hi all, pool available at http://bazco.inminimum payouts 0.1 CLINT payments processed every 30 seconds initial diff 512 (range 1-1048576) stratum at stratum+tcp://bazco.in:3333 username is your CLINT address password doesnt matter ie. cgminer -o stratum+tcp://bazco.in:3333 -u <clint address> -p xhave fun  james please note all, this is a clint v2 pool (however, v1 and v2 appear to be 100% compatible). |
|
|
|
hi all, pool available at http://bazco.inminimum payouts 0.1 CLINT payments processed every 30 seconds initial diff 512 (range 1-1048576) stratum at stratum+tcp://bazco.in:3333 username is your CLINT address password doesnt matter ie. cgminer -o stratum+tcp://bazco.in:3333 -u <clint address> -p xhave fun james |
|
|
|
|
exchange?
and yes solo-mine works well.
although theres nothing stopping you from setting up your own stratum pool.
|
|
|
|
|
Mining at 24-28kh... getting squat
{
"blocks" : 1170,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00439886,
"errors" : "",
"genproclimit" : -1,
"networkhashps" : 293056,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false,
"chain" : "main",
"generate" : false
}
Oh, i just died a little inside..
|
|
|
|
Oh you have to mine this through the wallet only. If solo mining, otherwise join a pool and use cgminer or whatever.
Can you be more specific? I am using the wallet as the server and an A2 Terminator as the miner which has CGminer built into its software. you saying you can only do the "setgenerate=true" and mine like that using CPU only? Solo mine through wallet only, yes this is cpu only. If you want to mine this with gpu or higher need a pool. Seems likely a better option to join a pool with current difficulty anyway. Why would it be CPU only? You can use an ASIC to directly solo-mine against the wallet's RPC port; no pool required. However you can set up a local stratum if you have a few ASIC's or some rented hashpower. It's a shame what happened with this coin. |
|
|
|
|
Reading upwards regarding Zeus vs Gridseed Blade argument.
Unequivocally, Zeus takes the podium here.
I've had the pleasure of dealing with both of these units, Zeusminer 7Mh blades and Gridseed 5.4Mh blades.
While the Gridseed Blades actually hash correctly, they are an absolute nuisance otherwise.
Issues with ferrite beads, with the standard PSU's running uncomfortably hot (not that you'd use them, but think about Joe Bloggs), the choice of a barrel power plug for 70W+ per pcb, major hotspots on the pcb's and the fact that when you release a product to the public - you DO NOT EXPOSE PCB's.
Not to mention you only need to look sideways at these units and they stop working.
The only good point about these units is perhaps the overclockability of the GC3355 IC's themselves; however the previous points hinder any improvement you'd make.
As for the Zeus; albeit being noisy and using 28% more power (Gridseed 5.4Mh/150w, Zeus 7Mh/250w), it's a delight.
Not having to worry about burning out your USB ports, even after investing in a heavily powered USB hub, is fantastic as well.
Or the Gridseed 'syndrome' of having the unit ground it's powersupply THROUGH THE USB CABLE (people will pretend this has never happened, because basically people are shit and also because electricity always follows path of least resistance), either due to shoddy cablework or a cable not being pressed in *just* enough.
Onto performance, having the entire Zeus show as one single device means this thing chews through HUGE blocks, like your mum after doing food shopping on welfare day. The amount of times i've watched the Gridseeds struggle to spit one share out, then find the stratum has already announced a new block and all that work for nothing.
Looking past others anecdotes of overheating and other issues, i'll throw my own in for fair share.
Having setup my Zeus Thunder X3 with two Corsair PSU's (one later found to be a bit dodgy), left them running all day at 342Mhz (from 328 standard) at approximately 32-34Mh. Only had the fans wired to one PSU; which happened to be the dodgy one (woops). Noticed around 2PM (whilst at work) that my hashrate had dropped right off on Nicehash.
Got home to find the fans had stopped and two of the blades had been sitting at upwards of 80 degrees for SEVERAL HOURS.
Like the troopers they were, replaced the PSU, turned it back on, no hassle. Like Zeus himself.
If these units were Gridseeds, there would be a puddle of tears on the floor and someones face buried in a pillow (interpret that however you like). Gridseeds do an ok job if you can pick them up cheap enough and micromanage them; better than a GPU i guess.
I've a Zeus Blade and 6 Gridseed Blades; guess which ones give me the most hassle?
|
|
|
|
Let me be the first to state this... His daughter is a newborn.... So for the record -  LMAO REKT BARRY STYLE must mean something different around the world, in australia getting wrecked is a desirable state. i've had a chat with dev anyway, see if we find anything in next few days. im a DOGED holder, not trying to fuck this up for anyone aha  |
|
|
|
|
debug.log entries do not tie users to transactions.
also, you've misunderstood regarding block retargeting, the diff is getting raised/lowered one block after where it should be. if you actually gave a shit you'd check it out but you sound like a smartarse.
you've also misunderstood the blockchain.info comment, the pool's stratum marks the winning block with a tag. fuck you're slow.
maybe i should post your fairly embarrassing transactions with luke-jr over you not knowing how to compile a linux wallet?
(cryptobuck is an old cryptsy currency, do you understand the concept of a fork?)
|
|
|
|
whoever said this is to be added to poloniex they know nothing of it being added seriously just because you can hide a ip address it makes you anonymous surely if it was tat easy there wouldnt be any dash or monero
-
good luck bagholders want to sell
OK if you really think DASH mixing works good luck. You can do as much mixing as you want but if the transaction can be linked to IP address you are going down lol. good luck with that. lol good luck its not hard to see whats gonna happen looking at charts and current thread chat all hype. ask poloniex yourself it aint being listed The hype is the re branding which is the start of a new era for DOGED VERGE. I guess you are trying to get the price down to buy some lol? yes at 1 sats it be a buy whats a rebranding gonna do tech will stay the same. like i said if anonymity was that easy o just hide ip then monero or dash wouldnt be around hiding ip no big deal its gotta be more than that. anyhow good luck watch the top wallets top one has fallen from 220m interesting, if we talk about dash and monero , both offer new tech and annon than bitcoin , so i could say good luck to old bitcoin, but the fact tell Bitcoin is the king, why?, because all about community mass adoptions. indeed but here were talking about anonymity not mass adoption. doged doesnt even have that. your talking about anonymity based on only hiding ip address. remember its not about bitcoin its about blockchain technology. anyway enjoy the pump but those top holders want out. i wouldnt even buy it even if it fell to 3 sats again you couldnt be more wrong. we offer far better privacy than any other coin. i'd love to have a public debate about it if you're up for it. mixing is not anonymous, and does not give user privacy at all, because mixing still pushes transactions through a database. "stealth transactions" are still not anon, because the users ip address is still relayed across the network. i2p is a superior network using ipv6 that changes users ip address 3 times every few seconds. sounds to me like you just want cheap coins. go ahead and open your debug.log for any of those coins you mentioned, and post it in this thread ;] Hi Dogedarkdev, Being the dev of Dogecoindark, you would know that the blockchain for ANY scrypt based coin (or pretty much any cryptocurrency for that matter) does not store any IP addresses. The client itself does contain the initial dns seeder (which you need to update in your latest windows wallet by the way because its stale), however if the seeder disappears off the face of the earth, theres no incriminating evidence. I'd also like to correct you in that in the case of a transaction or a found block; the users IP address is not transmitted. The block makes its way around the peer network. This issue was raised by people using blockchain.info when questioning whether blocks were coming from the pools they said they were ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113860.0). All coins will log details regarding node block updates and peers with IP addresses in debug.log; again irrelevant, regarding point above. In fact a quick look at the debug.log of DogecoinDark and you'll find IP addresses that will lead you no closer to a user. Now - instead of talking shit on here, how about you go fix the off-by-one mining transaction bug, the difficulty retarget bug which seems to set the difficulty one block after its meant to and maybe compile a new Windows wallet containing all the changes you've made in the past year (seriously the newest wallet is 2014) on https://github.com/doged/dogedsource. Also whats with all the staking code left in the wallet from ppcoin? Clean that shit up because it literally makes you look like you don't know what you're doing. barrystyle |
|
|
|
|
Satoshi himself built several FPGA units.
|
|
|
|
LOL, no exchange is going to touch this.
You'dve made a lot more with maybe 500mh to start with on a local stratum.
I tried that, it didn't work because someone had put 20Gh and was ramping the difficulty. To be fair from what i can tell the distribution isn't pyramid scheme style, so its not like early blocks are 1000 coins or something.. it should level off soon. no - as in exchange wasnt contacted prior to launch, they have no reserve of this coin themselves. they're not going to list it just so 2-3 people can dump. you've wasted yer btc rentals! |
|
|
|
|
LOL, no exchange is going to touch this.
You'dve made a lot more with maybe 500mh to start with on a local stratum.
|
|
|
|
|
exchange?
difficulty retarget? (so once all the instaminers nicehash balance drops, how long are we going to have to deal with insane difficulty)
|
|
|
|
|
Pool Hashrate: 19,187.60 MH/s
wow.
|
|
|
|
|
greetings GMT+8 fellow night dwellers
|
|
|
|
Is this a selfie Litejavichu? Care to elaborate line by line how LuckyCoin's IRC code actually works? A few modified variables does not equal an exploit. |
|
|
|
Something doesn't seem to add up right to me. If your running an exchange you should be building daemon code from source and not put any executables from an unknown source on critical to function computers. Since we have access to the code in question I would really like to hear a detailed technical explanation of how the code could have been used in this way. If you ask me transparency is critical in any exchange (or any big institutions) right now. We deserve the right to know what is happening at the time it happens and not a year and half later. Trying to turn a “profit” after such an event is just plain ridiculous imho. Where's the value for 13,000 BTC and 300,000 LTC really being taken from if you think about it? I really don't wish this situation on anyone and hope things turn out fine for everyone at whatever the outcome. They do build daemons from source; they also audit any code before compilation/acceptance. They also run each daemon in a chroot/jail meaning individual daemons are isolated from each other. What i posted was the IRC module from Batcoin vs Luckycoin, they are nearly identical. My point was that the LuckyCoin accusation is a load of crap. Irc.cpp is literally a tiny IRC client that logs onto public IRC nodes, so they can find other peers to communicate with In fact, go to github.com, type 'irc.cpp' (without the quotes) into the search box and see how many coins have this mechanism. Next person who continues to believe BigVern is going to cop a belt from me. His cloak and dagger/divert attention tactics are so obvious. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
