Latest posts of: vuce

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31]

601

on: April 16, 2011, 06:40:37 PM

grue speaks the truth. It's all about expected values, and prop expected value is always higher than pps.

602

on: April 16, 2011, 06:18:18 PM

Quote from: bitcoinex on January 23, 2011, 08:37:59 AM Quote from: da2ce7 on January 13, 2011, 10:20:51 PM Allow bitcoin to export wallet file with encryption. Question: Can we use the built-in Bitcoin public-private key infrastructure. And use a Elliptic curve encryption? "Elliptic curve encryption" don't allows encrypt anything. It is may be used only for signs. care to elaborate? ecc can be used with every algorithm of which security depends on discrete logarithm being difficult. This can be either for encryption or signing. @OP: why not use symmetric encryption instead? Public-private key cryptography doesn't make any sense in this situation.

603

on: April 16, 2011, 06:14:25 AM

Quote from: zoro on April 16, 2011, 04:12:04 AM a proposal to make deepbit just a little more interesting a fee to the one that finds a block of 5% or 10% and the rest of the block to go to the other co-miners? In the long run this doesn't really matter, it would only increase the deviation, and this is exactly why we mine in a pool, to keep it down.

604

on: April 15, 2011, 08:46:18 PM

Quote from: FreeMoney on April 15, 2011, 08:39:36 PM So there are about a million Americans who want to play poker right now and can't. It would be a good time to open a nice Bitcoin poker room. If some developer with experience making things happen needs a little capital, let me know. we're in the process of assembling a team that would/will make this happen.

605

on: April 14, 2011, 06:07:36 PM

Quote from: JohnDoe on April 14, 2011, 12:52:05 PM 3) If you were extremely wealthy, would you prefer storing your bitcoins in a single address or spread it out evenly over 100 addresses, making it 100 times more likely for a collision to happen but only being able to lose 1% of your wealth at a time? even if that happened you would not lose any coins, as I understand it.

606

on: April 14, 2011, 02:37:54 PM

Quote from: Grinder on April 14, 2011, 02:30:06 PM It should be pretty obvious that it was a joke, even if slush hadn't included the smiley. ah well, now that I look back at it that makes sense sorry about that.

607

on: April 14, 2011, 02:28:24 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on April 14, 2011, 02:20:19 PM Quote from: vuce on April 14, 2011, 01:36:05 PM Quote from: slush on April 14, 2011, 10:51:43 AM Looks like your pool forgot switch to higher difficulty . btc/share went down as soon as the difficulty changed, so I'll say that's not the case. "BTC per share" is only for PPS mode. yeah I know, but that obviously means your pool took the new difficulty in account, doesn't it?

608

on: April 14, 2011, 01:36:05 PM

Quote from: slush on April 14, 2011, 10:51:43 AM Looks like your pool forgot switch to higher difficulty . btc/share went down as soon as the difficulty changed, so I'll say that's not the case.

609

on: April 10, 2011, 08:45:10 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on April 10, 2011, 08:44:21 PM Quote from: vuce on April 10, 2011, 08:42:55 PM I keep getting "not talking to master and retries used up". Is anyone else experiencing the same problem? I'm deploying second server, so short interrupts are possible. Don't worry, it will be fine shortly. Ok thanks.

610

on: April 10, 2011, 08:42:55 PM

I keep getting "not talking to master and retries used up". Is anyone else experiencing the same problem?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31]