Yeah, I know that. That's why I said it's a stupid question. Even if all nodes enable RBF, centralized exchange users won't be able to control their Bitcoin. With that stupid question, I would request everyone to move their Bitcoin out of the exchanges. About some other wallets that do not have a coin control feature, what will they do? Unfortunately, no organization can force those wallets to include a coin control feature.

There was a time when Binance was charging 20000 Satoshi for Bitcoin withdrawals, which was around $5 at that time. However, a transaction could have been confirmed with ten sat/vB, and the cost was less than $1. When the mempool started getting busy, Binance raised it to 0.00075 BTC, which is around $33. But, general Bitcoin users can confirm their transaction spending around $10-$15. Of course, it depends on their transaction size and many other factors. But Binance charges $33 for each withdrawal . Look how profitable it is.

I am curious how I hurt my privacy. Someone can identify by the transaction that I am the one who received the money from a casino, I am the same person who received the money from a mixer, and I am the same person who got some loan from a lender. Are you talking about similar privacy hurt? I understand that this is bad for privacy for those who want to hide that they have used a mixer, gambled on a casino, or taken a loan.

But, If someone does not want to hide that they gambled, they took a loan, and all of them are public already, using the same wallet to receive the funds won't hurt his privacy further. Isn't it? I guess Bitcoin users who have been using trust wallets or other wallets that do not provide multiple addresses to receive Bitcoin were hurting their privacy from the beginning.

Usually, people come up with such ideas when they are desperately looking to create a thread and looking for merits but don't know what they should do, and then they come up with such a stupid idea. Just like signature participants write in a gambling discussion board where they write shit without even understanding what they are writing.

One of my locals said they should wash their wallets daily to clean them. But everyone was talking about crypto wallets on that thread  . Can you imagine how stupid that was? Icopress even leave him neutral feedback for writing that kind of shit post.

Oh no. I didn't get any notifications from this thread until now. I don't know when Hatchy posted that.
He probably edited that later, which is the reason I didn't get a notification. Otherwise, The translation could have been ready now.

Anyway, I will start translating tomorrow.

Edit: There we go; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631891.msg63367035#msg63367035

But that does not always happen in every case. Right? Most of the BitcoinTalk users use one address to receive their signature payments. Now, if they use another address to receive money that came from a casino or a mixer, in this case, sending everything will link all his addresses. But, when someone uses the same address for every purpose, it does not violate privacy.

Moreover, some wallets do not give you multiple addresses to receive Bitcoin. I have used Atomic and Trust Wallet. I don't remember If they had multiple address options. Let's say I was using a trust wallet to receive my payments, and I used to send everything. It does not break privacy. Or do you see anything wrong here, too?


In most cases, Blockchair itself marks an address as a change address, and most of the time, it's correct. But they are talking about privacy.  

শুধুমাত্র মেমোরি লোড করার জন্যেও ধরতে পারে। এর আগেও বিভিন্ন যায়গায় অভিযান হয়েছে। আমি আরো অনেক আগে এই ব্যাপারে শুনেছিলাম। যখন ডিবি বা পুলিশের তেমন কোনো কাজ না থাকে, তখনই মূলত তারা ছোট আকারের ব্যাবসা গুরোতে অভিযান পরিচালনা করে। অভিযান পরিচালনা করার আরো একটা কারন হতে পারে সুনির্দিষ্ট অভিযোগ। ধরেন কোনো একজন সচেতন পাবলিক ফোন করে বললো বা লিখিত অভিযোগ দিলো যে অমুক বাজারে, এই এই দোকান গুলোতে মেমোরি কার্ডে পর্ন লোড করা হয়, সেটার ওপর ভিত্তি করেও অভিযান পরিচালনা করা হতে পারে।

অনেক সময় দেখবেন, ট্রাফিক পুলিশ সব কিছু ঠিক থাকার পরেও মামলা দেয়ার জন্য পাগলের মতো ভূল ত্রুটি খুজতে থাকে। যদিও এনারা কোনো টাকা পাবে না মামলা করলে। কেনো এরকম করে? সোজা হিসাব! যতো বেশি মামলা, ততো ভালো রিপোর্ট এবং প্রমোশন বা পুরস্কার পাওয়ার চান্স। মাঝে মধ্যে এচিভমেন্ট দেখানোর জন্য ও অভিযান পরিচালনা করা হতে পারে।

I would love to ask a stupid question. What will happen if all transactions are RBF by default? Do centralized exchange users get control over their transactions?  Some wallets have to do some work to implement these features. There are a lot of users who use Trust Wallet these days, which gives them the seed phrase! Still, the users do not have options to enable RBF.

I don't see any dangers because it will be a great way for Bitcoiners. Currently, the mempool is unrealistic, and sometimes it goes from 100 sat/vB to 150 sat/vB in a few minutes. It takes less than an hour to reach 250 sat/vB. If RBF is enabled in most wallets, users could bump the fee and avoid waiting for ages!

I thought you were answering with what you have written. Because you did not mention anything, If you wrote it for other newbies, you could write a phrase like "For those who are going to ask questions".

Yes, exactly. He created this thread for other newbies to ask questions. But, I have opposed the idea. I also mentioned the reason for opposing the idea why people should not ask questions in a single thread. You can read below;

I can do $300 Per trade if you want because That's all I have in my CEX wallet.
Or, If you can send it first, I can exchange it for you at no charge (Only if you can trust me).

Dear Dailyscript

The entire beginner and Help section is to ask questions and guides. You don't really need to create a specific thread for users and ask them to ask questions. I have a feeling that you won't be able to answer them all. You might get some unexpected questions that you never heard and you don't know the answer. A single thread for answering several types of questions will become a pure mess. Instead, anyone who looking for answers to their questions should search for the specific topic first, if there are no results, then they should create a thread and ask questions to get the answer from the community.

I would love to elaborate more on why they should create a specific thread and why I encourage them not to ask all the questions in a single thread. If a person creates a thread and asks a specific question, let's assume he got the answer in his thread. Now, if someone searches for similar threads, they will find the thread, and the entire thread will be about that specific question and it is well organized. It's more like how the forum sections are organized now. You should not discuss altcoins in the Bitcoin discussion section. So, A single thread for multiple questions will be a mess! I hope you got that.


He is not asking for help, nor he is asking any questions. He asks others to ask their questions in his threads so the community can answer them.

ভাই, গ্রাম এলাকায় এটা একটা কমন ব্যাবসা। একটা কম্পিউটারের দোকান দিয়ে সেই দোকানে পোলাপাইন পর্ণ লোড করার ব্যাবসা করে। গ্রাম এলাকার প্রায় সব বাজারেই দেখবেন মেমোরি কার্ড এ গান লোড করার দুই একতা দোকান থাকে। সেখানে স্কুলের ছাত্র থেকে শুরু করে বুইড়া চাচা অব্দি গান লোড করতে যায়। আবার দোকানে গিয়া জিজ্ঞেস করে নয় ছয় আছে নাকি? আমার দোকানে বসার অভিজ্ঞতা আছে। এমন বয়সের লোকজন এসে এইসব প্রশ্ন করবে, আপনি কি বলবেন কিছুই বুঝতে পারবেন না।

অবশ্য আজকের দিনে এসব ব্যাবসা বিলুপ্ত হয়ে গেছে। তবুও গ্রাম অঞ্চলে আছে শুনে অবাক হলাম। প্রায় সব গ্রামেই এখন ইন্টারনেট কানেকশন চলে গেছে। পোলাপাইন এখন অনলাইনেই পর্ণ দেখে। আর অনলাইনে আরো কতো সব এপ্স আছে যেগুলোতে পোলাপাইন আসক্ত হয়ে লেখা পড়া ছেড়ে দিচ্ছে।

The suggestion for a Thanks button is not bad. But the threat you have given to the forum moderation is ridiculous. haha.
There indeed was for members to thank someone which is merit. But if you are a newbie with no sMerit, you can still post thanks in a thread. As long as you are not doing it in every thread you read, it should be okay.

Let's say I suggested you thank them and now you started to post Thanks in every thread, this will be considered spam and that does not make sense at all. There are a lot of forum members. If they can follow the forum rules, you can do it too. If the forum admin adds such a button, it won't harm anyone. But, I highly doubt theymos will do something like that.

This is merit abuse and you should not do it.
Many things are not mentioned in the official rules thread. Sending merits to your alt account is not forbidden in the forum. But, the community sees it as abuse because it IS abuse. The forum does not moderate scams. But you can still advertise scams and you won't get banned for that. But the community will likely give you negative feedback. Similarly, forum do not forbid account selling, but if you get caught buying/selling accounts, you will be tagged by the community members. There might be some other rules, but I do not remember them.

Now, one more important point. While some people speculate you are not a newbie but an account farmer, I would like to believe you are not. Judging from your merit history, you have some skills and you are likely to earn a lot of merits with the knowledge you have. Knowing programming is not everyone's job. If you know something special that everyone don't know, you can make yourself a special one. Try to contribute in this forum positively and you can become another discovery of the year.

Not only on Social media, but I guess I have seen similar offers in this forum, and it was this morning If I am not wrong. Someone was offering arbitrage trading from Africa. He said he could buy cheap Bitcoin from Africa and sell it on the other side of the world with more demand, and he was asking potential buyers to DM him. Whenever I see someone ask to DM them for a deal and they are newbie, I feel like this is a Scam.

We are heading into a most speculated halving event. A couple of ETF approvals ahead. So, we expect Bitcoin to boom next year. Meanwhile, more scammers will invent new ways to scam people. It's the right time to ask everyone to be careful.


Porfirii, I don't know about him. But, believe me, I saw a casino ad this morning on Facebook, and I was laughing. Because It was Shakib Al Hasan's deep fake video where the voice was robotic. He was saying that Bangladesh gives a license to a casino to operate and he is the brand ambassador. I knew it's fake and I skipped it.

Username: Learn Bitcoin
Have you placed a sports bet in the last 60 days? No

Reserved

I have sent my LTC address via PM.

A Short review of your service.
I have been in your campaign since the beginning of my forum journey. That is over 40+ weeks in all your campaigns, and I don't remember If I had a single issue with the payment or post count or something. You have been professional with your campaigns.

1. Bucks
2. Yes
3. Warriors
4. No
5. Lakers
6. Heat
7. Yes
8. Suns
103 points

This is not entirely correct. I don't know how many newbies I have seen fighting with others or poking others, or insulting others. But, I have seen a lot of high-ranked members who consistently engage in discussion with a negative mindset, and always try to find something wrong. For example, let's say you didn't know the difference between the gas fee and Bitcoin's sat/vB. While some members will tell you the difference and help you understand which one is used for which one and how fees are calculated, some others will start criticizing you because you were wrong.

There are another type of people who will always look for your mistake if you ever speak against them. They always deny their mistake and they believe that they cannot be wrong. The recent case of a one of the reputed member shows how anyone can be grounded due to bad manner. I guess you have seen Ratimov in this forum. He has a bad habit of attacking others whenever he see someone said something that he did not like.

So, yeah. It's important to have good manner and most importantly, A Thicker Skin.

Hi Julerz

Can I reapply?
If so, here is my application;