Thanks.
It's the tuto that i have ever follow to upgrade but, my new cgminer never start after upgrade.
Just typing "cgminer" not start anything
Any idea ?
thanks.
I think I can remember that something changed that the command to start the miner changed. Try starting the miner through the terminal by typing whatever is written in the readme of cgminer. Sorry, I can't offer more help as I personally use BFGMiner. Best of Luck. |
|
|
|
I might have a few factory seconds left. If you are interested and serious pm me.
PM sent |
|
|
|
|
Any known trusted 2nd hand sources for these?
|
|
|
|
My questions:
1.) Would it be possible to import a supernode DB someone else built?
2.) If yes, would the ram requirements be signifficantly lower just to run and maintain the DB after?
3.) Are there any UI changes when running --supernode? Is there a simple way to e.g. check address balances? Or would I basically have to create a new watch only wallet, import the address and the advantage would be instant showing of balance without rescan?
1) Yes. It will need to be using the page size as your machine's native page size, so there may be some limitation from one OS to another. 2) Yes and no. The DB will access less data to update the last few blocks, but a lot of that data is spread randomly around the DB, so unless you have a SSD or tons of RAM, expect extreme updating times regardless. 3) No changes in UI yet. Any wallet or private key you import will render quasi instantly (time to compute the paged history). We had planned on adding a plugin to quick look at any address, but that was put on hold. Maybe for 0.93.1 Anyone care to torrent a supernode db? I would love to try. I am not so sure what page size means exactly but i am on x64 Ubuntu 14.04 shall it matter. |
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm responsible for the DB code. For those who care, it takes me 3h30 to build supernode, which approximates 90GB with the current blockchain size.
If you have less than 16GB of RAM and a HDD, do not expect supernode to build under a week. Your machine can't handle it. This DB type tracks ALL transactions in the blockchain, it's meant for heavy duty servers. You should at least try and see how long it will take your system to build fullnode before thinking of going with supernode.
The obvious bottleneck is I/O. Moreover, LMDB maps its whole dataset in RAM, so a machine with little RAM and a swapping file on a HDD will get crushed.
I tried to start with supernode and ran into performance issues as described by others. I only have 4gb ram so I guess it is to be expected according to gotapigs post above. I did not read through the whole thread and maybe the answers are given already... My questions: 1.) Would it be possible to import a supernode DB someone else built? 2.) If yes, would the ram requirements be signifficantly lower just to run and maintain the DB after? 3.) Are there any UI changes when running --supernode? Is there a simple way to e.g. check address balances? Or would I basically have to create a new watch only wallet, import the address and the advantage would be instant showing of balance without rescan? |
|
|
|
Hi
Is it possible to upgrade Cgminer to 4.9.1 on minepeon 2.4.6 ? It's for can working with my antminer U3
U3 is not reconised on provided Cgminer version on minepeon and only like a Antminer U1 on Bfgminer.
Thanks for helping me...
Yes it is possible. There are some tutorials/walkthroughs on the minepeon forums. Unfortunately the search function is pretty bad on that forum so I can not find it for you: http://minepeon.com/forums/ |
|
|
|
for bfgminer -o http://localhost:8332 -u username -p password --generate-to 1and_so_on i am getting [2014-11-23 23:31:27] bfgminer: --generate-to: unrecognized option Am I using it wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Hatte mit OP per PM kontakt. War sehr hilfreich, Danke.
--no-stratum löst das Problem
|
|
|
|
Hi
Also diff1 ist unabhängig von der aktuellen Geschwindigkeit des Bitcoin Netzes.
Wenn ihr 4GH/s habt solltet ihr jede Sekunde ein Share finden. Wenn ihr nur
400MH/s habt dann halt alle 10 Sekunden usw.
Das ist aber alles nur statistisch, garantieren kann man das nicht. Das kann
auch mal länger dauern oder aber auch schneller gehen. Im Durchschnitt ist
es aber so wie oben beschrieben.
Denis
Könntest Du diesen Reddit post mal ansehen. Ich schaffe es einfach nicht auf diff1 zu minen. Meist ist es 32. Manchmal mehr, manchmal weniger. zudem redirected mich 8332 getwork immer auf den stratum port. Es ist echt schwer einen low diff PPS pool zu finden. Alle anderen sind gestorben oder haben sich als scams entpuppt. Wäre wirklich extrem verbunden, wenn wir für unser Projekt einen diff1 Worker bei Euch haben könnten. http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2msb2w/to_arms_bitcoin_community_help_us_to_complete/ |
|
|
|
Hi
Also diff1 ist unabhängig von der aktuellen Geschwindigkeit des Bitcoin Netzes.
Wenn ihr 4GH/s habt solltet ihr jede Sekunde ein Share finden. Wenn ihr nur
400MH/s habt dann halt alle 10 Sekunden usw.
Das ist aber alles nur statistisch, garantieren kann man das nicht. Das kann
auch mal länger dauern oder aber auch schneller gehen. Im Durchschnitt ist
es aber so wie oben beschrieben.
Denis
OK danke für die Bestätigung. Da muss aber in demfall etwas im Argen liegen. Wir haben 9.5 Ghash/s brauchen aber so zwischen 20 und 40 Sekunden im Schnitt. Manchmal gehts auch nur 5 Sekunden. Schnitt ist weit weg von dem, wass Du schreibst. Woran kann es liegen. Welche Einstellungen bei BFGminer sollte man machen, um ideal für getwork diff1 aufgestellt zu sein. Kann es sein, dass mehrere shares zusammen geschickt nd aknoledged werden? Ich weiss wirklich gerade nicht, was ich tweaken soll... |
|
|
|
|
Hallo btcmp.com Team ;-)
Ich habe ein Frage und denke dass ich hier richtig bin.
Ich habe eine Mining Anwendung, bei der ich mit wenig Hashrate jeweils nur kurz am Pool bin. Deshalb habe ich mich für btcmp.com mit getwork diff1 entschieden. Es handelt sich um eine "Muscle Powered Proof of Work" - Installation im Zürich MoneyMuseum. Die Bitcoin Ausstellung dort eröffnet am 07.11.
Kann es sein, dass es länger geht, wenn die Hashrate global nun bei 300 Petahash/sec ist als noch vor ein paar Monaten bei 160 Petahash/sec, bis eine getwork diff1 share akzeptiert wird? Wir haben in letzter Zeit das Problem, dass das bis zu 30-30 Sekunden dauert. Das wirft uns nun etwas das GUI über den Haufen, was nämlich auf die Last Share received Time schaut um den Satoshi Zähler zurückzusetzen, für den nächsten Kurbler.
Gibt es BFGminer seitig zwingende Einstellungen, die wir allenfalls falsch haben. Habe den Kollegen gesagt, dass sie nochmals überprüfen sollen, dass MinePeon auf den richtigen Pool zeigt: rr.btcmp.com:8332
Um jegliche Hilfe bin ich sehr verbunden.
|
|
|
|
I don't know somebody wrote to here or not.
But i think the Armory and other programs could have a potential vulnerability.
For example what if your computer with installed Armory (watch-only wallet mode) is infected and trojan/virus which modifies a receiving address in Armory's interface? How can i trust to my online watch-only computer that all generated addresses are my addresses? What if trojan/virus modifies installed DLLs/Shared libraries of Armory and substitute watch-only generated addresses or seed to hacker things? If i will send to money to generated address how can i sure that this address is my address for private key at offline computer? :-/
What do developers think about this?
I jsut double check the address before broadcasting. That's more or less all I can do. Of course you could take appart the unsigned and signed transaction before broadcasting. However, as long as I don't hear anything else I consider it safe enough... |
|
|
|
Hello, I am here tonight to see if you can help with a thought I have. I want to download Armory but I have worries that it will require me to download the blockchain again. I remember the 60 hours I spent waiting to download blockchain before with the qt client I think it is called.
My question is this:
If I download the Armory wallet and synch it, will it take more than...20 minutes?
Electrum looks good because it does not require a full download of the blockchain
Thank you
If you already have a Bitcoin core installtion, Armory will go on top of it. For me armory takes about 5 min untill the DB is built and the wallet is online once the Blockchain has finished catching up. So yes it does require a full blckchain downlad, but you can use the one you have already. |
|
|
|
|
Got mine as well... THX. Left some trust rating...
|
|
|
|
So when are we receiving our payouts from those 1000 blocks!?
PAYOUT, is another main questionn to be addressed, pls! |
|
|
|
|
WTF, just checked my cryptomex account. Nada, nill, nothing. Where is the fu**ing cash man. What was all the talk about test payment, rest comming later.
I really hope these guys feel miserable for the rest of teir lifes and will never get a job related to Bitcoin ever again.
No communication, nothing, not even excuses. What was the lates official announcement on this thread?
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
We are rewarding bug contributors with the following Bounties (0.03 Btc per bounty):
LOL - 1
PRab - 4
PodBayDoors - 1
SimonBelmond - 1
Searinox - 2
TimS - 1
(Note that this does not include Helgabutters who's bounties are being handled separately)
If you think that you are owed a bounty that is not included in this list, please let us know and reference the post with the bug.
For those on this list please post a public address for us to send your reward.
Thanks for everyone's contribution to this project. We really appreciate it and so do all of the Bitcoin Armory users.
As I have previously donated to Armory anyway, these 0.03 can be used to fund the next bug-bounty round. THX for everything you guys are providing! By the way, my offer here is still valid for anyone interessted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=607046.msg7606568#msg7606568 |
|
|
|
sorry guys, I have been traveling. I will try and make a new build sometime soonish.  The error that Moneychagner cannot start is because of not packaging a QT dependency. There has been a huge amount of work on Open Transactions since the last build. There may be quite abit of work to create another build. Cam. THX. Looking forward to it... |
|
|
|
|
OP has not replied here in weeks. Will write him a PM as the activity log shows that he was active today!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
