Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:03:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
581  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 08:15:28 PM
Well looks like the lab has turned it around, so let's say labcoin reaches their december goal of 500th/s.  Has anyone used some math and took a guess as the share price and dividend yet? If they get anywhere close to 500th/s it could be epic, no?

This can anyone run some numbers?  Im going to take a guess of 5BTC+/share without hardware sales profits.
582  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 02:27:55 PM
good morning labcoin fans, I see we crashed again last night?
guess that means time to pick up a few more cheap shares  Grin

Btct decided to update the warning message, and show no bias towards Labcoin while Peta who has broken their contract and is in clear turmoil has none.
583  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 02:22:00 PM
Hai guys Im burnside I care about companies breaking their contracts.

Anonymous voted NO with comment: Attempting to break the contract -- odolvlobo
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Contract terms in flux after moderator approval and shares sold.
BTCTRADINGPT voted NO with comment: BTC-Trading-PT shareholders voted 290-65 to not approve.
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Muddy contract terms that often change.
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Not following their contract!
Anonymous voted NO with comment: How about you try IPOing when it's actually hashing, rather than putting all the risk on investors? The difficulty in Dec may be astronomical, and thus rendering this investment to result in almost guaranteed loss.
woodtech voted NO with comment: As other "No" voter said; all risk is on investors. You need to have some skin in the game yourselves please!

Riiiiiight

https://btct.co/security/PETA-MINE

584  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:41:34 PM
Clearly whats happening here for the people who arent dumb. Burnside trying to FUD his competition,  Labcoin is the only company so far hashing, and will surpass Asicminer, if they dont run into any problems.

Labcoin needs to have a contingency plan incase burnside desides to fuck them over.

Well im labcoin fanboy but i do think burnside is honest and standup guy; he will handle this on a mature level.

A mature stand up guy would remove the warning when the issuer has contacted them trying to resolve it in good faith, or put a message issuer im contact with us trying to resolve issue.

Yet companies like peta mine who have broken their contracts completely, naaaah no warning because im burnside who clearly cares about scams.
585  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:37:58 PM
Hai guys Im burnside I care about companies breaking their contracts.

Anonymous voted NO with comment: Attempting to break the contract -- odolvlobo
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Contract terms in flux after moderator approval and shares sold.
BTCTRADINGPT voted NO with comment: BTC-Trading-PT shareholders voted 290-65 to not approve.
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Muddy contract terms that often change.
Anonymous voted NO with comment: Not following their contract!
Anonymous voted NO with comment: How about you try IPOing when it's actually hashing, rather than putting all the risk on investors? The difficulty in Dec may be astronomical, and thus rendering this investment to result in almost guaranteed loss.
woodtech voted NO with comment: As other "No" voter said; all risk is on investors. You need to have some skin in the game yourselves please!

Riiiiiight

https://btct.co/security/PETA-MINE
586  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:32:59 PM
Clearly whats happening here for the people who arent dumb. Burnside trying to FUD his competition,  Labcoin is the only company so far hashing, and will surpass Asicminer, if they dont run into any problems.

Labcoin needs to have a contingency plan incase burnside desides to fuck them over.
587  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:27:15 PM
I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.

Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.

WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.

Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin

Wtf are you talking about? Labcoin is being super fucking shady and they deserve MORE then a warning.

So has everyother security including burnsides own, Peta broke its contract where are the warnings? Riiiiight
588  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:24:47 PM
It all boils down to whether this hash rate will increase in the next few days or not... someone could have bought Avalons bla bla bla, but would be extremely hard to do that all the way to 50TH/s...

Even using labcoins numbers, those 180nm chips supposedly produce ~250 MH/s. To reach 50TH They would need to produce 200 thousand chips in a test fab not meant for volume production,  and 20000 PCBs, assemble them,  test them, mount them, deploy them in a pretty darn huge datacenter, power them (300+ KW) and cool them. All that based on a unstable asic using a PCB design no one has seen (or if we did, one that magically works without copper layers or traces).  The magnitude of that is greater than what BFL has produced and shipped to date!

Yeah, thats  gotta be a lot easier than deploying 100 of these:
http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/400gh-miner-october-2013/

Not that he will reach 50TH. Is there an online bet on this somewhere?

Yes were going for the 180nm fud? jezus read in, before yelling bullshit.. The 180nm is already history.. and that also counts for the specs with it.

Yes guys labcoin should pay full retail price for miners!!!! Instead of pennies so they make no profit. The idiots on here are quite hilarious.
589  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:20:39 PM
I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.

Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.

WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.

Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin
590  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 05:03:21 AM
P.S 817gh/sec+
591  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 05:02:33 AM
In any case, labcoin will probably stagnate between .0026-.0028 for about a day or two before it either booms due to increased hashrate or falls due to stagnant hashrate.

There is no chance whatsoever that this is going to happen.  None.

Is the market going to anticipate a good news (growing hashrate) or not (we want to see it before) ?

If yes, you're right. If not, he's right.

Make your bet.

Just leave why are you still here?
592  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 05:01:59 AM
going to sleep so when i wake up i see past .004s dividend in a few days and we'll probably see 1BTC's and 50TH after lol. 500TH in december this goes to 5BTC+/share.
593  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 02:52:55 AM
They just moved up to the 22 spot...still a sceptic though until I see some big numbers go up.
If they can hit the 2th mark they are supposed to be hashing and we are still seeing growth then I'll think about reinvesting.  



Just the fact that they manufactured working chips means that it is only a matter of time until they have nearly unlimited hash.

lmao when and how was that "fact" ever established?

From pictures of their chips? Troll?
594  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 02:50:37 AM



WTF are you talking about they are listed on BTC guild, good fail comparison.

Yea so am I & I can also claim I'm hashing with custom hardware but that dosen't make it true. Really now, how gullible are you?

The reality is right now this is nothing more than another over priced revenue share when it should be a asic manufacture stock.



Yes you can claim with zero proof. Labcoin had their hash listed on btcguild. What are you even saying.
595  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 02:34:14 AM
They don`t need to prove anything to you personally.  They will do this with hash power and dividends

Look future promises are just not enough. As a share holder I sort of am entitled to know that a shady company isn't scamming me. Maintaining investor confidence is fairly important. They're doing the absolute minimum to keep their current valuation afloat.

But hey if you're buying it I've got a 600MH/s mining account that I promise will rise to 100TH/s in 3 weeks. You can get in for just .005 per share! Can't post pics of my hardware though because it's rough and you wouldn't understand. 1N1cYXgRWz7UwXpD1UjBJTba3uwR1v7ko7

WTF are you talking about they are listed on BTC guild, good fail comparison.
596  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:35:45 AM
UPDATE:

Even though I don't like making promises but Sam has assured me that 20TH is a goal that will not be missed within 2 weeks.

I am also working on having the "warning" removed from the security as Sam assured me that the team has not to sell any significant amount of shares and the ownership is still far above the 75% that was communicated as the holding limit.



Finally, you're going to clear your name+labcoin's on this one ? That would be a good start. A better one would be to add explanations about what happened these last 3 weeks.

Delays, explanations already given like 3 updates ago. Forgot you can't read, my apologies for bringing up this matter again.
597  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:27:14 AM
I bet you something more, YOUR NAME
You can't bet something you don't own.
What you bet is your Bitcointalk account, which no one cares about.

Nah just your excuse of being a pussy. Real men bet on making other men shut their mouths, hence you stop posting from your name or I stop posting from my name. The name has nothing to do with it, its the principal, its the pride.

But I forgot your French, you have neither balls, pride, or are a real man.
598  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:23:51 AM

Don't forget being fat is a sign of wealth, secondly The French are the dumbasses who created french fries and started an epidemic.
599  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:22:42 AM
UPDATE:

As usual by now I am very sorry for the lack of updates. I do however at this time have an update for actual hashing.

Though the launch of the mining operation has been delayed and the team is still tweaking miners we now have around 800gh hashing at btcguild at:

http://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings&section=teams

The Labcoin team is currently listed as 24 Labcoin.

According to Sam, more hash rate will be deployed daily. I do not have any goals or hash rate estimates to communicate right now but as soon as I do, I will of course communicate this.

I hope that I can provide more timely updates on a lot of open questions shortly, and I hope everyone is having a good weekend.

Ytter stop wasting time, and look here ^^
600  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 22, 2013, 01:21:19 AM
Seems your brain is made in USA. Good people vs. Bad people
You're either with us, or against us!

Anyway I just congratulated Labcoin for their achievement and acceptable proof. It's going to make some brains explode!

Or I could say it's both late, and less than 20% of what was first promised Wink


I'm calling off the bet - too bad none of the cheerleaders had the balls to even bet 0.1 BTC.

I bet you something more, YOUR NAME, which like a pussy you backed out. Now feel free to leave with the rest of the FUD gang, since you guys don't have to protect us anymore against unrighteousness.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!