An account value assessment is not something that some other website that have some type of script predict since most of them just use standard cases and we all know that each account value, differs even if their both have the same rank with the same activity and post. every single accounts needs to be evaluated on a case to case basis before you could accept them for a loan, as a collateral. Quality is one thing, trust is another thing (that both contribute into giving worth to any account).

To give a different answer, think of it as a lego tiles, when you want to create an image, all you do is to add each block to the next one, but with the respective color as intended. Patience is the key into achieving the desired logos for signatures. If your looking for a shortcut, then there's non (AFAIK). You have to do it yourself and keep on previewing it and see if you get it right. Having a basic html knowledge would certainly help you into making good signatures together with the help of photoshop to choose the appropriate colors.

Update:
Like I said before, you need to know some basic html coding. Here's a resource for the shapes: http://www.virtualteen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=28157

What methods of payment or in your disposal for trading? (it could help into providing you a better trading platforms). For now I list few websites in which you could use to trade BTCitcoins in Egypt:

https://localbitcoins.com/country/EG
https://localbitcoins.com/places/579976/cairo-eg/
https://www.facebook.com/EgyptBitcoins
https://mycelium.com/lt/help.html

You could also open up a thread in the following section of this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=53.0

an S7 will do around $187 assuming the difficulty remains the same which it always changes (per 2 weeks). Their main difference is an S7 Antminer is one of the most efficient mining rigs at the moment and s5 is behind it and that makes the breaking point of being profitable than s5.

You could also try the following link: https://bitify.com/section/crypto-mining/
there's an s5 in auction there although personally haven't ordered anything from there (yet).

Honestly after reading few articles of those published by some of the attendees, from the looks of it, were heading to more centralized path if it continues this way and since 95% of miners votes are needed for this to go through (hope I understood it correctly) then it's going to complicate a bit since that's too high. I'm starting to worry though a bit since there seem to be no consensus on the matter (til now) since it looks like two groups that one looking for centralized system with more fee's and the other is after decentralized with less fee.

This is very strange for someone to waste this sort of BTCitcoin in which most of them will go for fee payments as result since it looks like a continuous type of transactions (mostly bot related). It could be used to deceive a brand that is paying perhaps (most likely a investment company that tricks into paying).

Well the title is a bit misleading since all I red on the article was like 99% about blockchain technology and on two occasions only, BTCitcoin was sited. Everyone is after blockchain only (it has been like this for pas few years) and we all know, those are not in the same path as to BTCitcoin, mainly due to them taking control.

AFAIK there's an agreement on place for the 2MB upgrade but just without the exact date at the moment. These changes shouldn't be right away as there will be some sort of collateral damage as result so instead it should go through a transitional phase in which will give enough time to everyone to switch. Taking control of 51% of hashing power is not as easy as it looks (easier said than done), and by saying taking control, you mean making in centralized (somehow) on that matter which is the opposite of what BTCitcoin supposed to be.

Not sure if I'm the only one but after clicking your website, I'm forwarded to the following page instead: http://www.hostinger.fr/cpu_depasse?bitglory.esy.es  It says CPU limit exceeded on the title bar so I assume it's due to overload of users trying to access the faucet and base on my experience, you should upgrade whatever plan you have on hostinger so this problem would be fixed on times of high traffic.

Well the new trend seems to me that it's just getting back to where it belongs. It was around $430 - $420 (earlier this week) before the down trend started 2 days ago in which, it went all the way down to $392 but then starting today, it had good upward streak and it has gone from it's lowest point of $392, up til $409 (highest point for today) and that for me, is recovering to the point, it was left or rather manipulated.

Finally a better domain than what you used to put the content on. There's a lot of free spaces in which you could use to put more ads or maybe even affiliate ads instead. Also I would suggest to add a tab in which you list faucets base on rewards as well since at the moment is base on time interval only (so user could go with higher rewards in case they have less time claiming). Also a better background would surely improve your list and also the header image is a bit stretched so you might want to improve that as well. Good luck

Well I think prior to the halving, were going to be in around $450 - $500 and after the halving were going up at least half of the value prior to halving, so around $750 I suppose (considering no other factors come to play at the time) but again there's a long way until July so our thoughts might not end up correctly in terms of range but in terms of effect, the result will be the same (spike in value).

Nice faucet overall, simple yet does the trick. Tested and it pays into my faucetbox account plus has attractive referral commission (hope it stays like that). One thing I noticed that was wrong is, the total percentage of rewards will give 100.9% instead of 100% so you might want to recalculate and correct that.

Can you sign from this address that goes back to June 18, 2014? 16gFsh4FzVe5i7nqt81LCgRcqCwHcFSmCL
People staked their addresses here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0
The thing is your full member and until now, don't know how to sign message so you could prove ownership of your account and that raises flags considering there's a gap between September 02, 2015 and March 01, 2016 in which you posted again and due to numerous cases of some accounts posting after some times (a lot recently), it would be good to prove ownership since IIRC there's a way that password changes don't appear or reflect on profiles (I heard it somewhere although not sure).

Easy and fast response on your unique faucet. Still have to validate in for 24 hrs to see if payments will go through without a problem (hope good fee's will be used for transactions so it won't stuck since so many faucets that paid directly, had this problem recently). One thing that hopefully could be fixed it, after the waiting time is finished, it just refreshes to that page and doesn't go straight back to faucet so it would be better if it just go back into the faucet itself, without the need to click the faucet game tab.

No I don't think it's related to recent fall down of market price, plus were up to 2% just for today and currently standing on $405 value. Most likely that,someone just switched off his mining farm (regardless of upcoming reduce in reward) or rather sold it to someone else instead (couple of days to ship so the difficulty remains lower than usual), so we should wait for the next 2 weeks to see if it gets recovered or not. Also I don't see why miners would switched their mining rigs at the moment (not until the halving passes by at least).

Not sure where you got that $250 thing since the whole point of the link you posted was something else and not it's value. I sort of agree with some of what was published on the website. Unfortunately it's never going to be easy for different kinds of developers to work together and as result, these difference rise and base on the link, it seems that there's somehow an agreement on the upgrade to 2MB but no time yet (so it's just matter of when). I believe that there will be some consequences after the halving, same time as it will most likely increase BTCitcoin value too so there will surely be some rough road that needs assessment (not by developers but by users as well). There's might be a chance that for 1 month after the halving that transactions get confirmed in a manner we witnessed recently due to the spam attack and as result more confirmations might get stuck again (even with normal fees) and that might result in some panicking in regards to the situation and think BTCitcoin would be gone forever but in reality that would be just the phase in which BTCitcoin enters a dark matter and sure enough in the end, developers would be forced into working together so they could fix the whole situation.

I also voted for above $500 since block halving is just in the corner and that surely will have a saying on increase in value of BTCitcoin due to more effort needed in order to earn it and at the same time, less reward on each found block. Also not to forget, this year, BTCitcoin have surrounded a lot of attention to itself and as result, more people are jumping on board and trying it, therefor more demand will also contribute on it's value as well.

Well since your question seems to be more in general then my answer would be due to supply and demand ratio, BTCitcoin value goes up and down accordingly but there are other factors that come into place from time to time to manipulate it's value like for instance, when someone from the so called "Whale club" buys and sells large amounts of BTCitcoin, it affects market value as well.

I believe it's still in the normal range in which market behaves ($10-$15 up and down). Right now it went a little bit up again (currently at $400 at the time of typing this) since it's range from todays lowest of $391 does talk for itself. People panic the moment it goes down and thread pop out of nowhere stating to their prediction of BTCitcoin losing it's value blah blah blah and now is the end (same old story).