Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »
|
Don't you think it's possible he's trying to retain plausible deniability while using his reputation to sell his project?
+1 The guy is no fool
|
|
|
when does the crowdsale finish? is there escrow?
nxtty was OK app
|
|
|
NODE is an enigma, why did it fade away, it had real tech
|
|
|
Hello all, Days ago i started working on new project which is a place where people can buy/sell digital stuffs such as steam gifts, csgo skins, projects, (no idea about other stuffs), etc... The project will be like an automated secured middleman, Im confused if people will be interested or not in something like that. If yes or not, please suggest me something to make it better, or other things to add to be more attractable, Or any other ideas which i can earn money from , Thank you for reading. good idea, but there's already so much competition from established players, like NXT freemarket, which is up and running for a couple of years almost you need a niche
|
|
|
Haha, as u say, that s a lot of IFs in one post.
'speculation' is the name of the game in the cryptosphere
|
|
|
My strategy is nearly always the same: I buy into a project that I see as promising and then I watch the development over time. And that's never boring, because I highly focus on "context". Every piece of information, even if it doesn't seem to be directly relevant for a specific project, can be helpful to get a bigger picture, which is needed to evaluate correctly what is relevant. And over time it all together becomes clearer. In some projects I believe to see more negative than positive signs and I sell. In some it's the other way around and I buy more.
In Factom I bought nearly to all prices. Most of my FCT's in the first three months after launch, but I also bought in early January and I bought the last weeks after the "pump-n-dump" in march.
I still believe that a lot of ppl come to wrong conclusions about Factom because they try to understand and evaluate it out of a wrong context. But Crypto has already changed and Factom is one of the projects that are different, not just the system but also the team. Exactly that is good and not bad.
That's my strategy mostly as well. I also follow people, and have had good success at finding coins early from seeing where respected forum users are posting. There's not one single key factor but if 4-5 guys with good credentials are following an alt I take notice. That's how I found Factom
|
|
|
Thanks! Wow, they started with 100,000% APR... that's intense. Unfortunately I missed out on that. that's insane for a PoS .... extreme staking ...
|
|
|
What POS coin has the highest interest percentage? (of the list)
Cheers
That would have to be BigUp with POS 2 @ 100% per year immediately and forever. Unless I am wrong :p then please someone point me to the insane POS coin :p It's TEK with 40% monthly interest. TEK was a standout but has had troubles with microstakers messing with the diff and so staking returns
|
|
|
This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?
I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project. It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view. However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it. crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price. There is no conflict of interest because between Investors in Factoids and User of Factom. User don't need to care about the price of Factoids. For them it's always about the price of Entry Credits which are fixed: $0.001 They don't even need to know about the existence of Factoids. They can buy EC's with Dollar - Credit-Card etc. If there is a conflict, than it's about short- and longterm-investors. Short-term-speculation needs news, as much attention as possible, "hype" and "soon". For them it's about the communication of a team. Often enough they buy the announcement of an announcement to sell into the real release (buy the rumor, sell the news). Longterm-Investors want to see the real value increase: The use of the system. So, the system is priority. Second: Business side... partnerships. And kind of funny but also kind of weird is how Crypto changed/changes the feeling of time. A month is a year, so there should be something to celebrate at least once a month (exchange-christmas). I know that feeling. But for those who do all the work, a month is still a month. Good post! I didn't realise entry credits had a fixed price, and I agree that crypto time is accelerated to ridiculous extremes now where days feel like months in other industries. I consider myself a long term speculator, so I'm holding factoids for at least 1-2 years. I suppose anyone who doesn't day trade is thinking something similar now, hold until crypto is mainstream, then sell a % for a life changing return
|
|
|
UpdateAs you are aware we have encountered a few issues along the way to the hard fork and the new wallet release. Firstly, we had a PoS issues that has now been fixed. Secondly, a user has flagged up another issue with balance transfers that we are also making a fix for. There are still problems to get the old chain to accept transactions from the new wallet and we are now working with a couple of test nodes to debug the transaction fault. It seems that the TX structure / format in the new code is slightly different. We are working full time on this and that's why there has been few updates. We have to get the new wallet working properly, no shortcuts, and successfully go beyond the hard fork before we can move on to other features and implementations. We will get there soon but I am not going to set a specific time for the hard fork until it's working and it's been tested. Once everything is tested and working we will announce a 7 day upgrade period on all channels. I will try to update every 1-2 days from now with what we are doing until we have this sorted. If you are technically minded you can have a look the latest public repo for MOJO. We are working with a couple of private repos and will commit from time to time to the public one. Just in case you are concerned that nothing is happening. Once we are past this stage, the network should run stable and we can concentrate on the wider implementations of MOJO and get some masternodes up and running. Hang in there and we'll create something special... thanks for the update!
|
|
|
This is all very nice and dandy but there s still only one question on the table. M2?
I think you should just sell your Factom as you obviously no longer believe in the project. It s not that I do not believe in the project. All my other project I m involved with, I get to have a daily or at least weekly communication with the DEV team. With Factom team, it s once a month, maybe, if they feel like it. This makes me feel they care more about end users then Factoid holders which s also acceptable from business point of view. However, this is not ACCEPTABLE from my point of view. Still, no point in polluting the thread with this argument, I understand I am not relevant for Factom at all so let s drop it. crazyivan has a valid point, the interests of Factoid speculative holders is different to Factoid users now, so there is some conflict of interests here. I am a speculator too as I bought in the ico before everything was known, like everyone else, and I don't see myself using factoids anytime soon for their intended purpose. I want Factoids to moon so I make some returns, but the dev team probably don't care about that. Factoid users probaby want stable price.
|
|
|
Happy Bday to Factom Senior QA Analyst Veena Gondkar, thanks for all your hard work! https://twitter.com/factomprojecthttps://twitter.com/veenagondkarIf you look at the photo, it can be seen in the Factom team has become more and more people. I hope the celebration of birthdays and various anniversaries will not affect the basic work above M2. happy people, nice
|
|
|
my patience is at the end.
sell coins and feel free I will buy cheap Mojo, send PM
|
|
|
All of the old skool high ongoing inflation rate coins(TeK, HBN, PHS) have all collapsed in value, particularly since cryptsy went away. Meanwhile Zeitcoin has seen nice stable & steady growth due to its staggered inflation rate which drops from 15% to only 5% next year. Just what's needed for a mainstream digital currency. Don't take my word for it, see for yourself. http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/zeitcoin/#charts While CBX only has 2% inflation rate and a minimal number of coins to start with. CBX with PoSP means effective stake is closer to 8%
|
|
|
No Ethereum can never be bitcoin. It has unlimited supply feature. Mining of Ethereum is comparatively easy as compared to bitcoin. It is good for investment purpose but it can never overtake bitcoin.
If the world economy growth is 2% a year and the supply growth of Ethereum is 1% a year, it is still a deflationary currency. world economy is headed for contraction, negative growth
|
|
|
Very nice 5p7Ux3qLntH5XZDsDszioKw5svWPcda8H2
|
|
|
Will eXocoin be on any exchanges on launch day? I'd like to buy some asap
|
|
|
3)"the Coin You Can Trade Forever"
|
|
|
I'm a member nxtl: 14892900634405657736 #788
|
|
|
|