You had us at 'Hello' but you should probably move this to Marketplace>Goods>Digital Goods See the bottom left of your screen for the move feature. |
|
|
|
9 trillion rubles is about $150 billion, much less that I expected, but still 10 times that of Bitcoin. If they din't use M1, what do they use? Do you mean that they only show the fractionally reserved money supply? I believe it is cash plus the banks' reserve requirements and they refer to this as Monetary Base (or MB). Their M2 is that amount plus deposits. |
|
|
|
#boycott_budweiser_buy_corona_and_krombacher  That's too long and convoluted for the Dems to read and comprehend. You need something short and sweet like: # |
|
|
|
Is there is a way to overload the card to get a decent more hashes out of it, i don't care about how much watts it pulls , all i care about is the hashing power , also the OC is not making such a difference in the hashrate , is there a bios mod that can make the card pull more power and really increase it's hashrate? All i need is answer with YES and i will do the search  Hard to say without knowing the actual card you are using. Rx 470 4g , Rx 480 8g all msi gamingx You can try some bios mods: bios modding tool - https://github.com/caa82437/PolarisBiosEditorbitxointalk.org discussion thread about 480X bios mods overclocking.guide guide discussion about RX480 bios mods (with downloads) Watch your GPU temps and good luck! |
|
|
|
Is there is a way to overload the card to get a decent more hashes out of it, i don't care about how much watts it pulls , all i care about is the hashing power , also the OC is not making such a difference in the hashrate , is there a bios mod that can make the card pull more power and really increase it's hashrate? All i need is answer with YES and i will do the search Hard to say without knowing the actual card you are using. |
|
|
|
Low fees will make transactions take quite a while to confirm especially when the mempool is very full like it has been these last few days. For transactions will low fees, I recommend trying the Via Transaction Accelerator at https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ . This makes Via put a priority on your transaction and they should include it when they mine their next block. I've used it a few times and it definitely speeds up the confirmation for these low fee transactions. Yes very good tool. I just ran OPs still unconfirmed transaction through it and it was accepted. You do have to have sent the transaction originally with at least a .0001 fee or the accelerator will not take it. I don't know how this accelerator works, but I will thank you in advance if this has a chance to speed my transaction up. It's pretty simple. ViaBTC is a company that mines Bitcoin - they will include up to 100 txs per hour of low-fee transactions in each block they mine provided the fee paid is at least 0.0001 BTC/kb. Maybe a goodwill gesture? Well, they have my good will, as I just checked and all of a sudden in the last several minutes since my last post my transaction went through! Wow! I just check your transaction and Block #451397 was in fact mined by ViaBTC. That's so cool. I hope it doesn't get abused. |
|
|
|
Low fees will make transactions take quite a while to confirm especially when the mempool is very full like it has been these last few days. For transactions will low fees, I recommend trying the Via Transaction Accelerator at https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ . This makes Via put a priority on your transaction and they should include it when they mine their next block. I've used it a few times and it definitely speeds up the confirmation for these low fee transactions. Yes very good tool. I just ran OPs still unconfirmed transaction through it and it was accepted. You do have to have sent the transaction originally with at least a .0001 fee or the accelerator will not take it. I don't know how this accelerator works, but I will thank you in advance if this has a chance to speed my transaction up. It's pretty simple. ViaBTC is a company that mines Bitcoin - they will include up to 100 txs per hour of low-fee transactions in each block they mine provided the fee paid is at least 0.0001 BTC/kb. Maybe a goodwill gesture? Edit: their current hashrate is about 8% of the network's so they will only mine one block per hour on average anyway. |
|
|
|
Could someone direct me to where exactly this lifeboat vanitygen is? Can I download it from github or am I missing something? Also could you link me to where it's explained what is does/if it's different/why it's better? Googling just keeps coming up with reddit post after reddit post but no real information for me... Sorry for the newb questions rofl.
http://lifeboat.com/oclvanitygen It will start the download right away. |
|
|
|
ok here's the thing i send btc to my other wallet and the transaction got stuck!I pay for fee's around 50k sat but it does not appear on my other wallet.
I just send almost 0.30
here's the transcation ID
e1c9cf1f944d1793dbe512ac915b1af845a401b0329a32888674ec66b23e6371
i got this message on blockchain.info i don't know what is this
Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: An outpoint is already spent in [DBBitcoinTx{txIndex=217065672, ip=219.117.241.96, time=1486083071, size=225, distinctIn=null, distinctOut=null, note='null', blockIndexes=[], nTxInput=1, nTxOutput=2}] [OutpointImpl{txIndex=216706305, txOutputN=0}, Outpoin
is my money gone?
Im using electrum 2.7.9
What is the txid of your previous transaction. It appears you have previously spent some coins and they have not been confirmed yet. |
|
|
|
3 total transactions with the wallet ...
February 1 @ 04:21 AM
Sent
To:
1CKav2MDgWxwSq1uPUFtuUBjTJHxVD8PM2
From:
My Bitcoin Wallet
Add a description
47.12411475 BTC ** the hacked transaction**
January 31 @ 11:56 AM
Sent
To:
3Bs4fCRpin2VxndjADy6NGAmsaZaN2iNbj
From:
My Bitcoin Wallet
Add a description
40.0001469 BTC **this transaction i sent the bitcoins to Bitstamp**
January 27 @ 11:57 PM
Received
From:
1FUw3p2LnveF8ZBoRTRJF8aDpmjbNkmmRR ** this transaction was the closed coinbase account where i moved my bitcoins here**
To:
87 bitcoins
This is getting more confusing. OP said you sent coins to Bitpay. Is it Bitstamp then? |
|
|
|
I used blockchain.info wallet on my cell phone as a bitcoin wallet. I set up all of the security bells and whistles on it..... then the dreaded withdrawal i saw when I logged in the person sent the bitcoins to this address 1CKav2MDgWxwSq1uPUFtuUBjTJHxVD8PM2
I see. That's not the way it is presented in the original post. How many times had you moved those coins in the previous days? |
|
|
|
And they probably do more than one tx on each address.
I know that when I buy from an online merchant with BTC (not dark web, I'm talking mainstream big commerce sites that take BTC) , if I check the send-to address they give me on a block explorer, it's usually got a few transactions other than mine. And usually has more BTC than the amount I sent. Usually not a lot more, but some. like maybe they use each address for 3 or 4 incoming transactions before switching to another.
Yes it is normal to exchange platform, poloniex also do so and i think this is to reduce transactions fee. Sorry for your friends loss 81 BTC is really big amount, i prefer paper wallet printed on offline computer or hardware wallet for long term storage. Web wallets are not good place to store such a huge number of bitcoin. +1 to all that. The problem with that explanation is that Blockchain.info is not an exchange. The Blockchain.info wallet is solely owned by a single user and the coins are not shared. There is something that doesn't add up in your story. Perhaps you mixed up which coins came from where? |
|
|
|
He did one thing right (bought 4 years ago and held it, also owned BTC silently, he told no one). But he did a lot wrong (kept a lot of BTC on web wallets, accessed accounts on computer used for everything, didn't have anti-virus on one of his computers, had his desktop computer with the BTC wireless, not wired and more. Whole story is on this episode: https://www.freedomfeens.com/?p=13678 We also cover simple preemptive counter measures, if he'd done them, he'd still have his BTC. Was his life savings. Bought it when it was half this price. He's crushed by it. I don't blame him. Was stolen from his IP while he was out of town. I suspect key logger, or war driver of router. He was NOT using default router password. I've walked him through closing all the holes, but there's nothing left now. He's too busy working and doesn't feel like talking about it, but he's fine with me posting on here with the transactions in case anyone wants to sleuth it and see if they can track where it went. Not expecting to get it back, but I know people always are interested in the tx info when this happens: This is the 47 Bitcoin stolen from his online wallet on BitPay: https://blockchain.info/address/1G4zDfdPRdANgGRv2SHeSzyusa6vm1GhBLThis is the 34 Bitcoin stolen from his online wallet on Blockchain.info: https://blockchain.info/address/17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528
This link - https://blockchain.info/address/17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528 - takes us to a specific address rather than a specific transaction. This is a screen cap of the web page with some specific information highlighted:  How do you know that these are specifically the coins previously belonging to your friend? If all those coins came from one address and were moved to 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528, I wouldn't have reason to ask this question but if we back out and look at the entire transaction rather than just one individual address containing 34 bitcoins:  We can clearly see that these are the same transaction IDs and the 34 coins in the address 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528 allegedly belonging to your friend were part of a larger group of coins residing in the multisig address 39xfyaTTefAPtRiTopLdWzaYXzPzpTkcdR!
So how is it possible that he only lost 34 of these coins from a blockchain.info wallet? How was the thief able to discern which of the 34 coins were your friends in order to move them to 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528. Who owns the other coins from this multisig address?! I'm not a Bitcoin forensics expert but this story doesn't make sense to me based on the information you have provided. |
|
|
|
I'm a bit of a noob with BTC, but when sending BTC from my Electrum wallet it almost always take a few minutes tops to be confirmed. But today I sent .5 BTC several hours ago and absolutely nothing seems to be happening. This despite paying what appears to be the highest transfer fee I have ever paid. Can anyone make an educated guess why this is happening? My wallet shows -.500261 unconfirmed.
Transaction ID= 0a546f6a539ce0a0c08b5c039648d4149d45903f15856004b55e19f9b377187f
You paid only 50 satoshis per byte. Not nearly enough for a quick transaction these days. Check out https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ |
|
|
|
|
OmG, did that guy just shit out a car?!
|
|
|
|
It is a commonly-held scientific speculation that beards grow faster on men who haven't had sex in a while. If you see a man with a very long beard, he probably needs a girlfriend. Wrong. I know these people are allowed to marry more than one woman. Same as with Muslems they marry up to 4 women and I think they have a lot of sex because they make up to 6 or more children from a single women. They almost all have long beards so this scientific proofs is not true for the case. Mine was a satirical post but here are a couple of salient points: 2) Greg Maxell is not Amish. 1) The Amish are not polygamists. Edit: sorry to rain on your otherwise humorous thread Gleb. |
|
|
|
It is a commonly-held scientific speculation that beards grow faster on men who haven't had sex in a while. If you see a man with a very long beard, he probably needs a girlfriend. |
|
|
|
|
One week into my one month free trial; time for an assessment.
wallet4bitcoin is helpful and quick to respond. He wasn't sure if the service worked with PIA VPN when I asked but offered to sign up for PIA in order to find out. He also offers a cheap VPN service if you require it. (I didn't need it because Private Internet Access works well).
The Directtvnow service works well and picture quality is generally awesome. I have seen the image blur periodically but instances of this are quite rare, short-lived and usually occur when first starting up the service. I've been using it through Internet Explorer 11 with the Silverlight plug-in - haven't tested it with Chrome.
As well as the live TV, there is a good selection of movies and archived shows. Searches will turn up movies, archived shows and even upcoming live events. Pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
