|
how can I get a slack invite for Nav
|
|
|
|
|
akzeptiert ihr auch DASH ?
|
|
|
|
when I want to install the Android app I get this error:  any solution ? |
|
|
|
The Navcoin Windows wallet has three hits in virustotal.com Antivirus Ergebnis Aktualisierung
Baidu Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.151026.9950.9997 20160730
K7AntiVirus Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 ) 20160731
K7GW Unwanted-Program ( 004baab71 ) 20160731
is there any reason for it? |
|
|
|
the site seems legit they listen all the exchanges' API and provide a good instrument for a trader not sure how their free plan is different from the paid one,though,apart from limited session (have to try it out to check,maybe they limit sessions to 30 seconds  ) also does the platform allow direct trading on selected exchanges through their client?do you have to provide them your API keys or user/pass combo? would love to hear from people who are using the service as 15 a month is not very steep a price for a trader after one month you have to buy a subscription for $15 per month they support direct trading on their platform after you provided them with a API key. But as I said before you may not rely on the visual Coinigy alone since the data may not be up to date. |
|
|
|
I have used Coinigy (and some other trading platforms) quite some time now. Coinigy is still new and little buggy in the user interface. They offer a full featured account for testing over one month - I recommend to try that before buying in. Basically they use the tradingview chart plugin which works very well. But there are still some shortcomings in Coinigy. Eg. the synchronization between Coinigy and the market place is laggy. Second issue is that the additional symbols in the chart which mark alerts buys and sells seem to jump around sometimes if the scale is changed. It works well to position orders graphically inside the chart - just need to wait for the next update from the market then  |
|
|
|
I have just seen the Web wallet - I am in guys  |
|
|
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't bitfinex also have the multisig but despite that ended up getting hacked ?
They had multisig but implemented it improperly. Finally they obvious were not more safe than a market without multisig. That is the result if some incompetent management crew uses buzzwords instead of acquiring specialists. |
|
|
|
bitalo.comthis is one of the best 2sig wallets/markets
|
|
|
|
if i didn't know any better, I'd say this was a sh*tcoin.
but you know better |
|
|
|
|
1FSGiB5eJPFkh4KSG8aiZrTvr3iSokYhtB
|
|
|
|
|
500k$ is a huge number
that would be around 10 Trillion market capitalization
but compared to gold which is around 8 Trillion now it seems not to be impossible
to reach that number something must change
that is not the mass adoption as payment system and it has nothing to do with intrinsic value (which is very little for gold)
but the trust base which is the number of people who hold Bitcoin must grow in dimensions
since we see daily news about Bitcoin already now most people have heard about it
but what is needed is that it becomes clear and normal to have trust into Bitcoins sustaining value
if that happens it does not seem unlikely that Bitcoins price make a big jump in a short time
it is not impossible or unlikely that some very rich people see that potential and simply start to buy big amounts
the bigger the economic risk in traditional asset classes becomes the more likely this szenario will be
the last asset class which seems to be safe up to now (gold aside) is paper money because governments back it up
and this guarantee is getting weaker now in insecure economic environments - too much money has been printed
the public debt of the USA has been doubled between 2008 and 2016 up to over 19 Trillion USD - just in 8 years!!
and on top the world wide financial derivative market has a volume of over 700 Trillion USD
as long as nobody throws the first stone public debts will grow more and so do the financial derivatives
but if this system is being shaken then it will fall apart like domino stones
we can see these two developments every day:
- trust base in Bitcoin grows
- word wide financial system is getting weaker
so when will the tipping point being reached?
|
|
|
|
...
Daneben gibt es 5000++ Knoten im Netz. Meine Knoten halten im Augenblick ca. 1000 Connections und < 5% davon laufen laut Version-String (der sich selbstverständlich fälschen lässt) auf XT/Classic/Unlimited. In diesem Fall würden die Mining Power in einem Netz mit 95% der Nutzer auf 25% fallen. Das sind goldene Zeiten für diese 25% der Miner!
Warum sollten diese 25% es sich entgehen lassen, für einige Zeit den Gewinn der abgesprungenen Miner mit einzustreichen?! Das wäre zumindest logisch und auch wirtschaftlich eine sinnvolle Vorgehensweise.
...
Sobald der erste Block >1MB gemint ist, sind die 25% außen vor. |
|
|
|
Wobei ich die Idee eines Hardfork mit Umstellung des Mining Algorithmus inzwischen richtig gut finde. Mit etwas mehr Entwicklungsaufwand könnte man hier sicher einen Algorithmus finden, der die effiziente POW Generierung nur noch unter Einbeziehung vollständigen Blockchain Historie erlaubt. Damit wäre zentrales Mining (und gleichzeitig auch GPU Mining) tot.
Das habe ich schon auf Reddit irgendwo als Vorschlag gesehen. Eine Umstellung auf Cryptonote oder X11 wäre kein Problem. Jonathan Toomin (Bitcoin Classic und http://toom.im/) hat das glaube ich als zu radikal abgelehnt. Der simple Punkt ist, dass das Mining Netzwerk einen wesentlichen Teil des Wertes von Bitcoin ausmacht. Der Versuch einer Umstellung würde noch problematischer verlaufen, als die Umstellung auf BitcoinXT. |
|
|
|
Output Total contains exchange and fees while Transaction Volume is the net sum |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
