Well, if this clown actually DID use @Cryptogift he would already be a banned user (YoutubeTV and about 40 other alts) and would be banned yet again for ban evasion. Unfortunately your screen print doesn't provide 100% proof for him to be reported. That being said I believe you. He's probably got 10 others going as well. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) A scammer for sure but whether he is this cockroach can't say. Also this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5133910.0
|
|
|
Little doubt he is a scammer but His posts say his telegram is: What makes you say it's @cryptogift?
|
|
|
~ I can see there being unintended negative consequences as a result of nuking trust ratings from banned users. I would support this being done say before they become a senior member or something such as that This topic isn't about all banned (Autobanned) users, only Newbies can be nuked (meaning all their posts are deleted when they get banned). Anyone from Jr. Member and up can't be nuked, unless a Mod manually removes enough of their posts to derank them back to Newbie. Is there a reason why trust comments cannot be edited, only deleted? Without an edit history, it would be unclear what you wrote at which date. There isn't if you just delete a trust comment and re-enter it corrected/edited either which you can do, so why not just allow an edit? Either way there is no "paper trail."
|
|
|
It's sandy-is-fine (You need the dashes and no "s" at the end). http://archive.fo/3K2jBhttp://archive.fo/cowOJSorry that the previous clown is spamming this thread. The 2 archives are all I need to say. Hopefully this alt will be gone like the other 5 or 6 and no doubt a new one will suddenly appear tomorrow and more crap from he/she will follow.
|
|
|
Can I also get POSITIVE FEEDBACK from SCAMMERS removed from my untrusted feedback like the 2 below. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2FsWjB7kD%2F2019-04-15-17-51-23.jpg&t=663&c=ONqOgrpqD9L4vg) Every red I have gotten, (if you simply look at the user's trust) I have no issue with as it is quite self-explanatory but the last 2 positives from the above 2 scammers gave me a chuckle. There is a move at play here, just waiting for it to start. I was checking sandy-is-fine's Untrusted feedback, and noticed a lack of arguments from for instance Konnow_: 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 24/7 ON BITCOINTALK VIRGIN 10/10 The account has been Nuked, but the feedback is still visible. I know feedback in general isn't moderated, but once a user has abused the forum up to the point where all his posts got Nuked, shouldn't his Sent feedback get Nuked too? There are more examples, the next feedback comes from Nuked user Mallex: Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Ching-chong kid I hope your mother burns alive #FUCKCHINA Not all trust abusers got Nuked, but it would be a great start to do some Trust cleaning.
|
|
|
A 5 year old post suddenly gets bumped by about 11 newbies with less than 10 posts each . Sure looks familiar. Wonder how much he paid for this account? If it looks like fish and smells like fish it's fishy. archived for history: http://archive.fo/xjTQ2
|
|
|
Big vouch for Podgor. So far no problems. Of course YMMV, this is just my personal experience so far. Just make sure you Skype the right person as he has a number of impersonators.
|
|
|
You can remove LOVEHACKED from the list (along with his 2 scam sisters SKEPTICAL ONE and PRINCE OF ESCAMS). Lovey got his big payback and finally got banned and joined the other 2.
being banned does not mean topics were deleted, so there danger is still there, these guys spread their telegram and emails in every post they make so they can pretty much be accessed, so it's best to keep these scums on the list for like ever. My comment was basically made in jest but yes, this is correct and is something that actually should be suggested (removing those posts) but this is off topic of this thread. That being said, I highly recommend this list as it has saved me at least one time. For the price you certainly can't go wrong.
|
|
|
Probably the wrong place for this post but ........ I'm surprised that when a user is banned it's not "scarlet lettered" BANNED on his/her profile (like in the spot where their rank would be posted). In the case of gift card scammers in Digital Goods section who have been banned their posts generally remain and since they were locked anyway they continue to scam on Telegram or whatever they were using..
|
|
|
You can add #73 to the banned list.
|
|
|
You can remove LOVEHACKED from the list (along with his 2 scam sisters SKEPTICAL ONE and PRINCE OF ESCAMS). Lovey got his big payback and finally got banned and joined the other 2.
|
|
|
This whole thread raises the much bigger question of why you are so keen for sandy-is-fine to be banned, and why you are picking other users' fights for them, especially when they don't want your help as evidenced by the above comment. It's almost as if you have some vested interest in there being no repercussions for posting anything you like in the Digital Goods board.
And like he said of me earlier in this useless thread: "Here goes Mr Payback again." He is def obviously obsessed with me. Guess that shows I am getting to him. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) @o_e_l_e_o , exactly what you said. Aside from being a troll Mr. Payback has an obvious agenda. Everyone should be skeptical about this one (pun intended) because it's obvious what he is up to. Note the dates he started posting vs. dates when the scumbags started having bumps deleted and quickly got banned Obviously all of us tagging the obvious gift card scammers like the former 3 sisters who are, I mean were, scamming behind locked threads have caused Mr. Payback's retirement account to drop like a rock. Since I have so much free time ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) it's quite easy to follow his crumb droppings. "THEBIGPAYBACK" for me was finally seeing all those major scumbags banned. Still a few to go. The one positive result of them being banned is most of their alts are now only bumping their threads once a day instead of 20x including the fake sock-puppet posts many of which also were banned All that plus this idiot's accusations that because the same people tagged these scammers on the same day we are all the same person shows exactly what his agenda is. He's just a troll and should be stepped on and crushed like the cockroach he is.
|
|
|
I think this person was probably on the list by mistake, OR it is a mistake that he is not banned. He has zero posts ATM. I presume it is the later. Also helpful would be links to all of these people's threads, so that readers can see examples of what constitutes a scam attempt in Digital Goods. I have looked at the Digital Goods section multiple times recently, and nearly every thread on the first several pages was a clear scam attempt, or a clear attempt to launder money, or both. DUSKEEGIFTCARDS was tagged for being a very obvious fake thread vouching and trust vouching alt of (now banned) BOLG1 along with DUSKS, DUSK, DUSK(pick a wildcard). Sinceyadin, kafiristanica and undoubtedly a lot more and IIRC also had his own thread. Many threads and thread topics get changed or deleted. Many of the messages in the threads get changed or deleted. Kind of like with the Skeptical triplets of which 2 of the 3 are banned and #3 is trying to behave like the good little scammer boy he is and waiting to jump back in for "the big payback". ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) They deleted all the old messages (including fake sockpuppet vouches) from a number of their locked threads.
|
|
|
Last week got scammed by this guy with username as: embroiderymate for $280. Folks please beware as he plans a perfect trap to scam you!
Obviously you didn't read his -999999999999999999 bright red 100% negative trust with about 3 pages of red negs. Sadly, the only person you have to blame for this one is yourself. Gotta do the due diligence.
|
|
|
Don't you think it's time to update your list?
|
|
|
You obviously missed my point. There is no way in the world people sell things to LOSE money (other than maybe to launder money). Obviously the people you buy from want to lose money which either makes them thieves, scammers or money launderers, there can't be any other explanation. I am not calling you a scammer and not saying you aren't one either but at the very least you have to be selling compromised stuff. Just saying what you (and other sellers like you) do makes absolutely no logical sense unless somewhere along the line something is wrong. If folks want to buy from you that's there right as long as they get what they pay for.
The scumbags who sell thing and don't provide them to the buyer at all ... that's another issue and I do not say you do that.
As for Paxful, you should just stick your forum name in your bio. At least that connection is made properly.
I understand what you mean, but there is no point for me to buy and sell above gift cards actual price. Noone would buy these. There are hundreds thousand gift cards sold below their price on daily basis in paxful and other sites aswell. I have updated my paxful bio and my forum username is there now visible on my profile. You simply don't understand and I'm not going to try to explain it again. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
You say you BUY them. How do you know the ones YOU BUY to resell are legit? Maybe your sellers steal them? Is that any different?
Why would you (or the people you buy from) go into a store and buy a $100 or $1000 allegedly legit gift card then resell them just to LOSE money? Makes no sense. Somewhere along your chain these cards have to be stolen/hacked/or scammed. So you buy them from someone and he makes a profit then you resell to make a profit so obviously these cards are initially obtained fraudulently somewhere along the chain.
Also, how does anyone know that Paxful link or your "proof" is actually you? I didn't notice anything there that connects you to this thread or user name? I am not very familiar with Paxful so just maybe I missed it.
No more free bumps from me.
I ask for sellers to send me card photo and receipt paid with cash(no credit or debit card payments). If my buyers are afraid of stolen cards they can ask me for anything other they need like handwritten notes and so on.. What else I am supposed to do? I am not able to put my forum profile link or telegram id in my Paxful bio. It is not allowed by paxful. However if anyone want to verify it is mine I can do it for just few minutes or you can tell me anything to write in my Paxful bio on time and you can check that yourself in my profile. I can verify its mine by any other way you have in mind. You obviously missed my point. There is no way in the world people sell things to LOSE money (other than maybe to launder money). Obviously the people you buy from want to lose money which either makes them thieves, scammers or money launderers, there can't be any other explanation. I am not calling you a scammer (and not saying you aren't one either) but at the very least you have to be selling compromised stuff. Just saying what you (and other sellers like you) do makes absolutely no logical sense unless somewhere along the line something is wrong. If folks want to buy from you that's there right as long as they get what they pay for. The scumbags who sell thing and don't provide them to the buyer at all ... that's another issue and I do not say you do that. As for Paxful, you should just stick your forum name in your bio. At least that connection is made properly.
|
|
|
|