I think of the user agent as a last line of defense mechanism.

We actually could deploy an upgrade where node would copy the same user agent used by the node speaking to.

This way we would not get REKT/banned by hadfork nodes keeping bug-for-bug compatibility at all costs.

I fully agree with this point.

The situation may eventually turn out in several different ways.

Even if Unlimited succeeds, we have the backup plans. But this is going to be a major blow, because from the economic majority overtake there's only a little effort needed for full network takeover. Once the network is fully taken over, we've pretty much lost control. At that points all bets are off.

Who are these Governments he's speaking of? I see only the masses and a few greedy pigs.

It's getting a little bit of heated in here.





HODL!

I think if you need money simply borrow from normal bank or a friend. I think large scale loans are scam and one of the reasons why the worldwide system keeps crashing every 7 years.

How. We need phone numbers to make accounts, etc.

Bitcoin is bank. A large worldwide bank. You save by buying or mining BTC, and spend by selling BTC.

I think these people are simply testing the waters, threw $ 8 000 000 000 , an attempt to game the system.

If everyting goes the way I understand it, they are going to be really really surprised about the result.

I think migration to quantum proof system would be trivial. No funds would be lost.

I think Americans that you should be worrying. It would be really a shame that some power lines may fail from the storm and that you will not be able to mine some smaller than 1MB blocks.

F2Pool Welcomes Bitcoin Classic Hard Forking Solution But Does Not Actively Support it



    

Greedy NY Bankers 0 : 1 Rest of the world


Chinese miners  ..!..

CLASSIC REKT

Cry more because daddy won't let you burn more juice in his datacenter.

You are wrong. Further discussion is not necessary .

We do not discuss opinion. We discuss the code by Satoshi Nakamoto.



Exactly, my friend. That's why I think this way. Because it's dangerous to you .

If Satoshi Nakamoto comes here, and tells me to remove His 1MB limit, I will do it immediately.

Yes. It's the original rules introduced by Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Nakamoto introduced his 1MB limit to prevent the dust attack also known as the first "stress test".

If you disagree with Satoshi's rules, you're getting on a slippery slope.

It begins with a block size. Is there so much use? Who knows? Who cares?

Next the block time can be put into question. Do we need faster confirmations? But this affects the reward schedule itself. And so on.

In the end we have inflationary paradise no more different than the bailout-plagued system of today.

In short:

Classic, XT, ... REKT

the last one is right?

What about raise limit and clog Bitcoin with dust?

They think they raise the limit and crash system using blocks full of dust.

LOL