|
As 3rd loan has been locked, the first loan has been repaid and Ponzi promotion stopped, I am locking this thread. If I see more than one non-collateral loan request by Marco at the same time (I mean ask more loan while there is an active loan) then I will reopen this thread again.
|
|
|
|
As I said, you got a answer to your question from repayment. You could lock this thread now for avoiding fake assumptions as above.
My question is/was regarding additional 0.3 BTC. What we got from this post 1. Avoid possibility scam if got 0.3 BTC2. Stopped Ponzi promotion. Why you are too much curious to lock the thread? Is it scam accusation? It is a topic for discussion. If you have faith then why you are not funding 0.3 BTC? |
|
|
|
Oh god!
You guys painted him red already? I hope I get my repayment today. I left him a PM. It will be safer for him not to ask anymore loan once he pay my payment and other ones payment. If he pays back then give him a break.
Thanks
He was painted previous two DT and new 2 Dt. I do not think he would pay you if got another loan also I thought he will default the loan as already got more than his desired. But might repay to take more and you could lose more money. I can't remember probably you lend money where I wanted to lend after taking money from you asked me again and I refused to give. I never give any loan if I see any active loan. |
|
|
|
I know how things go here and I have borrowed from this forum
I am sorry but could not see any post on lending thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2542493;sa=showPosts so if you took the loan from the forum then that is from your another ID. Okay, leave it. I have updated my feedback and thank you for bringing this to our attention as a community.
Thanks for updating the feedback. |
|
|
|
am still considering changing the wording
If you remove that one and give a new one then if there is any positive word then that might misguide. I saw after a few moments that you have changed your feedback though according to the current situation seems positive. You may give any type of feedback you want. But right now there is another case "Ponzi Promoter Trying to take multiple loan (Non-collateral)". Already tagged by two DT for promoting Ponzi. |
|
|
|
Not necessarily true, I used to take loan for couple of months, I was forced because of my bad financial condition. marcotheminer was a lender back in the days and has turned into a borrower now. Probably he is passing worst days now. I am not vouching anyone here. Never give a loan without a valid collateral. And all of the borrowers giving a valid collateral must think of collateral scammers. At the end of the day, always using a trusted escrow is the best deal. On your post history, I can't see any loan. I think you might have taken a loan from your well-known person or from a bank. Take a loan from a well-known person and a bank is not the same to take a loan from here. |
|
|
|
Btw your title declare this loan as a risky one but you say that is more than sure that nothing will happen. A bit confussing, don't you think?  Op is a self-contradictory person where s/he, him/herself told riskily but asking that one. OP has the fund on a bank but not want to invest where s/he wants to give interest. |
|
|
|
I think that is easy to understand that the user has tried to build a trust by take and pay little loan, with the hope to gain trust : now he is arrived at the end of the scheme, and he asked bigger amount for scam.
You have mentioned a valid point. I just noticed that bill gator revised his positive trust to neutral. And base on the rank which has made by default (only 4 earned merits), don't deserve such a loan also has two negative trusts by reputed members. |
|
|
|
What a clairvoyant. 2020 vision. Was it necessary to write such an obnoxious reply?
We have to write to know as many information as possible to save the community. No collateral, no loan.
Overall agreed, though there should have few exceptions. |
|
|
|
I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam. A random Legendary with 2 red tags (from Mitchell and BadBear, both former Staff members) seeking a $1000 quick buck doesn't make it any better. You are absolutely right and also there are two active loans. Also I guys he is promoting Ponzi which is showing on his signature. |
|
|
|
I'm just curious, how much you can rate my account in case I will apply for a loan?
Someone may give you 1 BTC or more. At first glance, I may take a risk about 0.1 BTC for you rest depends on your post history, post gaps time, recent merit, post quality etc. I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam.
A lot of hero/legendary leaving away by taking only 0.03 BTC there are a lot of proof see on lending board. You are wrong about the "he will be a scammer" part.
Also never heard that lenders cannot be borrowers, ahhhh traditional banks just cannot be!
If I am wrong then that will be good for the community. It is not a traditional bank. It is a virtual place just a forum where I have not seen anyone who gives a loan and takes a loan at the same time except you. A lot of your negativity stems from "feeling" I'm a scammer.
I think if you get that loan you will obviously scam. I have not yet seen when marco posted it, if it's recent then marco can't be trusted. As Ponzi promoter is a scammer. Soon I will check it. Edit: Just checked and seen the image posted by nutildah that you are promoting ponzi. So, you can't be a trusted person. I think you should be tagged immediately for promoting ponzi. Archive for reference |
|
|
|
Sorry you do not know what is staked adress, anyway, also I do not need that now as you already got negative tag. Sorry but your loan reuest has been rejected. @Kisleav Do you read the term before apply? good luck, btw  He had applied before tagged. |
|
|
|
Snip Can you please provide the link of the staked address so that I can verify easily? And also please create a fresh post without quoting previous posts. |
|
|
|
That clearly means to me that you are judging him already and I think there's no need to ask for other's opinion on this matter.
I'm sure you'll dissaprove his loan request the moment he will apply a loan on you.
His trust level to me is/was up to 0.03 BTC. And you are right I would not or will not approve too much. Few days ago he took 0.02 BTC loan from another lender and then asked me for another 0.02 BTC then I had not approved that. And also I never allow any loan if there is any active non-collateral loan. I have faced a few problems (loan defaulted) where I sent earlier then another lender gave more. Result: Loan default and I lose my fund with the new lender. didnt know its good for help community
It must be helpful for the community. For example, I can trust you to lend 0.05 BTC but I will not trust you 0.1 BTC. In this case, if I see you got already 0.05 BTC loan then I will not give any loan to you. |
|
|
|
It is possible his financial situation has changed from when he was managing the coinsbank(?) signature campaign, and may be willing to scam for $500 today when he was unwilling to scam for $20k years ago if he is now desperate for money. It is also possible, he is trying to engage in many trades so he can gain additional reputation, so he can have additional business opportunities, such as managing campaigns.
On that time the managing or getting campaign/bounty and current time I do not think the same also I think marco also think the same. Also, I do not think comparing with that time with the current time is the same. That time people traded account without any problem now it will be tagged immediately. Then the earning amount of a bounty hunter is more than a bounty manager/campaign manager now. So, forget the previous reputation. Try to understand its recent reputation and behavior. |
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.02 BTC
Loan Purpose: fix my taxi
Loan Repay Amount: 0.023 BTC
Loan Repay Date: 18 March 2019 or earlier
Type of Collateral: No
Escrow profile Link: Na
Bitcoin Address: 1N9CdQYQXAmVwVE2KbUiHB3C1sScUjM7WA
I agree with all new terms of shasan
Can you provide any staked address or unedited post where you posted your bitcoin id and also can you sign a message with that bitcoin id? |
|
|
|
although I would not be surprised if he posted it somewhere and the logic is convoluted.
I have found it on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=147773 (trust page of marcotheminer.) you may have a look from there. IIRC, in the past, he was entrusted with ~50BTC to run a signature campaign (worth ~$20k at the time), and to my knowledge he paid out appropriately
There is a long gap and earlier he was a lender but now he is a borrower also then how was a manager but a few days ago I saw he tried to join on a campaign where he has not been accepted. So totally opposite from earlier, in the meantime, anything can happen. |
|
|
|
After looking at the post history and password change lot,the account might changed hands on 2018 or in Feb 2019,so as you said this may be an act of big scam attempt but tagging an user based on suspicious is not a right way.
Might need more suggestions from other DT members.
Anything might happen which we don't know but we may guess. Check the sent feedback by VOD then you will get clear understand how s/he thinks the borrower might be a scammer or default a loan. |
|
|
|
I don't know how can you label a person risky before he has done any shady work
Came back on the forum long after and then asking non-collateral loan is one of the shadiest work. Almost all the cases it caused scam. Eg: loan default, account trade or something else. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
