
2013-07-07 19:48:23.922620 P2Pool: 17462 shares in chain (17466 verified/17466 total) Peers: 6 (0 incoming)
2013-07-07 19:48:23.922785  Local: 13672MH/s in last 5.6 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~59.6% (54-65%) Expected time to share: 9.0 minutes
2013-07-07 19:48:23.922883  Shares: 2 (0 orphan, 2 dead) Stale rate: ~100.0% (34-100%) Efficiency: ~0.0% (0-86%) Current payout: 0.0000 BTC
2013-07-07 19:48:23.922992  Pool: 1097GH/s Stale rate: 22.7% Expected time to block: 23.2 hours
2013-07-07 19:48:23.928893 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:23.929048     Hash:   a05aa5b108837b213bff4705f6909066d4c01edd2cfbfdd75c0b919d
2013-07-07 19:48:23.929188     Target: 485f60345db91c000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:23.937017 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:23.937258     Hash:   df476abf298776044878cc3f070f8e6b4312ee14b06fb31a8683f066
2013-07-07 19:48:23.937387     Target: 485f60345db91c000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:24.259964 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:24.260147     Hash:   d6a0358698bf77396d47fc27a261327a89b533b0e053dfe68699cc05
2013-07-07 19:48:24.260246     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:24.747383 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:24.747589     Hash:   7b459de0e13f928c2595d145a95c669166a54c4a5e7976952774e4d0
2013-07-07 19:48:24.747691     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:24.877765 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:24.877950     Hash:   93192b3f1b9863eed64a7f099bd594893c9cfcdde6d88061b0e5fb2e
2013-07-07 19:48:24.878049     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:25.413071 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:25.413297     Hash:   791be9497d311418544d32d10f3307d241828e9a27c1a7a2ba5eb5b6
2013-07-07 19:48:25.413400     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:25.420694 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:25.420837     Hash:   be1d5918ddd8894c94197245e88d6adb3384f40fa719e59e4428c2b2
2013-07-07 19:48:25.420874     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:26.347089 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:26.347286     Hash:   7fdefddad6b86859392ace66bbc3960c4d58a0f5c7ee93ada08ed93c
2013-07-07 19:48:26.347412     Target: 485f60345db91c000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:26.528118 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:26.528331     Hash:   9ea676585fcdb2729a3a7175e2ffc5421fcc269eafe8feedaade83d8
2013-07-07 19:48:26.528452     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2013-07-07 19:48:26.534254 Worker pioruns10_beblade submitted share with hash > target:
2013-07-07 19:48:26.534432     Hash:   803a15090454a4e2880229dffc923d4d59c807d8c3c558f593730f5b
2013-07-07 19:48:26.534530     Target: 3ccf1029e7d6b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Try to set your pseudoshare difficulty to 1 (username+1)
510  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1000GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: July 07, 2013, 03:32:54 PM
It's interesting how AM blades wil perform after the switch. According to my calculations, they must still have about 18% DOA  Sad
511  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service on: July 07, 2013, 01:44:31 PM
Burnin, do all the board's chips share the same 32-bit nonce range? How often can work be restarted?

512  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: July 07, 2013, 01:05:27 PM
btw, people "dumping" in the last few weeks are in general not "people that need the money", they are scared "investors", thinking the price is falling to the floor and their dream of "getting rich quick" is in ruins.

Personally, and being really harsh, these are chumpsters and the bitcoin economy is better off without them.

They will be back at next price rise to blow another bubble.
513  Economy / Auctions / Re: [WTS] 2 GH/s of perpetual mining bonds. Please post if interested. on: July 07, 2013, 12:59:44 PM
Strange that nobody is interested. Where are all those who buy PMBs at 4+ BTC/GH at exchanges  Huh
Should I lower the price to 3?
514  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [POLL] Why don't you mine in p2pool? on: July 07, 2013, 09:56:46 AM
Great news!

P2Pool release 13.0  - HARDFORK, UPGRADE REQUIRED - commit hash: f3a0e8dfcd872716123771db7900cdcd963b91ce

Windows binary: http://u.forre.st/u/xqerwrpk/p2pool_win32_13.0.zip
Windows binary signature: http://u.forre.st/u/viejmrru/p2pool_win32_13.0.zip.sig
Source zipball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/zipball/13.0
Source tarball: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/tarball/13.0

After 50% of each P2Pool's mining power has upgraded, warnings will be displayed to everyone who hasn't upgraded. Approximately 24 hours after 95% of the mining power has upgraded, the switch will happen.

Changes:
* Hardfork at 95% upgraded:
** Bitcoin share period increased from 10 to 30 seconds to cater to ASIC miners. Avalon/BFL/ASICMINER devices should start working well after this.
** Litecoin share period increased from 10 to 15 seconds
** Litecoin payouts spread over 3 block-lengths instead of 12, reducing dust payouts
** Transaction pre-forwarding greatly simplified, allowing future network traffic reductions
** Maximum share difficulty multiplier increased from 10x to 30x to give more freedom to below share difficulty adjustments
** OP_RETURN used in last txout to prevent UTXO database spam
** Stratum nonce length increased from 4 to 8 bytes, allowing for future Avalon support without having to use the "avalon" branch

* Automatically increase share difficulty to prevent payouts below "dust threshold", 0.001 BTC and 0.03 LTC
* Automatically increase share difficulty to prevent any single node from making more than 5% of shares, by default
* Worker username parameters (+PSEUDOSHARE_DIFF/SHARE_DIFF) not longer have to be in a specific order
* Support for submitblock RPC call in new Litecoin versions
* Fixed incompatibility with ASICMINER BE Blade
* Updated bootstrap address list
515  Economy / Lending / Re: CoinLenders :: Get bitcoin loans, and earn interest on your deposits! on: July 06, 2013, 12:05:13 AM
I still haven't received my direct tx from CoinLenders to inputs.io. Could it be because I created account on inputs.io after sending coins?
516  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [NVC][P2Pool] Public node + source code! on: July 05, 2013, 06:24:43 PM
UPDATE 05/07
IMPORTANT

Everyone who downloaded Windows binaries before this update must clear their data/novacoin directory. Accidentally, it contains a cached public key, which will be used as your node's default mining address if you don't delete it! Download link fixed.
517  Economy / Lending / Re: CoinLenders :: Get bitcoin loans, and earn interest on your deposits! on: July 05, 2013, 05:12:59 PM
Inputs.io lags hard.
Direct deposit from CoinLenders has not appeared after 20 minutes now.
Code:
Your confirmed balance: NaN BTC
Is it being DDoSed?
518  Economy / Auctions / Re: [WTS] 2 GH/s of perpetual mining bonds. Please post if interested. on: July 05, 2013, 10:53:14 AM
Oh shit!

Mods please edit the OP, remove all bold/italic. I will always press 'Preview' before posting from now on, I promise. Thank you!
519  Economy / Auctions / [WTS] 2 GH/s of perpetual mining bonds. Please post if interested. on: July 05, 2013, 10:50:06 AM
These are preliminary[/i] auction rules. Please post if interested, ask your questions, suggest your changes to conditions. Start of auction and final rules will be announced in this thread if there is demand.

I want to sell 2 GH/s of perpetual mining bonds in shares of 100MH/s. They are backed by:

- my current available hashrate (~335 MH/s SHA256d + ~1 MH/s scrypt)
- BFL 5GH pre-order from 30 March 2013 = 5 GH/s
- 20 Avalon chips in SebastianJu's group buy (going for assembly to Burnin, who has already shown photo of a ready board) = 6 GH/s
- 32 Avalon chips in t13hydra's group buy + PCBs paid = 10 GH/s
- 2 shares in pidobir's Metabank/Bitfury device group buy = 10 GH/s
- 1 share in SilentSonicBoom's KNC Jupiter group buy = 5 GH/s
- my own funds (yes, I have a job not related to BTC and some history on this forum and take full personal responsibility for dividends payment)

Dividends will be paid each time Bitcoin network difficulty changes (approximately once per 2 weeks).

If requested, I can transfer my shares in the group buys to escrow (they are bound to BTC address, so it's as easy as just posting a signed message to the group's buy thread). Also, a part of funds from this auction may also go to escrow address. You may suggest your way to escrow.

Starting price is 0.35 BTC/share = 3.5 BTC/GHps.

If you would like to buy the PMBs at that price but do not like any of my conditions, please suggest your changes.
520  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] Deprived Mining Speculation (DMS) on: July 05, 2013, 07:46:39 AM
Hi!

How long does it typically take to convert PURCHASE?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!