Zaragota95 used the address 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW to enroll with 12dailycoin 5 days ago, and quoted the post right now, when he got his upfront payment for 10 posts. Username: Zaragota95 Current Post Count: 31 Current Rank: Jr.Member Bitcoin Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1322129.msg13613417#msg13613417The same address was used by randchingo to claim a giveaway 11 days ago. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1320565.msg13497271#msg13497271Done! Will PM you my email Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
The user copperhorse111 signed a message from that address 13 days ago to get a loan here: -Amount: 0.03 BTC -Duration: 10 Days -Collateral: 3 70 Activity Member account I have -Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW -Return: 0,033 10% interest Signed message, IF3F3mcJ8H/7VWsTFWTtTs84QXfJeM7CspC8Q1G2AV/SDmfeSi4M7/r6V2b29dHqchdBMzQK/Rrt/thUy52sCas= I'm copperhorse111, I'm taking a loan from grtthegreat and using this account, cointtoo and NETFix as collateral on 01/07/2015 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
From the signed message, I read that you also own cointtoo and NETFix, and gave them as collateral to grtthegreat.
The address 1Y2TzeLBX7Mz56NjUdMaVDXtNq9vb5sYt is used by bikoBoy (which you admitted to own right now) to enroll with 12dailycoins.com here 5 days ago: Username: bikoBoy Current Post Count: 263 Current Rank: Member Bitcoin Address: 1Y2TzeLBX7Mz56NjUdMaVDXtNq9vb5sYt
The account NETFix (the one I mentioned above already) uses the same address in a tipster competition by directbet 20 days ago here: Name : NETFix Bankroll : 100 mBTC Address : 1Y2TzeLBX7Mz56NjUdMaVDXtNq9vb5sYt
Addresses 1Y2TzeLBX7Mz56NjUdMaVDXtNq9vb5sYt and 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW are connected through the transaction 9d89ff5f26cfedec6f90120180b5ac5e8ba318250935eed07012d62b7af90f80.
From this I take that you currently own at least the accounts Zaragota95, randchingo, bikoBoy, copperhorse111, NETFix and cointtoo.
Update: Guess what?! The owner of the alt account group around SulphurXX defaulted on yet another loan. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1222331.msg12801700#msg12801700
|
|
|
Yes these were all at-some-point-in-time my accounts, I sold them all at different periods but currently only own bikoboy and randchingo
So why did today Zaragota95 post the address 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt which you clearly got the private key to? Might wanna update this list of accounts you "only own".
Just posting an address is not proof that you control the private key to that address. A scammer could potentially post one of your addresses in an attempt to frame you for being an alt of his. I am not saying that is what happened in this situation (I have really not looked into it), however it is a possibility
Possible, but posting that address when enrolling into a signature campaign seems to me not like trying to frame someone. It seems however like that user wants to be paid to said address. Therefore I believe the account is still in possession of the person who posted above that he "only" owns bikoBoy and randchingo at this moment.
|
|
|
There are actually 3 seeds. Server, client and private/secret seed. nvm, don't want to get into this conversation about seeds. I'm a developer and I find it waste of time talking about such stuff with people who don't understand code, no offense. Was just pointing out that flagging users for this specific matter isn't the best way to act. Peace
Don't know on which sites you bet, but those sites I've been to only use a client seed and a server seed. I never had problems verifying my bets with only those two seeds either. You seem not to understand things, not mexxer-2 and me, but hey you're a "developer".
|
|
|
Added and, yes I have seen the post(Still opened), will be posting a SS as a conf. shortly. Edit: Adding the other one you just added.
The post by randchingo was done at 01:36:19, the one by zaragota95 was done at 01:36:48, in the meantime the first post was deleted. Don't really think its a false flag Addresses 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G used by randchingo and 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt used by Zaragota95 and SulphurXX are part of the same wallet https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/030e925e662467ff/addresses
besides randchingo following accounts are using the 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G address: botboy24, faince222, smoothaces, moneybat, bikoBoy and coaloreMah number is 32, Addy: 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G
Loan Request: Amount of BTC wanted:0.001 Optional Collateral (If you want a 100% of getting accepted): Account?! , 1 SWC chip (worth exactly 0.001 but has a 20 chip minimum cashout limit. Date Of Repayment: 10/23/2014 Interest: 100% Reason: Made a small rounding up error and only fees short. This loan is just open for the hour ~to about 12 forum time.. address: 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G
1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G
Username: Bikoboy Bankroll: 1 BTC Address: 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G
Mah number is 32, Addy: 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G
bikoBoy and randchingo connect both lists, hence all accounts in either list have been (at least at some point) in the possession of one and the same owner. All those guys are alt accounts of the loan defaulter SulphurXX!
|
|
|
Since this is getting longer than expected, I decided to order my post a bit. This is going to list the accounts connected with addresses from the following wallet: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/030e925e662467ff/addressesOne account worth mentioning is the loan defaulter SulphurXX. A second wallet connected with the person is this one: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4e1113de21ed6512/addressesAccounts connected with addresses from that wallet will also be listed here.
Accounts connected with the address 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt: gio3442, gandalfar, Patton000, dodo42221, mariding, jokucoin, SulphurXX, bikoBoy and Zaragota95.
Proof: Post count: 32 BitcoinTalk name: gio3442 Address: 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt
I think I'm late but anyway 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt
Username : Zaragota95 Current Post count : 32 Rank : Jr. Member BTC address :1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1132608.msg11950999#msg119509991GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt Thanks!
Username : bikoboy Bankroll : 1000 mBTC Address : 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1155908.msg12180131#msg12180131- Name: SulphurXX - Bitcoin address: 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt - Bankroll: 0.01 BTC
Addresses 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt and 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d48eccf4f6fae8d137c209fb79939e0891dae3e53fc4e303af77d144510a59c4Accounts connected with the address 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G: botboy24, faince222, smoothaces, moneybat, bikoBoy and coalore
Proof: Listed in another post that can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13605983#msg13605983aswell as: Another alt of this person is randchingo (who aswell got negative feedback on his account), he posted with the wrong account in the DoubleBot sig thread. Sadly, I couldn't archive those fast enough, so there is only a screenshot: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs6.postimg.org%2Fxmwgt0w01%2FPost1.png&t=663&c=GCSczJkbJLwANQ) Some minutes later, he deleted it and posted with his other account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1329156.msg13605756#msg13605756
Addresses 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt and 1KVrfMfuhXXHxAdoDmurfWmKSLr77rWgfj are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/d48eccf4f6fae8d137c209fb79939e0891dae3e53fc4e303af77d144510a59c4Accounts connected with the address 1KVrfMfuhXXHxAdoDmurfWmKSLr77rWgfj: gio44
Proof:
Addresses 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G and 1GEDYMfrVA8F18K4STnnFpca48CoJzxQme are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/c5baaaad747505d15584f7d5e151f2387598a311cbe8828d9212dd4ee3a8c54bAccounts connected with the address 1GEDYMfrVA8F18K4STnnFpca48CoJzxQme: MezoK, Exther2 and SideShow
Proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1008724.msg10947230#msg109472301GEDYMfrVA8F18K4STnnFpca48CoJzxQme Lol. Forgot the calender day Tongue The only one in which someone with positive trust randomly give people 0.1 Each Tongue
and with today's rakeback Here's the first withdrawal request! User: exther Amount: 1,007 Chips 0.10007 BTC BTC Address: 1GEDYMfrVA8F18K4STnnFpca48CoJzxQme @Admin further confirmation can be done by contacting my e-mail address added in the account during registration.. Thanks!
bump 1GEDYMfrVA8F18K4STnnFpca48CoJzxQme
Addresses 1GVBu7pgYnpCVMx9yrjKKCF3sTTCSZ3FUt and 16uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/1b194daa5dc056d14b3440d912712b8006f214929f4aa99f8c38c09eabf9ee3bAccounts connected with the address 16uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW: sulphurX, taekwondoma, retes12345 and howzar
Proof: BTC addy: 16uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1132608.msg11950214#msg1195021416uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW Thanks!
16uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW
still on? I doubt but anyway: 16uFRew4JZ6WxxMLyBhHFgXSKQKBJfDkmW
Addresses 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G and 1DLy3EwYCYZU4gUhjoPcAHUZvAKNsQL5cu are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/79a8a16979b7f7bfaab0d9d84f874e2ca1a0d1f34607e48310027823c02b3ff5Accounts connected with the address 1DLy3EwYCYZU4gUhjoPcAHUZvAKNsQL5cu: LockedLogic
Proof: Done and just liked the facebook page too, My address: 1DLy3EwYCYZU4gUhjoPcAHUZvAKNsQL5cu
Addresses 1PG6Azy3pa6N53YpezdSjFqjG2EWVsas8G and 1B5DSkxn7WAxRWjtJxR9MoEnKoEoxqa5e2 are connected through the following transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/79a8a16979b7f7bfaab0d9d84f874e2ca1a0d1f34607e48310027823c02b3ff5Accounts connected with the address 1B5DSkxn7WAxRWjtJxR9MoEnKoEoxqa5e2: jokucoin
Proof: Message: username: jokucoin amount: 0.012 BTC BTC Address: 1B5DSkxn7WAxRWjtJxR9MoEnKoEoxqa5e2 collateral: BTCT Account + Special Offer Repayment: 0.0132 BTC Date of repayment: 25/08/15 address for repayment: 14RwtwDvtTiYJu4AiD38bvmtkRqSJFthCN signed with: 18fZyjcEiP856yYHb1K3r2uKVe3t4ysSdJ Signature: IO5oOiiK5iV3BudDfUCp7xSoMTZnokQcyM0W4dWVAQYXt4TkIuIVslTn0Kh6OE2E9l2DCQBJYwYcXXoPxOJzS9U=
Another addresses used by Zaragota95 and randchingo is the address 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW, which is part of the following wallet: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/4e1113de21ed6512/addresses
Accounts connected with the address 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW: Zaragota95, randchingo and copperhorse111
Proof: Username: Zaragota95 Current Post Count: 31 Current Rank: Jr.Member Bitcoin Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1320565.msg13497271#msg13497271Done! Will PM you my email Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
-Amount: 0.03 BTC -Duration: 10 Days -Collateral: 3 70 Activity Member account I have -Address: 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW -Return: 0,033 10% interest Signed message, IF3F3mcJ8H/7VWsTFWTtTs84QXfJeM7CspC8Q1G2AV/SDmfeSi4M7/r6V2b29dHqchdBMzQK/Rrt/thUy52sCas= I'm copperhorse111, I'm taking a loan from grtthegreat and using this account, cointtoo and NETFix as collateral on 01/07/2015 1CRBDuT62K3NpoUTUsCzdFTn79rLvBcDyW
From the signed message of the last post, we get that the users cointtoo and NETFix are also owned by the same person. (those two accounts aswell as copperhorse111 are currently held collateral by grtthegreat, the loan is due today.) More proof of their connection can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13613499#msg13613499
|
|
|
2) Because you should read OP: Added are websites that are at least few months old and have some decent amount wagered (only Bitcoin websites!)
Just mentioning the Just-Dice stats : Total Amounts Wagered : 23,715,818.43925442 Bets Made : 1,104,192,439 Invested : 1,146,463.26506667 Also from the campaign spreadsheet : http://www.chainroll.com/ [Site shut down] Bets my by dicecoin.io :180,991,579 [which is way lesser than just-dice] The Sheet needs to be updated indeed. Just-Dice uses Clam, in case you didn't discover that yet. And clam and bitcoin are not the same, they are indeed different coins. Thats the reason why Just Dice won't be on this overview. Not because of the wagered amount. And here I stand, thinking that bolding the important part would be obvious enough for everyone...
|
|
|
Question : Why the thread is resurrected ? How come Just-Dice has never made it to that list? Requesting op to add justdice to the list,its running since a long time by one of our own forum members.
Answers: 1) Because the sheet has been updated recently. 2) Because you should read OP: Added are websites that are at least few months old and have some decent amount wagered (only Bitcoin websites!)
3) Nope.
|
|
|
The exchange was created just to trade the POS pump and dump schemes or other fully pre-mined shitcoins,but they should be added unless they them selves are scamming people or having an unfair dice system.
YoBit dice is a little gimmick, not their main feature. You can only play on x2 multiplier and they got a 2% house edge. That's nothing compared to the features of the other sites listed here. Looks like the spreadsheet has not been updated since long.
Call Oxford, the new definition of "since long" is 3 days. Added fastdice, some minor fixes.
|
|
|
ore-mine was paying for ~2 years, I believe that just as how scam campaigns arent listed here, campaigns without escrow also shouldnt be listed
Setting campaigns without escrow at the same level as campaigns for e.g. DoubleBot or 12coins is ridiculous. Some campaigns without escrow are really stable, running for a long time and paying on point every week. Also, this overview would be down to 4 capaigns, with 2 of them being LuckyBtcCasino, and all of them being closed for new participants, if you would remove non-escrow campaigns. If you don't like them, don't join them, easy as that, that's why the fact whether or not a campaign escrows funds is listed in OP. But removing them would be removing the "overview" character of this thread, as 80% of campaigns would be missing in this thread.
|
|
|
I told what I could here. You are not on my side and cannot see the situation. Very nice, I will also add send a request about your person to the police, because it looks like you threaten to kill me. It is a reason for you to go to a prison. Be more kind and do not forget that you have only one life. Life is not only a money. If you so blind and cannot see the difference between scam and business problems and you are making a danger for my life I am closing this thread and will not post here anymore. I CAN NOT save a business currently and it is not the same as to steal somebodies money by own decision. I am not a scammer and who gave you the right to say so? Bad investments, bad management or a bad luck, anything, but not scam. There were no deliberately from my side. Another people are a reason of the situation. I will do all I can to return the site and to pay for all investors back. But, most likely, I will not say any more public words here from this moment because it is taking too serious for my safety. If I will be able to resolve the problem, I PROMISE to all of you that you will see ore-mine online again.
Sounds like you try to blame anyone but yourself, and like you search for reasons to vanish permanently. Not realy helping your case here, for any thing else, EcuaMobi said enough.
|
|
|
If they are arranged according to the house edge and in an ascending order then i guess the sites with variable edge and with the maximum of 1 percent should be on top rather than the bottom,like rollin and betterbets.
It's probably fixed house edge first, then those with variable house edge. And those groups internally are sorted from low to high.
|
|
|
Then why are you not giving -e trust to gambling sites? Innocent people still loose money at gambling site, so why not give them red mark? Moreover if you say they are 18+ and they can do what they want, then why not with other sites, no site force anyone. To participants : Please wait some hours, I have lots of PM and other stuff, I will soon tell you about your status, the rates and all. Stay tuned.
Maaaaybe it's because gambling sites are open about their house edge and don't promise things they can't possibly deliver, something like: "200% Payout ★ 100% Payouts Guaranteed" - which is a lie and nothing else. But that's only a wild guess, what do I know ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Seahawks (+1.5) at Seahawks starting at 1:05 EST Sunday
That's my pick, where do I place the bet? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I always wanted to find out how the hawks offence would play against their legion of boom. Would be a killer matchup though...
|
|
|
you do realize its like 4 in the morning in russia right?
Actually, it's somewhat between 7am and 5pm, depending on where in russia exactly you are.
|
|
|
-snip- It is correct, but I'm afraid that this is working only by now. With time there will be farm of Full, Senior accounts with negative trust and will rise red trust sig campaign plague.. Hopefully not.
No worries ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) The ponzies we neg-tag today won't live long enough to see any of their advertisers turn Full Member or higher.
|
|
|
Do you still belive that warning users with negative trust that they will get negative trust will work?
Yep But.. We can't do nothing more.
Accepting it, is the first step to avoid making unnecessary drama in bitcointalk For scammers is easy to make 10 or more accounts and spam around. Giving them negative trust changing nothing. But, what I know.. I think it's working. You're right, they can create 10 new accounts and farm them to junior in almost no time. And we will give those farmed junior accounts neg trust, not only for the reason that they have to be tagged accordingly, but also to keep higher value accounts from joining those campaigns. We see very few Full/Senior Members, and absolutely none higher, to join those ponzi campaigns. That's one thing those neg-tags have achieved. Those campaigns only get advertised with member signatures or lower, which are far less flashy than the signatures in higher groups.
|
|
|
Payout will be based on the following table (round 6):And here is our Tweet of the week: https://twitter.com/YsyBibney/status/688148087496249347Crypto-Games.net guarantees fair play technology and best fruit slot with the most useful fruit Congratulations to Oksid. You might love to hear that our slot is going to have 25% more fruits soon! Payment information has been submitted, payments will be done anytime soon.
|
|
|
Hey guys,
when adzino resigned as campaign manager, he announced me as a temporary replacement until a new manager is found. We've discussed over the role as campaign manager and came to the conclusion that I will take over this campaign not temporary but permanently.
I've already conducted the last postcount, aswell as some (2 more I think) of them earlier, and I've been running backup for adzino almost as long as he has been managing the campaign. You guys know me and even more important, I know what to do.
That being said, ofc I will also conduct todays post check, it will be done a little earlier than usually (between 7 and 8 UTC I think), more information on when the payment will be made later. I hope we'll have a great time, Lutpin
|
|
|
He earn alot already. See the stats of their investment.. over 100btc
If these stats are true, he already made lots of profit.
Why do you believe someone who is lying about the very nature of his "business" when it comes to how many deposit he has? Of course he wants you to believe that many deposits have been made, that only makes future deposits likelier. I for myself wouldn't trust any number this user puts on the table.
|
|
|
Fair warning:You will recieve negative trust for joining this "best site to invest" signature campaign. Quoting from the last thread: PSA: Anyone joining this campaign will be given a negative trust from EcuaMobi, shorena, me and Lutpin. This is a clear scam and users who wear this signature are doing so for money knowing that others will lose theirs. If they are willing to affect other people's money as long as they earn some themselves then I would think they won't have problems in the future being untrustworthy again. I would not trust someone who does that.
Besides warning newbies not to invest on this site now that negative trust would be a warning to deal with extreme caution with people willing to promote a scam site to earn some coin. I will check the participants of this signature campaign and will add negative trust permanently unless they desist immediately before receiving their payment.
To those participants that have received a negative rating from me.
I will remove the rating if you remove the signature and no payment was claimed. I will rephrase the rating if you remove the signature but claimed payment.
In case you are not aware. You are promoting a ponzi which will eventually collapse. The rating serves as an additional warning.
Edit: EcuaMobi and Shorena have been informed of the thread accordingly
|
|
|
|