Usually it's the other way around. You use the signature of the project > Apply and if you get accepted, you'll see your name on the spreadsheet > Then you're considered a campaign participant of that project.

Sure. Apart from your list, the following should be included as well:

1. Master key
2. Proof-of-stake
3. Node
4. RFID
5. Supply chain management
6. ERC20 token
7. Off-chain
8. Segwit
9. Lighting network
10. Cross-chain atomic swaps
11. ASIC resistant
12. Proof-of-Work
13. API
14. Smart contracts
15. CoinJoin protocol
16. PPC
17. SHA256D
18. Quantum Resistance
19. Hierarchical Deterministic (HD) wallet
20. I2P
21. Multisig

---

Take note: Just finished updating it but make sure to double check (in case I missed some).

In addition to what "MadGamer" stated, if you're a "well known person" within the community and ask nicely (with a valid reason) then you might get it as well (last person that got a custom title [through a request]).

It isn't mandatory (just because someone has a certain position within the community).

Since you're aiming to provide noob-friendly information, then I suggest to add a feature that upon hovering on some of the keywords, it gives a brief information regarding each of those words (so users won't be forced to search for those in external sites).
- A lot of words fall on that category (not that noob-friendly).

1. Have the ability to add (to the list) and delete (from the list) coins.
2. Be able to change the order of the list (based on "Price" and etc...)

---

I like how clicking a coin, gives you the different prices from different exchanges (hope to see the data being fetched from more exchanges).

- On the last column (Date Posted), the indicated dates shows the dates that those respective threads (that had the search results [posts]) were created.
- Since you had it at "oldest topics first", then what you're seeing in the top, is composed of the oldest results/post (for that particular keyword). You can try and click the above line of each quotes from the results and you'll be able to clearly see it's functioning the way it supposed to be.

No, you're doing everything correctly (with a bit of misunderstanding for how results are shown).

There was a bug (2 months ago) that disabled images to show normally. theymos fixed it but still from time to time, some of the images aren't shown normally.

Refreshing the page will do the trick.

Wasn't able to replicate that error, using your UID. I got this (regarding your account):

---

Since you made some changes to the original algorithm that achow101 had, may I know how "Good Post" category is being measured? If it's based on certain character count, then the results are irrelevant.

If you took a minute to actually read the thread, you would've seen the answer within the first 3 lines of the OP.

---

John (John K.): Since you updated the thread recently (in regards to addition of merits), then it would be worth to update the "Limits on PMs" table to the "New PM limits" table as well.

1. Just to be clear, the amount generated on the platform pool is the combined advertising earnings for everyone, am I right? If "Yes", then those that contributed more towards the ad revenue, will earn less than they should (since generated visitors of a certain article, doesn't always result in same percentage for ad revenue of the platform).

2. Also why as a form of a token? It's like adding an unnecessary layer.

---

On a side note: Great website you got there.

I tested using my "Newbie" alt account and was able to replicate it, however this wasn't the case using my original account. It's account related (meaning you have to normally use forum and rank up, before that limitation is lifted).

- Simply lurking here (like how you've been doing since the creation of your account), isn't going to help.
- Based on the following message that I got (for my "Newbie" alt account):
Then waiting for "90 seconds", shouldn't be that much of an issue...

He works with them. He's their "business development advisor".

Proof 1
Proof 2

More can be found easily.

Agreed. When an exchange platform performs the way they do (for the past year), they should be considered as a red flag.
Having said that, they used to be good in the earlier days but that's no longer the case (constant complaints here and there).

It appears your issue, has been fixed.

You're welcome.

- Having common words as your username, will result in showing excessive results that at the same time, makes finding those who quoted and replied to your post a difficult and impossible task.
- Regarding "...  from: nvq4596", that was meant for the "OP" of this thread (nvq4596).

Indeed. Someone suggested something within those lines (recently).

Click the magnifier button (in front of the "Search" button at the upper right corner of any page) > It opens the "Set Search Parameters" window, go to the middle section that says "Search for:" > Type your name then choose the date range from "Message age:" > Click "Search" button on lower left area > You'll see a quote that has the following words at the beginning: "...  from: nvq4596" and on top of that, name of the person that quoted and replied to your post (by ...) > Then click the title of the thread that has "Re:" before it (it goes straight to where that user made the post).

This is the result for the past 3 days (for your account): https://imgur.com/a/qcNNb (make sure to click the image, so it zooms in)

You should've done your research prior to using it. There's a lot of complaints against them (recently) and with a simple search for their account here "Changelly", you'll end up seeing the negative review/feedback given by others.

Based on my observation: Whenever there's an issue, it takes more than 24 hrs for them to fix it.

---

Given how recent events are folding, I no longer trust them.

For 3 of the local boards I mentioned earlier, I didn't see a sign (that he was looking for one, unless I missed it) and for the other one, considering the time he created this thread, I find it hard to accept that there's no one to fit for those criteria.

Basically it's "Off-topic Version 2".

Then there's no reason to promote someone since they will basically do what others do (directly reporting to a mod is similar to using the "Report to moderator" button).

I wasn't going for deleting a local board due to lack of a moderator.

I've noticed few of the promoted moderators, haven't been that active in participating on their own local language threads (those located in "Other languages/locations") prior to creation of their local language boards.

That's the issue. These things should be considered prior to creation of those local boards, not after. I'm sure there's a way to measure each user based on where they are (regardless of VPN usage and etc...), so they can be monitored prior to creation of these local boards.

1. Was curious to know why some of the local languages that already have their own boards, still have no dedicated "Moderator"?

a. Hrvatski (Croatian) - A bit of exception (due to how events folded)
b. 日本語 (Japanese) - Last created local board, through a request
c. 한국어 (Korean) - Also a bit of exception since "theymos posted this"
d. Skandinavisk

Even though for few of the above there's the cases of demotion, the question still applies (due to lack in moderation within these periods)...

---

2. Just to be clear, I'm not involved in any of the above local boards but was also wondering why having a "Moderator" in mind, isn't mandatory prior to creating a local language board (unlike for demand and etc...)?

You've been using the wrong platform. You're better off using one of the following instead:

1. XBTFreelancer
2. WorkingForBitcoins
3. cryptogrind
4. Coinality

Take note: I haven't tested any of them.

This.

I'm impressed.

---

Few issues and suggestions:

1. Upon clicking "Discuss on Forum" button at the top of each table (the one with CryptoHeresy logo), it goes back to the main page of "preev".
2. When adding a lot of coins, it would be better to have them to add up "Vertically" instead (so we can easily scroll it using our mouse).
3. Ability to resize each coins respective section, like how it's done for "Trollbox".

---

On a side note:

Are you connected to "robwspi" that has posted this thread? Both of you seem to use a similar template (for your main website "preev.net").

You have to visit "the page that provided you those information (again)" and follow the steps (in order to wear it).