Odds, changing or not, will not determine the winner of the game. It is jist a 'pulse' from the gamblers such that majority thinks that the team with lower odds will win the game. Although it happens often, it would be wrong to fully rely on it such as betting all out. Anything could happen not only in the match but also with gambling. Therefore, risk management should always be consider than to be dependent with different factors such as odds.  Indeed there's a reason to why the odds is low or why do majority of bettors believe that a particular team would win; could be previous matches and stats. It is just that super teams in any field came across losses.

Banning of account won't be a problem if it will just be the consequence of cheating. It won't also be enough to stop players on such activity jist because of it. Cheating is a choice and people have their own reason to do so. What's obvious is that cheating won't always work in this industry 'coz if it does, many gamblers should be rich by now. Also, there'll be many gambling sites to close by this time. I think if there would be a way to cheat, for a single time, to each and every gambler, I think majority will embrace the opportunity. One reason is that  it is hard to win in gambling so it won't be shocking to know that many players would be eager to experience it, in any way possible. I would be guilty as well for such thing.

Never heard of this instance before. If you would bet from pre-game, the odds that you bet would be fixed and won't change afterwards. On visuals yes it would change especially if you would refresh the gambling site but if you would check your betting history, odds should not change the moment you put your bet into a particular odd. If it does, then there's something wrong with the website. Changing of odds more often is something which is present with live betting given that there are many gambler who does it. In every bet, there would be a change with the odds and as the game goes on. If gap on scores is big, then expect for a lower odds and lower returns. But if scores are xlose to one another then odds would still be big. Losing on the other hand is not because of odds. Betting with higher odds won't guarantee winning and would mean higher risk as well.

In sportsbetting, there's this thing called fixed matches. But it is exclusive to a group of people ofcourse, more likely "big" individuals or orgaanizations. It also depends on the size and popularity of the league; bigger leagues means rich individuals would only be able to access such informations for fixed matches. But with normal betting groups  basically they are just having an agreed analysis of the possible outcome. If you, as an individual gambler,thinks that their position or bet is making more sense than your speculation, then betting in line to their position, would be better. But indeed, it won't guarantee victory. It is either you would all win, or you would all lose vs. You win they lose or they won, you lost.

Indeed, question is whether the price would remain the same in the first place and interest would be the only sort of increase to be paid by the one who pawned it 'coz if not and the price of Bitcoin would be also considered, then it is where problem may arise. Lucky if it happen that Bitcoin's price suddenly fall therefore you'd be able to pay less but if it would increase in a sudden then you'd be in huge debt just to get it back and not to mention the interest into it, if you will choose to wait for its price to fall. It is better to use other collaterals I guess than to use something having a very volatile market price.

Also if it is pawning, I would prefer taking a loan to an amount I can afford to payback in a short period of time. Atleast in such way, I won't be minding no other additional payment other than the interest itself.

Indeed, it would more likely be some sort of 'pushing your luck' scheme. During continued bet losses, I'd prefer taking a pause and having some rest. Once you are affected by your emotions such as frustration, then things won't do you any good. Let it slide for now. The drive to make up with your losses will just more likely give you a tendency to lose even more. Even if you have a large pocket to gamble, you'd be tilted aftereards. This is gambling and we won't always win the game no matter how good of a player you are. Let us simply accept the fact that there are "red days".

Analysis will just help a player to make a guess with basis and not guess alone. It would indeed lessen the risk of losing but will never guarantee winning. Ups and downs are part of our gambling routine and rather than focusing to learn in order to come up with a win, I think it would be better to be preventive, or to simply make adjustments and limitations to how much can you afford losing.

One main reason I guess is familiarity. Sportsbettors are still a normal being who are playing games in particular with esports  as they grow up. Esports is an interest to many youngsters out there to both male and female individuals. Graphics, contents and variation is attractive no doubt. Also, it is as profitable as with sportsbetting. As entertaining as well, especially if it fits your interest. There's no direct correlation between sportsbettor and esports bettor but it just happened that most of us have experienced playing some of the games in our computer and phones which are now being developed to be more competitive.

If its market price is still increasing, then that would be fine. Also, it just sounds expensive 'coz it is 1 bitcoin as a unit, but fact is, you can buy a portion of it. Given that its market value depends on demand and there's limited supply of it, then it is okay to believe that skies the limit for its market value as long as demand is increasing as well. People would buy no matter what price there is as long as it moves. Volatility is the biggest risk for assets of the likes but it is also the biggest advantage over other type of investments. And as a currency, what's more likely to happen if people would be buying Bitcoin at $100k, is for investment purposes and not for payment means.A crash happened last ATH but if we would base on graphs, in particular with annual Bitcoin price movement, such thing is possible. Cycle is  price goes up, be corrected then go up again. Even I, before, never believed its price could be as huge as its ATH, but what happens simply proves how huge the potential is, for this industry.

Somehow right but not all the time. Fiest of all, even if you have the knowledge but lacks the capability to invest, you won't be able to test or even apply that knowledge, right? As per those who have money, indeed they would be only after with profit but still they have the capability to try and test, and learn eventually. Both has ups and downs, it just depends on the individual to how will he/she be able to make use of the circumstances. Perhaps there's a huge dump with the market price, initially, you would have idea of buying right? Then how would you be able to do that? You know what to do but you cannot act in accordance with your plan. I'd say people with money has the advantage still, even if dumps occur, they can afford holding for a long time until the market recovers.

The only thing which binds gambling into futures trading, is risk of losing money. But the truth is, trading would only be a gamble if you won't have any trading plan. Indeed anakyses won't guarantee a winning trade but atleast it would allow you to lessen the risk of losing and at the same time would help you manage the amoubt you would be engaging. Gambling is indeed somewhat alike but the distinct characteristic I guess is that in trading, there are more people who win in comparison with people who win in gambling.Best representation.
But unlike with gambling, there's a period wherein most of the people in trading industry are winning;bullrun. And such feature does not exist in gambling. However I won't blame those who still thinks that these two are the same. There are even different ways to earn in this industry, in the first place.

Well, things won't be fed with spoon, unfortunately. People would ask for an exchange to do so unless you are one of their relatives or they are just concerned to you. Many people are asking with the same question and query but you'd most of the time get the same answer; learn it through reading and creating your own research. Also, it won't be profit to come first but risk of losing money. The market price is volatile in nature which should be enough to be worry of the outcomes and to not be blinded by potential alone, of this industry.There's an intention ofcourse. Whether he's aware or not, of the tendency of being fooled by other people because of the chance that there will be individuals taking his innocence for granted, he might have his own intentions as well. 'coz obviously, he could have dropped all of his wuestions in this topic but he still chose to have a talk privately. For the new ones out there, if you guys could make effort asking, atleast apply it as well on gaining atleast initial knowledge on what you are trying to engage yourself with.

Either it go up or down. Now make a choice whether to invest right now, having beliefs that the market value would continue increasing, or to wait for things to fall in order to invest more. Eitherway would give you a chance to make profit fron investing into this industry. However you have options to diversify your funds to different tokens in this industry. Investing into one bucket, as we all know, won't be advisable. There are other options to choose from given tgat all tokens has its own potential. Problem is picking the right alternative.Would be hard to determine especially as early as it is in the present. Rejection in $31k may still take place but it also has the tendency to breakthrough especially if buyers would support such market price movement. On my end, I'd choose waiting 'til the ideal market value on my end  shows. There's no need to rush in the first place, so better wait for trend to be more obvious.

Not all streamers or promoters are gamblers anyway therefore, it shouldn't be surprising to know that many of them are just after the money, as their reason to do so.But eitherway, it is not always on a bad side. They are still a help to some gamblers who are building interest with a particular gambling site. These streamers would give them initial thought whether to continue their engagement or to look for other options. There's no rule in the first place that streamers should be players of the thing they are promoting. It is just that such feature of them could help them to be more knowledgeable of the things they are trying to offer to their audiences.

Username: Twentyonepaylots
Rank: Sr. Member
Current number of posts: 3019(including this one)
Bitcoin Address: bc1qme0j0hxrxyghzgxfrdd7sat5eehuyatugak2th
When can you start: Soon as accepted

Will wear signature once accepted, thanks.

Username: Twentyonepaylots
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qme0j0hxrxyghzgxfrdd7sat5eehuyatugak2th

Will update signature once accepted, thanks

Problem is not all gambling sites are having good systems to have such feauture, unfortunately. I'd also say this is possible with both small and big platforms as long as their system is not monitored to avoid such problems. Indeed jackpots are a bit of a percentage, most of the time, of the total platform's fund and this is already one way to avoid bankruptcy. No gambling site in their right mind, would put all of their funds in a single winning. This instance just sounds impossible because it rarely happens, but not because of that, casinos would be too comfortable. We are in online platform and glitches maay happen in a sudden.Algorithm, I think, still matters. If there's no such thing their edge would be overpowered by continuous winnings of the players, especially if it won't be a single gambler who'd be in such place. Edge of a casino works with the majority's transactions and losses, but if the other way around, that is pere problem would more likely arise as in line with the topic.

Well, yes, the best thing to do first is to understand each sides on every situation. They should both first be aware that they had mistakes, regardless of who was more wrong, in order to come up with a solution. Setting a date for the gambler to be able to pay the agent would be a good idea but what if the player has no plans of paying it because he wanted to still blame the agent? If there are no waiver involved in this transactions, I guess the agent will be left with no other choice but to accept the circumstances and learn from it.

We do not all think the same way. Some people will be staying on their stand, in every argument. Going to the roots of the problem would help, indeed, but it won't easily work most of the times especially if other party is not cooperating.

Indeed two different things. But to add, there are different kinds of addiction wherein some people are addicted to the behavior and not the reward from doing so. And I think it is obvious that in gambling, addiction is created by the slight tendency of winning big time in an instant and not really to the behavior or the actual gambling or playing experience. I've mentioned this 'coz we are talking aboyt consequences. Playing too much won't be that bad in the first place and its worse problem is to not be able to function with proper on a daily basis especially if you're a student or an employee. On the other hand, playing because of high hopes of winning would more likely leave you broke or sell your properties if incase frustration would take place as its consequence, and this is where worse case scenarios, as a consequence, is not being percieved by some 'heavy' gamblers.

Is it worth teaching this technology? Yes, for sure it would be good for this industry to spread its popularity but for individuals who are not really interested? I'm not sire. It is like exposing them to risk. Maybe it does depend on who would you be sharing the concept of Bitcoin with. Most of non-crypto investors think that this industry is either an easy way to be rich or a total fraud. Sharing its profitability depends on who you be shared it to. If the individual won't put any effort because of such impression, then that will just be a waste of time and the possible outcome is blaming you if incase anything bad would happen.
Showing proofs will indeed help you persuade or convince them to engage towards this industry but the fact that profit won't come in an instant and in a consistent manner should also be considered to avoid overlooking the potential of this industry.

Once you get the idea that you just grabbed the opportunity or chance to win, you'd be away from regrets simply because if the outcome is good, you'd probably be celebrating at the end of the day. You won't lose of you did not bite the chance. You won't win if you did not try. Either you lose or win, you've made up your decision to gamble therefore there should not be any regret. To feel sad of the bad outcome is just fine but remorse is another thing. If you ever be feeling such thing after betting, then you should stop it already; gambling isn't for you. There'll be always a tendency to lose so would you be okay feeling remorse everytime? That would be too tiring on my end.