See reference which Pamoldar has been given. It is not my business either Pamoldar will remove or give positive or negative. If any DT did anything unfair than you can post it on reputation board, though I don't think there is anything unfair also based on your behavior the negative trust by me was also accurate but removed that as a courtesy. If you don't Remove that I have still no problem, will create post against the feedback if you again is on DT.

If dogie was excluded from DT, then I would not start this thread. My main concern if you make me DT and I got negative feedback from another DT who gave me unfairly then why you will not give counter feedback. If you cant give me counter feedback means you have made me DT for unfair means.

As I have seen silverfuture gave negative feedback without any scam or scam attempt by TMAN. Ognasty made silverfuture a DT and Ognasty already gave feedback to silverfuture so it is not matching with the question of this thread. It is same as I am thinking.
For Tman: Tman gave feedback for the answer of silverfuture's feedback. As there is no comment/reply option I don't think it is unfair.
Above all, I think silverfuture done mistake by giving negative feedback of TMAN. Tag should be removed if you ask me to remove anyone then I would vote to remove silverfuture.
I had no intention to give negative trust but I gave it is a replied of the feedback by iconfirm. Anyway, I am removing that as a courtesy.

IconFirm does not read and/or do not want to read s/he just wants to leave negative if you write anything which may go against IconFirm. 100% trust abuser thanks God s/he has been removed from DT for creating this thread.

It will show only to you, not for others, so not need to be excited. Untrusted people can be excited by seeing like this because they think their feedback made the person negative.

Yes, it has value like masturbation. The untrusted person can give a 1000's negative trust if that might have value then DT will go down by a single minute. Because DT receives maximum negative trust from Untrusted person(non dt).

Did you give me negative trust without checking that link? I have posted that link on the topic starter. You have no power to read and write you can just give a fake review.

You will have to laugh if you see the reference and then match with the comment. On reference, I told about his/her DT power and on comment s/he told about the trust s/he has given to others.

There was something power misused/mistake that's why now you are not on DT if they were right and I am wrong then more people add you on DT. But now check your DT score last time I saw -2. Hopefully, think you got your answer.

This post is not regarding whom and why you gave negative trust. This post is for how a negatively trusted person can be a Default Trusted person. Who has been tagged by another DT and the person who has made you DT not gave counter feedback? If s/he cant give counter feedback then why s/he can include you in DT?

Someone gave 11 merits that don't mean anything unethical, I have also seen both of them targeting to post mainly on currency exchange and this also can't prove anything. To proof merit, abuse needs more proof and for your kind information want to say you that moderator does not moderate merit abuse or scam activities or anything like this.

You joined on "Round: 15/4 - 21/4" and on that round you created only 5 posts so no payment on that week. On round "Round: 22/4 - 28/4" you created 20 posts you received 0.0006BTC and "Round: 29/4 - 5/5" this round will be ended today and you will be paid tomorrow if you can fulfill their requirement.  You have applied on April 12, 2019, 03:00:28 PM and have been accepted on "Round: 15/4 - 21/4".

If you mean @logfiles Then as further as I know s/he is not getting any from signature as the campaign already ended.

---

Anyway, there is a possible scam so why the community will stay away from the discussion?

I mean Lafu excluded IconFirm on Lafu's trust list.
And lovesmayfamilis removed IconFirm from lovesmayfamilis trust list. Hopefully, think now it is clear.

Read my Terms and conditions from https://archive.fo/Apbh4#selection-733.0-733.130
Do not need to post here if you can not fulfill my requirement. If you still create a non-sense post then that will be time waste for both of us.

I had created this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139390.0
After that IconFirm is not on the DT list.:
1. Lafu excluded IconFirm on Lafu's trust list.
2. lovesmayfamilis  removed IconFirm from lovesmayfamilis trust list.
So the feedback by IconFirm has gone to untrusted feedback. That's why now your trust is on neutral.

I am using Depth 2. You are also seeing the truth. In the meantime there is two change:
1. Lafu excluded.
2. lovesmayfamilis removed from DT.
That's why now you can't see him/her on DT list.

Reserve:
IconFirm has been removed from DT2. More info will update here if got anything. Still waiting for my answer.
Received Negative trust from IconFirm for this thread.

I have just seen this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5139388
When I saw the negative trust I thought it was for loan default when I went details I saw the different reason. But 1 thing kept my attention. I saw the DT who gave negative trust also a negative trusted person.
The DT: IconFirm
The negative trust given by: dogie
Reference for the negative trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064824
Negative trust received at: 2016-05-25
DT made by: lovesmayfamilis

If any DT1 make anyone's DT2 then why s/he cant give counter feedback if the person is legit. And if DT1 not sure the person is legit or not then how s/he can make that person DT2?

That can be bought by anyone and you can know the ownership not changing for that that can only change a few features. But when you will sell or buy the account then ownership will be changed manner/activity of the previous owner and the new owner can be different but for copper ownership not changing so activity/manner not changing.
For being a copper membership the owner of the account cant get any advantages from the community I mean cant sell reversible payment, cant take loan for the rank, can take part on the higher ranked campaign and so on. But if account sells then all this opportunity can be taken by the account.

Yes, I think you are not responsible for that and you should not be responsible for that.

S/he is selling account which can increase scam, spam. And once s/he will sell the account and the account will be tagged and after tagging the account will the seller return the money? The seller knows very well that account will be tagged that's why not posting from the real account or s/he has no legendary account.