SecureTag looks as an nice investment opportunity
a new account promoting the currency. hahahahahahaha, it is very noticeable that it is an account of some of the team |
|
|
|
|
I wish the best for the project and time will tell. 2 years is an unrealistic term when there is no exchange, price and hardly attention of the miners. Only master-dealers sold with a pre-mine will have an advantage, so whoever has money has an advantage. Where is the decentralization?
I prefer projects where the development team charges a% of the rewards, that makes them be more for their currency / project. Selling masternodes at $ 3500 does not inspire confidence.
That of charging in advance before knowing if the project will work, only benefits a part, the developers. I'm sorry but I see it that way.
You say in discord that you want to avoid nicehash, there are better protocols to do it and of course you need a good developer for that.
You yourselves are centralizing the currency when selling in advance and at BTC masternodes at a very high price without even knowing if the project will or will not be successful.
Just 350 blocks in 18 hours of mining in his explorer, it is clear that the miners do not support only 160mhs of hash power, but only 1 reward coin with protection instamine. Everything is designed for those who want the master pay them.
If then the project falls or not, they are things that happen in life.
The truth is that I wish the project the best, but the excessively lazy, and as much as you comment that you want transparency, what really happens is that you only earn more money, buy the master and when the exchange comes out, sell everything and make the DUMP.
It is not something that I invent, it is what always happens. Whoever purchases a Master must be very sure of what he does. I would expect to have a price in a more or less quality exchange, not a bad exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
Let no one think of mining this coin when the current reward is 1 coin per block. Everything is studied for them to sell their masternodes with pre-mining at a gold price of 0.5 btc. POW mining should not support this type of project where the miner is paid miseries. Later they give more coins, but then the price will have fallen sharply because the masternodes will be selling every day and it will no longer be worth a 0.5 btc Master.
Now it is best to wait and wait, and even never to undermine. It is ridiculous to undermine something that is delivered so slowly when there is no price and when there is an exchange the price will plummet like all others.
The moment of mining is when the price has fallen and stabilized. Right now I do not even know what they offer POW
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect wallet, the master gives reasonable benefits, very happy
|
|
|
|
|
the days go by, the problem of the wallet in windows does not fix it, there is no DEV. I'm going to sell the coins of my master. There are many other more serious projects and with committed people.
|
|
|
|
|
3 questions:
The synchronization of the wallet is incredibly slow, they can publish new addnote. I arrive hours and hours and hours
A coin without value, without exchange, what is it for ?, mine so that afterwards there is no exchange or have a ridiculous value and you already ask for 10000 coins, it seems to me something very high without knowing the possible value
What exchanges are you thinking, I hope something half serious cryptobridge, crex24
the wallet is primitive, it lacks a menu, the texts do not read well. If you create the address to receive from the gui is not an address that can be used to mine, you must do it from console. It does not give any impression that it is something done by a professional, rather by an amateur.
Ordering 10000 coins and not having value, is a huge risk
|
|
|
|
|
They just published a guide in discord, only for linux. As there is no developer they can not do anything to fix the windows problem. It is to extend his death a little longer.
I strongly recommend not to enter this currency, or mine or master node, the price goes down, there is no DEV, there are hardly any exchanges, CryptoBridge has deleted it until the DEV does the maintenance, and there is no DEV, the data that appear in masternodes.online is unreal because it does not pick up the thousands of windows master with failure.
So, gentlemen, this coin has days or weeks to die
RIP GOA, and I say that I have a master and I'm fooled by the MNO numbers
|
|
|
|
|
GOA costs 1000 coins, in windows it is rewarding 12 coins every day or two days. That means that the ROI is a minimum of 83 days, that's counting at today's price, but as it will fall, the ROI in money will go to more than 150 or 200 days.
I'm sorry, but right now there are better coins, and the Masternodes.online information is incorrect, I leave the notice here.
If you do not do to solve the problems, I will not do anything to promote it.
With how easy it would be to get new wallet that works well in windows, then the real data would be seen in MNO and it would not be at all attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
As much as I try with Desire's sentinel, it's only enabled 2 minutes. I have added the sentinel in the task scheduler every 5 minutes, but it has no effect.
I do not think that this problem is solved, we receive less rewards from Windows users, there is no exchange, the DEV does not comply. I see a bad ending.
I understand that as you have 24 masternodes try to protect your interests, but there really is no real solution for Windows, when someone will teach me how to fix it then. In Discord they do not pay any attention, they say that only 0.0001% of the masters are windows and that windows does not matter, that's in the discord.
3 days ago they said that in 2 days they were going to publish a guide to solve the problem of windos, they have overcome the time and they do not solve the problem and we are locked with the coin without being able to sell it, I would sell my coins right now of GOA, since goa is despising the masternodes in Windows. You only need to read discord for it.
If you give me the solution so that ENABLED is always on the GOA wallet in windows I will change my opinion in this forum. But I feel compelled to say what is happening, so that people know where they get.
In masternodes.online the ROI that GOA gives is IRREAL, it is not such, because it does not count the thousands of windows nodes with Whatdog_expired, and it gives a roi and gains that are much higher than reality. Another shows more than the currency is closer to death than to resurface.
I'm sorry to be sincere and realistic, I do not have to tell me that I'm doing well on windows and I have 24 nodes. Give the solution, because if not, I'll think it's a lie and just want to protect your investment and the best way to protect it is by having more users buy the node.
I have many other masternodes, and I would like to read the forum in bitcointalk people tell the truth as I am doing right now, instead of promoting something that right now is not working well for windows. Yes, it gives some rewards, but less times and less than Linux, we are at a clear disadvantage and do nothing to solve it. I want people who read the forum to know whether to buy or not, know what is happening with GOA, as I would like to read it in other posts and not only read the positive, and once you have bought the coins you will find the problem if you use windows.
They are very unpleasant against Windows users.
So I suggest that the DEsire sentinel solution hangs here so that the master node will always be on Enabled or it will be a lie. I have read you in Discord asking for help for windows, and there you have not received an answer. I hope your solution or this post bitcointalk I would be concerned to comment what is happening with GOA and masternodes in Windows.
The only way for GOA to obtain benefits is by raising the collateral or introducing more members, such as a ponzi scheme.
Right now my personal recommendation that if the numbers of ROI and profits of masternodes.online are totally wrong because Windows does not count and gives ROI and very high PROFITS that do not correspond with reality. And if you are going to enter with Windows, do not do it. I just like to comment with sincerity.
|
|
|
|
You can use windows sentinel for Desire coin. I ran 35 nodes on windows vps, most of them got reward already.
I have that sentinel and it only works when you open the wallet for a little while of a few minutes, then although you launch it again, it does not remain enabled. So what to give some special configuration? |
|
|
|
|
I guess it will have to be through the task scheduler and launch it every 5 minutes or something similar.
What exchange are there that GOA can be sold?
|
|
|
|
|
those who think about mounting a masternode to think about it, if it is in linux there is discord support, but in Windows the wallet gives a Whatchdog_expired error and they do not do anything to fix it, you get only 1/10 of the rewards
So if you mount your Masternodes on windows do not buy the coins until they fix the problem, because if not, users of the wallet linux take your winnings
|
|
|
|
|
there some easy way to install sentinel for windows ?? because everyone in discord gives the solution for Linux. It seems to me a discrimination on the part of the DEV that does not have the wallet well compiled for Windows.
Some solution to fix whatdog_expired in Windowa
|
|
|
|
|
His problem is that day, where he has the rigs is a workshop, and he can not have access to all the energy to run the rigs at 100%, and he wants to lower the OC so that the workshop and the Rigs work. And then at night increase the OC to the maximum you can to maximize income.
I suppose this kind of situation will happen to many people. It does not have to do with the price of electricity, only with electricity availability when sharing electricity with a house, a workshop etc ...
|
|
|
|
https://www.dropbox.com/s/65evui8bz7w7vyp/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202018-08-22%20a%20las%2013.42.57.png?dl=0Hello @patrike and @moobidoo, I have a problem with one of the users of my telegram group, who is embarrassed to write in the forum and they have me as a messenger. I think it's a problem that can be quite common. He has 6 rigti of 1080ti, in a place of his mother who has a workshop. By day he does not have all the energy, and at night he does. Right now he is working with a generalized OC of day, and another global one at night. So I suggest that in the properties of a miner, when we choose a protocol, for example neoscrytp in the GPU Clocking Profile section, it is a little wider. By default like this, but that there was the option to put double OC and that each one activates at a time. For example Neo to 9AM, choose moderate OC profile Neo at 10 PM chooses aggressive OC profile If you do not touch anything, it would be the default one that we now put in the normal way as in the capture. I leave capture in case there are doubts of where I say. That way he can put different OCs to each protocol or a-l-g-o, instead of just playing with two general OCs, because that is not to get maximum performance. Some protocols consume little and may have a higher OC of day and others are very demanding and would require a lower OC of day. I told you that it is not my problem, it is the problem of another user of my telegram but that they have made me the official spokesperson. Another thing, I want to give you the congratulations of my telegram group for the statistics, everyone will buy the Cloud service when there are statistics and I the first. I leave capture of the area where you could solve this problem can choose two OC and two different hours to activate each. And if you leave the first by default and without time, it would be the same as right now. I hope you understand the problem
|
|
|
|
Hello Patrike,
Thanks a lot for adding ability to update softwares using local network shares. It works perfectly !
I would have another request regarding benchmarking. Most of the softwares allow AM to read power consumption from graphic cards.
Could you add the possibility for AM to read this power data during benchmarking and save it at same time it save hashrate ?
I know it's not representative of the global power used by a rig but it could be enough to compare profits between algorithms...
Thanks for the update. The feature to include power usage for benchmarks should be possible to support on nVidia systems in the future. Thank you patrike! *** TL;DR
Could you give the consideration to offer (for a price where you see fit) periodic data collection into AM Cloud that includes data like http://mypc:17790/api/miners, and future, power consumption when integrated) please? *** Long Version*** More feature suggestions - (likely suggested b4, but let's see if it can be pushed up the development plan) I think by now, most ppl gotten into mining "seriously" (ones that can call collection of home rigs "mini farm" and has to fork out electricity cost from own pocket) are starting to realise that mining is hard work and not immediately profitable or "lucrative", as of this time with BTC hitting almost yearly low and Altpocalypse, a good portion of the mining community has already switched off their rigs / sold their equipment...etc. It probably makes good sense to implement a "real" performance analysis feature and there's no better time than now when everyone start to realise the pick and shovels are quite costly to run and work their magic. Right now, I haven't came across (granted, haven't tried much) any software that seriously takes the cost factor into performance report/analysis. like @trucobit says, it's a feature that is becoming very sought after (see how desperate he is  ). Everything involved in profit switching decision making is revolved around no more than 24 hours of data and can only provide estimate with limited samples, this is true not just for AM, but almost every collective mining management software out there. IMHO, there really is no "performance analysis/report" when this performance doesn't take into account of cost, AM already has historic hashrate performance logging, but that means little on it's own if power consumption / monetary profit statistics cannot be used in conjunction with this data. Especially when hashrate differs from profit switching perspective and the data on its own has very little to no usefulness. Might I humbly suggest, that since AM already has cloud service integrated. Is it possible for now, that you could provide some options to collect (as much in detail as possible) mining data like how @Finnsk3 does ( http://stats.finnsk3.com/) periodically (1min is cool). I understand implementing anything useful for representation / analysis will take huge amount of time (like @Finnsk3 said, he collected all the data, but he also lacks time to have it integrated in his own site for reporting), but at least it would be nice to have a way for us non-programmers to have these historical data collected and available for future use. and you could work this one out progressively to provide extra add-on services for the AM Cloud feature like how @trucobit suggested @Finnsk3 (at a cost of course, I know @trucobit and I for 2 are willing to pay for the reasonable add-on price for additional features ;p, i'm not inciting business competition between you and your customer(s), but who'd know AM better than you and already has a working cloud platform to run the services?) Wouldn't be useful if there's no data to analyse, so better late than never, to start collection process now, and gradually expand the aspects of report analysis. This not only give insight to past performance, future estimates, but it could provide a nice foundation for "Intelligent Profit Switching" decision making etc. *** One thing I'm doing (extremely slowly) is that while people are requesting ability to record and find out the optimal "intensity", I'm trying to find the optimal Hash/W at given BTC/Fiat in order to find the best Profit/W, by adjusting Power Limit instead of adjusting intensity, in theory and probably easily (but not for me, my mathematics sucks), there is an optimal given BTC price where benefit of increase in power consumption still results in more increase in profit and conversely in some cases, benefit (profit) of reducing power usage (hence increase H/W) actually is better when say, in a prolonged bear market like this year. This for me (and my level of crappy maths) involves benchmarking at various PL (currently, i'm doing in 10% increments) and record them in different profiles, then later trying to figure out the correct formula, so I can say (in English/common language) and make rules that's like (for a very concise example): When USD/BTC is > 10000 and/or mbtc/MHs (for particular algo) is > xxx, then use high PL profile, or else, use low PL profile. this would come into very handy to find an optimal value for USD/BTC and mbtc/MHs (once I figured out the formulas or...if you could make AM do it, saves me the headache ) used for the trigger, especially when you also have a comprehensive "historical" data to compare. Best Regards, *** P.S. I just tried minerstats.com's msOS, and the comprehensive reporting doesn't have what I wanted above, and AM is far more superior and versatile in terms of profit switching (and self managed), so for a price of paying for the kind of services like minerstats, minerboard, hiveOS, i'd rather have to just pay AM and have less complicated operation. Although I quote you (@moppidoo) here, the answer below is of course for @trucobit as well. First of all, I fully agree with your points that the current performance history feature and the insight and statistics of what you have been mining isn't as good as it could be. I've had a number of comments on this so it's on the list of feature to add. Your insightful feedback is valuable and is interesting as it also brings up the concept from a Cloud Services point of view. May I ask what your view is on if the existing Performance History feature is improved, without the use of Cloud Services? For example that Awesome Miner wouldn't only include hashrate and temperature, but also pools, algorithm, mining software, power usage and profit? Of course a way to analyze and get a summary of this would also be required. I do see both benefits and drawbacks with including Cloud Services in the concepts here so any additional comments on this topic is of course valuable. Thanks for the great comments. I only want to give my opinion about deep statistics. I am not a user of the cloud service, although I would not mind paying if the price does not rise. As indicated by moobidoo, upload statistics data of all subscribers in your own cloud can be bestial in your hosting account, unless it limits for example statistics to the last 3 months. And if it is a problem as indicated by Moobidoo link for example Dropbox, I have a business of 1tera. An alternative to reduce costs in storage if at the end you store the statistical data, it is of course compress that data and cache to 4 -12 hours. It does not have to be real-time statistics. The frisking as you know, reduces the requests to the database and only reads a txt with the information, and this file is updated every X hours. I would reduce the threat and process, although it would not be bad to link it to an external Dropbox account in my particular case. AM the program, has Database installed, could even the same in localhost display it in a browser window, and be the same equipment that has installed the AM who would store the data. But I understand that it can be a service of added value to the cloud service. I do not use Cloud, because I have everything in the same place, in my house of three floors, in the basement, and I can put even more miners, I manage everything by RDP, and if something fails under a plant and restart. That's why I have not hired that service, but if you include those detailed statistics, the more details the better, it will be what will make me and other users pay the cloud service in the end, in my case only for the statistics. In the telegram group that I have about AW, we have talked a lot, and we would not mind paying an amount per month for having that information, because in the end I will recover it by making better decisions. Especially towards online services and even on loose coins. It is important to have a vision of everything. I know that you have it in mind, and that someday we may be surprised with a new version of the cloud with statistics, that same day, I will hire the service, I do not mind paying and it is not a high payment. And the added value should be no more cost, you would enter more because you would sell more cloud services. I do not insist anymore with this, I see that we are all in agreement and it only depends on you how and when. I hope you surprise us with something good that makes you even stand out more about your competition, if you have one. |
|
|
|
Hello Patrike,
Thanks a lot for adding ability to update softwares using local network shares. It works perfectly !
I would have another request regarding benchmarking. Most of the softwares allow AM to read power consumption from graphic cards.
Could you add the possibility for AM to read this power data during benchmarking and save it at same time it save hashrate ?
I know it's not representative of the global power used by a rig but it could be enough to compare profits between algorithms...
Thanks for the update. The feature to include power usage for benchmarks should be possible to support on nVidia systems in the future. Thank you patrike! *** TL;DR
Could you give the consideration to offer (for a price where you see fit) periodic data collection into AM Cloud that includes data like http://mypc:17790/api/miners, and future, power consumption when integrated) please? *** Long Version*** More feature suggestions - (likely suggested b4, but let's see if it can be pushed up the development plan) I think by now, most ppl gotten into mining "seriously" (ones that can call collection of home rigs "mini farm" and has to fork out electricity cost from own pocket) are starting to realise that mining is hard work and not immediately profitable or "lucrative", as of this time with BTC hitting almost yearly low and Altpocalypse, a good portion of the mining community has already switched off their rigs / sold their equipment...etc. It probably makes good sense to implement a "real" performance analysis feature and there's no better time than now when everyone start to realise the pick and shovels are quite costly to run and work their magic. Right now, I haven't came across (granted, haven't tried much) any software that seriously takes the cost factor into performance report/analysis. like @trucobit says, it's a feature that is becoming very sought after (see how desperate he is ). Everything involved in profit switching decision making is revolved around no more than 24 hours of data and can only provide estimate with limited samples, this is true not just for AM, but almost every collective mining management software out there. IMHO, there really is no "performance analysis/report" when this performance doesn't take into account of cost, AM already has historic hashrate performance logging, but that means little on it's own if power consumption / monetary profit statistics cannot be used in conjunction with this data. Especially when hashrate differs from profit switching perspective and the data on its own has very little to no usefulness. Might I humbly suggest, that since AM already has cloud service integrated. Is it possible for now, that you could provide some options to collect (as much in detail as possible) mining data like how @Finnsk3 does ( http://stats.finnsk3.com/) periodically (1min is cool). I understand implementing anything useful for representation / analysis will take huge amount of time (like @Finnsk3 said, he collected all the data, but he also lacks time to have it integrated in his own site for reporting), but at least it would be nice to have a way for us non-programmers to have these historical data collected and available for future use. and you could work this one out progressively to provide extra add-on services for the AM Cloud feature like how @trucobit suggested @Finnsk3 (at a cost of course, I know @trucobit and I for 2 are willing to pay for the reasonable add-on price for additional features ;p, i'm not inciting business competition between you and your customer(s), but who'd know AM better than you and already has a working cloud platform to run the services?) Wouldn't be useful if there's no data to analyse, so better late than never, to start collection process now, and gradually expand the aspects of report analysis. This not only give insight to past performance, future estimates, but it could provide a nice foundation for "Intelligent Profit Switching" decision making etc. *** One thing I'm doing (extremely slowly) is that while people are requesting ability to record and find out the optimal "intensity", I'm trying to find the optimal Hash/W at given BTC/Fiat in order to find the best Profit/W, by adjusting Power Limit instead of adjusting intensity, in theory and probably easily (but not for me, my mathematics sucks), there is an optimal given BTC price where benefit of increase in power consumption still results in more increase in profit and conversely in some cases, benefit (profit) of reducing power usage (hence increase H/W) actually is better when say, in a prolonged bear market like this year. This for me (and my level of crappy maths) involves benchmarking at various PL (currently, i'm doing in 10% increments) and record them in different profiles, then later trying to figure out the correct formula, so I can say (in English/common language) and make rules that's like (for a very concise example): When USD/BTC is > 10000 and/or mbtc/MHs (for particular algo) is > xxx, then use high PL profile, or else, use low PL profile. this would come into very handy to find an optimal value for USD/BTC and mbtc/MHs (once I figured out the formulas or...if you could make AM do it, saves me the headache ) used for the trigger, especially when you also have a comprehensive "historical" data to compare. Best Regards, *** P.S. I just tried minerstats.com's msOS, and the comprehensive reporting doesn't have what I wanted above, and AM is far more superior and versatile in terms of profit switching (and self managed), so for a price of paying for the kind of services like minerstats, minerboard, hiveOS, i'd rather have to just pay AM and have less complicated operation. Totally in agreement with @Moppidoo, he has been able to express much better than I the importance of some functions that do not exist now. AM for me is the best program, but it can be improved, you already have options for almost everything, you update miners frequently, everything goes more or less well. It's time to have control and statistics, under my humble opinion |
|
|
|
|
The project is still solid, it does not win much but it is in a stable phase, which is a pity that the forum post does not have more activity
|
|
|
|
|
Well you're wrong, the nodes follow, the page has returned with the white paper, everything works ok. Please do not do FUD
|
|
|
|
|
Please complete statistics, earnings per protocol, changes per protocol, per pool etc ... There are already many functions, at some point you have to begin to have more control over what we mine and the benefits that we report. Knowing if I make changes in my strategy is better or worse ... It is already necessary, it is basically what the program needs most now
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
