It's still too soon to call it a breakout or moonshot since it haven't yet gone to it's full potential which I believe is somewhere in region of $700 (after the halving) and since were still at $400 region ($411 to be exact) then it's a long way to reach what you could/should call a moonshot.

Honestly, my first impression was was, very sleek and nice interface (good choice of theme there). Bookmarked your website since it seems to have great potential. Few things I noticed which was a big strange: On your donation page, it's somehow lags a lot while scrolling up and down but on other pages everything is normal. Lastly on the top header part in donator tab and in 1 2 3 part, all have the same links, not sure if it's meant to be replace by names of individuals or it's an error. Aside from these, it's perfect.

In regards to your second question, No, I personally don't find the useful (to me), since there are numerous ways to buy BTCitcoin already and that could explain why only few are left as you mentioned the other ones were removed. Also some of ATM's were reported having long process before users could get their BTCitcoins sent to their addresses so that could also explain why it's not that popular after all.

Thank you for the confirmation, we appreciate it

Done, spot given to next in line, thanks.

Thank you for the nice words, I appreciate it

Update:
Thanks for the confirmation and your welcome

Update 2:
Kindly read every where before you apply since clearly, were full at the moment, thanks.

Update 3:
No, were full clearly, pls read first.

Here's my entry, hope it fits your criteria (although you didn't mentioned any particular style), good luck everyone

Wow, It would be a waste if someone actually pays for .gq or .gq extension for $5000, even if it's for bitcoin domain itself. Their not attractive and professional since most known brands use either of (.com / .net / .org / .info) only and all these new extension (there are few others that are pricey as well) are pretty much nonsense.

I voted with 100% as well of majority (until now). I haven't encounter a problem so far in my BTCitcoin experience, although some have (due to their own wrong doings) so I'm quite happy with the outcome so far. Although there isn't a thing as 100%, I'm sure when more complications rises, developers rise to occasions as well and would do their best to overcome it (that's what I've seen so far).

Accepted on trial basis, make sure you read the rules all the time. Welcome

Also accepted on trial basis. Complete the enrollment with needed steps so I could include you in the sheet and also read the rules all the time



Sorry guys, those 2 spots are taken now

Note: No more Spots

Update:
No max post per day. obviously pay day is today and if you've red the FAQ's area, everything is there.

Thanks for the application and understanding. But since he applied earlier, I chose to go with him instead.

Thanks for the confirmation and your welcome

Done. Thanks also for being with us until now


Note:
2 Open Spots for either Full/Sr./Hero/Legendary

I'll list some of the things that need some improvement, in order to have better experience (overall):

1. Top image use in the landing page is very bad and low quality and as results, makes it impossible to read clearly. Also I noticed in the very last option the three lines that opens up a window in the header due to the chosen background.
2. Instead of Question in the added header window, it would be better if it's FAQ.
3. Not sure whats supposed to be in place of the part where some comments are there in which it has doge avatars. If it supposed to be a comment or feedback type then a default picture would be better.
4. before the last part on footer, there are no pictures on provided spaces in regards to UI.
5. On footer itself, the order is wrong, it should be: Home first then About Us.
6. Lastly the background image used in forum, is also very bad and low quality and should be improved.

Nice faucet, got 400 Satoshi on the first try. At first when I noticed, it went to the wallet on the site, I thought it's one of those faucet that has certain threshold but then I checked and could cash out without a limit so not sure why you didn't just make it directly, so it will save a step further in the process. Since you mentioned it's a website to help people know more about it, maybe you could add a tab and put some articles there, even though there are some informations in the lower part of the faucet. Overall, nice work

No yet, what were experiencing at the moment, is just normal ups and downs on it's value in the market even though mostly have been up. I would give another 2 months for gradual increase since it's still in a phase that could go either way with short trend of downs and ups (happening recently), and the real rise would be after the halving in July.

It was a well written article, thanks for sharing. It would have been better if they named it "Reduce risk of making your financial privacy known, with BTCitcoin" instead since there's no way to protect it completely while using BTCitcoin, as also mentioned on different cases throughout the article itself. Regardless of it, it's good that they publish about BTCitcoin (more exposure).

Unfortunately it seems that the likely outcome for every country, in the near future. All the country I'm in, still has positive interest ratings, this year alone it was reduce 2-3% alone and from the looks of it, their in the same path as few others that went with negative interest rates lately and this will leave us with BTCitcoin and as result, more demand will surely increase it's value so overall the situation )for us on board) is somehow still a win - win perhaps, as opposed to others that only have funds in fiat.

The most online user I've noticed from the escrow list is, SebastianJu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102721.0
But there are other users that are trusted within the community and do escrow deals on occasions as well, like the following: (on a side note: It would have been better if you sited the amount since some have limits)

shorena: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=181801
mexxer-2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=341982

It's going to happen but not like how it went all the way up in 2014. It's going to be in smaller scale and step by step unless all factors combined then sure enough we could go all the way up like before. The halving alone has a lot of saying on it but we never know if a factor goes against it, in the future.

We might as well call it a no solution after all. People won't pay to view/read a page (very few really do it so far in order for them to access premium content) and if given to make this proposition, happen then can't really see it's effect (like at all). Users will just do what their doing now (blocking the ads).

I know that feeling (like people looking at you as in seeing a celebrity and then asking things they don't believe until their impressed). I've spend BTCitcoin once only here in the country I'm residing and it was for a shoe (the only shop that accepts it openly here), and it took more than I expected (just a bad day). Had to wait until it got 3 confirmations before I was allowed to leave the shop (and it took longer than I expected before the confirmations came in).

Nice graph. It's true and that's the most likely outcome (only one) when this happens again in few months. The moment supply comes harder, price surely goes higher since demand keeps on coming in higher numbers most of the time so looking forward to July when this happens. If you could put a wider range of back in 2012, it could be better to see how was the longer range back then, after the halving.