I noticed that Cygan green rating has increased dramatically. I realized that he adds everyone to his list of trust. The reason for adding such users to his trust list is that they left him positive feedback and in order for it to be displayed, he, as a member of DT1, makes them DT2. I suggest throwing him out of DT if he doesn't immediately stop doing this shit. He not only needs to stop this, he must also remove from his trust list all those whom ONLY he trusts. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnaDDWI2.png&t=665&c=Ue1SHZhbVmt2tA) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fy3YJ0mT.png&t=665&c=yCgLoiDIc87_bg)
|
|
|
Discussion! I just saw this news and freaked out. Source: https://hub.elliptic.co/analysis/has-a-sanctioned-bitcoin-mixer-been-resurrected-to-aid-north-korea-s-lazarus-group/Like Blender, Sinbad is a custodial mixer, meaning that its operator has full control over the cryptoassets deposited within it. Elliptic analysis indicates that Sinbad is in fact highly likely to be a rebrand of Blender, with the same individual or group responsible for it. In particular: - Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that, before it was publicly launched, a “service” address on the Sinbad website received Bitcoin from a wallet believed to be controlled by the operator of Blender – presumably in order to test the service.
- Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that a Bitcoin wallet used to pay individuals who promoted Sinbad, itself received Bitcoin from the suspected Blender operator wallet.
- Analysis of blockchain transactions shows that almost all of the early incoming transactions to Sinbad (some $22 million) originated from the suspected Blender operator wallet.
- The on-chain pattern of behavior is very similar for both mixers, including the specific characteristics of transactions, and the use of other services to obfuscate their transactions.
- The way in which the Sinbad mixer operates is identical to Blender in several ways, including ten-digit mixer codes, guarantee letters signed by the service address, and a maximum seven-day transaction delay.
- There are strong similarities in the structure of both services’ websites, as well as in their use of language and naming conventions.
- Both services have a clear nexus to Russia, with Russian-language support and websites.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FB84fvbk.png&t=665&c=avGSBOYIhxqQbQ) Blender may have been motivated to re-brand in order to avoid sanctions, and OFAC could now seek to impose further sanctions on Sinbad. It may also have done so in order to gain trust from users, following Blender’s abrupt closure last year, and the disappearance of significant amounts of funds from the mixer.
|
|
|
Why is my ost removed? I just wanted to know what would happen to the $40,000 left in the campaign fund. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Hoće li DarStar podijeliti ostatak sredstava ChipMixera sudionicima kampanje? Menadžeru je ostalo 40 tisuća dolara i rekao je da nema veze s ChipMixerom. Zatvorio je Google tablicu i valjda će nakon što u nedjelju isplati sudionike kampanje zadržati sredstva. Možda kupiti motocikl ili nešto slično. https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty
|
|
|
Does this mixer work? I cannot access the site.
|
|
|
I'll leave this here so that people can familiarize themselves with the situation. ( ~yogg)
|
|
|
Hero of Good: LoyceV, JuanG Golden Feather: fillippone Bitcointalk Ninja: DdmrDdmr Bitcoin Geek: HCP, gmaxwell, NotATether Event of the Year: - Fail of the Year: - Discovery of the Year: n0nce Best SpamBuster: GazetaBitcoin, Csmiami Best ScamBuster: examplens Craft Master: Jayce, AntiHero: JollyGood, franky1 Miss Bitcointalk: -
|
|
|
Isn't it forbidden? Can someone clarify this? I think this is a veiled call that should be banned as the thread will be filled with non-organic posts. 10% bonus for providing support on Hunnyplay Ann thread in absence of the forum representative.
|
|
|
Imagine what the losses would amount to the day Binance gets hacked again.
This is unlikely since Binance stores 95% of its own and user assets on a cold wallet. And, Binance has a $ 1 billion insurance fund created to fully cover losses from hacks. If Binance collapses, it will happen for other reasons.
|
|
|
This verified twitter account is hosting a giveaway posing as the LooksRare project. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaD19Iv4.png&t=665&c=jtDA6KZe1RqTAw) Coinmarketcap says that the domain name of this project is different (.org). ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fx7Nd4K8.png&t=665&c=OJzGGKdG3Es46g) When you go to this phishing site you see a countdown but when you refresh the page you have the timer set back to 13 minutes. In no case do not connect your ETH wallet to this site!![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F5TYkuP5.png&t=665&c=BrI_AQ5s0dgopA) I have already reported this to twitter support.
|
|
|
snip I just wanted to know who better not to mess with to avoid problems. Those who, through their influence and pressure, can destroy your reputation on the forum. Someone to be feared, or at least someone who should have their ass licked to be your friend.
Ratimov
I don't think he has any influence here. While it has made some serious progress, (it has evolved from a translation spammer to an adequate poster). [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
Foxpup - Influence 8 out of 10.
Foxpup has created a unique closed club, whose members represent the cream of this forum and no one in their right mind will dispute his tags and will not argue with him publicly, because whoever does this will be subjected to a flurry of criticism from the members of the closed club (and those who trust these people).
|
|
|
In my seven years of existence on this forum, I have seen many people, and in my opinion Lauda was one of the most influential people here. I take into account only ordinary users, those who are not related to Bitcoin Core. I'm talking about those people who have influence on the public. Tell who you think is influential and why. https://bpip.org/Report?r=mostmeritUsers from this list best fit the description.
|
|
|
Can you please tell me where can I find instructions for setting up a bot for publication in my thread? Thank you!
|
|
|
I am completely confused.
Why doesn't Roy777 exit the project and pay the required amount from his personal funds?
|
|
|
It is an Idea. I think you should check it with these points.
All parabola with >50% linear corrections are cycles. All tops found as log 1.618 extensions of cycle lows. Cycle top ~$180k BTC. Sub 50k potentially never seen again. $1 million bitcoin projection at end of decade.
But please keep in my it is an Idea. Idea of Alternate Macro.
I'm still waiting for Bitcoin below $30k to buy. Do you think it's in vain?
|
|
|
6. Using feedback as a weapon, Ratimov clearly shows how far he is from understanding the foundations of the trust system.Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist. The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it? I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts: ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Floyce.club%2Fother%2Fairfinex.gif&t=665&c=n_pitKOdJVAgVg) When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it. (~~~) As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust. That would be very obvious Trust abuse. (~~~) You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them. To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day: ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Floyce.club%2Fother%2FwooI_Ioow.gif&t=665&c=E-r5T0A5xdOWeA) I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another " brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts?
|
|
|
1. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts.Ratimov: More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection? Your saying would be true if I created a topic about airfinex a few days after he accused me.The Pharmacist: The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.LoyceV: Just last week, airfinex posted in "~", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic: 2. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov.—if Ratimov did not deny in principle, that publishing something in the form in which he publishes it is a bad example. —if Ratimov had not chosen to reply with an ad hominem attack against an accusation brought with evidence. 3. Constantly demonstrates extremely arrogant and devil-may-care attitude towards the community, he deleted posts but there is an archive.Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me. 4. Ratimov regularly resorts to mutual exclusion on the basis of revenge, eddie13, DireWolfM14 expressed his opinion and he added him to the list of distrust.3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FRvPomeb.png&t=665&c=SS6yNSDOWhXzDg) To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out. I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks. Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3S7oUMo.png&t=665&c=8Pfb0C1a8fFXwQ)
|
|
|
1. Absolute Hero of Good: theymos 2. Golden Feather: JayJuanGee 3. Bitcointalk Ninja: LoyceV 4. Bitcoin Geek: Greg Maxwell 5. Event of the Year: - Exploring options 6. Fail of the Year: - Exploring options 7. Discovery of the Year: n0nce 8. Best SpamBuster: actmyname 9. Best ScamBuster: Nutildah 10. Craft Master: Jayce 11. Antihero: Ratimov 12. Miss Bitcointalk: Foxpup 13. Best Moderator: Welsh
|
|
|
Pretty much any media format can be an NFT including audio and video.
Those cases when pictures are destroyed but before that they are scanned are also called NFT?
|
|
|
|