The entire "debate" can be summed up in one quote: Science is questions which may never be answered, and religion is answers which may never be questioned." I would much rather admit I don't know that accept made up answers based on bad or no evidence!

This has evolved into a level of crazy I'm not used to seeing outside threads started by Actor_Tom_Truong

On the other hand I would pay good money to see a movie where a pair of Tyrannosaurs murderstomp their way around Noah's ark. It will be called "Forty days of TERROR" and you read about it here first.

Failing that, they could always just ignore the whole creationist b.s. and found a real religion based on being nice to one another that has no creator gods that demand stupid things of them despite never making a properly documented appearance.

I see no evidence in the fossil record to confirm macro-evolution by honest observation.

We should be able to observe mutations that are beneficial if evolution was an observable scientific theory even if natural selection had removed all of the "unfit" genes.  We still have more negative mutations passed on from generation to generation.  In fact, we are getting more mutations that are not beneficial as time goes on.

To understand something takes intelligence.  If our genetic code is so complicated that it is hard to understand then it should tell us something.  Maybe someone intelligent designed the genetic code perhaps?