Beyond 1 minute the size limit for the human eye everything blurs into a line that rises to the eye level, it's a flat line because the earth (70% water) is flat.

"one thick line"

^^^ Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416 disagrees with you.

The distance to the horizon is based on the aperture size of the eye and its elevation. A Nikon P900 can see 6 miles no problem and there's no curve, no geometric horizon and no globe!

The closest star is 25.6 trillion miles away according to the sodomites at The American Astronomical Society. A quick angular size calculation on that number exposes these Jesuit fags as liars, their claims are in blatant violation of some very basic laws of optical physics.

^^^ Thank doG for the New York Times, 800 out of a 1,000,000,000, that's on par with the common cold!

Those stories about the smell of burning bodies must be fake news. Satellite photos from outer space of burning garbage piles that's all, isn't that right boys?

John McAfee thinks it's man made.

https://crypto-markets.news/news/john-mcafee-circulates-man-made-coronavirus-theory/411



   If the cancer industry is any indication, then making AIDS spread like the common cold could be a huge cash cow for the pharmaceutical industry. Look at all the people "living" with AIDS today, now we can all have AIDS!

Right now where I live all the stores have pulled hand sanitizer, in preparation for the pandemic. A smart move that will greatly assist with market penetration by removing barriers to the #1 vector for infection.

^^^

Close your eyes and imagine an apple. What do you see?

.

^^^ You two are on the same page, you both agree the Sun is a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb a hundred million miles away. You guys are working together to gaslight me with your pseudo-scientific heavenly spheres. Your fucking balls contradict both the Bible and the laws of physics!

^^^ I ordered my Prospero X-3 2 TH/s ASIC Bitcoin miner from BLACK ARROW in 2013, I'm still waiting for my ship to come in.



Do you think maybe it got delayed by this flu going around?

While the electron is no doubt a mathematical abstraction, negative charges are definitely physical in nature. The smallest, lightest, least dense charges are emitted from the (-) cathode (ground/earth) and flow to the (+) anode (dome/firmament). These charges push (down) denser matter out of the way as they flow to the anode. This process creates a density gradient (fluid) such that denser material is forced down by a less dense material until layers form.

The ground and the firmament also form an asymmetric capacitor and displacement current (aetheric) flows between the electrodes.

@odolvlobo,

   Buy a clue dude, the electron is a mathematical abstraction. The aether, a super-fine gas with a non-zero mass so small it can never be measured is all that exists, all that is "real", all that is "physical"; the aether is the canvas of reality.

You can't see how it [Maxwell] applies because then you'd have to admit that the Coulomb Force is the mechanism behind buoyancy. This exposes relativistic gravity as the experimentally falsified (D&P 1939) fraud it is, to which you seem to heavily invested.

Full disclosure is that you can measure the Sun yourself with a sextant, this is possible because the aperture size of the human eye and, the wavelengths of sunlight are known. The Sun is 32 minutes or nautical miles across when measured directly.

The nautical sextant comes with a welding glass filter for looking directly at the Sun.

^^^ What right do you have to any opinion on science whatsoever? You believe that a mass of pressurized spinning gas can exist in a hard vacuum without a container!

You want to have an authoritative opinion on the weather but can't grasp the basic concepts of high and low pressure systems...

Check out this tailgate party, they've got Mexican beer coolers!

Medical Workers Detain Chinese Couple in Metal Box -- https://youtu.be/FM5FnCrEMmM

@odolvlobo,

"...they still didn't know what electricity was at that point..."

   Maxwell, the guy who wrote the book on electromagnetism, he didn't know what electricity was? You're joking right?

"...I asked for a technical explanation of buoyancy in the absence of air..."

   And you got it, aether behaves as a superfine gas (a fluid).

   If you can't put two and two together and see that Maxwell's treatise describes electromagnetism in terms of fluid flow equations where the fluid is the aether, then you're in over your head buddy.

   All the forces involved with buoyancy are electromagnetic in nature; Coulomb's Law applies.

"...like the flywheel paper you  previously linked, you gave me something that was not applicable..."

   The paper I linked describes shear stress in regards to flywheels, the SHEAR STRESS on a flywheel thousands of miles wide would be absolutely catastrophic. A spinning globe just like pressurized gas in a vacuum, is physically impossible!


P.S.

   Don't ever become an engineer.

No you've got it wrong, belief is something you have in regards to living on the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum. I know the earth is flat and motionless, I know because flat and motionless is the default condition and, you, you and your shitty faith with the church and their heavenly spheres of theoretical impossibility, you look like fucking idiots with your fucking trash pseudoscience and circular logic.

If you think pressurized gas can stick the surface of a ball spinning a thousand miles an hour in a hard vacuum, you've gone full retard!

These assholes are lying to you, all their trashy propaganda about how the Sun works is nonsense, like outer space and the whole dog-on Copernican system. The Sun is not a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb that never stops exploding in your face, you damn dirty apes!

The Sun is a close small disk of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane, the image of this disk is reflected off of a concave mirror (the firmament) to create the holographic projection we see. The Sun directly measures 32 minutes (nautical miles) across.





"... Seven of the 20 fake articles written by the trio were accepted by journals after being approved by peer-review committees tasked with checking the authors' research. A faux study claiming that "Dog parks are Petri dishes for canine 'rape culture'" by one "Helen Wilson" was published in May in the journal Gender, Place and Culture. The article suggests that training men like dogs could reduce cases of sexual abuse. ..." -- https://phys.org/news/2018-10-real-fake-hoodwinks-journals.html

^^^ Dubay (the author of that quote) is correct and you're an complete idiot, here's why:

   The horizon (apparent) is created by the angular size limit of the eye or camera, this physical limit is the result of the aperture size and wavelength(s) of light. As objects recede into the distance they get smaller to a vanishing point (the size limit), the distance to this point is defined by the eye. The result of all objects in the field of view converging to a point is a vanishing line a.k.a. the horizon line.

The globe model's geometric horizon (physical) is complete nonsense and doesn't exist, this can be confirmed by the individual with modern optics such as the Nikon P900. The apparent horizon is an established part of science and has been a known optical effect for a long time.



Reference:

   Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. ISBN 978-0444511416.

Documentation:

   Nikon P900 Distance to the Horizon Test -- https://youtu.be/U7GIW0vJcic

^^^ I'm sorry but you're an idiot, now you're going to cry because Maxwell above your IQ level and you can't see how it relates to your question?

You asked for a technical explanation and you got it. It took me many weeks to read and understand that shit, I had to read them several times over. You didn't have time to read any of it.

Displacement of aether as I stated before is a macroscopic explanation for why objects fall in a vacuum, however electromagnetic forces are behind this phenomenon. If you want to understand the concept of aether and the forces at play Maxwell's calculus goes into details but, this is not a physics textbook for pre-schoolers that describes why shit falls.

You keep asking about aether displacement and I keep telling you about electromagnetic forces, I'm not avoiding the question I'm explaining what I understand is going on, capiche?



edit:

There's a few things I should mention, for one there's original copies of the treatise available. Any copies linked from Google or academia will be censored versions. Also the equations touted as "Maxwell's Equations" by academia are not from Maxwell, these equations are crippled versions of his original quaternions.

Second, the aether can be regarded as a superfine gas however, it's what matter is made of. Let me explain with an analogy:

Say we have air, water, a whirlpool and a boat. We can talk about buoyancy with the boat displacing the water or the water displacing the air but, what does the whirlpool displace? It displaces the water creating a funnel shaped void of air and, it's made of water, and water is flowing through it.

Do you see the difficulty in describing the whirlpool using buoyancy and the displacement of water? You need to use fluid dynamics to describe it properly. Maxwell's original equations are all based on fluid flow mechanics.