I have no idea what is this ENS however let me know if this is listed on a reputed exchange like Binance or Kucoin. If yes then I can fill the request with a 120% plus value against BTC price.

I could do the investigation by my own but I am not at home right now and using my cell phone.

Yeah got that. Great job on the site and I hope you will start adding features too with more staffs like trust, flag etc. Post, Activity, Last Active, Merit, Local time, Website, BTC address are some dynamic column. How are you going to keep them updated. What frequency you are checking each users?

By the way, nice username you have there :-P

Edit:
You really need to PM theymos and request to change the username to something else. From your trust page I already see it has already got attention and obviously I think all those users are correct in their inputs. Your creation seems exciting (on the site) and I really hope you will respect the forum value too.
PS: I left you 5 merits to show some encouragements on your work.

Whatever the link was in your post, it has been removed. And talking about the project, we have LoyceV DdmrDdmr and some other users who scraps forum data and they also have the data you have scrapped so far. I hope you are aware of http://loyce.club site.

Anyway, let's see what you bring up with the data you are collecting. Good luck.

Edit: Just found the IP. First impression is good. I like the thing that I can filter by number of posts and merits. Also the sorting option of the table data.

Give this feature to the users to see x number of data in one page. Right now it's everything in one page and once you will have huge data then I am sure the page will take ages to load.

As OS you require Windows 7 or higher so I do not think your OS has anything to do here.

You downloaded C++ Redistributable? If not then read here. https://www.threesl.com/blog/fixi-api-ms-win-crt-runtime-l1-1-0-dll-missing-error-install/

Don't use an outdated version of Electrum. Always make sure you have latest update with you.

Let me try if I get it correct. Since you are going to use escrow and the new flow will be like this:

BTADDRESS1 (CEO)
ESCROW address
BTADDRESS2 (SHAREHOLDER)
BTADDRESS3 (INTERMEDIARY FOR THE DEAL TO HAPPEN)

If BTADDRESS1 sends to ESCROW address 1 bitcoin
ESCROW address moves  to BTADDERSS3 0.12 bitcoin
ESCROW address moves 0.88 btc to BTADRESS2 at the end of the deal and the smart contract finishes

Did I get it correct?

DarkStar_ is also top guy.

YOSHIE, let's keep the debate of if they will pay or not for a moment but let's talk about your understanding of the business model they have. I am not sure where you from, how experienced you are in online world or if you ever really had this knowledge of stand alone e-commerce and marketplace type of business model.

The way you are progressing with your arguments here, it seems to me that you really do not know what you are talking about but trying to prove that you got everything to rise an accusations. You are actually embarrassing yourself here.

Have you heard of
1. Amazon, eBay, AliBaba, Ali express? (Of course you do unless you are newly civilized from aboriginal tribes or from amazon jungle)
Please explain their business model.

2. Have you heard of next, Binance or River Island?
Please explain who take the credits of a sell in these platforms.

Do you even know why I categories these brands? Someone with a basic understanding will already got the idea of what I am trying to point here. Question is, can you?



Quoted without img tag of some of the mages for reference to show the stupidity came from you after I know your understanding of the questions I have asked above.
Full archive: https://archive.is/ldV9i#selection-4084.1-4093.79

Accepted!

And you can not tell them wrong.

And it's not necessarily need to be right always. They PMed me and said they want to manage their campaign by themselves and I see nothing wrong there.

I did too but I ignored as I got the essence that he wanted to say. I am sure he missed a negative word there to add with the sentence, we all do this kind of mistakes :-P

Royse777 - Australia - bc1qmuw7d9lygyhfxr2ahxvygxjg5v0pp43ydusj33 - 0.0001 BTC - Paid
JSRAW - India - bc1qp4q4lup0ry4qqqk7qspj8ntgrm7e7pwk9g05mqq402k0j76xlcvshrkq5p - 0.0001 BTC - no need
akhjob - Australia - N/A - 0.0001 BTC - Paid
deadley - India - bc1qjwfd79202wfreyv3qu0mygwyt2lpck84upy2smrgeanj66j8gz2s9nl364 - 0.0001 BTC - no need

Rolled over:------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0000 BTC
Total in the pool -------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0004  BTC

Royse777 Tx: c0cc95dc27ad511395a611fd0b9d11108ee9a5b6985e21763a10abe1bb77b2c8

Tx:

Tx: 3296e72d54ef538c9fc0cc853158877e9c3ca9bf3b21983b697bc7e05cfbf144

Tx:

Payment info:
TxID: c810b05625f199cec9c4cf0b16df4b5a5362c40d5d5037e5bc4e5f02f67a1b55

Surprising result in the first ODI. India lost by 10 wickets. India was not even able to give any fight after losing Dhawan in their innings. The bowling unit field with the batting unit. Both Warner and Fintch got century and they won the match with having 74 falls in hand! Can India turn the table in their favor in the 2nd ODI?

Join my Telegram channel for quick update: https://t.me/royseMultiBet
Market: Win - Tie - Win
Send BTC to this address: bc1q0ycsc65x7v2qt30wdt9uw056r6wm5djkp26a209tq23rltsxn0mquqcexa

If you are above member rank then you can send the amount later (after the result) too.
In case of no winning (participants) the total balance will be rolled over to the next pool. I mean this amount will be added as an extra for the next pool we will have.

Match: 2nd ODI, Australia tour of India at Rajkot, Jan 17 2020 @ 08:00 GMT
Last time to place a bet: 20 minutes before the toss event.
Min bet amount: 0.0001 BTC
Max bet amount: 0.005 BTC


How to join?
Response in this thread with:

---

In case of an abandoned match, the stake will be rolled over (deducting the tx fees).
Please always have this in mind that only the tx fees will be taken off from the total pool amount.
You can not change your entry once you post it. What I mean by that is - you can not edit your post.
Each entry for each selection which means you can bet however you want

This is not a discussion topic. Only make a post with your picks in here.
For discussion please jump to: Cricket 🏏 Mutual betting discussion and active betting pools 🏆

---

Current stakes and balance: Please see the next post.

I hope you did not gamble too much with bookies for India. I know it sucks when you end up seeing a result that you have not expected. I have not checked the odds in the bookies so I have no idea who they were favoring. But I am guessing they were favoring India?

PS: I moved 0.0001 BTC from your address to the pool address. Tx: 38b5639c3cc8aaead38a96a31b5ca46093f66392bf91acfccc61e9210a2025ac

It seems you have not yet understood my angle of leaving that feedback counter.

Note: counter.

If I was to say something like this: "The exchange is blab blab with all positive things" then you could say that I left them a nice green trust. I was rarely giving them any feedback if there were no neg from you which is still harsh in my opinion.




Which side you take? Left or Right?

Glad it was spoken out. Thanks bud.

The neutral you left is good enough to warn the visitors now.

On my last post to you, I had this point that you tagged them without doing any investigations of those scam accusations which was clear in your post before me and also tagged them just because they did not use escrow. As always, I can tag them only if they do not pay me after a week and with that I can create a flag 3 too.

Okay, I won LOL
India played very bad cricket. Next match will be interesting.

Please do not start your poetry.

Falg type 1: Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (kinda like neutral tag which really does not carry much value and anyone can create it)
Flag type 2: user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages. (between you and the other party only then you can create one)
Flag type 3 : user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages. (between you and the other party only then you can create one)



Having a trust list always does not mean that one is doing it just to be in the DT network. Having a trust list means that one trust the judgements of user x or y or z or all or does not trust some of those users.

Asking to be excluded? I think you took that job to do.

Seems like your interpretation of trust setting is different than mine. Listen bud, we both do not have anything personal here so let's just move on.

Cheers,

You mean if I start a business then you will not do business with me :-P
Пойми, что я имею в виду

I too do not hand out greens very easily. I have few guys who took large amount of loans and if I was into sending out greens very easily then those guys deserves the greens. I only leave a green when I am 100% confident about it.

I too believe the same. And if I were here to stay in the DT and building up my reputation then I would add users in my trust list and would PM them after with saying that I have added them in my trust list and would also hand out positive feedback to users who I would think may benefit me in future.

I hope you are getting my points here.

Wrong unless you get some of the sarcastic part of my last post. Quoting bitmover and telling he has a point was just a diversion. Enough with the clues.

I can tell you that you have no idea where to send red tag. There are scopes of leaving red tag and leaving neutral tag. But leave it and let's not argue with who is wrong and who is right here. We both realized one thing here so far is that you and me are good in disagreement in this matter.

By now you should have some decent idea that I really less care to be in the DT. So it does not matter for me. I still have doubt that your tag was appropriate there. You can only tag them if they do not pay their participants.

If they agree with you then of-course they should exclude me.

Seriously I have not much idea how they play it. I think I tried in blackjack dot com or io site in here when they had their signature campaign running but lost whatever money I deposited there several times LOL

When I see something to do together in the community I feel very tempted and I am tempted in this one too to contribute/to_be_a_part_of_it. But poor me that I do not know the game.

Just found out they have accepted me in their signature campaign. I applied there yesterday knowing that they do not have any escrow. There are campaigns we have seen without escrow and in the first glance it make sense that they will just scam but in this one, I did not feel any red alarm and this is why I applied (this is my personal experience by the way. Other does not have to have the same feeling). I can be damn wrong and after a week they may not pay me which is very possible but in this case they get red tag from me and also from other DTs or users without any question. But right now giving them red seems too harsh.

There are no question that in this forum it is easy to scam users and as a community we those have good experience, we try to protect them. And you are right that 9 out of 10 times who refuse to escrow turns out scammer. Best_Change can resolve it just by asking for an escrow but I have no idea why they are not doing it however not doing this does not mean that we as a community will force them to do it. This topic by eddie13 is a good read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.0

There are no question that I am new compared to you but this is also true that I also learnt a lot on my way in this forum to protect me and the community. Some of the things but not limited to everything of course is here.

I know when two DT users especially DT user like you who are with the community longer before than me and has a big follow base gets the edge in most of the cases and in this case hearing you actually will benefit me and all those opportunist (the forum is full with opportunist, most of them actually do not care about the community but just pretend to be a part of it) would do this. Shall I do this too?

I think I should but a part of me still says that this is wrong, this is very harsh and this tag of yours should get a counter. A part of me says that I should stand by my decision but if I do then that means that I will be losing my DT status? Does one really need a DT status too speak for what they feel right?

You have a point and I removed my counter.

It's your trust list and you keep it how you want. I will tag them only if they do not pay the participants. The forum users are adult enough and going through the feedback page they can decide what is good for them.

Talking about the green? As long as yours get removed I will remove mine too as mine is serving as the counter of yours. I am really not into leaving feedback and stuffs much by the way.

I really do not see the point to tag someone just because they did not use escrow. My mind is open to listen by the way. Feel free bud.

If they do not pay the bounty and signature campaign participants then they will get red tag. Plain and simple. Can we force them to use escrow? No, we can not.

@YOSHIE, there are two dimension of your topic.
1. You are questioning them not to use escrow
2. Few scam accusations against them. <=== I have not verified them so I really do not have any idea about the status and details of those accusations.

You left them a negative feedback saying:
Note: likely
And also note: Did not use available escrow.

So it turns out that you tagged a user based on your observation (likely fraud) only, did not bother to do an investigation and also you tagged them because they did not use any escrow?

Do we really tag users because they do not use escrow and without any investigation on the scam accusations they have against them?

TMAN left this:
I disagree the Tag and I am going to counter yours. And I will tag them if they do not pay their participants as they promised.