2019-04-22 10:46:07.456 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 20344840 at height: 275688
2019-04-22 11:52:31.640 [miner 1] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 20732706 at height: 275890
2019-04-22 13:42:29.622 [miner 6] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 26754556 at height: 276227
2019-04-22 14:08:05.277 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 37343741 at height: 276315
2019-04-22 14:34:39.849 [miner 2] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 43804445 at height: 276399
2019-04-22 16:25:25.013 [miner 6] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 22590116 at height: 276710
2019-04-22 16:53:23.407 [miner 2] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 27224519 at height: 276800
2019-04-22 17:21:16.983 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 23429583 at height: 276880
2019-04-22 20:37:07.029 [miner 0] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 17312876 at height: 277446
Same here, screenshot from a mined block but no reward on wallet at after several hours and refreshes.  Is there any specific mechanism to receive block rewards? Otherwise we mine for another person's wallet and is a total scam!!! I had the same problem. I mined for more than 18 hours offchain. In other words, I was mining on my own chain for some reason. After I downloaded the bootstrap .raw file and extracted it, then restarted the miner and it synced to the correct chain. However 18 hours of electricity waste was just.. waste. link: https://minesolo.com/release/blockchain.rawcommand to import: solo-blockchain-import --verify=0 --input-file=blockchain.raw add this only if you changed the default data directory> --data-dir then start miner Here you can check if your version/ blockheight matches with network: http://explorer.minesolo.com/I just talked with dev in discord and here is the solution.... from the cli wallet : set refresh-from-block-height 0
rescan_bc My wallet showing balance now... i found their discord from twitter https://t.co/ktwaHyVc81 |
|
|
|
Strange.... Anyone else receiving an error about incompatible version 1.0.3.4 despite having download and install the latest Windows binaries 1.0.3.6?
It results into an IP ban for more than an hour after 5-10 minutes of usage, while the CPU hashrate keeps mining at full speed as usual.
I am receiving those message too...some nodes are not yet upgraded... I have a question ....I entered "start_mining" without address from the daemon and find two blocks..... is the mining rewards go to my address? I have checked no coins received yet Are you sure you were blocked, or YOU blocked someone else's IP, for him having an old version 1.0.3.4? Nope, I am definitely using the latest version, while "bans" command listed my own IP there. Nevertheless, after the latest fork today the problem didn't re-appeared. Strange, now I'm using the "start mining" command from daemon with my wallet address... but the reward is not received 2019-04-22 10:46:07.456 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 20344840 at height: 275688
2019-04-22 11:52:31.640 [miner 1] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 20732706 at height: 275890
2019-04-22 13:42:29.622 [miner 6] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 26754556 at height: 276227
2019-04-22 14:08:05.277 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 37343741 at height: 276315
2019-04-22 14:34:39.849 [miner 2] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 43804445 at height: 276399
2019-04-22 16:25:25.013 [miner 6] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 22590116 at height: 276710
2019-04-22 16:53:23.407 [miner 2] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 27224519 at height: 276800
2019-04-22 17:21:16.983 [miner 5] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 23429583 at height: 276880
2019-04-22 20:37:07.029 [miner 0] INFO global src/cryptonote_basic/miner.cpp:570 Found block for difficulty: 17312876 at height: 277446
 |
|
|
|
Anyone else receiving an error about incompatible version 1.0.3.4 despite having download and install the latest Windows binaries 1.0.3.6?
It results into an IP ban for more than an hour after 5-10 minutes of usage, while the CPU hashrate keeps mining at full speed as usual.
I am receiving those message too...some nodes are not yet upgraded... I have a question ....I entered "start_mining" without address from the daemon CLI wallet and find two blocks..... is the mining rewards go to my address? I have checked no coins received yet |
|
|
|
|
Hey Chris
It's been a long time... I just found my brain key and login into open ledger. I found my swap token OCEANX and put an order in open ledger site... is it safe to trade there now because I found your next post suggesting to trade at wallet.bitshare.org... and btw what is your future plan for OCEANX... Thanks
|
|
|
|
I don't think listing on a new exchange is the most important thing for the project right now. Much more important is the progress in development and marketing, which will attract new investors and increase trading volumes on existing exchanges
I think this project lost popularity already. And they dont have any experience in blockchain development and in marketing as well... The more time passes - the more I have an opinion that they are not going to do anything. In addition to trips to the conference almost nothing happens PTOY already a working product... they only need a massive hospital to use their product... so I think the trip to the conference is one of the big marketing steps they need to take... it's hard to believe anymore with PTOY, maybe you said that PTOY is one step towards success ?, this will be difficult, the future PTOY is still unpredictable, if PTOY like this continues to be sure PTOY might be removed from bittrex, why? because all silent with community, Everyone knows there are lots of steps toward success... and those steps are not easy... no one can predict the future ... however, they are creating steps for the future... I still received the movement updates from their newsletter... so maybe they need a man to chit chat with you here  |
|
|
|
Hello... I just downloaded the Gladius Node Manager for windows... I saw only one pool is available.... is this pool active? and how much time to get my application approved  |
|
|
|
I lost my HD and all my coins are gone! ¬¬ I cannot belive on this, holding for years and this shit happens...  Having bad days. omg You need to regularly make a copy of your key mate... what happen with your HD... this would typically happen If you are using optical storage. I have suffered this also. however, I already make a copy. Have you swapped your CFT to ethereum token? |
|
|
|
Hello, nice project... so you cannot mine this coin with GPU right? Is it for now only or do you have the plan to make GPU miner in the future?
Yes this project or coin is a CPU mineable only. About the future, This will be an ASIC, GPU Resistant and im sure the Developer will keep updating the algo to make this a CPU only coin for a long time. Wonderful... sounds fair for users who didn't have big resources... any plan to make GUI wallet and mobile apps?... Simplicity brings more user... |
|
|
|
|
Hello, nice project... so you cannot mine this coin with GPU right? Is it for now only or do you have the plan to make GPU miner in the future?
|
|
|
|
Can someone remind me what is "Name Claim" purpose and what is the plan for XDE2 now? @vegasguy Do you have plan to fix wallet in yobit? Thanks
This is a question for Yobit. they depend on them whether or not they will update wallet. I think that this will not happen. Coinexchange working well. https://www.coinexchange.io/market/XDE2/BTCYes... however someone needs to tell them right... and I think XDE2 team is the right one.... btw ... I just downloaded the XDE2 wallet.... is this the correct version? the synchronization process feels like forever to me... is it normal?  Looks like you're in the right version. Where are you with synchronisation? What is the last block time? If it going too slow, maybe I can upload an updated wallet. It will be faster for you. Ok cool.., what I found was the XDE2 wallet signature flagged as coinminer activity, however, I manage to exclude the signature from AV monitor and nodes are instantly connected with my wallet. The synchronization is running but stuck at some point. The wallet needs to reopen for the synchronization process. |
|
|
|
Thanks for reopening the thread... I think bowhead is one of the most active blockchain company... Indiegogo marketing is a good action to let people know about blockchain use cases... I admire the bowhead team hard work finally manage to release the product. To Optimal Health! |
|
|
|
Sonm is better than golem but only when comparing technology. In terms of marketing I would say Golem has the upper hand. Somehow they made it possible for people to believe that Golem is something amazing, but in reality sonm has much more to offer
I would like a windows version with full GPU sharing feature released first... That will define SONM from Golem as super FOG Computing network. in the future SONM will definitely make that happen, because you know yourself now mining with GPU is very difficult, SONM provides information about Nvidia 1080Ti GPUs can provide $ 2 reward per day, this I think is good Techniques are necessary but marketing is very important. Many things are not so good but they can make a strong impression by good advertising strategy. SONM needs to be more active. Windows OS user is the largest market and that is half of the marketing goal... yes marketing is the key factor of a successful company. I think SONM need to use a different marketing strategy. |
|
|
|
I'm hoping it gets back up to $10 in the next 2 years. The progress IMHO is not what it should be. The delegate mafia for forging is another concern
and JavaScrypt seems to be on the way out (some programmer told me) though I maybe just being messed with (I don't program)
Not looking good. I have 'mostly' ICO Lisk...so it is a kinda 'meh' for me..but would have hated to be the folk who bought even at $10 (i did some groan)
the horror...
we will see chump or champ I guess
brad
Soon enough, my friend... it will rise along with btc bull market... The daily volume is not bad at all....and 10 USD is what I expected for this year.... so be prepared...  Well is there anything in play to fix the forging and Delegate situation? I mean talk about power! Just curries if Lisk folk have any ideas or plan to break up that cartel or is it now too powerful and if you broke up the current Delegate situation it would crash the price of LISK to dust? curious ..or is it just me that has issues with this delegate setup? brad I want to add something, Lisk is a decentralized platform, so everybody should have the ability to forge or delegate... that is what blockchain should be .... open and accessible for all... |
|
|
|
|
What is the latest development and product? FSBT need more exposure... Try to push with google ads and listing in new exchange..... FSBT supposed to be a World Crypto Bank
|
|
|
|
I don't think listing on a new exchange is the most important thing for the project right now. Much more important is the progress in development and marketing, which will attract new investors and increase trading volumes on existing exchanges
I think this project lost popularity already. And they dont have any experience in blockchain development and in marketing as well... The more time passes - the more I have an opinion that they are not going to do anything. In addition to trips to the conference almost nothing happens PTOY already a working product... they only need a massive hospital to use their product... so I think the trip to the conference is one of the big marketing steps they need to take... |
|
|
|
Sonm is better than golem but only when comparing technology. In terms of marketing I would say Golem has the upper hand. Somehow they made it possible for people to believe that Golem is something amazing, but in reality sonm has much more to offer
I would like a windows version with full GPU sharing feature released first... That will define SONM from Golem as super FOG Computing network. |
|
|
|
Looks like the developer left the project.
The coin does not trading anywhere.
The reasons for which the developer left this promising project are not clear.
But I still hope for the resurrection of this coin.
I hope the project continues... maybe he just takes a rest from the bear market... however, there is a tiny volume in Yobit... someone is still buying ELE. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
