Some will certainly disagree with this proposal, but I think we need to focus more on the present or the recent past.
I have seen users were punished because of a sin they have done 3+ years ago. I think it was plagiarism. I am not against punishment but once a user establish themselves worthy and contributing the forum from long years the forum owe them. Punishing them for a sin that was done years ago is unfair. I too think when reporters are reporting, they should deal with recent posts and when mods are moderating then they should not go back for x amount of time. I understand people will have different opinions.
|
|
|
However, if I make bet, I will do bet for Rafael Nadal, not only I like his energetic and powerful style, but also because he has more experience in final match of GrandSlam.
I will suggest you to watch the next match of Medvedev between him and Dimitrov. You may change your mind. This boy Medvedev is playing some top class Tennis at this moment.
|
|
|
In my life, complete devastation. A debt hole formed. The family is disappointed in me. Banks do not give loans and debts must be repaid immediately. The only person who stayed with me is my wife. I love her so much. I can’t cope with these problems and only my wife holds me in this world. Is it possible to receive a donation or a crypto loan without collateral online? And how is this best done?
One BTC is around $10k now. It's too expensive and valuable. Those who are holding Bitcoin, they know they have a bright future. No one is going to help you with a fraction of BTC unless you have a collateral. They question is why would anyone will help a stranger like you?
|
|
|
It looks like Firefox is doing a good service for crypto enthusiast around the world by blocking third party cookies and cryptominers by default:
Firefox is much more safer than Chrome when it comes to privacy.
|
|
|
My electrum version is 3.1.3, and the bottom left window says synchronizing, but never changes.
I will install latest version and let you know how it goes.
The latest is Electrum-3.3.8 Once you install the latest one, I am pretty sure you will see your coins are there. There are nothing to worry anymore. Good luck Edit: Many thanks for the help.
You are most welcome. I was a bit late to make this post LOL
|
|
|
Are you sure that you have given the correct address to receive the coins? Okay pretty sure your Electrum has connectivity problem or sync problem. You can try installing the latest version. Remember to back up your wallet file or wallet seed. Wallet seed is the safest.
|
|
|
I did not plan for that but it just happened :-P Honestly speaking, when you spend long time online you eventually find yourself posting a lot and that's what happening with me these days. And it's not boring, I can guarantee you :-) By the way, appreciate a lot to bring this reference. Cheers,
|
|
|
UPDATE: I was asked to provide the name of bank employe who signed me bank documantion (confirmation). Do you think that they will finally contact Nova KBM bank and solve this problem?
Thank you
Weird request. No idea but it should not be a matter for you. Your job is to response them and provide the things they asks for. If you already given the information then wait for the next instructions from them. It really sucks to wait so long but you are doing well I think.
|
|
|
Did you guys tail the pick Medvedev reaches the semis? Hope you made money! Could even get to the final. Man I am having the feeling to see him to lift the trophy. This is the best chance for him. The only BIG gun for him is Nadal at the moment. This tournament is not favoring the top ranks anymore.
|
|
|
Getting nervous on the Federer vs Dmitrov final set Dmitrov led 2-0 but Federer is serving. I have a bet on Federer on this one, lol. Medvedev showing how good he really was, I though Wawrinka is going to stop his giant run however, this kid is too good at this point.
Edit: Federer lost the fifth set: 2-6.
I am expecting final between Medvedev and Nadal. Platform is very wide open for Medvedev now since he is not going to face Federer. One can argue that Dmitrov can beat Medvedev and I agree but it's the name and pressure of playing a player like Federer is no more there for Medvedev. WOW, what a great opportunity.
|
|
|
The Ashes 2019 4th Test Australia elected to bat and lost their first wicket for only one run LOL. Just tuned and seeing one down :-P Warner failed again! How many more? Smith and Starc back, that's the good news.
My prediction still stands - Australia to win.
Edit: Guys, battle between Smith and Archer is beautiful.
|
|
|
What kind of enhancements you are looking for? Please specify a bit. Your title and post says complete different two things. Cheers,
|
|
|
He might be thinking of giving seamers little more rest because it's hot and India playing with 3 seamers. The bowling team bowled only 47.1 overs before the wrapping up the WI first innings LOL This excuse also does not adds up :-P
|
|
|
sportsbet88.io does not have a license and operates illegal!
Suck your own dick. You are a disgrace for you company.
|
|
|
Hi guys, We can confirm this is our domain, we mainly use this domain in case people have trouble accessing our main url. Everything is safe and solid. Regards, Lenny Sportsbet.io Thanks for the assurance. I think you need to list all the domains you use in your OP so that users do not get worried about phishing links. I certainly thought it was a phishing attempt but good to know that it was not.
|
|
|
Though it may not be sexually attractive to admit it, if I were running a business it would have to be Bitpay.
I wouldn't want to fuck around with my own exchange accounts on top of BTCpay. I want one agreement that results in fiat winding up in my account no matter what. I would not want any grey areas.
So BitPay is taking BTC from the clients but paying his clients (Merchants) in fiat? For example: I have service with namecheap and I use Bitcoin to pay them. If BitPay is operating like I said in the first line then namecheap is not actually receiving any Bitcoin but they are receiving fiat from BitPay?
|
|
|
Sad to see that Djokovic could not continue after losing first two sets. He retired which means officially Djokovic is out from US Open. Now the platform is wide open for Medvedev.
I do not see much competition for Medvedev to reach to Semi and to face Federer. If he somehow can beat Federer then Nadal will be his next challenge to have his first US Open title.
There are still a lot to unfold in this US Open.
|
|
|
Wait a second. It's not sportsbet.io! The interface looks same but check the URL in the top. What is that I am missing here? Is this sportsbet?
|
|
|
~snip~ Historically Virat doesn't like to give follow on to opposition, guess you missed my post ? he done that atleast 5 times so it makes sense why he didn't opt for follow on.
Yeah, I did see your post the one you are talking about. But adding only 168 and then to declare did not make sense to me. Was he worried about not getting much time to all out WI 2nd innings, or he was worried that rain could interrupt the match? If he was worried about rain interrupt then forcing WI for follow on was perfect decision since you know that they are not in good shape and you want to finish the match as early as you can without wasting time for your innings. If anything left then you always has chance to bat again. If he was worried about not getting much time to all out WI 2nd innings then batting the 2nd innings before WI also does not make sense. In cricketing common sense, it really did not make sense to me. It (the 2nd innings) was a wasted innings for India. Windies need 3 big innings to pull this off. If they win then will criticise virat Kohli's decision and more importantly every one will go gaga ( including me ) and say finally cricket won. This WI team does not have the caliber but that's not the excuse. You can not under estimate your opponent. You can slip anytime if you run out of your options.
|
|
|
He is talking about the 168 runs made in the second innings. Not the lead.
This did not make sense to me. Did Kohli think that they were only 168 runs short with the lead they had in the first innings? It seems like they wasted the 2nd innings. They could ask WI to follow on and can win the match from there. If needed then they could bat later but now it's impossible (assuming WI will not able to chase the run). Imagine somehow WI managed to chase this run (Yeah, we all know it's not likely to happen but still)?
|
|
|
|